Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Auriol Grey being jailed is not appropriate.

1000 replies

Finnyfanjango · 03/03/2023 11:47

I’m interested to hear the thoughts and reactions of others as to me given her cognitive issues and the fact she is partially blind, it just seems like such a sad accident, I can’t see why she was jailed.
I think what she did was awful, but it surely just highlights the lack of appropriate social care she clearly needed?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
Carlotta367 · 04/03/2023 14:38

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

freyamay74 · 04/03/2023 14:38

@lollipoprainbow 'fraid the conviction and sentence shows it's not the 'end of' that Mrs Ward was cycling where she was

lollipoprainbow · 04/03/2023 14:39

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

None of those things just entitled to my opinion.

DesertRose64 · 04/03/2023 14:39

BadNomad · 04/03/2023 13:49

Link - again for the people who missed it.

Yes. That was a definite push.

HarlanPepper · 04/03/2023 14:40

lollipoprainbow · 04/03/2023 14:39

None of those things just entitled to my opinion.

Well, they do say opinions are like arseholes.

Swiftswatch · 04/03/2023 14:40

Rhondaa · 04/03/2023 14:33

'I cannot wrap by head around the people who think she did nothing wrong or who seem to think you somehow can’t be an abusive asshole if you have a physical disability.'

I don't know anyone who said she hasn’t done anything wrong, rather the sentence is excessive for what was a tragic accident.

She lives in supportive housing, she has disabilities this doesn't mean she can behave as she pleases rather it may explain her reaction.

I've no idea how the judge can boldly claim her disabilities were irrelevant, I would suggest anyone with a sight impairment would have reacted to someone hurtling towards them on a bike on a pavement. As others have said this was Oct 2020 where many, particularly the vulnerable, were very anxious about folk invading their space.

A suspended sentence was surely more appropriate and I hope any appeal is successful.

If she was concerned about people ‘invading her space’ she could have moved over to the ample amount of space to her right. Instead she shouted close to the cyclist and reached out to physically touch her. Hardly seems like the actions of someone vulnerable and afraid of someone being in her space. Quite the opposite infant.

What about verbally abusing someone and then causing them to fall into traffic is a ‘tragic accident’?

Carlotta367 · 04/03/2023 14:40

lollipoprainbow · 04/03/2023 14:39

None of those things just entitled to my opinion.

Enjoy giving victim blaming opinions then?

TheBigWangTheory · 04/03/2023 14:40

Significant cognitive issues is not a "physical disability".

There are some very abelist posts here.

ReneBumsWombats · 04/03/2023 14:40

I don't know anyone who said she hasn’t done anything wrong, rather the sentence is excessive for what was a tragic accident.

If you think it was an accident, you must think Grey didn't do anything wrong. And she absolutely did. And it killed someone.

An accident would have been Grey unintentionally failing to move over far enough to make way for the bike, causing them to collide. Or Grey accidentally dropping her bag and Celia hitting it or getting distracted by it.

Walking purposefully towards Celia while shouting and swatting at her, until she's on top of her and the contact she makes sends her into the road is not an accident. It isn't an accident just because the full consequences weren't intended.

BishopRock · 04/03/2023 14:41

The dailymotion video was the one I saw and it's pretty obvious Grey moves towards Celia Ward and makes the motions of leaning to touch her (Grey admitted to light contact). Immediately, Celia wobbles and falls into the road.

It's a real shame the CCTV angle wasn't a bit better as it would have caught the contact and there'd be no dispute about haw light or otherwise it was.

lollipoprainbow · 04/03/2023 14:41

@HarlanPepper very mature !

Carlotta367 · 04/03/2023 14:42

lollipoprainbow · 04/03/2023 14:41

@HarlanPepper very mature !

Says the victim blamer?!

freyamay74 · 04/03/2023 14:44

@BishopRock it's not a 'shame' that we can't see more in the video. I watched it once and that was once too many, seeing and heating the vile aggression spewing from AG.

Point is, the police saw the whole video. Copious evidence was presented to the court- and a lot of that would have been from AG's barrister to try to defend her.

At the end of the day it's indefensible. Which is why she's convicted

Florenz · 04/03/2023 14:44

She committed manslaughter, she didn't intentionally kill the woman but she did push the woman off the pavement into the road and in doing so the woman fell under the wheels of a car, which killed her. The sentence is appropriate. Being blind and having cognitive issues doesn't give someone a license to kill.

Livingtothefull · 04/03/2023 14:45

HarlanPepper · 04/03/2023 14:40

Well, they do say opinions are like arseholes.

Indeed: and like arseholes, they are often best kept to oneself rather than being offensively on display.

WhatNoRaisins · 04/03/2023 14:45

I'm guessing it's because a lot of us have had the experience of having to dodge a cyclist or a near miss that there is an instinct is to side with the pedestrian.

Looking at that video is a different matter.

OneTC · 04/03/2023 14:47

People should be glad the video exists at all, with her lies and attempt at evasion she could have easily escaped any punishment

BishopRock · 04/03/2023 14:47

I meant we as in society, as in it's a shame for the case that the camera didn't pick up the contact. If it had she may have got longer.

lollipoprainbow · 04/03/2023 14:48

Yeah let's just lock her up and throw away the key.

GrasstrackGirl · 04/03/2023 14:48

BishopRock · 04/03/2023 14:47

I meant we as in society, as in it's a shame for the case that the camera didn't pick up the contact. If it had she may have got longer.

It did, the jury were shown the video of the whole incident.

Livingtothefull · 04/03/2023 14:49

I find it so unspeakably offensive the amount of victim blaming on this thread. Much of it by people who just don't like cyclist so presume the cyclist must be to blame.

I think the sentence was justified if rather too lenient; but overall I trust the court got it right, who would have looked at all the evidence including mitigating factors. Rather than some of the tabloid reading, cyclist hating amateur sleuths on here.

OneTC · 04/03/2023 14:49

GrasstrackGirl · 04/03/2023 14:48

It did, the jury were shown the video of the whole incident.

It's the same video just the court one will include her getting run over.

We see the important part

ReneBumsWombats · 04/03/2023 14:49

GrasstrackGirl · 04/03/2023 14:48

It did, the jury were shown the video of the whole incident.

I don't envy them. I don't think I'd sleep for weeks if I had to watch the aftermath.

BishopRock · 04/03/2023 14:51

GrasstrackGirl · 04/03/2023 14:48

It did, the jury were shown the video of the whole incident.

No it didn't, the cctv will have gone on to show the aftermath of the contact, which no one wants to see unless they have to.

The camera can't change position to show the contact itself in full.

GrasstrackGirl · 04/03/2023 14:51

OneTC · 04/03/2023 14:49

It's the same video just the court one will include her getting run over.

We see the important part

And they would have seen how Aoriol reacted after Celia was hit by the car.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread