To find this entitled?

[Aaaaaaaaaaaaahh]

This doesn't apply to people with childcare or caring responsibilities, any sort of illness or disability which means they cannot work full time.
But I've seen a few people on here or social media basically saying 'I can do supply/care work/0 hours work and sometimes only get a shift or two a week, because my husband earns well.'

So they're pretty much choosing to swan about and avoid full-time work, because they assume their husband or partner will carry on in their high-earning, full time role.

What happens if this husband loses their job, becomes sick, or just decides they're sick of having to be the breadwinner?

I see it all the time on supply teacher pages,'Oh I've only had 1 day of work in 2 months but it's fine because my husband is the breadwinner!!'

There are other jobs where you could make a living, you just don't want to do them, yet you still want your dream forever house and luxury lifestyle. If it were the wife full-time and the husband taking the piss there would be uproar.

We didn’t make the decision in isolation and looked at the risks;
all savings in my name
voluntary contributions to state pension
private pension
beneficiary of life insurance
Dh and I have been together for 38 years so splitting up seems unlikely, however should it happen we are both financially protected.

Then maybe you should be grateful they're not competing with you for jobs.

and I disagree with you.

Maybe it's a double standard, but so many women find themselves doing the wifework anyway whether they work FT or not, so maybe it's justified.
There are still a fair few men around who actively don't want their wives to work, and are happy to come home to clean house & dinner on the table, so I think it's unfair to make out she's sponging off her husband. Marriage is a partnership, with unpaid domestic labour done majorly by women being grossly undervalued by society (although not in the divorce courts, where it is seen as an equal contribution).