Pan: You really do need to try not to see everything I write as some sort of attack/condemnation. I stated that this site is "to a large extent, a web version of a woman's magazine." Therefore I was not being dogmatic and stating that it categorically was an online woman's magazine but that it had features that are similar to those found in print.
As to my "tone", it is not "judgemental" as you put it, as I rarely remark on the life-styles and comments of individual contributors, although I admit to making a couple of sarcastic remarks regarding the general subject matter of some of the conversations.
However, on the net we have none of the benefits of face-to-face discussions and no body language or inflection to assist in understanding each other. Therefore we have to rely entirely on what is written, with the addition of one or two emoticons. Given these constraints I do try to write in a rational and coherent manner in the hope that what I write will not be misconstrued.
If, by this, you consider that my manner of writing is more masculine than feminine then, of course, you are entitled to your opinion. However, I regard your implied suggestion, that such a style is ipso facto an exclusively male preserve, to be extremely derogatory towards women and very sexist.