Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think extra lessons for top students isn’t fair?

392 replies

Beepboobeep · Yesterday 21:12

My DD’s state primary school has a “top maths club” and “great writers club” for the top performing students in yr 5 and 6 held outside of school hours. There is no charge for this - so it’s free childcare and free tutoring. You have to be invited. This has been running since the second week of the school year and is restarting on the first day of this half term.

By contrast, my dyslexic DD is in a group for those needing more support in writing, also outside of school hours. But they only managed 2 sessions last year and it hasn’t started back up this year. She gets ad hoc in school support; where it happens she misses other lessons that aren’t then caught up on, putting her further behind in the those.

I appreciate these children deserve challenging, but surely that could be done in class with different work and the teacher’s out of hours time, if available, used to help those struggling?

Is this even allowed in a state primary?

OP posts:
JLou08 · Yesterday 21:29

Beepboobeep · Yesterday 21:26

So what about support for those that need it? What if that is totally lacking?

They should be getting support in school hours. Raise it with the SENCO. Find an extracurricular that she enjoys. After school clubs are optional, they're not there to deliver the curriculum, that needs to be done in normal school hours.

OhHobnobs · Yesterday 21:29

Beepboobeep · Yesterday 21:28

Yes, exactly. Offer these clubs fine, but why are children that need support not offered it?

The children offered this are already heavily tutored outside of school (most go to 11+ five days a week in school holidays and tutoring 2-3 sessions a week during term already).

So perhaps they ARE the ones that need the support

Beepboobeep · Yesterday 21:30

HettyTagliatelli · Yesterday 21:23

It’s more than allowed. It is encouraged because it was finally recognised that the higher ability students were being unfairly neglected in favour of the children that struggle. They are all equally deserving of teaching that is right for them.

😂😂😂😂😂😂 We must live in very different areas. These children are HEAVILY tutored outside of school already. They went to 11+ camp 5 days a week between yr 4 and yr 5, they will between yr 5 and yr 6. Few have a natural ability, they are tutored towards an inch of their lives as it is. They don’t need more when those that could do with support are forgotten

OP posts:
arethereanyleftatall · Yesterday 21:31

Maisy84 · Yesterday 21:17

I think it would be fine if they were giving the same provisions to those needing additional support and those in the middle, but only giving additional resource to children already exceeding is about supporting the school results and not the children and is poor form, I’d challenge it.

The entire curriculum is aimed at the middle for starters. So all day every day for them. Every school I’ve been in gives most of their provisions to those needing it. This is a very rare change.

Arbourimage · Yesterday 21:31

Beepboobeep · Yesterday 21:28

Yes, exactly. Offer these clubs fine, but why are children that need support not offered it?

The children offered this are already heavily tutored outside of school (most go to 11+ five days a week in school holidays and tutoring 2-3 sessions a week during term already).

No one is stopping you from supporting your own child’s learning as much as you want outside school.

GiantSuit · Yesterday 21:31

Beepboobeep · Yesterday 21:24

Exactly - it’s a hot house primary school, top 60 in the country. Obsessed with results

So, respectfully, why did you send your child there, if it’s a hothouse that doesn’t provide for your child’s needs?

WonkyIvy · Yesterday 21:31

Sounds great. The school I worked at decided to prioritise the top twenty percent rather than the bottom twenty percent in order to bring as many dc as possible to greater depth. They were so thrilled to be going off and with adults as it had never happened to them before.

Beepboobeep · Yesterday 21:32

JLou08 · Yesterday 21:29

They should be getting support in school hours. Raise it with the SENCO. Find an extracurricular that she enjoys. After school clubs are optional, they're not there to deliver the curriculum, that needs to be done in normal school hours.

But her out of school hours support (which I’m not saying should be offered regardless to anyone) managed 2 sessions in a year! These free clubs haven’t missed a week. Make that make sense?

OP posts:
Beepboobeep · Yesterday 21:33

arethereanyleftatall · Yesterday 21:31

The entire curriculum is aimed at the middle for starters. So all day every day for them. Every school I’ve been in gives most of their provisions to those needing it. This is a very rare change.

but is it right or fair? Support for naturally gifted children without extra support at home fine. But these children’s parents already pay fortunes for out school tutoring

OP posts:
StayPuftMarshmallow · Yesterday 21:34

If you have a bright child in primary then they are forever used almost like TAs giving support to the less capable so if they are getting extra to stretch them to their capabilities im in favour...im sick of the brighter ones being held back by 'everyone is equally capable' which is completely untrue.

Beepboobeep · Yesterday 21:35

GiantSuit · Yesterday 21:31

So, respectfully, why did you send your child there, if it’s a hothouse that doesn’t provide for your child’s needs?

Funny enough I didn’t realise my 3yo (her age when you have to apply) had dyslexia.

I’m from the area, this is my closest primary school. most other parents moved to the area specifically for this school.

it was covid so I couldn’t look round it.

we are already in the process of moving her.

OP posts:
arethereanyleftatall · Yesterday 21:36

Beepboobeep · Yesterday 21:22

My point is they are giving MORE time to those already getting full marks than those struggling.

We live in an area with two of the top grammar schools in the country (no catchment) and border two grammar areas where kids out of area have to get extremely high marks to get in to them. 70% of the kids will go to grammar from this school. They are already heavily tutored outside of school. When asked how they spent the summer it was in 11+ camp 5 days a week.

Why should they get more free teacher hours on top than children that need more support?

I thought you said your dd got adhoc support in your op? Is that 121? So more than these group sessions?

all of that extra curricular stuff in summer was up to parents, so thats up to you to do that.

Beepboobeep · Yesterday 21:36

StayPuftMarshmallow · Yesterday 21:34

If you have a bright child in primary then they are forever used almost like TAs giving support to the less capable so if they are getting extra to stretch them to their capabilities im in favour...im sick of the brighter ones being held back by 'everyone is equally capable' which is completely untrue.

Happy for them to have clubs if those that need it have support first.

OP posts:
itsmeitsyou · Yesterday 21:37

Beepboobeep · Yesterday 21:30

😂😂😂😂😂😂 We must live in very different areas. These children are HEAVILY tutored outside of school already. They went to 11+ camp 5 days a week between yr 4 and yr 5, they will between yr 5 and yr 6. Few have a natural ability, they are tutored towards an inch of their lives as it is. They don’t need more when those that could do with support are forgotten

Question how do you know so much about the lives of all the other children?
If you know this is going on why haven't you invested the same in your own daughters education?

Brickiscool · Yesterday 21:37

Teachers hold clubs in their own time after school. There's a big. Difference between having fun exploring higher level maths problems and tutoring struggling children.

Your child should be getting support within school hours. And you should speak to Sendco and teachers about this. An after-school club is not the right place

Somewherenorthofhere · Yesterday 21:37

Beepboobeep · Yesterday 21:36

Happy for them to have clubs if those that need it have support first.

Those other kids need it though.

To reach their potential.

Kepler22B · Yesterday 21:37

I’m secondary but I run an after school (or lunchtime- it varies every year) to support students applying to Oxbridge or other unis that have the aptitude tests.

This is spending extra time on already very good students.

Is this ok? If so I can’t really see any difference with primary providing stretch and challenge doing things adjacent to the normal curriculum.

Beepboobeep · Yesterday 21:38

Arbourimage · Yesterday 21:31

No one is stopping you from supporting your own child’s learning as much as you want outside school.

Well we will shortly be moving her to a private school so yes, but why should children who get full marks get more free support than those that don’t? I’d be fine with it if they also gave support to those who need it.

OP posts:
SamphiretheTervosaur · Yesterday 21:38

Beepboobeep · Yesterday 21:12

My DD’s state primary school has a “top maths club” and “great writers club” for the top performing students in yr 5 and 6 held outside of school hours. There is no charge for this - so it’s free childcare and free tutoring. You have to be invited. This has been running since the second week of the school year and is restarting on the first day of this half term.

By contrast, my dyslexic DD is in a group for those needing more support in writing, also outside of school hours. But they only managed 2 sessions last year and it hasn’t started back up this year. She gets ad hoc in school support; where it happens she misses other lessons that aren’t then caught up on, putting her further behind in the those.

I appreciate these children deserve challenging, but surely that could be done in class with different work and the teacher’s out of hours time, if available, used to help those struggling?

Is this even allowed in a state primary?

It used to be called Stretch and Challenge

The top, most able kids got supported to do more, the least able got supported to meet the basic levels and gain more confidence and the kids in the middle ground got a bit more attention than they would have because the most and least able kids were being kept engaged by their targeted work

Then being clever, able, skilled became a bad thing and those kids got left to drift, bored and probably a bit destructive

So.yes, it is fair and probably long overdue a proper comeback

Beepboobeep · Yesterday 21:38

Kepler22B · Yesterday 21:37

I’m secondary but I run an after school (or lunchtime- it varies every year) to support students applying to Oxbridge or other unis that have the aptitude tests.

This is spending extra time on already very good students.

Is this ok? If so I can’t really see any difference with primary providing stretch and challenge doing things adjacent to the normal curriculum.

Yes, if your school also supports those struggling

OP posts:
Arbourimage · Yesterday 21:38

Beepboobeep · Yesterday 21:36

Happy for them to have clubs if those that need it have support first.

Why should struggling children automatically be prioritised over excelling children though?

You have no real logical argument other than you want your child to have access, you’re insanely jealous of children who are tutored or put in summer camps but you won’t give your child the same help.

Beepboobeep · Yesterday 21:39

SamphiretheTervosaur · Yesterday 21:38

It used to be called Stretch and Challenge

The top, most able kids got supported to do more, the least able got supported to meet the basic levels and gain more confidence and the kids in the middle ground got a bit more attention than they would have because the most and least able kids were being kept engaged by their targeted work

Then being clever, able, skilled became a bad thing and those kids got left to drift, bored and probably a bit destructive

So.yes, it is fair and probably long overdue a proper comeback

Edited

That sounds lovely and absolutely fair. Not when those struggling get nothing

OP posts:
Beepboobeep · Yesterday 21:40

Arbourimage · Yesterday 21:38

Why should struggling children automatically be prioritised over excelling children though?

You have no real logical argument other than you want your child to have access, you’re insanely jealous of children who are tutored or put in summer camps but you won’t give your child the same help.

I’m not saying prioritised - I’m asking for equal

OP posts:
Lavendersong · Yesterday 21:40

I don’t think you quite get that the last thing a struggling child wants to do is spend extra time outside of school hours on more maths and English. The teachers are volunteering their own precious time unpaid to spend more time on the gifted students so they can devote more time on the less able during actual school hours

Beepboobeep · Yesterday 21:41

HettyTagliatelli · Yesterday 21:19

So it’s fair that your child is given extra support to achieve their potential but not fair for other children to be given support so that they achieve theirs?

You are being massively unreasonable and very selfish.

No, I’m asking for my child to be given ANY support. She gets nothing from
the school. The top performers are getting MORE.

OP posts: