Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Christa Pikes is awake and ‘talking’

930 replies

wouldntyouwanthelp · 06/10/2026 22:32

She’s out of the coma and talking to her lawyers. Aibu to think the state of Tennessee can’t possibly try to do the lethal injection again ? Surely not? People on Reddit are suggesting she might need an amputation of one of her arms because of how caustic pentobarbital is.

Christa Pike 'conscious and speaking at hospital' after failed execution in US
https://news.sky.com/share/13595950

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Orangerowanberries · 07/10/2026 08:56

The drugs used are the same as those used for assisted suicide - and the bill on that that was recently attempted to be pushed through parliament specifically disallowed any scrutiny of these drugs. Thank goodness it was voted down!

SquirrelMadness · 07/10/2026 08:57

gannett · 07/10/2026 08:39

The details of Pike's crime aren't actually relevant to the death penalty debate. Nor is the abuse she suffered herself, actually. The death penalty is barbaric because of what it turns those enacting it into. Killing blackens our souls; a state sanctioning killing blackens that society.

The reason the death penalty is immoral is its effect on us, not the ins and outs of what a criminal did or didn't do.

Neither do I think victims' families' feelings should determine punishment. I have extremely violent feelings towards some people I perceive as evil - vengefulness and anger are just parts of being human, but I don't think I should be encouraged to lean into them. If the state is good for anything, it's to ensure that society is guided by higher principles, not just punishment and retribution.

Totally 100% agree with this. This was what I was trying to write. The death penalty doesn't belong in a healthy society.

BermudaRhombus · 07/10/2026 08:58

ZeStreoving · 07/10/2026 08:50

When it involves murdering someone..... yes.

ok, so at least we’ve limited it to murder which is a start. What if the victim had raped or murdered the perpetrator’s children. Is that mitigation? Would that merit commuting to life in prison?

ReleaseTheDucksOfWar · 07/10/2026 09:00

Orangerowanberries · 07/10/2026 08:56

The drugs used are the same as those used for assisted suicide - and the bill on that that was recently attempted to be pushed through parliament specifically disallowed any scrutiny of these drugs. Thank goodness it was voted down!

No, they aren't.

The drugs they used to use, which are the same as the assisted dying ones, are no longer supplied for executions.

So they use old drugs, ones obtained on the grey market, or cocktails made up by specialist pharmaceutical companies that are distinctly lacking in quality control.

There have been problems with assisted suicide administration sometimes, but the drugs are executions are essentially old or counterfeit.

BermudaRhombus · 07/10/2026 09:00

Spicysenorita · 07/10/2026 08:53

The moment you kill someone so brutally, i agree with the death penalty.

Ok, but that’s not the same as a life for a life. That sounds more like a life for a life sometimes.

TheWonderhorse · 07/10/2026 09:03

She's a person. We don't need to find reasons to keep her alive, we need reasons to torture and kill her. Give me a reason for that which isn't appealing to exactly the same instincts as the murderers themselves might use.

Keeping people safe is justified and necessary. The death penalty costs more than life in prison, and achieves nothing. It's ritual murder, dressed in clinical garb and performed with an IV line instead of a ceremonial dagger. It lessens the state carrying it out, and permeates society with the idea that revenge is justice. It's bullshit.

OtterlyAstounding · 07/10/2026 09:08

TheWonderhorse · 07/10/2026 09:03

She's a person. We don't need to find reasons to keep her alive, we need reasons to torture and kill her. Give me a reason for that which isn't appealing to exactly the same instincts as the murderers themselves might use.

Keeping people safe is justified and necessary. The death penalty costs more than life in prison, and achieves nothing. It's ritual murder, dressed in clinical garb and performed with an IV line instead of a ceremonial dagger. It lessens the state carrying it out, and permeates society with the idea that revenge is justice. It's bullshit.

We don't need to find reasons to keep her alive? I wish people cared more about keeping others alive when it came to non-funded cancer treatments, etc. Governments let innocent people die every day because it's inconvenient and expensive to extend their lives or seek cures with proven treatments.

Life is cheap, the death penalty is only expensive if you allow appeals, and humans are not an endangered species.

(Disclaimer: I'm still not actually in favour of the DP, based on the fact that I don't trust governments with that power.)

Fredabasset · 07/10/2026 09:08

LoisGriffinskitchen · 07/10/2026 07:09

I would not fancy meeting some of you lot here on a dark night with your dark vengeful souls.

Christa has survived two lethal injections. There is no legal precedent for this, at the very least they are going to be tied up legally for a long time and are probably going to have to a rewrite DP laws.

in the meantime they will likely have to commute her sentence to LWOP which is what it should have been at the start. She was 18, an abused kid with an immature and likely stunted brain growth. Add in the fact that the brain does not fully mature until aged 25 or thereabouts and you have a problem.

If I was Colleen’s Mum I’d want the DP too but this won’t bring her daughter back, all it’s done is delay and delay justice as she sees it. Justice should have been LWOP from the start and she could then have mentally thrown away the key,

Edited

I would not fancy meeting some of you lot here on a dark night with your dark vengeful souls.
Then don't murder any of "us lot's" son or daughter and you won't have to 🙄
I get fed up with all these people saying that "the brain doesn't mature until it's owner is 25". Unless they have learning difficulties anyone can still read at 18 and know right from wrong.
In Tennessee they have just altered the law about Criminal Responsibility.
https://nashvillebanner.com/2024/07/15/new-tennessee-law-juvenile-court/

msmillicentcat · 07/10/2026 09:10

Generally I’m against the death penalty however after reading what she did I have lost sympathy. It was so horrific. Many people are abused in life sadly but don’t end up murdering someone.

I’m not sure what the answer is. They can’t let her out (she has also tried to murder someone whilst in prison) but it can cost $100,000 per year to keep someone in prison in the US so there may be others reasons at play.

Fredabasset · 07/10/2026 09:10

SquirrelMadness · 07/10/2026 08:57

Totally 100% agree with this. This was what I was trying to write. The death penalty doesn't belong in a healthy society.

If we had a "healthy society", as you put it, there would be no murders.

Bogstandardname · 07/10/2026 09:10

Will she become some sort of celebrity if she returns to prison? Maybe they should let her victim's family choose what happens to her now.

TheWonderhorse · 07/10/2026 09:11

OtterlyAstounding · 07/10/2026 09:08

We don't need to find reasons to keep her alive? I wish people cared more about keeping others alive when it came to non-funded cancer treatments, etc. Governments let innocent people die every day because it's inconvenient and expensive to extend their lives or seek cures with proven treatments.

Life is cheap, the death penalty is only expensive if you allow appeals, and humans are not an endangered species.

(Disclaimer: I'm still not actually in favour of the DP, based on the fact that I don't trust governments with that power.)

No. Because she already is alive. The act they need to justify is killing her.

OtterlyMad · 07/10/2026 09:11

ElatedOtter · 06/10/2026 22:47

You can’t keep injecting people with fatal substances until you get it right and they actually die, surely?

Lethal injection isn’t the only method available.

Sidebeforeself · 07/10/2026 09:14

This whole case.. the torture and murder, what’s happened to the murderer.., proof if you ever need it that there is no God

Fredabasset · 07/10/2026 09:15

Sidebeforeself · 07/10/2026 09:14

This whole case.. the torture and murder, what’s happened to the murderer.., proof if you ever need it that there is no God

How so ??

OtterlyAstounding · 07/10/2026 09:15

TheWonderhorse · 07/10/2026 09:11

No. Because she already is alive. The act they need to justify is killing her.

Ah, so your argument is that inaction is moral, even when it assuredly results in death, but action that results in death is immoral?

TheWonderhorse · 07/10/2026 09:18

OtterlyAstounding · 07/10/2026 09:15

Ah, so your argument is that inaction is moral, even when it assuredly results in death, but action that results in death is immoral?

No, I'm talking about execution. I'm not talking about healthcare. Obviously people should get medical treatment but that's another thread...

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 09:18

It sounds awful what I’m about to say but karma is a bitch 🤷🏼‍♀️

Askandyforcompo · 07/10/2026 09:18

EmeraldRoulette · 06/10/2026 23:23

But if you know you’ll never get justice, you might want vengeance if that’s all you can get.

So what is justice to you? If the death penalty is 'vengeance' then what is 'justice'?

Murder and torture is either wrong or right. It can't be both.

OtterlyAstounding · 07/10/2026 09:23

TheWonderhorse · 07/10/2026 09:18

No, I'm talking about execution. I'm not talking about healthcare. Obviously people should get medical treatment but that's another thread...

No, we're talking about deliberate inaction resulting in death, vs deliberate action resulting in death. Is one more moral or acceptable than the other?

Sidebeforeself · 07/10/2026 09:25

Fredabasset · 07/10/2026 09:15

How so ??

I would have thought it was fairly obvious. Why would a God make people suffer so much .. and that includes creating the evil people that inflict suffering to others.

ThatCyanCat · 07/10/2026 09:27

Blackwidowsbite · 07/10/2026 09:18

It sounds awful what I’m about to say but karma is a bitch 🤷🏼‍♀️

It does indeed sound awful, because botched executions are not "karma". Ask a Buddhist.

elperil · 07/10/2026 09:27

You just have to look up those countries who currently impose the death penalty.

I think that's enough for me to make a judgement about how civilised these countries are, and I include the US in that.

Life without parole in solitary is enough punishment for anyone IMO. Executions are the epitome of uncivilised vengeance.

LowlandLucky · 07/10/2026 09:28

crikeymikey123 · 06/10/2026 22:52

She's suffered enough.

And if she had tortured your child until they were dead then kept a piece of their skull as a trophy would you be saying the same. You wouldn't know how it would feel to know your child was murdered in such a way. Maybe Colleen's mother should have the final say.

StandingDeskDisco · 07/10/2026 09:30

Ponderingwindow · 06/10/2026 23:57

The real issue is that a government that tried to carry out a death sentence lacks the competency to complete the task. This isn’t the first execution with complications, even if it is the first with these particular circumstances.

There is nothing to indicate that Tennessee or any other U.S. state now has the capability to swiftly execute a human within the current guidelines for what constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. Whether or not we agree with those guidelines or the death penalty at all doesn’t change the fact that continuing to try to execute people on these circumstances is going to cause problems.

They have untrained people using a single degraded drug when previously an in-date cocktail of medications was used.

I think this incident should effectively halt executions. They can’t get the job done. The culture has already decided that only lethal injection is acceptable. Enough of the population has decided that lethal injection is unacceptable to the point that the drug companies won’t cooperate. I don’t see how the death penalty alters isn’t at an effective standstill even if it remains law.

The culture has already decided that only lethal injection is acceptable.

This is what I don't get.
I am 100% against the death penalty, but if they are going to do it, why not a simple bullet in the head? Why not the old fashioned guillotine? Why have they decided that injections are the only acceptable way?