Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Am I thick?

27 replies

Theresawaytobehonestandkind · Yesterday 03:05

I’ve only ever gained weight until recently really trying to get into shifting it. I cannot figure out if I eat 1000 calories a day what amount of weight will I lose?? Everywhere says maybe 2lbs. “Maybe” two!! Surely more? I really want to lose 3lbs a week so I can go into next year feeling a little better. 37. 5’4 and 13 and a half stone

OP posts:
Theresawaytobehonestandkind · Yesterday 03:56

Is it worth killing myself to do 800 calories?? God if I get it off I can never let it go back on. Currently self loathing massively as on top of the weight I have a million stretch marks and will probably need a breast uplift and tummy tuck after I lose it.

OP posts:
DoNotGoGorgeously · Yesterday 04:01

It depends entirely on how many calories your body uses to keep itself going (basal metabolic rate — if you Google it you will find BMR calculators)), and your level of activity. Very low-calorie diets tend to be unsustainable in that the weight is regained after you return to eating more.

FullOfLemons · Yesterday 04:05

The word “maybe” should probably be used a lot more by doctors (and definitely be used a lot more by economists)

You might take a look at the results from the DiRECT Trial (Google Diabetes Remission Clinical Trial). They captured average weight loss for people on c. 800-850 calorie diet.

Best of luck.

Theresawaytobehonestandkind · Yesterday 04:07

Again I sound stupid but it says 1,520 for BMR. Then 1,832 for sedentary exercise. I thought exercise had little bearing on losing weight in clearly very ignorant on weight which is why I’ve become so fat.

OP posts:
IbizaToTheNorfolkBroads · Yesterday 04:09

It depends on how many calories you burn too.

1 lb fat loss = 3500 calorie deficit.
Say you need 1700 calories a day and only eat 1000, then after a week you’ll have a calorie deficit of 700 x 7 =4,900.

4900/3500 =1.4, so just under a lb and a half weight loss.

Now that is all theoretical. Your metabolism and energy demand may well be different, but it’s just to illustrate that a calorie intake of 1000 cal/day is likely to result in a 1-2lb weight loss a week.

junebirthdaygirl · Yesterday 04:12

It's better to lose 2 lbs and keep it going steady than just run out of steam from overdoing it and give up. You still have to live and do your work etc. At your age l would have lost 3 for maybe the first two weeks as my body got over the shock of no junk then it would drop to 2. Remember to still eat but eat well with good food that is nutritious. Alcohol is a big one so completely eliminate that as easy calories to drop. Have a good breakfast..no short cuts with that. The stronger you feel the easier it will be.

bearinthebigbluespouse · Yesterday 04:48

1000 calories is too low imo, you'll be starving and give up.

Try 1200 + exercise.

ShattonerfDaParp · Yesterday 05:30

When people say 'exercise doesn't help you lose weight' what they're really saying is 'losing weight is difficult'. Exercise makes it easier to run a bigger calorie deficit on a given day, but running a bigger calorie deficit on a given day will make you feel hungrier later that day or the next. If you can deal with that then brilliant, you'll lose weight faster. But lots of people can't.

Rather than worrying about whether you need to be eating exactly 1253.387 calories per day, just focus on the fact that you definitely need to either eat less than you do now, exercise more than you do now, or a bit of both. If you tend to eat snacks then stop and see how you go. Or if you drink more alcohol than you should then stop that and see how you go. Or if you do basically no exercise then start doing a bit and see how you go (and even if you start exercising and lose no weight at all, you're still better off). No need to try and do everything all at once though - that's setting yourself up to fail.

NotAnotherScarf · Yesterday 11:37

I'm currently on another diet...story of my life. But rather than just cut calories I've upped exercise and joined a gym

Think of it like a car with half a tank of petrol. Food is just fuel for the body. To empty a car's tank, it needs to move.

If it sat completely still you'd lose very little.

If you drove it normally but didn't fill it up to full every week, you'd eventually run out of petrol but that would take a long time.

If you don't fill it up to full every week but drive it more it will run out of petrol much sooner

Dabspeed · Yesterday 11:46

"I really want to lose 3lbs a week so I can go into next year feeling a little better. 37. 5’4 and 13 and a half stone"

You don't need to lose 3lb s week to do this. You can lose 1lb a week and still go into next year feeling significantly better. Data is averages across populations and your own physiological response to a particular set of diet restrictions will be unique to you. Pick sensible foods that feel filling and sustainable and keep on keeping on.

Icanthinkformyselfthanks · Yesterday 13:27

My advice would be to focus your energies on your health. Read around the subjects of glucose control, insulin resistance, UPFs and their impact on our weight and time restricted eating. Try and incorporate some resistance training into your routine and walk as much as you can.
Good resources are:-
The Zoe podcasts
The Glucose Goddess
Dr Jason Fung (The Obesity Code)
Proffesor Chris Van Tulleken (Ultra Processed People)
We all want the weight to magically disappear overnight, please accept now that it won’t but whatever you achieve between now and next summer will be an improvement on where you are now. Understand that weight loss is not linear, there will be weeks you work really hard and lose nothing or even put weight on, it happens so expect it. Focus on changing the unhealthy habits which have brought you to where you are so that when you reach your goal you will be in with the best possible chance of maintaining your weight. Consider Berberine and Psyllium husk. Take measurements and photos, the scales are sometimes an unkind partner on this journey those photos and measurements can help you to see how far you’ve come.
I wouldn’t obsess about calories if eating less and moving more on its own was the best way to lose weight there’d be far fewer fat people and fewer former overweight people would regain the weight they lost.
Good luck!

SexyFrenchDepression · Yesterday 14:04

https://tdeecalculator.net/

I am 5ft 4 and 46 and I started losing weight at just over 12 stone, maintenance calories 1675, so to lose 2lb a week my calories needed to be 1575, I was closer to 1000-1100 a day and lost more than 2lb to start with, obv more you lose the lower the calories need to be.

With your stats your maintenance calories if sedentary (i would ignore exercise unless you do extreme amounts) would be 1833. So 1700 would be fine to start with to lose weight (2lb a week) but you could go lower. You need to check it regularly and if counting calories you need to count/check everything!

TDEE Calculator: Learn Your Total Daily Energy Expenditure

Use the TDEE calculator to learn your Total Daily Energy Expenditure, a measure of how many calories you burn per day. This calculator displays MUCH more!

https://tdeecalculator.net

Millytante · Yesterday 15:41

My own experience, which successfully corrected an uncharacteristic weight gain about 25 years ago, didn’t involve calorie counting at all.
Instead it involved what used to be known as ‘food combining’, and it suited me down to the ground, as no aspect of it was a hardship.
You know all the Keto and Atkins type diets? Focussing on a low glycaemic index? They all spring from a French regimen from yonks ago, called the Montignac Diet. (I read about it in Vogue, some time in the early ‘90s)

Anyway, it’s a very gentle, forgiving version of a much stricter Atkins-ish diet, whereby you avoid white carbs above all else (and actual sugar, being exactly the same thing as far as bodily fuel is concerned).
Needless to say, as a French diet, dark chocolate is permitted, in great moderation. Au revoir, croissants though, for the time being.
Then the only fine tuning you do is to eat your remaining carbs (eg good wholemeal bread, mostly, but also legumes and lentils, brown rice) with minimal fat (so eat your toast with delicious jam, no butter), and eat your protein (meat abd fish, obvs, also dairy) with minimal carbs, but loads of veg, especially green. Lots of good fats eg olive oil, and, curiously, goose fat (yippee!) which behaves like a healthful plant oil for some reason. Virgin (non-industrially pressed) nut oils too, walnut and hazelnut in particular. (Making mayo with a variety of oils is great fun)
One of the best and simplest recipes is a flourless cheese soufflé: still the best soufflé I ever cook, and it’s foolproof. It’s a really joyful way to way to eat (though tricky for vegetarians unless you are tofu adepts)

The great thing is there’s no substitute food stuffs, nothing ersatz, and you eat absolutely normal ‘mainstream’ stuff, just slightly tweaked in terms of combinations.
Any restaurant accommodates it easily. (Burger sans bun, steak without chips but with a pile of haricots verts, etc)

The big news is that once you are steadily dropping pounds abd approaching you goal (and it does this fast, once you are in the groove of the regimen), you can relax a few ‘rules’ according to your own judgment, knowing that returning to the stricter path will swiftly correct any unwanted gains, but honestly, if you adhere in a general fashion to this ‘diet’, you will never put that weight on again.
I never have, and at 70 Im the same shape and presumably weight I was a good thirty years ago, without any excess, and happy in my skin.
(The basic Montignac ‘training’ one absorbed decades ago definitely helped avoid post-menopausal weight gain)

Montignac was a wonderful experience, as there was no hardship, no real sacrifice (unless potatoes are very dear to you) and no hunger ever, above all.
Calories were neither here nor there.

BillieWiper · Yesterday 15:55

800 could be painful to someone who's probably eating more than 3000, and it has gradually built up to that over months or years. Your stomach capacity will be large and you'll feel very hungry I think.

If you're not using WLI it's better to give yourself less of a restriction otherwise it can lead to bingeing. And feeling a failure. So 1300 ish or so should be low enough but not unbearable?

But it depends on your level of activity.

Sunbringer · Yesterday 16:55

There’s no set amount because all bodies are different - some are more or less efficient and all have different caloric needs. However I would say 1000 calories down is pretty brutal and hard to sustain.

Your maintenance calories are around 1899. So to cut to 1000 calories would be almost half your daily needs. You will find that very painful.

SilenceInside · Yesterday 17:04

Weight loss is never consistent and predictable. You set yourself up for disappointment and false expectations if you want to lose 3lbs every single week. Aiming for 1 to 2lbs a week is more sustainable and will still get you to your target weight.

Loverurarliving01 · Yesterday 17:24

People focus far too much on calories and not enough on what they're actually eating. If someone has been recommended 1,000 calories a day, make those calories count!

Drinks: Black coffee, without sugar or milk. No soft drinks, even if it's zero sugar. Only water.

Fruit and vegetables: Plenty of leafy greens, such as kale, spinach, cabbage and lettuce (they will fill you up). Alongside broccoli, carrots, peppers and other vegetables. Always whole fruit- avoid fruit juices.

Protein: Eggs, fish, chicken, beans, chickpeas and lentils.

Fats: I prefer full-fat products. I don't automatically assume that 0% fat or low-calorie products are healthier. Read the ingredients instead of blindly following marketing. If you eat full fat, it will fill you up and provides you with more energy.

Homemade meals: Lentil stew, bean stew, vegetable soups and homemade chilli. Simple meals made from basic ingredients, without spending a fortune on fancy diet products.

Healthy eating doesn't have to be expensive or complicated.

It's not just about counting calories. It's about the quality of your food, too. Don't assume that everything labelled low-calorie or diet-friendly is healthier.

IckyIck · Yesterday 17:42

... flourless cheese soufflé: ... (though tricky for vegetarians unless you are tofu adepts)
It's suitable for vegetarians but not vegans.

UniquePinkSwan · Yesterday 17:45

Low calorie doesn’t work long term. reducing carbs will make the weight melt off. Also eat fat to make you fuller for longer. Fat doesn’t make you fat

SexyFrenchDepression · Yesterday 17:49

Loverurarliving01 · Yesterday 17:24

People focus far too much on calories and not enough on what they're actually eating. If someone has been recommended 1,000 calories a day, make those calories count!

Drinks: Black coffee, without sugar or milk. No soft drinks, even if it's zero sugar. Only water.

Fruit and vegetables: Plenty of leafy greens, such as kale, spinach, cabbage and lettuce (they will fill you up). Alongside broccoli, carrots, peppers and other vegetables. Always whole fruit- avoid fruit juices.

Protein: Eggs, fish, chicken, beans, chickpeas and lentils.

Fats: I prefer full-fat products. I don't automatically assume that 0% fat or low-calorie products are healthier. Read the ingredients instead of blindly following marketing. If you eat full fat, it will fill you up and provides you with more energy.

Homemade meals: Lentil stew, bean stew, vegetable soups and homemade chilli. Simple meals made from basic ingredients, without spending a fortune on fancy diet products.

Healthy eating doesn't have to be expensive or complicated.

It's not just about counting calories. It's about the quality of your food, too. Don't assume that everything labelled low-calorie or diet-friendly is healthier.

100%. I find I do lose weight if I purely calorie count regardless of what I eat but it isnt sustainable and I lose it differently. If I focus on protein and fibre I lose more, am stronger and lose more from my belly, plus look less bloated overall quicker. I know everyone is different but that's what it does for me. Obviously you feel a lot fuller also.

Charlenedickens · Yesterday 17:52

Bmr is basic metabolic rate. What you need to just exist, ie if you were bed bound, anything you burn above this, is your movement throughout the day,

if you burn 1800 a day which is very low, at your weight, then to lose two pounds a week you’d need 800, but that’s not sustainable,

Charlenedickens · Yesterday 17:54

When I do your calculation is says 2000 cals a day is sedentary for your weight and height, as such, 1000 cals a day will see you lose 2 lbs a week.

shimasu · Yesterday 17:55

Less fat more carbs and protein. Aim to lose 1 -1.5lb per week. Target would be 37 -57 weeks and you can build muscle whilst dieting so you don't get loose skin issues. For your weight and height
it's 44g of fats
100g protein
133g carbs.

Your sedentary calorie burns 1500 calories per day. If you walk and exercise this should reach 2000 calories per day making a 500 calorie deficit.

So with the above intake of carbs, fats and protein you should achieve 1lb - 1.5lb of weight loss per week.

However I would take measurements of your body now across chest, waist neck and arms as this will be also an indicator of weight loss if for example you lose and inch from your waist.

Bear in mind that fat content is to be watched. If you have 120g of chicken and 1/2 avocado you've probably reached your fat content for the day so all other food has to be zero fat. Greek Yoghurt, cottage cheese chickpeas etc which are now giving you grams of protein.

JudyP · Yesterday 17:57

DoNotGoGorgeously · Yesterday 04:01

It depends entirely on how many calories your body uses to keep itself going (basal metabolic rate — if you Google it you will find BMR calculators)), and your level of activity. Very low-calorie diets tend to be unsustainable in that the weight is regained after you return to eating more.

This exactly - I am very active with gym daily and dog walks and I eat approx 2000 cal a day to maintain my weight but you will be different so you need to know what you “need” to survive and then either cut calories or up your exercise ( or both is easier for me) to lose weight but approx if you lose 500 calories a day then in 1 week you will lose a pound if this helps - but this is a very simplistic way of looking at it and it depends on many factors - but 1 lb a week is actually better as it is sustainable I think

Dontlletmedownbruce · Yesterday 18:03

Don't aim for 3lbs a week OP, it's too much pressure and sacrifice and I know too well successful weight loss has more to do with your well being than your weight. Aim for 1lb a week and accept you will not be transformed in the next month. Once you get the first 4 or 5 lbs down you'll start to feel happier and energised and then you can start looking at your end goal