mmm where to start.
Actually the way in which she started her career doesn't make me think that little of her. Lots of women do modelling/soft porn, and while I don't agree with it and certainly wouldn't want any daughters I might have to see someone who does that for a living as a positive role model, for the most part it's not that mnuch in your face and if someone wants to be wank fodder for men then I guess that's their choice.
I think what I dislike about her the most is the way in which she exploits her children, especially harvy, for financial gain.
Harvy's disabilities are such that he will likely never have the capasity to realize that he is being sold to the tabloids, and will also never have the capasity to say no. Yet she continues to allow him to be on the front of hello/ok/heat/whatever other trashy mag she sells the rest of her life to. That is sickening and wrong on every conceiveable level. Selling yourself is one thing, selling your children is quite another.
And this is the same child who has recently been seriously ill in hospital, is she at home with him? no she's out in Australia playing the victim for £350000.
So in answer to your question no I don't think as little of Sam Fox or Jamie and Louise Rednap, because while they might have sold parts of their lives, they haven't turned themselves into a brand or sold their children into the bargain.