I suspect your words will fall on deaf ears here ponders
bubble throwing the bottle away removes the choice of ever using a bottle under any circs. Or for anyone other than mummy to feed the baby. I just think it's shortsighted. The child will play with the doll in line with his/her experience. So if mummy is BF they will BF the doll irrespective of whether a bottle is included.
Anyhoo I have had a quick look and here is a typical set:
"She drinks from her bottle, eats her own special food, needs her nappy changed, cries real tears, uses her potty, squeals, has movable limbs and is bathable.
All the accessories you'll need to look after her are included: a bowl and spoon, a bottle, a potty, a dummy, a nappy and even her very own birth certificate."
I would argue that having "special food" is an onslaught on BLW, probably spearheaded by AK, so would chuck that. Special bowl and spoon are unnecessary IMO. Chuck. Dummy, never used one, chuck. Baby is clearly not old enough to be potty trained, based on appearance. Chuck.
I mean all in all they're pretty random accessories for a pretty crappy toy. But I don't like dolls anyway.
Chuck the whole lot I say and lets free ourselves of gender-based nurturing play. DD gets on perfectly well changing her teddy bears nappies so that's the way forward i reckon.