I thought the reviewers comments were very valid to this sort of debate,
"He presents precisely & calmly that it is time for Feminists to grow up & become Womanists.
" Biology, Feminist ideals notwithstanding, still rules supreme & if we don't know how we work, then we don't know why we're doing what we're doing."
"There are natural stages to a woman's life, and every daughter wants to know what they are...The womanist philosophy, concerned heavily with the natural stages of a woman's life, is useful...because it is a path to freedom, not social constriction...It is a middle ground between the old view: a woman must stay home - and the feminist view: a woman must conquer the workplace."
I think the Womanist idea is that as women we need to get back to recognising certain things that affect us all - as a result of our biology. Recognise the things that bind us together as women and fight the female corner - so that women who want to work are able to do so with the support and respect of all women who recognise the need for work environments that are receptive to the unique challenges that working women face - because of their biology. Likewise, the decision to be at home with children should also be seen as a respectable choice that arises from a biological imperative that predates both feminism, and the subjugation of women of the preceeding centuries.
MN has reinforced to me that our roles as mothers IS special and profound and not the same as the (also special and profound) role of fathers. We are all ruled by our biology and it is time we glorified that rather than were ashamed by it... These sorts of threads do not further the cause of women in our society because they magnify divisions between women, when really what we need to challenge a still largely male dominated world is to unite and say that the multifaceted roles that women provide in society: nurturing and professional reflect the truly talented and multi-functioning innate nature of our gender.