Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to be surprised someone on £34,000 receives Universal Credit?

254 replies

Balicious · Yesterday 14:37

I was listening to BBC Radio 5 Live at work yesterday morning. They were discussing the Conservatives’ proposal to stop people spending benefits on alcohol, cigarettes, etc.—but that isn’t what my question is about.
One caller said she earns £34,000 a year as a trainee social worker and receives an additional £500 a month in Universal Credit. She didn’t mention having children, paying rent or having a disability—she simply said she struggles to live on £34,000 and needs Universal Credit to top up her wages.
What is going on? That’s more than I earn! Could I apply for a top-up too? Has anyone else heard of someone working full-time and earning well above minimum wage having their salary topped up by Universal Credit? I just couldn't get over what I was hearing!

OP posts:
pokewomans · Yesterday 17:45

Public sector pay is better than private I thought overall. The difference is in the private sector you can earn very high salaries which are far less common in the public sector.

Not even less common but don’t exist eg a MC partner can earn 2m.

ProudOpalRobin · Yesterday 17:49

cadburyegg · Yesterday 17:43

What do you mean, “how”?

How would you like your pitchfork delivered?
How is the money paid into my account?
Or how/why am I eligible?

how are you eligible

YourWildAmberSloth · Yesterday 17:50

Depends on her circumstances. I get UC on a £46k salary, with one child, I get approx £190 per month.

catspam79 · Yesterday 17:55

YourWildAmberSloth · Yesterday 17:50

Depends on her circumstances. I get UC on a £46k salary, with one child, I get approx £190 per month.

Is that to pay towards you rent ? Just as I get less than you and don’t qualify

YourWildAmberSloth · Yesterday 17:59

catspam79 · Yesterday 17:55

Is that to pay towards you rent ? Just as I get less than you and don’t qualify

Not specifically, although rent is included in the calculation but I'm HA tenant so my rent is relatively low (£800pcm - 2 bed in London).

Pluto46 · Yesterday 18:01

JLou08 · Yesterday 17:32

What a strange comment. Do you not realise the tax payer (including the subject of the post) pay for the welfare bill as well as public sector salaries.
They should be paid an amount that prevents them having to apply for universal credit and avoids the additional administrative costs of UC. Surely that's a more effective use of tax payers money?

Err...what a stupid comment. The point is its a TRAINEE role - if you up this pay everyone deemed to be qualified or more experienced, and presumably not claiming UC, will expect their money to go up accordingly

SameOldMe · Yesterday 18:05

When ‘affordable’ rent near me is 1400 in a housing association house , for example
https://www.homemove.org.uk/property-detail/611814876-SH002955
The only way a family could survive that wage is on UC so it’s not a surprise at all.

Its a trap.

Property details | Homeconnection

https://www.homemove.org.uk/property-detail/611814876-SH002955

Plsfindattached · Yesterday 18:10

catspam79 · Yesterday 17:27

I won’t comment again. You seem to think I’m some sort of half wit. I’m on the bones of my arse and struggle each month. Everything is getting more expensive food shopping, bills etc. I work full time and think what’s the point. I’ll say it again I’ve been told my earnings are over the threshold for UC . Do you not think I’ve tried to get something. Years ago I’d get tax credits but they stopped obviously.

I don’t regard you as a half wit @catspam79

but I don’t think DWP has singled you out to deny you UC you are entitled to.

If you aren’t getting, you’re not entitled. It’s that simple.

bluewhitebluewhite · Yesterday 18:10

Balicious · Yesterday 14:51

Why the need to be rude? I said I was working, so yes, I obviously missed that detail. It’s easy to be unpleasant from behind a keyboard.

How right you are OP. So easy to be unpleasant from behind a keyboard. Do you see what you did there?

JLou08 · Yesterday 18:11

Pluto46 · Yesterday 18:01

Err...what a stupid comment. The point is its a TRAINEE role - if you up this pay everyone deemed to be qualified or more experienced, and presumably not claiming UC, will expect their money to go up accordingly

They'd have already spent 3 years completing their degree and will still be working full time in a very stressful role. We're not talking about 16 year olds on a level 2 apprenticeship. They should be paid a decent salary.
They should push up the salary for all social workers too, maybe we'd deal with the huge shortage of them and the waste on agency staff aswell as reducing UC claimants.

Mouldemort · Yesterday 18:16

Smokeywater · Yesterday 15:44

All the sarky comments - how dare the OP suggest this is unreasonable - but there is the minor detail that the UK can barely cover it's debt interest payments. Eventually the shit will hit the fan.

Yes, we really need to collect the £59bn tax shortfall, and deal with ballooning executive pay.

ThreadGuardDog · Yesterday 18:19

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 15:41

It is, isn’t it?

🤣

Pluto46 · Yesterday 18:26

JLou08 · Yesterday 18:11

They'd have already spent 3 years completing their degree and will still be working full time in a very stressful role. We're not talking about 16 year olds on a level 2 apprenticeship. They should be paid a decent salary.
They should push up the salary for all social workers too, maybe we'd deal with the huge shortage of them and the waste on agency staff aswell as reducing UC claimants.

A decent salary - like Sharon Shoesmith on £133k (nearly 10 years ago) when Baby P was murdered and later paid off to the tune of another £600k +. As always with the public sector, too many layers of management, smoke and mirrors to ever be properly accountable. Increases, if needed, in social worker's pay should come from streamlining the service, not just putting a load more tax payers money into an already inefficient sector

EraOfTheGrey · Yesterday 18:30

19lottie82 · Yesterday 14:39

She must have children or receive pip. A healthy single working adult without children wouldn’t receive any benefits if they earn over something like 11k

PIP isn't paid as part of Universal Credit.

Greebocat · Yesterday 18:33

I know someone who is married with children and neither of them will work extra hours/overtime or take on extra responsibilities (for more money), because it messes up their UC. Why would people put in the extra time and effort when they are getting the same or more from the government. It’s a hard one to solve, but its not benefit bashing to say this is not sustainable to keep topping up peoples wages, especially if they are working part time.

YourWildAmberSloth · Yesterday 18:34

catspam79 · Yesterday 17:27

I won’t comment again. You seem to think I’m some sort of half wit. I’m on the bones of my arse and struggle each month. Everything is getting more expensive food shopping, bills etc. I work full time and think what’s the point. I’ll say it again I’ve been told my earnings are over the threshold for UC . Do you not think I’ve tried to get something. Years ago I’d get tax credits but they stopped obviously.

Tax credits were replaced by UC along with all of the other benefits. I was getting Tax Credits and was migrated to UC. I pay into a civil service pension - I don't know if that affects entitlement although I suspect not.

Laurmolonlabe · Yesterday 18:41

The upper limit is quite a lot higher than that, depending on how many children you have- best advice put in a claim, the worst they can do is say no.

disgracefullyyours · Yesterday 18:43

This is one of those threads that convinces me that some people on this website lead very sheltered lives. The government don't pay £500k to anyone who works just because they ask for it and I'm amazed you never considered they would have children or have PIP.

catspam79 · Yesterday 18:43

Plsfindattached · Yesterday 18:10

I don’t regard you as a half wit @catspam79

but I don’t think DWP has singled you out to deny you UC you are entitled to.

If you aren’t getting, you’re not entitled. It’s that simple.

When did I say UC had singled me out?

Plsfindattached · Yesterday 18:47

catspam79 · Yesterday 18:43

When did I say UC had singled me out?

Oh @catspam79

If you aren’t receiving it - you’re not entitled to it for some reason. But a single parent on £34k with a dependent and presuming fits the parameters - would get UC. You don’t because … you don’t

LakieLady · Yesterday 18:48

LilyBunch25 · Yesterday 17:26

As Lakielady says, who I believe has way more than even my 15 years experience in welfare benefits, the UC helpline, poorly named, is not the best place to ask. That's the reason there are so many advice services. God help me I've just had to leave the sector. You are better off using a trusted online benefits calculator or just make a claim for UC online. I am very interested to know what reason you were given for non entitlement. From what you've said your savings are less than £16k? I'm assuming also you have no other income from property/annuities similar?

More years, @LilyBunch25 , but not necessarily more experience as for quite a few years it was only part of my job.

And it shows how much I've forgotten since I retired last year, as I completely failed to consider the capital/tariff income question, or even the possibility of the OP having a spare house hanging around...

catspam79 · Yesterday 18:51

Plsfindattached · Yesterday 18:47

Oh @catspam79

If you aren’t receiving it - you’re not entitled to it for some reason. But a single parent on £34k with a dependent and presuming fits the parameters - would get UC. You don’t because … you don’t

Edited

I know I don’t that’s what I was trying to tell you

SkyRaisin · Yesterday 19:02

Plsfindattached · Yesterday 18:47

Oh @catspam79

If you aren’t receiving it - you’re not entitled to it for some reason. But a single parent on £34k with a dependent and presuming fits the parameters - would get UC. You don’t because … you don’t

Edited

Nobody should be getting it on £34k, that’s completely ridiculous.

Kirbert2 · Yesterday 19:04

SkyRaisin · Yesterday 19:02

Nobody should be getting it on £34k, that’s completely ridiculous.

Have you seen how high some rents are? Some will also get it for childcare.

LakieLady · Yesterday 19:07

catspam79 · Yesterday 17:27

I won’t comment again. You seem to think I’m some sort of half wit. I’m on the bones of my arse and struggle each month. Everything is getting more expensive food shopping, bills etc. I work full time and think what’s the point. I’ll say it again I’ve been told my earnings are over the threshold for UC . Do you not think I’ve tried to get something. Years ago I’d get tax credits but they stopped obviously.

If you want to check that what you've been told is accurate, there's a really user friendly benefit calculator here

Benefit checker

It's really not at all unusual for the DWP to misinform people about entitlement, especially when it comes to UC, as there are so many variables.

If you are paying a high-ish rent, and providing that you don't have savings in excess of £16k (or a spare house!), it's quite possible that you could be entitled to some UC. The calculator linked above will give you a definitive answer.

Where you live

Welcome to entitledto's free benefit calculator. To find out what you might be able to claim enter your details and you'll receive an estimate of your entitlement...

https://www.entitledto.co.uk/benefits-calculator/Intro/Home?cid=7e36b5f4-abe4-4cfc-80d7-28e8bf8fcece