Oh my. That's just shocking. And her parents were so encouraging! It's just wrong 
As to the Great Name Debate ... I am a huge fan of Elodie and Eloise, in fact most names that start with vowels (for girls) - my OH has quite a hard-sounding Anglo Saxon name so we need something classical and girlie, and I'm liking vowel names a lot at the moment.
Sooo, every single name I have suggested he has dismissed as chavvy. Elodie and Eloise are apparently chavvy because they 'can be shortened to 'Elle or Ellie''! Also now on the blacklist are Imogen, Iris (was getting desperate and it jumped out at me one day), Agnes, Alice, all flower names (Daisy, Poppy etc are too common in the popular sense of the word, not in class judgement terms, ditto Florence and Olivia), Adelaide, Ada, Eva/Ava, Amelie, also Lucy. Others I had previously tried include Raven and Trinity. They're much more out-there, I admit, but still, I think Raven has a certain ring to it, especially as junior will be black-haired (barring any weird genetic throw-backs).
I fell in love with Ariel the other day until I remembered the small issue of the soap powder. Maybe I'm just horrendous at picking names!
Boys names seem to be less of a problem, mainly because most boys names will go well with the surname. Sebastian is on the shortlist, which we both quite like (he suggested, dammit) but I have concerns about shortened versions clashing with the surname.
I took great comfort in finding out at the weekend that OH's youngest brother was nameless for three days after birth - they had a name for him all through pregnancy, but it didn't seem right when he arrived.
As for Savannah - it's not one I'd choose but conjures up images of a strong young woman with huge potential. Which I think could be worse...!