Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be cheesed off with Universal Credit entry fees?

1000 replies

MaturingCheeseball · 28/06/2026 11:43

I know it’s been done before, but…

I thought I’d like to visit Chatsworth House with (teenage) dd. The cost is £33 each PLUS parking at £7.50. So £73.50.

Then I saw the universal credit/pension credit/pip etc price. THREE POUNDS. And free parking! So £6.00 for two adults (age 17+).

I do not have 12 times as much money as someone on these benefits. I doubt many people do. I’m not begrudging the disadvantaged a day out, but come on! The price differential is ludicrous.

When I saw the £73 price I just decided we couldn’t go, and so be it. But upon seeing the potential for a £6 entry, it made me feel mugged off.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
TheCurious0range · 28/06/2026 12:34

I know a family have known the husband for years, they have 2 children, when pregnant with the second and refused a HA property as priority, they 'split up' which basically meant he transferred his bank, car insurance etc back to his parents. The wife then went off sick from her part time job, claimed she couldn't afford the private rental on her own got a two bedroom HA house before the second baby was born, the week she moved in they 'got back together', later down the line he was added to the tenancy as there seems to be no barrier to that. She has barely worked for the last 15 years, occasionally in care work for a couple of months but then quits citing bullying poor treatment, stress. He had a decent job in a construction adjacent field in lower management, had worked there years probably earning 40-50k, decided it was too stressful and he hated not being around during the school holidays 'for the kids'. So quit, again citing stress, retrained as a TA , good for him. Except they could afford all of this as every time their income drops their UC goes up. He had 20k inheritance a few years ago, rather than take it (his mum died) he asked his dad to just buy them a new car so it didn't affect UC. To me this isn't what the benefit system is for, to be played like a game, it's should be a safety net for people in need. It's not what the rest of his family are like and he knew nothing about the benefits system prior to their relationship. Her whole family claim some kind of benefit (other than the ones in prison) , they know every loophole and hoop to jump through. That isn't a safety net, it's a lifestyle choice. They both smoke which is hugely expensive. Do I want to quit my job and go on benefits, no thanks. Do I begrudge my taxes paying for people like that? Yes. I came from a truly working class background, everyone worked manual/unskilled jobs often multiple jobs to make ends meet. Good hardworking people. There are now whole families without this motivation, I don't think it's a positive environment for children to grow up in and you see already their attitude to working for something including at school.

Icanseeasquirrel · 28/06/2026 12:35

I don’t understand why PIP is on that list. It’s not means tested. My exH gets PIP and doesn’t need it. Nearly £900 a month.

IllBurnThatBridgeWhenIGetToIt · 28/06/2026 12:35

Teenytinydot · 28/06/2026 12:33

£6 is pretty much free compared to £78!

Honestly I am really considering selling our business. And becoming an employee.

Our current take home is 5.5k and we have no spare money for pension. I mean 0!

I worked out the other day if we were employees we could put 2k+ a month into pension and get UC. Our take home would be 4.7- 5.1 depending how mad we went on the pension, AND we would get all these free trips so it the difference there would put us in the plus.

I'm sorry that 5 5k per month isn't enough for you.

Absolutely quit your business and become an employee. Sounds like the right move for you.

Forestgreenblue · 28/06/2026 12:36

I agree it’s not fair

I used to claim UC and worked full time - 2 kids. Single parent. rented house

Salary was £22500, received roughly £700 a month on average universal credits - income total was around £2250 monthly putting me on a salary equivalent of £35k per annum

So why on earth people in this situation receive massively discounted entry when there are people not in receipt of UC on the same salary is utter madness

I receive no benefits now at all BTW - not even child benefit - but I can see both sides

emuloc · 28/06/2026 12:36

Teenytinydot · 28/06/2026 12:33

£6 is pretty much free compared to £78!

Honestly I am really considering selling our business. And becoming an employee.

Our current take home is 5.5k and we have no spare money for pension. I mean 0!

I worked out the other day if we were employees we could put 2k+ a month into pension and get UC. Our take home would be 4.7- 5.1 depending how mad we went on the pension, AND we would get all these free trips so it the difference there would put us in the plus.

So what is stopping you from doing that then?🙄

Backedoffhackedoff · 28/06/2026 12:36

It’s ironic how Gen X/ millennials have been banging on for 20 years about how they wish they had a scandavian utopia where big society looked after everyone and everyone was happy and healthy. Then when it comes in pretty much any form we’re all bitter and furious that someone else might get something we didn’t.

charliehungerford · 28/06/2026 12:37

MostArdently · 28/06/2026 12:04

Just for clarity whilst they are called ‘Universal Credit Tickets’ on the website this is the full list of benefits that qualify.

Why should PIP be included, all the other categories are means tested and are generally for those on a low income. I know someone who is a higher rate tax payer, as is their partner, who due to an ongoing illness is entitled to Pip. Their net household income is over £100k a year, not sure why they’d require subsidies to visit attractions!

Backedoffhackedoff · 28/06/2026 12:37

Teenytinydot · 28/06/2026 12:33

£6 is pretty much free compared to £78!

Honestly I am really considering selling our business. And becoming an employee.

Our current take home is 5.5k and we have no spare money for pension. I mean 0!

I worked out the other day if we were employees we could put 2k+ a month into pension and get UC. Our take home would be 4.7- 5.1 depending how mad we went on the pension, AND we would get all these free trips so it the difference there would put us in the plus.

UC isn’t worked out after pension contributions 🤣

Cannybeme · 28/06/2026 12:38

Icanseeasquirrel · 28/06/2026 12:35

I don’t understand why PIP is on that list. It’s not means tested. My exH gets PIP and doesn’t need it. Nearly £900 a month.

If UC is on the list why shouldn’t PIP be? Maybe you should report your exH?

GetAbsOrDieTrying · 28/06/2026 12:38

ElleintheWoods · 28/06/2026 12:34

You know what? I know this taps into stereotypes, but I'd rather people with little to no money visit Chatsworth House, go to the library, go to the theatre, access sports and healthy diets etc. It is good for us all. Why are you so invested in wanting people to sit in their house, drink cheap beer, eat UPFs and watch tv as that's all they can afford? Why do their children need to be deprived because their parents struggle financially? Why is it that money needs to buy access to art, beauty and education?

We are lucky in the UK that you can visit many world class museums for free. If you want something for nothing, there is actually plenty available. You may know that Chatsworth is private property, i.e. not owned or run by the taxpayer, and British nobility has, in fact, a long history of giving to the disadvantaged.

People on benefits should have the opportunity to further themselves and develop, this is cultural capital. Did you know they have access to some educational courses on free/ preferential rates also?

I am tired of living in a society where it's a permanent race to the bottom, rewarding the cheapest, crappiest things. Learning about arts, history and landscaping shouldn't be for the privileged. I don't want to live in a world where about 5% of the population can follow a conversation about arts, politics or history, because the rest think education is 'not for the likes of us'. Unfortunately we are largely there.

You may well have 12x more money than people on benefits. Say after all essential expenses, someone on benefits may have £100 spare. If you have £1,200 available to spend, including whatever you choose to save, you have 12x more money. If you have £600, you probably still have 12x more money.

Regarding specifically advice for your visit. You can park for free in a nearby village and roam the grounds for free. You're welcome.

And here's 50% off if interested: https://www.artfund.org/explore/museums-and-galleries/chatsworth

I don’t think anyone wants to deny benefits claimants and their kids from visiting these places. But someone needs to clamp down on this ridiculous differential in price. That makes it un-affordable for a lot of families. And that just isn’t fair. I have colleagues whose household income is 60K but there is hardly any disposable income. They aren’t entitled to any benefits. Their kids would also enjoy these places but they can’t go only because their parents work hard and pay taxes so others can go. How is that fair?!

Backedoffhackedoff · 28/06/2026 12:38

charliehungerford · 28/06/2026 12:37

Why should PIP be included, all the other categories are means tested and are generally for those on a low income. I know someone who is a higher rate tax payer, as is their partner, who due to an ongoing illness is entitled to Pip. Their net household income is over £100k a year, not sure why they’d require subsidies to visit attractions!

I dunno something nice to do for someone who has been dealt a shit hand in life?

it’s not subsidised, they are just offering reduced prices

DontBuyAnotherBook · 28/06/2026 12:38

Rage bait.

Teenytinydot · 28/06/2026 12:38

emuloc · 28/06/2026 12:36

So what is stopping you from doing that then?🙄

Selling my business! It’s quite a decision and we will have to see how it goes over the next few years. If we continue as we are with no extra to put into pension then we will have no choice. IMO it’s unethical. But whats even more stupid is to cut our nose to spite our face. And I cant work out which option is doing that.

shellyleppard · 28/06/2026 12:39

@MaturingCheeseball regards the discount price. By the time you have spent money on buses (3 buses each way from where I live) or paid for fuel it's not that much of a discount....its a very isolated place.
Only time I go is if family can drive me which isn't very often

RetiredFromExplaining · 28/06/2026 12:39

As has been said before, the entry price is calculated to get the most people through the gates. This means that the price is what people are prepared to pay.

The reason the companies offer very low price tickets is because once through the gates they will pay for food, drink and gifts at full price. They make more money from this than from the entry fee.

It’s called capitalism. If you don’t like it, vote for a left wing political party.

PeriPeriMayo · 28/06/2026 12:39

OneShyQuail · 28/06/2026 12:26

Would you begrudge me a visit to such a place, when I was working as a teacher, with 2 young children and my marriage ended very suddenly much like the horror stories you read on here?!

The issue is there is no distinction for people - if youve never had to rely on a benefit when your world came crashing down around you, you really have no place to criticise.

Not everyone on UC is lazy, taking the piss, workshy or commiting fraud. Its a minority making it bad for others.

Lots of people are only one family emergency or marriage breakdown away from needing support.

I dont begrudge you a day out and am certainly not accusing benefit claimants of being lazy or workshy, majority are anything but.

I also don't see why you can't see it is grossly unfair for UC claimants to get these cheap tickets when many middle class families can also not afford - or have to ration these days out - too. Why are the families on UC more deserving?

myglowupera · 28/06/2026 12:39

thepariscrimefiles · 28/06/2026 12:22

So you could afford the cost of having a lovely day out at Chatsworth House but because people on benefits are getting it much cheaper, you decided not to go?

That sounds like cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Exactly what I was thinking. She’s spat her dummy out because people in a different life situation to her have got something she hasn’t got. Waa waa waa.

Teenytinydot · 28/06/2026 12:39

Backedoffhackedoff · 28/06/2026 12:37

UC isn’t worked out after pension contributions 🤣

Yes it is

Stressedandgrey · 28/06/2026 12:40

charliehungerford · 28/06/2026 12:37

Why should PIP be included, all the other categories are means tested and are generally for those on a low income. I know someone who is a higher rate tax payer, as is their partner, who due to an ongoing illness is entitled to Pip. Their net household income is over £100k a year, not sure why they’d require subsidies to visit attractions!

I'll give you an example.
My autistic son can tolerate maybe an hour at an attraction like this before becoming overwhelmed.

I would imagine there are people with physical disabilities who could not manage a full day because of tiredness, meds etc.

£3 means you can go and see how you get on. At full price you wouldn't take the chance.

Until you have lived with the impact of disabilities it's is hard to imagine all the little ways it can impact.

Kirbert2 · 28/06/2026 12:40

charliehungerford · 28/06/2026 12:37

Why should PIP be included, all the other categories are means tested and are generally for those on a low income. I know someone who is a higher rate tax payer, as is their partner, who due to an ongoing illness is entitled to Pip. Their net household income is over £100k a year, not sure why they’d require subsidies to visit attractions!

Because they clearly aren't in the majority. Most people who either claim PIP for themselves or DLA for their child do not have an income of over £100k a year.

Coffeebeansforever · 28/06/2026 12:41

Mt563 · 28/06/2026 12:26

Would you rather be forced back into work when you're not well enough, potentially making everything worse?

No of course not. I'm not dissing the system, more pointing out that for some there is a disincentive to work. Should also point out that I don't get any extra UC for health related issues, which I could have done, so this is just the basics amount. This was never meant to be long term, but I'm surprised how well we've managed. Life is certainly calmer and better for DC with me at home

Backedoffhackedoff · 28/06/2026 12:41

Teenytinydot · 28/06/2026 12:39

Yes it is

Goodness let’s all put 100% of our salary into pensions then. I’ll be able to retire by 46

emuloc · 28/06/2026 12:42

Icanseeasquirrel · 28/06/2026 12:35

I don’t understand why PIP is on that list. It’s not means tested. My exH gets PIP and doesn’t need it. Nearly £900 a month.

He obviously feels differently to you, and to be eligible for the higher rates, on both components of PIP, he must have a high level of disability.

Teenytinydot · 28/06/2026 12:42

Backedoffhackedoff · 28/06/2026 12:41

Goodness let’s all put 100% of our salary into pensions then. I’ll be able to retire by 46

Well check it out if your and employee. I am not against people getting ahead. Good for you.

It’s just galling that when you try to stand on your own two feet. Pay your housing, set up your own business - you’re just screwed at every turn.

Pickledonion1999 · 28/06/2026 12:43

MostArdently · 28/06/2026 12:04

Just for clarity whilst they are called ‘Universal Credit Tickets’ on the website this is the full list of benefits that qualify.

Three of those benefits don't even exist anymore.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.