Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think we need to start talking about the lack of jobs?

596 replies

Newmeagain · 27/06/2026 21:57

This is prompted by quite a few threads I have read recently, from parents of young people looking for jobs or posters themselves struggling with finding a job.

I feel like a lot of responses are completely out of touch and people are not aware how hard it is right now. There are no “supermarket jobs” etc that you can just pick up.

I think this is having a particularly significant impact on school leavers and graduates looking for their first full time job, students wanting part time work and also anyone over 50 who suddenly finds themselves unemployed.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Housebashing · 28/06/2026 09:33

EasternStandard · 28/06/2026 09:32

Strange take.

If you say so

frozendaisy · 28/06/2026 09:34

It’s just changing at a rapid pace and there are no blueprints on how to adapt so the youngsters are having to figure this out and parental advice is redundant.

We have teens and have no fucking clue.

We now have a mountain of paperwork to get them EU passports, whereas we didn’t need that. Although we want EU passports as well I guess.

Are their education choices going to be a help or a hindrance? God knows. They are keeping their languages up, for fun, but also that language brain thing that it’s easier learning further languages if you are already bi-lingual (plus they will get a language test for passport)

They are going to have to be resistant adaptable I think, in ways we managed to luckily bumble through. H could train them in computer geek skills, not sure that’s what they want to do but might be an option.

We can’t move house as we want to until they are established, where we are isn’t too bad for career jobs and connections.

It almost feels like we need to create a career job for them which is clearly ridiculous, but that’s how it feels.

Optimistically in a depressing way especially after this week the world has many problems to sort out in the coming years. We are going to need ideas, engineering, solutions, adaptions, different goals. There is always much to do.

EasternStandard · 28/06/2026 09:34

Housebashing · 28/06/2026 09:33

If you say so

Have you set up a business? Why would anyone be ‘playing’ at it.

Imdunfer · 28/06/2026 09:35

Housebashing · 28/06/2026 09:30

The UK for the last 15 years under a conservative government has been encouraging nonsense like this and actually it’s not good for the UK at all. It’s people playing at running businesses playing employing people the moment actually they need to work out a viable business plan. they cant.
Right back to the days of Henry Ford the planning included the factory staff being able to afford to buy Ford cars if you can’t do that you literally don’t have a business and there’s been far too many people playing shop
Being subsidised, not fairly contributing and now the game is up

He hasn't had one penny of subsidy. None of his UK employees have ever been on salaries so low they need benefits. He and his staff and his company have paid millions in tax over the years. He hasn't been playing at anything, he's worked his arse off and taken huge personal financial risk to build a very successful business from scratch.

He's the kind of high value job creator the country is desperate for more of, but left leaning profit haters are too blind to see it.

MikeRafone · 28/06/2026 09:35

EasternStandard · 28/06/2026 09:34

Have you set up a business? Why would anyone be ‘playing’ at it.

the posts written would indicate that is indeed the case

UnexpectedlyRetired · 28/06/2026 09:35

Brokedownpalace · 27/06/2026 22:35

I agree, I am unemployed for the first time in my working life (20 years or so) I have applied for well over 150 jobs in the last few months and have only managed to get 3 interviews.

It really does seem to apply at all levels - Saturday jobs for teens, school leavers, graduates, experienced staff who haven't yet reached the age for ageism, older people, and in casual jobs, professional jobs... In the last few years, some of my experienced friends have had lengthy periods (1-2 years) with no job at all. My DD had a 2-year graduate job contract, and after that ended she spent well over 2 years out of work, applying for both professional and casual jobs, before getting a zero hours waitressing contract.

There are a few on here saying their children and all their friends had no trouble, but they are the lucky ones.

On holiday in Italy last year, we went to a very small supermarket. There were about 6 tills, and every one had a person on it. There was also a man weighing fruit and veg for customers. When I go to my large supermarket in the UK, there may be nobody at all on the tills, a single person supervising the automated checkouts, and one or two other staff wandering around. Plus a security guard who occasionally gets attacked or verbally abused by customers. How come they can pay people to serve customers in Italy while we are shopping in a dystopian nightmare?

EasternStandard · 28/06/2026 09:36

MikeRafone · 28/06/2026 09:35

the posts written would indicate that is indeed the case

Edited

What is the case and why?

CarbonArtist · 28/06/2026 09:36

dizzydizzydizzy · 28/06/2026 06:45

A lot of them are fleeing war or persecution Eg Sudan, Afghanistan, Iran, Eritrea. They’re here to avoid death. It’s part of our duty as a decent international citizen to protect these people.

Of course some people are coming for economic reasons. They’re the ones who should be sent
home.

A larger population can create more jobs in time. (So not instantly). More people spending = more revenue = more job creation

I’m not talking about asylum seekers. Asylum seekers only account for 5-10% of immigration to the UK. Vastly more come on work visas.

Last year 183,000 people immigrated to the UK legally on work visas granted by the British state. They brought 83,000 dependents with them, again with the full permission of the authorities.

Why are the Government importing so many new workers when British people can’t get jobs, and when the prospect of mass AI-related redundancies is on the horizon?

frozendaisy · 28/06/2026 09:37

MikeRafone · 28/06/2026 09:26

how did he fund the training?

Well his mum paid obviously
You have to invest a bit in your children sometimes

Housebashing · 28/06/2026 09:37

EasternStandard · 28/06/2026 09:34

Have you set up a business? Why would anyone be ‘playing’ at it.

I’ve set up several businesses that are actively active today.
Hundreds of businesses locally that are fighting for their lives every day. My daughter was working for one literally didn’t take money in the till to pay people.
One of the most active posters in my network on Linkedin at the moment is the Debt Collector guy who is driving the country trying to get people to pay for service services that they have engaged but could never afford
I’ve been a victim of it myself with some twat playing running a business incurring 25 g worth of fees from myself owing HMRC 950 grand and they’ve just gone bust surprisingly
But it’s not surprising at all they never had a business to begin with.
It’s been smoke and mirrors

Imdunfer · 28/06/2026 09:39

Housebashing · 28/06/2026 09:32

Precisely I presume that this captain of industry is married to the poster she doth protest too much
He is not a good person. I could do exactly the same and outsource to South Africa or getting some AI bots. I’m making an active decision not to and I’m still profitable and people are choosing to use me rather than my competitors for precisely that reason, they’ve got children of their own.

I am not in any kind of a relationship with him, what a bizarre assumption to make.

OneUniqueSquid · 28/06/2026 09:40

Imdunfer · 28/06/2026 09:31

I never said that at all.

Working from home full time proves your job can be done overseas.

There is simply no logic to suggesting that working in an office proves your job can't be done overseas.

You said this and I quote:

"On another forum after COVID I got slaughtered for pointing out that if people insisted on WFH they just prove that their jobs can be done by the cheapest person anywhere in the world"

And so people pointed out no it doesn't. And also pointed out that if WFH proves their job can be done by the cheapest person anywhere in the world, then you must think not working from home and working from an office proves otherwise?

Then you went on to argue that small companies wouldn't have dreamed of outsourcing labour to other countries (where it's cheaper) before WFH became popular and that people 'refusing to return to the office' meant that they had to.

You seem very confused about what you said.

Differentforgirls · 28/06/2026 09:40

MintSnail · 28/06/2026 07:03

If we are going to have exceptionally high taxes on people please can we invest that money in education and apprenticeships Vs benefits, and remove the extra national insurance cost from employers. Why does a 16 yo living at home need the same min wage as a 25 or 30 yo... Removing these barriers would increase the number of jobs for young people. I miss going to the pub / out for dinner but I can't afford it any more.

Because not every 16 year old lives at home.

Housebashing · 28/06/2026 09:41

OneUniqueSquid · 28/06/2026 09:40

You said this and I quote:

"On another forum after COVID I got slaughtered for pointing out that if people insisted on WFH they just prove that their jobs can be done by the cheapest person anywhere in the world"

And so people pointed out no it doesn't. And also pointed out that if WFH proves their job can be done by the cheapest person anywhere in the world, then you must think not working from home and working from an office proves otherwise?

Then you went on to argue that small companies wouldn't have dreamed of outsourcing labour to other countries (where it's cheaper) before WFH became popular and that people 'refusing to return to the office' meant that they had to.

You seem very confused about what you said.

very confused

Imdunfer · 28/06/2026 09:43

And also pointed out that if WFH proves their job can be done by the cheapest person anywhere in the world, then you must think not working from home and working from an office proves otherwise?

You critical reasoning skills are failing you there I'm afraid.

EasternStandard · 28/06/2026 09:44

CarbonArtist · 28/06/2026 09:36

I’m not talking about asylum seekers. Asylum seekers only account for 5-10% of immigration to the UK. Vastly more come on work visas.

Last year 183,000 people immigrated to the UK legally on work visas granted by the British state. They brought 83,000 dependents with them, again with the full permission of the authorities.

Why are the Government importing so many new workers when British people can’t get jobs, and when the prospect of mass AI-related redundancies is on the horizon?

We should be using NEETs and young people over this. It’s probably because it’s easier to use work ready people with visas but we can’t have so many YP not in work.

Imdunfer · 28/06/2026 09:45

CarbonArtist · 28/06/2026 09:36

I’m not talking about asylum seekers. Asylum seekers only account for 5-10% of immigration to the UK. Vastly more come on work visas.

Last year 183,000 people immigrated to the UK legally on work visas granted by the British state. They brought 83,000 dependents with them, again with the full permission of the authorities.

Why are the Government importing so many new workers when British people can’t get jobs, and when the prospect of mass AI-related redundancies is on the horizon?

This is a really good question!

UnexpectedlyRetired · 28/06/2026 09:45

Housebashing · 28/06/2026 08:48

You literally need to fight against it. There are people out there that are taking jobs educating the AI to take more of our young people’s jobs. We need to stand up against that use the checkout with a person on it even if it’s inconvenient for a few minutes.
Hang up if AI calls you to discuss your bill if we all do it they won’t implement it and they won’t fuck your young people over
But it is the only way
AI is rubbish. It makes mistakes critical mistakes so currently it should not be replacing any of us if it is that’s worrying.
But we’ve got no incentive to train the damn thing

I got a job alert from LinkedIn recently, which went like this

Role: Translator (Remote)
Job Type: Part-Time Contract
Location: Remote (Work From Home)
Compensation: Up to $20 USD/hr, paid weekly

About the Role
We are looking for fluent language professionals to help train and evaluate AI language models. This is a flexible, part-time contract role you can do entirely from home, on your own schedule. If you work with language professionally - as a writer, teacher, translator, tutor, linguist, or language specialist - this role is a strong fit.

What You'll Do
Read and evaluate AI-generated text for quality, accuracy, and fluency
Write short prompts and creative responses to help train AI systems
Rank and compare AI outputs based on clear evaluation criteria
Provide written feedback on language quality

What We're Looking For
Fluency in your language and English
Bachelor's degree or higher, preferably in a humanities, language, or writing-related field
Professional experience working with language - writing, teaching, translating, editing, annotating, or related fields
Strong attention to detail and ability to follow evaluation guidelines
Background in linguistics, academic writing, data annotation, or AI content evaluation is a plus
What You Get
Up to $20 USD/hr, paid weekly
Fully remote - work from anywhere
Flexible hours - you set your own schedule
Part-time contract - ideal as a primary or supplemental income source

So basically, they are advertising a graduate job, for someone with professional experience, for which they pay around £15 an hour (my daughter earns more waitressing). This job has the express intention of replicating and stealing your hard-earned skillset, with the goal of rendering you obsolete. Nice. Unfortunately I couldn't see any way of contacting them to say Fuck Right Off.

pragmatismuniversalsentimentalist · 28/06/2026 09:45

Peoples experiences of this issue are always going to vary hugely, becahse obviously, there are still jobs. But there are fewer of them.
So chances are, if you live in an urban area with lots of opportunities and your teen is super personable, polite, tidily presented, flexible and motivated, they can probably still get a job, and you'll think oh there's no issue!

When there are job shortages, its going to be the people living in quieter areas and the less employable teens who miss out - the ones who frankly struggle with talking to adults, struggle getting up in the morning, perhaps don't present themselves well. Once upon a time supermarkets were full of grumpy teens on a Saturday because they needed staff so they'd hire anyone, now they dont need as many, so can be a bit choosier who they give the jobs to.

In smaller towns high streets have lost loads of smaller shops that once provided part time employment for young people.

There isnt really a solution, other than keeping the minimum wage for 16 year olds low to make them a more attractive proposition to employers.

sweatymessi · 28/06/2026 09:45

@Imdunferyou need to reread your posts…

Housebashing · 28/06/2026 09:46

UnexpectedlyRetired · 28/06/2026 09:45

I got a job alert from LinkedIn recently, which went like this

Role: Translator (Remote)
Job Type: Part-Time Contract
Location: Remote (Work From Home)
Compensation: Up to $20 USD/hr, paid weekly

About the Role
We are looking for fluent language professionals to help train and evaluate AI language models. This is a flexible, part-time contract role you can do entirely from home, on your own schedule. If you work with language professionally - as a writer, teacher, translator, tutor, linguist, or language specialist - this role is a strong fit.

What You'll Do
Read and evaluate AI-generated text for quality, accuracy, and fluency
Write short prompts and creative responses to help train AI systems
Rank and compare AI outputs based on clear evaluation criteria
Provide written feedback on language quality

What We're Looking For
Fluency in your language and English
Bachelor's degree or higher, preferably in a humanities, language, or writing-related field
Professional experience working with language - writing, teaching, translating, editing, annotating, or related fields
Strong attention to detail and ability to follow evaluation guidelines
Background in linguistics, academic writing, data annotation, or AI content evaluation is a plus
What You Get
Up to $20 USD/hr, paid weekly
Fully remote - work from anywhere
Flexible hours - you set your own schedule
Part-time contract - ideal as a primary or supplemental income source

So basically, they are advertising a graduate job, for someone with professional experience, for which they pay around £15 an hour (my daughter earns more waitressing). This job has the express intention of replicating and stealing your hard-earned skillset, with the goal of rendering you obsolete. Nice. Unfortunately I couldn't see any way of contacting them to say Fuck Right Off.

Thank goodness you had the intelligence to see through it. I’ve seen people on this site suggesting that our young people train these bots.

UnexpectedlyRetired · 28/06/2026 09:49

Housebashing · 28/06/2026 09:46

Thank goodness you had the intelligence to see through it. I’ve seen people on this site suggesting that our young people train these bots.

Sadly though, many of them need a job, any job. Luckily for me and my sanity, I don't!

1975wasthebest · 28/06/2026 09:50

UnexpectedlyRetired · 28/06/2026 09:35

It really does seem to apply at all levels - Saturday jobs for teens, school leavers, graduates, experienced staff who haven't yet reached the age for ageism, older people, and in casual jobs, professional jobs... In the last few years, some of my experienced friends have had lengthy periods (1-2 years) with no job at all. My DD had a 2-year graduate job contract, and after that ended she spent well over 2 years out of work, applying for both professional and casual jobs, before getting a zero hours waitressing contract.

There are a few on here saying their children and all their friends had no trouble, but they are the lucky ones.

On holiday in Italy last year, we went to a very small supermarket. There were about 6 tills, and every one had a person on it. There was also a man weighing fruit and veg for customers. When I go to my large supermarket in the UK, there may be nobody at all on the tills, a single person supervising the automated checkouts, and one or two other staff wandering around. Plus a security guard who occasionally gets attacked or verbally abused by customers. How come they can pay people to serve customers in Italy while we are shopping in a dystopian nightmare?

The owner of that small supermarket won’t have the money to pay for self checkouts and a gate that means you have to scan your receipt before they let you out. If they did have the money you can bet your last penny they would make the experience as automated as they can, because eventually profits would rise with less humans to pay.

Torchout · 28/06/2026 09:51

The town i live in has seasonal jobs at low level, minimum wage and similar at a much lower level out of season. There are jobs in the next town in each direction. One, again, is mainly seasonal but a few office jobs and driving. The other direct has more office jobs but again mainly minimum wage. Neither is particularly easy to get to by public transport outside mainly. Working hours, for instance in one town the latest you can work to is 5.30pm and my son got rejected for a job because they wanted someone who could work on shift up to 7pm (not advertised)

Then you get self checkouts in shops, AI taking office jobs.

Something needs to be done as we'll have so few people working, so many claiming benefits that something bad will happen ver suddenly.

Housebashing · 28/06/2026 09:52

1975wasthebest · 28/06/2026 09:50

The owner of that small supermarket won’t have the money to pay for self checkouts and a gate that means you have to scan your receipt before they let you out. If they did have the money you can bet your last penny they would make the experience as automated as they can, because eventually profits would rise with less humans to pay.

Well, we keep going round and round in circles. If you don’t pay human beings, they can’t buy what you’re selling so they’ll just steal it.
And nobody will make any profit on anything

Swipe left for the next trending thread