Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to reconsider a long friendship over support for education tax?

1000 replies

CoconutRumcake · 03/10/2026 10:46

A close friend of over 15 years last night unashamedly said she supported the children’s education tax. To put this in context, she is godmother to my ds and has seen first hand what damage this has done to children and families as well as her own sister losing her job when the school closed. She had maybe drank too much and has apologised over text this morning, but I really can’t shake the feeling that I don’t want to be around her.
AIBU -try and move past it
YANBU -it’s run it’s time

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
5128gap · 03/10/2026 17:21

As pp pointed out, your friends views are the majority. You are part of a fairly niche cohort of people still seeing this as a grievous wrong and taking umbridge when people are not showering you with sympathy. Other people in your position have accepted it and paid up (none of us love tax, but moaning doesn't change our liability) or in some cases like a couple of my friends actually agree with it themselves.
I'm guessing your friend didn't simply announce her support for it apropos of nothing, just to upset you. I imagine this issue is your motivating grievance and you go on about it, playing for sympathy, getting all political and belligerent a lot? That's pretty tiresome.
Maybe she just got fed up biting her tongue. You should respect her for being honest to your face.

ilovesooty · 03/10/2026 17:21

CoconutRumcake · 03/10/2026 16:23

Exactly right. I don’t think, even if I wanted to, I can actually forget she supports such a wicked policy that has hurt my children. I think I’ll just step away from the friendship, it’s one think being ignorant if the damage this us causing but entirely another to see what people supposedly close to her have gone through because if it.

So you're going to ghost her rather than tell her your opinion of her and why you don't want to be friends with her any more?

CandidHedgehog · 03/10/2026 17:21

CoconutRumcake · 03/10/2026 17:00

It’s a tax on children’s education and vocational training. It sounds like exactly what it is.

You’ve edited out the non-governmental again.

If you have to deliberately misquote to make your point, it probably isn’t a very good point to begin with.

Arlanymor · 03/10/2026 17:22

Pearlstillsinging · 03/10/2026 17:18

I'm afraid that it is you who doesn't understand the policy. These schools did not have charitable status but a loophole in the law meant that they were treated as if they did. Now that loophole has been closed and they are treated like the businesses that they are. They have decided to pass the cost of VAT onto their customers which has put their fees up.

Absolutely, kind of makes me laugh that people blame the government when private schools could have chosen to suck up the cost. Often supermarkets suck up the cost of rises in their arena and don’t pass it on. But no one is cross at the schools… religious establishments have a similar loophole and it’s also wrong.

Differentforgirls · 03/10/2026 17:23

CoconutRumcake · 03/10/2026 16:49

It’s a tax on children’s education and vocational training, I’ve posted the link several times and at this point don’t know how else to be clearer. Is the problem because I didn’t specifically say non government funded education and vocational training for children?

Edited

Did you have to move your children?

bafta16 · 03/10/2026 17:24

CoconutRumcake · 03/10/2026 10:54

It’s not politics though, it’s not some abstract vague politics of envy for her as she’s seen first hand what it’s done to people I’d assumed she cared about. I just spent the evening trying to avoid talking to her, I’m not angry I just think I’m disappointed. For reference, she is a net tax payer herself.

Just do normal school and keep your friend.

please don't mention SEN

BiGuy · 03/10/2026 17:24

CoconutRumcake · 03/10/2026 17:15

It would help, but as ridiculous as it sounds we do unfortunately now have one. Don’t worry though, it’s just for children’s education.

It would help, but as ridiculous as it sounds we do unfortunately now have one. Don’t worry though, it’s just for children’s education.

Don’t worry though, it’s just for children’s private education so 93% of children are unaffected.

ThreadGuardDog · 03/10/2026 17:25

Differentforgirls · 03/10/2026 17:23

Did you have to move your children?

I suspect the children are still at private school - the problem may be that it’s eating into the caviar budget.

CoconutRumcake · 03/10/2026 17:25

khakipant · 03/10/2026 17:15

You understand the NHS is free at the point of use yes? And you pay for it via tax? The same with state education. Those who opt out are choosing a luxury and therefore taxed at the normal rate, raising vital funds for the education of all. You are at best misinformed, at worst a total bigot.

Erm yes I do understand, but I don’t know why that’s relevant. I also understand that education is paid for by income tax payers of which I’m one, I didn’t stop paying for state education simply because my children don’t use it. When at independent schools, my children received no educational government funding.
The bigot term could also be applied to someone who , because of their prejudices, supports punitive legislation to prevent a type of education for someones children.

OP posts:
fuckeditupbadly · 03/10/2026 17:27

ThreadGuardDog · 03/10/2026 17:20

I was under the impression that the VAT exemption would continue for SEND children. And private SEND provision isn’t automatically better than state provision. There are legal and practical limitations and much depends on the child’s own needs

While it’s true that private settings have smaller class sizes and more flexible funding, it’s also the case that they are not bound by the same statutory duties under the Children and Families Act as state schools - EHCP carries different enforcement and legal rights in the private sector.

In addition private schools often don’t have enough staff trained for conditions such as severe ASD or ADHD and therefore not sufficiently equipped for children with complex needs, and often parents find that their children are asked to leave in cases where behaviour is a problem.

Edited

Im talking about children who do not necessarily have an EHCP but ND, often poorly understood at an early age. They are often 'quirky', of the type to be targets for bullies. Talk to any SEN parent about their child being encouraged to fit in more, rather to having their quirky nature accepted and any bullying visible ans swiftly dealt with. Im not criticising state, I used to work in it and many are amazing but the sheer size and busyness of them is incompatible with many kids who are not 'severe' enough to need a specialist setting but just need the quietness a small school can offer.

Arlanymor · 03/10/2026 17:27

BiGuy · 03/10/2026 17:24

It would help, but as ridiculous as it sounds we do unfortunately now have one. Don’t worry though, it’s just for children’s education.

Don’t worry though, it’s just for children’s private education so 93% of children are unaffected.

Absolutely! The vapours over this when actually kids can get a very good education and go on to do great things in via standard education streams.

Has anyone read this? It’s brilliant: Posh Boys: How English Public Schools Ruin Britain by Robert Verkaik

Explains why so much twattery abounds in public life…

CoconutRumcake · 03/10/2026 17:29

Differentforgirls · 03/10/2026 17:23

Did you have to move your children?

Yes the school closed, basically loads of children left particularly in the younger years and the intake was down 40%. It was a pretty horrible time for lots of families.

OP posts:
Winter42 · 03/10/2026 17:29

CoconutRumcake · 03/10/2026 14:51

What do you mean literally no one believes the education tax?!? Unfortunately HMRC believes it whether you do or not, so you have to pay it or move your kid out of school.

Can I ask what exactly is it you don’t agree with me on? Are you saying the children’s education and vocational training tax doesn’t exist?

It is not a special tax on education. It is just VAT like we pay on everything else.

Surreyblah · 03/10/2026 17:32

YABU. Silly to get into debate about a topic you disagree on and that you’re emotional about.

The changes have affected her friend(s) or family, but she maintains her views - fair enough. For both of you ‘the personal is political’ but with different views.

DecisionTime123 · 03/10/2026 17:32

I think if you never spoke to this friend again, she's had a lucky escape.

Scout2016 · 03/10/2026 17:32

CoconutRumcake · 03/10/2026 17:07

Incorrect, again this has nothing to do with charitable status or profits or being a business. It is a tax on education paid by the children for education services.

Yes your last point is correct, the service just happens to be education in this instance.Now do you think it’s a good idea to tax children’s education? And why only aged between 5 and 18?

Yes, if you buy education you should pay tax on it.
Same as if you pay for any other service.

Vaxtable · 03/10/2026 17:33

I feel very sorry for your kids as you simply can’t understand something basic

it is not a tax on children’s education. VAT is a tax paid by most businesses and private schools are businesses.

schools are provided by Government and funded by them

Private schools have been set up by businesses to provide another option, should people choose to use them.

you are not forced to use these businesses to educate your children. Fully funded school are provided. You are choosing to use a business to provide your kids education, thus paying VAT as you would for any business you would choose to use that pays VAT toHMRC

so stop with your education tax.

CoconutRumcake · 03/10/2026 17:35

Arlanymor · 03/10/2026 17:22

Absolutely, kind of makes me laugh that people blame the government when private schools could have chosen to suck up the cost. Often supermarkets suck up the cost of rises in their arena and don’t pass it on. But no one is cross at the schools… religious establishments have a similar loophole and it’s also wrong.

Edited

Lots did, ours did. It reduced fees so that with education tax included we were up 14% rather than the full 20%. It’s not the big schools who were affected by this, infact they can now claim back vat on big capital projects like swimming pools etc. It’s the small not for profit prep schools who had small reserves are closing and suffering, it’s really shameful what they’ve done to them.

OP posts:
Arlanymor · 03/10/2026 17:38

CoconutRumcake · 03/10/2026 17:35

Lots did, ours did. It reduced fees so that with education tax included we were up 14% rather than the full 20%. It’s not the big schools who were affected by this, infact they can now claim back vat on big capital projects like swimming pools etc. It’s the small not for profit prep schools who had small reserves are closing and suffering, it’s really shameful what they’ve done to them.

Shameful to pay tax?! The rest of the UK pays tax on luxury, schools are no different. If you can’t afford it then move your kids. Most of the country can’t afford luxury education.

ThreadGuardDog · 03/10/2026 17:39

CoconutRumcake · 03/10/2026 17:25

Erm yes I do understand, but I don’t know why that’s relevant. I also understand that education is paid for by income tax payers of which I’m one, I didn’t stop paying for state education simply because my children don’t use it. When at independent schools, my children received no educational government funding.
The bigot term could also be applied to someone who , because of their prejudices, supports punitive legislation to prevent a type of education for someones children.

Edited

I‘m now convinced that this is just rage bait. In every single post you have omitted the word ‘private’ and refused to acknowledge that private is a choice. It’s not because there is no other form of education available. You have actively chosen to pay for your children’s education instead of accepting state provision - no-one stops paying for state education. Even those who don’t have children still pay, because it benefits us all.

Given that it’s generally only the wealthy and privileged who can afford to pay for private school I can’t fathom why you would think they are entitled to some sort of a discount when literally everyone else pays VAT on goods and services.

EasternStandard · 03/10/2026 17:40

fuckeditupbadly · 03/10/2026 17:00

And I've yet to see one single definable benefit to come from this to the state sector. Not one.

Yep. It’s a woeful Labour policy that has only damaged a sector. Pointless.

To the op probably not worth falling out over.

CoconutRumcake · 03/10/2026 17:40

Vaxtable · 03/10/2026 17:33

I feel very sorry for your kids as you simply can’t understand something basic

it is not a tax on children’s education. VAT is a tax paid by most businesses and private schools are businesses.

schools are provided by Government and funded by them

Private schools have been set up by businesses to provide another option, should people choose to use them.

you are not forced to use these businesses to educate your children. Fully funded school are provided. You are choosing to use a business to provide your kids education, thus paying VAT as you would for any business you would choose to use that pays VAT toHMRC

so stop with your education tax.

Business or not business, children’s education and vocational training is now taxed. It has nothing to do with a school or training facility, the child pays 20% tax on their education. An education tax, but just if you’re aged 5 to 18. For now.

OP posts:
MyWilly · 03/10/2026 17:40

randomchap · 03/10/2026 16:11

They can still choose. It's not been banned. Obviously

But making choice 20% more expensive.... Someone might not like the choice of the state schools around. We all know how atrocious the behaviour can be at state comps

AnswerIsNo · 03/10/2026 17:40

CoconutRumcake · 03/10/2026 17:25

Erm yes I do understand, but I don’t know why that’s relevant. I also understand that education is paid for by income tax payers of which I’m one, I didn’t stop paying for state education simply because my children don’t use it. When at independent schools, my children received no educational government funding.
The bigot term could also be applied to someone who , because of their prejudices, supports punitive legislation to prevent a type of education for someones children.

Edited

The logic about you not stopping paying for state education because your children are privately educated doesn't carry....

There are many employed people without kids - ergo they will paying a % proportion of their income tax to state education because that's how equitable funding of democracy through capitalism works.

and a decent number of these will have private healthcare, but a portion of their tax will also go towards funding the NHS

there's no opt-out of paying for state services, while private education is an opt-in

One is choice by virtue of being in a place of privilege, the other is mandated via law - i.e. enforced by HMRC.

and why would your children receive government-based funding from schools that are set-up as privately funded?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread