Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to question Snag Tights using very plus-size models?

200 replies

DallazMajor · 24/06/2026 17:32

Snag Tights have women who are morbidly obese modelling their products.

AIBU to think that this isn’t ok?

OP posts:
pointythings · 24/06/2026 20:15

Tights aren't just tights. When you're tall and plus size, tights like Snags are a godsend. I wear them and it feels as if they aren't there. I don't have to stretch them to their limit to get them to be long enough for my legs and then sit properly at my waist as well. Standard tights don't offer that. And their larger sizes only come in black, brown, grey and if you're very lucky, navy.

Why shouldn't bigger women have a choice of colours and patterns in tights that actually fit and are comfortable to wear? Showing bigger women isn't telling the world 'go on, be fat, it's great!' Nobody is that stupid. But we exist and we are allowed clothes. We do not deserve to be punished with boring drab clothes for the sin of being fat.

PinkyFlamingo · 24/06/2026 20:16

BlueFahrenheit · 24/06/2026 20:13

I didn't know such a brand existed.

Having landed on the front page and looking at the tights, this brand is a definite no from me.

Well aren't you lucky not to need plus sized tights then. I'm in Tunisia just now and their chub rubs are a godsend under my dresses.

Heartbroken38 · 24/06/2026 20:16

I don't think it even matters. Very few people find morbid obesity something to aspire to whether we have plus size models or not

AbsoluteHoot · 24/06/2026 20:18

Isn’t a big part of their market ‘chub rub’? It makes perfect sense then, that they use fat models.

Iloveeverycat · 24/06/2026 20:18

SilenceInside · 24/06/2026 17:35

They make sizes that go up to size 28 to 36 so you would expect that those are modelled by women of that size. They tend to have a range of models of various sizes.

Why would it not be ok?

This. I don't see the point of skinny models advertising plus size clothes.

ChaToilLeam · 24/06/2026 20:20

Used to love Snag for their great range of sizes, patterns and colours. And it is helpful to see how the tights look on a body your own size.

Went off them with their increasing pornification and hectoring tone towards anyone who disagreed.

MabelAnderson · 24/06/2026 20:23

FrenchBunionSoup · 24/06/2026 18:24

Well Snag did a whole thing where they sold patches that said "choke me", and when a number of women (including victims of DV) said that this was inappropriate, Snag labelled them kink-shaming bullies.

I did buy some snag tights years ago, I was a size 10-12 and not bothered by the larger models but I am definitely bothered by the promotion of choking, the pornified images and the fetishising of fatness as well as their insistence that men can be women. I will never buy from them again. The tights weren’t even nice, tight waist elastic and dingy colours.

PinkTonic · 24/06/2026 20:34

MabelAnderson · 24/06/2026 20:23

I did buy some snag tights years ago, I was a size 10-12 and not bothered by the larger models but I am definitely bothered by the promotion of choking, the pornified images and the fetishising of fatness as well as their insistence that men can be women. I will never buy from them again. The tights weren’t even nice, tight waist elastic and dingy colours.

Same.

Their usp was the sizing for different body types. Fair enough, that is a good idea as typical tight sizing doesn’t differentiate between a short fat person and a tall thin person. You can read all that on the size page though. And with that usp there was no need to stray into fetish.

RamesesCollosus · 24/06/2026 20:35

likelysuspect · 24/06/2026 19:21

I thought there were rules about not using models with an unhealthy low weight, so a particular BMI

I dont know why it doesnt apply at the other end.

Probably because they don’t want to encourage people to see the images of somebody very underweight as “thinspiration”.
IMO, overweight models are different because it’s a very uncommon thing to look at somebody bigger than yourself and think “I really want to be that big”. It might encourage them to think “Actually I’m fine as I am and don’t need to lose weight” but it’s still very much not a desirable thing to be morbidly obese. So the two things are not comparable really.
Plus the health dangers of eating disorders like anorexia nervosa can become life threatening in a really, really short timeframe. It’s not on a parallel with obesity.

Bellic · 24/06/2026 20:47

If they’re purely for obese people doesn’t it make sense that they use obese people in the advertising? If they’re not purely for obese people using overtly overweight people is usually just cheap virtue signalling and a big no from me.

I was trying to help my partner find some swimming trunks a month or so ago and came across an advert for a full range of sizes but the picture has a very overweight model. It’s was extremely unappealing and a straight no from me.

Bellic · 24/06/2026 20:49

Just found their website. It clearly a straight no from anyone who isn’t a porn sick overweight trans identifying man.

BringBackCatsEyes · 24/06/2026 20:58

Heartbroken38 · 24/06/2026 20:16

I don't think it even matters. Very few people find morbid obesity something to aspire to whether we have plus size models or not

Some of the poses are semi porn, or at least clearly made to look overtly sexy. I’m sure people are getting off on the morbidly obese woman bending over in her thong. You don’t need to be in that position to model the clothes.

Shizzlestix · 24/06/2026 21:10

likelysuspect · 24/06/2026 19:21

I thought there were rules about not using models with an unhealthy low weight, so a particular BMI

I dont know why it doesnt apply at the other end.

Tell that to M&S!

BabblingBiddy · 24/06/2026 21:14

Bellic · 24/06/2026 20:49

Just found their website. It clearly a straight no from anyone who isn’t a porn sick overweight trans identifying man.

I must see a different Snag to you. I saw 2 men advertising the pride tights. And other than 1 picture on the home page, nothing even remotely pornographic until I looked at the "sexy tights"

MyGhastIsFlabbered · 24/06/2026 21:14

Bellic · 24/06/2026 20:49

Just found their website. It clearly a straight no from anyone who isn’t a porn sick overweight trans identifying man.

I love Snag and though I am overweight I am not porn addicted, nor trans nor a man.

Thawtfulpanda · 24/06/2026 21:17

I thought snag was ok until the choking women thing and since then I've avoided like the plague

Allmarbleslost · 24/06/2026 21:19

What exactly is the point of your post? Do you not think fat people should wear tights?

NeverDropYourMooncup · 24/06/2026 21:21

likelysuspect · 24/06/2026 20:03

The ban on using small/underwweight models was not about it being more convienent to find small clothes!!

It was because it was acknowledged that those underweight models are not healthy and not a good role model for people looking at them.

The same applies to those overweight models. They're not healthy and not a good role model for those looking at them.

Those models weren't used to sell tights (historically, many tights models have been tall men because their legs were longer and slimmer).

They're not selling a dream of being clad in internationally renowned multibillionaire clothing, bags and living a jet setting lifestyle, they're flogging tights. And tights need to fit - with increased weight, body proportions vary significantly, particularly in women. They're not wanting to encourage people to look like them, they're wanting people who do look like them - older, taller, shorter, larger, smaller, disabled, whatever - to see the tights and think 'oh, they look like they'll fit me, I'll pay the significantly higher cost per pair compared to something from the supermarket that might fit but probably won't and take a chance'.

HaveYouFedTheFish · 24/06/2026 21:22

PurpleCoo · 24/06/2026 17:49

They cater to plus size, so of course it makes sense to have plus size models. That being said, it doesn't seem very balanced and most of the models are in the much larger sizes.

I love snag tights but haven't really seen models in a/b/c sizes. I am a size 10 hourglass with large boobs but a small waist and bravissimo don't really do clothes any more. I'd wondered if snag clothes might meet my needs as it can be a struggle to get swimming costumes or certain styles of clothes that are flattering and have room for larger breasts without flapping like a tent on the waist. Snag don't seem to show many models in 'regular' sizes though, only plus sizes. I think they should show both.

The brands Freya and Panash both do swimwear in large cup and small back size combinations.

SideboobToYouToo · 24/06/2026 21:25

daughterfromhell · 24/06/2026 19:37

Depends if you’re a transphobe or not.

Mot liking the promotion of choking during sex doesn't make anyone a phobe of any sort.

Jamesblonde2 · 24/06/2026 21:26

Agree OP. I wouldn’t expect any fashion house to use size 26 models even if their clothes went up to that size.

Like any advert, surely you use it on who will look best in the item, then beyond that surely we all have a good enough imagination.

InQuiresandplaceswheretheysing · 24/06/2026 21:44

hugasaurus · 24/06/2026 17:37

I don’t think unhealthy extremes at either end of the scale should be used for advertising.

Exactly this. And I won’t buy from them for this reason.

SusanChurchouse · 24/06/2026 21:45

FrenchBunionSoup · 24/06/2026 18:24

Well Snag did a whole thing where they sold patches that said "choke me", and when a number of women (including victims of DV) said that this was inappropriate, Snag labelled them kink-shaming bullies.

Ugh, I didn’t know this.

I don’t find their products particularly good. I get better fitting tights on the high street and honestly think a lot of the design ones look daft. They’re also expensive, and delivery and return fees are high. The ‘customer photos’ seem to be overly sexualised compared to other brands like Bravissimo who use customer photos and influencers of different body types. I had to hide them from my social media feed as I found the fetish adjacent content a bit nauseating. I have no issue with men, transgender people or obese people modelling their clothes. In fact, that’s probably the least offensive thing about them.

labamba007 · 24/06/2026 22:28

I personally think fat people should only have the option of wearing a giant bin bag.

signed,

a fat person

DallazMajor · 24/06/2026 22:32

Obesity shouldn’t be celebrated. It’s a dangerous medical condition.

I didn’t realise snag was a plus size site but irrespective we shouldn’t encourage this kind of “body positivity” it’s wrong.

Being unhealthy isn’t a vibe. I’m not fat shaming I’m not skinny myself but some of their models are clearly on a shortcut to a hospital bed.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread