Methinks she doth protest too much.
Like a spoilt child,, who has just learned she cannot have the toy she hankers after: "Well, I didn't want it anyway! So there! It's probably rubbish, anyway! Yeah, this one's much better! So there!".
This article peddles misinformation as fact and is clearly aimed at justifying her decision not to bf and to encourage others to join her little "club" of guilty formula-feeders-in-denial.
Befoer anyone jumps on me, let me make it clear that I am not saying that mothers should feel guilty for using formula - but rather that, despite protestations to the contrary, it seems to me that she is riddled with guilt about it all.
It's a shame that she did not find the type of support she so clearly needed, when she needed it. From what I can glean from the article, it seems that there was no reason why she could not have gone on to bf successfully. Sadly, I think that the "breast is best" message put forward can be counter productive. When the all-too-common difficluties in the early days arise, it can come as a huge shock to people whose only experience of bfing has been through seeing soft-focussed pictues of attractive mothers gazing adoringly at the contented infant sucking happliy at the breast.
Should also add that the author might consider that when other women told her of bad experiences with bfing, they were, possibly, trying to empathise. If someone regailed you with tales of woe about all the problems they had with sore nipples, latch, crying baby etc etc etc, it wouldn't exeactly be tactful to say "Well, of course, dd and I took to it like ducks to water. It's so wonderful isn't it? Love every minute".
Has anyone commented on the article in the magazine?