Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think we should spend less time policing 16/17 year old social media use and more time worrying about young children spending their childhood on iPads?

187 replies

Frenchspainiard · 14/07/2026 20:00

Government has apparently announced a social media curfew on 16 and 17 year olds, I’m unsure how this will be policed but it seems insane to me. They can join the military, they have jobs etc. I personally had a child and moved out at 16.

The real issue from what I see is why do we allow people to buy tablets for young children especially toddlers who then become inactive asocial zombies?

OP posts:
howdidit · Today 14:33

Tbh, I do think this is the problem: there’s a definite sense of unrealism from a number of posters as to what toddlers can actually do. Most activities that aren’t screen based will need some help. Yes, most will play with toys for a while but not for prolonged periods. Meaningful role play doesn’t tend to happen before the age of about three.

We don’t have loads of screen time on the whole but we do have some. One ‘block’ in the morning and one in the evening. Because in the morning I’m needing a while to wake up and in the evening I need to do dinner / shower the other one etc. As DD gets older that gets less important but I have to be realistic about what she can manage.

howdidit · Today 14:37

Thechaseison71 · Today 14:31

I have 2 toddler grandchildren. One 16 months one 18 months. Both can wander round front room or garden paying with various toys. They don't concentrate on anything for long obviously but just move onto next thibg

And do you have custody of them, or do they live with their parents?

You can probably see where I’m going here. Your home is a novelty. My DD was obsessed with a toy at a playgroup; played with it for ages. I was thrilled and bought an identical one. Sadly it did not have the same allure when in her own playroom!

Anononony · Today 14:41

I mean, you can allow a young child to use a tablet and not allow them to become a zombie. My 6yo has a tablet, it's technically mine but he uses it most, our TV is broken so he uses it to watch Netflix or Prime (YT is mostly banned except for very occasional use) or play games on cloud gaming, often with his dad or brother

He uses it in the car and at home, we wouldn't bring it into a restaurant or anywhere once we get to our destination.

He can zone out for an hour or so on the tablet, but he also does 2 sports clubs multiple times a week, and is incredibly active, fit, strong and healthy.

You don't have to just hand a tablet over and relinquish all control/allow your child to refuse other activities in favour of it.

ChillingWithMySnowmies · Today 14:51

Marycontrarygarden · Yesterday 12:05

LOTS of lazy parents on this thread it seems.

Lazy? no. Special Need parent? yes.

My two are 17 & 20 now, they both have autism. The oldest is profoundly affected by his, so yes, when we go out, he brings his tablet and headphone. I expect him to sit quietly, to engage with us while eating his meal, (which i have to cut up for him and put in the correct order, and watch him eat), but once he is done eating, i let him settle with his tablet to play his games and watch his videos, it lets me eat my food and have a conversation with the other people with me.

DD also brings hers, but she is an artist, and will sit and draw once she is done eating, and engages with us about what she is doing, helps keep an eye on her brother, plays his games with him and chats to us.

this has always been so.

Just because a child is sitting in a coffee shop or a restaurant with a tablet, doesn't mean they're 'doom scrolling' or 'glued' to it 24/7. It's a snapshot of a short moment in their day... nor does it make the parent 'lazy'.

TheAmberKoala · Today 14:53

PinkCatCushion · 14/07/2026 20:48

One age is not more deserving than another.
How about the parents of 16/17 year olds police their child and the parents of the young children police theirs?
16/17 year olds are still vulnerable and need protection, they are very much at risk of harm from social media.

Edited

and when they become 18 they magically arent? Or are we going to police 18 year olds too?
By 17, a lot of kids have finished high school and are at uni or work. Id moved out of home by then.
It makes a lot more sense to educate them and show them how to use technology safely.

Thechaseison71 · Today 15:33

howdidit · Today 14:37

And do you have custody of them, or do they live with their parents?

You can probably see where I’m going here. Your home is a novelty. My DD was obsessed with a toy at a playgroup; played with it for ages. I was thrilled and bought an identical one. Sadly it did not have the same allure when in her own playroom!

I'm talking about in their own homes.

Same as my own kids did as toddlers, wandered round playing with various toys. None of the played with for " ages" but about 6 different toys available so moved from one to the other and also played with wooden spoons, sets of keys etc

My phone is obviously far less child friendly that my DDs homes

Frenchspainiard · Today 15:33

TheAmberKoala · Today 14:53

and when they become 18 they magically arent? Or are we going to police 18 year olds too?
By 17, a lot of kids have finished high school and are at uni or work. Id moved out of home by then.
It makes a lot more sense to educate them and show them how to use technology safely.

Yeah same moved out at 16 and had a child of my own. Fuck off would anyone have been stopping me scrolling facebook at night once my child was asleep 😂 focus should be on very young children spending their formative years learning nothing except for how to watch Bluey and skibidi toilet two inches from their face

OP posts:
SomersetBrie · Today 16:01

Frenchspainiard · Today 15:33

Yeah same moved out at 16 and had a child of my own. Fuck off would anyone have been stopping me scrolling facebook at night once my child was asleep 😂 focus should be on very young children spending their formative years learning nothing except for how to watch Bluey and skibidi toilet two inches from their face

I still don't see why you wouldn't just go into settings and change the default. That is all you have to do.

Scrolling at midnight while your child is asleep works for you but not so much for 16/17 year olds who need to get up in the morning and go to school.

I have no problem with a small tweak to social media that might just get a few people to sleep better at night.

Velumental · Today 16:13

ChillingWithMySnowmies · 14/07/2026 20:17

So, what is different to you from them sitting with a colouring book/crayons, or a book, and sitting with an ipad/tablet?

I'm 45 and whenever we went out my parents would bring stuff to keep me occupied and i was expected to sit there, do that, and be quiet.

How is this any different?

It lets people be super judgy, they'd be even judgier if the child dared to act like a young child in public. Also the thing noone seems to understand about toddlers is they all go through this late bedtime stage while they are dropping naps and parents still need to eat. And weather spoons is hardly some upper class establishment you wouldn't expect to take a child into for a quick bite. It's w weatherspoons, if the worst you hear is a bit of baby shark you're doing well

howdidit · Today 16:29

Thechaseison71 · Today 15:33

I'm talking about in their own homes.

Same as my own kids did as toddlers, wandered round playing with various toys. None of the played with for " ages" but about 6 different toys available so moved from one to the other and also played with wooden spoons, sets of keys etc

My phone is obviously far less child friendly that my DDs homes

So when you’re visiting your grandchildren who are both under two, they just wander around playing with toys, just as your own children did?

I know it sounds like I’m being really argumentative and that’s not the intention. I just do think some very selective memories happen. People look back at some thirty years ago and insist their toddlers were doing certain things or behaving in a particular way (or would never have behaved in a particular way!) when actually they did, just the passage of time means we forget.

My own children aren’t bad at all when ur comes to playing fairly independently and ds (now aged five) can and will entertain himself for fairly prolonged periods in a way his on-the-cusp of turning three year old sister can’t yet. And certainly when they were under two they couldn’t; they needed adult guidance and help with a lot of things. And unfortunately as most people with children know attention and general mood wanes as the day goes on so while a lot of children will play happily unsupervised in the morning for a while they lose the ability to do so as they day goes on, often coinciding with when you need to make the dinner!

Thechaseison71 · Today 16:35

howdidit · Today 16:29

So when you’re visiting your grandchildren who are both under two, they just wander around playing with toys, just as your own children did?

I know it sounds like I’m being really argumentative and that’s not the intention. I just do think some very selective memories happen. People look back at some thirty years ago and insist their toddlers were doing certain things or behaving in a particular way (or would never have behaved in a particular way!) when actually they did, just the passage of time means we forget.

My own children aren’t bad at all when ur comes to playing fairly independently and ds (now aged five) can and will entertain himself for fairly prolonged periods in a way his on-the-cusp of turning three year old sister can’t yet. And certainly when they were under two they couldn’t; they needed adult guidance and help with a lot of things. And unfortunately as most people with children know attention and general mood wanes as the day goes on so while a lot of children will play happily unsupervised in the morning for a while they lose the ability to do so as they day goes on, often coinciding with when you need to make the dinner!

Yeah they do. I spent and hour and a half with my DD yesterday. We were sat in the garden Her 18 months old was playing on swing/ slide combo, then at water table then tykes car etc. in between coming up handing over a ball or collecting water bottle
We adults were sat at the table chatting, certainly not involved in his play

The play he likes adults involved is generally rough and tumble with his dad

Seeing as it was yesterday I've hardly forgotten

howdidit · Today 16:43

An hour and a half? And how many hours are in a day? Even with a couple of hours shaved off for nap time?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread