There's an interesting 'debate' going on in the March ante-natal club, about the benefits of being a young mum / old mum...
Am I old or young at 32 to have one DS and another on the way?
If I'm an old mum then I'm running the risk of my kids not being my friends, being too embarassed to go shopping with me, and I will be too strict on some things (no bouncing on furniture, no shouting) and not strict enough on others - allowing my kids to push other kids about and take their toys away from them.
So I really hope I fall in the younger mum category as I'll have far more energy, be best mates with them, have exactly the right balance of fun and discipline and still be young enough to see my grandchildren.
As (I hope) you guys can probably tell, these aren't my opinions - but isn't it funny how some people really do believe that the position they are in is the best and that anything different is flawed, even though they try to cover it up with back tracking statements.
Think I'm probably being over-sensitive (I'm pregnant, I'm entitled to be ) but do think its a shame on a 'support' thread. I'm glad we've never had these 'debates' in the wagon.
NB: The author hereby abdicates all responsibility for the above contraversial posting and will rely entirely on pg as an excuse for offending anybody