"Unless a child is a precious first born they won't get one to one care."
Agree - but then they are rarely being cared for in groups of SIMILAR AGED babies. A baby has different needs from a 3 year old.
"Not everyone has granparents who are capable of looking after young children. My FIL is prepared to help out, but sadly he is not mentally on the ball as he once was. His reactions are not fast enough to cope with six year old, yet a lone a young baby."
No - this is true. I never suggested that having grandparents provide care if parents cannot will always be possible or desirable. You don't need to justify your decisions as to childcare.
Reallytired - we're not really discussing part time childcare for older children (something many people on this thread seem to have completely ignored, in their urge to have a rant at the OP).
Different age group, different issues.
Scottishmummy - if you have a student you feel is basically immature and emotionally needy it doesn't follow that she is incapable of passing a course - doing all her assignments and having good observations. That doesn't mean she is going to be the best person to assume full-time care for several babies at the same time, on a day to day basis.
Think about it - 17 and 18 year olds ARE usually emotionally needy and immature. The sort of girls who get onto nursery nursing courses aren't overwhelmingly those who have 9* grades at GCSE. Childcare is one of the most poorly paid jobs in society; compared to teaching, childcare courses disproportionately attact students from educationally and sometimes socially disadvantaged backgrounds. That doesn't make them dangerous or intrinsically unsuited to caring for children in some capacity, and it's not feasible to fail them for their personal and educational failings when they have completed the assigned work, have turned up regularly for college, have had reasonable assessments and observations. That doesn't mean I personally would feel happy to put my precious children into their care for 60 hours a week and I have major misgivings about such young, inexperienced and immature people having such a major input into the formative years of the children in their care.
And yes - I took the money. There was no 'whistle blowing' to be done because most people follow protocols most of the time. If I'd seen practice that was dangerous or abusive than I would have done something about it. However, I wasn't the one doing placement observations so this wasn't part of my remit. Also, like many people on this thread - I had a mortgage to pay and children to support.
Sometimes you have to compromise on what you think is best. I've had to do this in relation to my work and in relation to the way my children have been cared for while I'm at work. I just wish things could be different. Shouting at and abusing those who raise concerns about these issues on the basis that putting children in group childcare is a social necessity for some people is unfair and unhelpful IMO.