Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that Gordon Brown is a fucking megalomaniac who should be removed from No10 for his and our safety?

247 replies

Rosieeo · 07/05/2010 06:46

The man must be on the edge: "OK, you've voted against me/my party in your thousands, but guess what? I don't care and will cling on to my bit of power for dear life because I am Gordon and I must be right."

I've never been so annoyed by politics in my life.

I know it might come to nothing anyway, but the bloody cheek of it all!

OP posts:
bubbles4 · 07/05/2010 21:34

That should read keep a certain candidate out.

PosyPetrovaPauline · 07/05/2010 21:39

no i don't agree at all

rosieo you are mad

Rosieeo · 07/05/2010 21:44

Had to laugh at this:

'The Sun is really not terribly impressed by the turn of events as the UK deals with a hung Parliament. It's front page headline is "Squatter holed up in No 10" over a picture of Prime Minister Gordon Brown. "Man, 59 refuses to leave house in Downing Street" is the paper's take on Mr Brown's decision to use his constitutional right to stay on as PM.'

Please don't assume I'm a Sun reader; I'm not, this was on the BBC.

Posy, it's been said before and I'm sure it will be said again

OP posts:
Kafka9 · 07/05/2010 21:49

I agree he is bananas. Blair would not have behaved this way. GB would sell his soul to keep power, and probably did so long ago. He has no integrity, is not a statesman and acts in his own interests and not in the interests of this country. I can't think of a modern politician, of any persuasion, who is so odious and devoid of anything positive. Increasingly he is looking more and more ridiculous.

policywonk · 07/05/2010 21:56

He is doing what the Cabinet Secretary (not a party appointee, a high-ranking civil servant) and every constitutional expert in the country is telling him to do. It's not megalomania, it's the constitution.

policywonk · 07/05/2010 21:57

Blair would have done the same thing
Cameron would have done the same thing
Orville the freaking Duck would have done the same thing

Kafka9 · 07/05/2010 21:58

But it is the way that he has and continues to conduct himself that is megalomania. And, since when has GB taken advice, he does what he decides to do.

policywonk · 07/05/2010 22:01

You don't like him - fair enough; you think he's a control freak - lots of evidence to back that up. But using this particular situation as evidence of megalomania is just wrong-headed. He has no choice about what to do. He can't go to the queen and offer his resignation until he can confidently advise her that someone else will be able to form a workable government, and at the moment he can't give her that assurance.

MintHumbug · 07/05/2010 22:05

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Kafka9 · 07/05/2010 22:06

it is not staying in no10 agree he has to do this constitutionally, it is the posturing last night and today that is delusional. and unhelpful to the country at this particularly difficult time.

Kafka9 · 07/05/2010 22:09

He tried to set the cat amongst the pigeons today with his lib dem offer. We are in a weakened position, obviously, the party with the stronger mandate is best placed to form the stronger gov-t. We need a strong gov-t with a real mandate not a crazy willing to hang onto power at any cost including the stability of the country.

policywonk · 07/05/2010 22:15

Oh, it's just political positioning. If you don't think Prime Minister Cameron will do exactly the same thing in spades, you're deluding yourself. They're politicians, it's what they do.

policywonk · 07/05/2010 22:17

ANd actually, more than that, as the sitting PM with the constitutional right to attempt to form a workable majority, it was a perfectly costitutionally correct thing to do.

Kafka9 · 07/05/2010 22:18

Disagree. Most people would see the writing on the wall, conduct themselves appropriately.

MintHumbug · 07/05/2010 22:23

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

policywonk · 07/05/2010 22:24

Just because Tories would like Brown to throw himself under a bus, that doesn't mean it's in any way appropriate. The writing on the wall only became apparent when Clegg made his statement, which was after Brown had made his approach.

MintHumbug · 07/05/2010 22:25

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

policywonk · 07/05/2010 22:26

No, Mint, there's no clear winner. Again, I understand why Tories would like this not to be so, but it is the truth of the matter. And the constitution is what it is - subjective interpretations of morality have absolutely nothing to do with it. Rather surprised to hear COnservatives making that argument, actually.

policywonk · 07/05/2010 22:27

'Power hungry' - to use this campaign's baleful catchphrase, get real. We are talking about three men who want to run the country. Power hungry is a given - for all of them.

whittywan · 07/05/2010 22:30

OMG Kafka9 can't you see that he is doing exactly what you think he should? Instead of insisting on attempting to form a workable government himself first (as is his constitutional right as the incumbent PM) he is respecting the fact that the Tories gained the largest share if the vote and is sitting back while DC and NC try to come to a stable agreement?

Kafka9 · 07/05/2010 22:31

Are you Balls or Campbell? Even Mandelson has stopped spouting the nonsense, Blair has gone to ground he has too much sense to support this..... It is indefensible trouble making and posturing, unhelpful for the country and the usual dogged behaviour from GB - who has survived countless coups and scandals becuase of his powercentric personality. He is obssessive and bloody minded - I concede that!

Kafka9 · 07/05/2010 22:32

Oh gawd the labour scrum are descending - I am off the thread I want to watch newsnight

BoysAreLikeDogs · 07/05/2010 22:33

no scrum here, we are trying to explain why your perception is incorrect

policywonk · 07/05/2010 22:34

OOh that's a new one, usually I'm accused of being Polly Toynbee

It's the law of the land. You can like it or not like it, but it's not remotely inappropriate, unreasonable, trouble-making or anything else. It is merely incovenient for jittery Tories. You'll get your Cameron administration, don't worry.

MintHumbug · 07/05/2010 22:36

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.