Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Burnham has won. More turmoil?

715 replies

KatiePricesKnickers · Yesterday 05:51

Now Burnham has won, it will trigger a leadership contest, and if he wins, a new chancellor of the exchequer.

Surely this cannot be good for the country, or its finances?

YABU - Burnham is a true leader who will improve the UK for everyone and be a competent and respected leader.

YANBU - FFS, here we go again.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
BIossomtoes · Yesterday 08:11

LuckyHazelFox · Yesterday 08:06

I agree. For those who promote the need for critical thinking skills, they certainly don't lead by example. This wasn't a necessary win for Reform. Labour, on the other hand and their sending voters to hassle other voters - no surprises there. One big circus.

Why did Farage say it was existential then? Turnout was 20% higher than for the local elections.

Dragonflyy · Yesterday 08:12

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 08:05

Or perhaps people who stayed at home in the local elections saw what happened and went to the polling station yesterday. Voting patterns are different in local elections.

Perhaps. I'm not sure what you're saying changes the facts though that people who voted for Reform a few weeks ago have just leant Burnham their vote so he can remove KS. This by-election was a vote to remove Keir Starmer. Of course turnout would be high.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 08:12

Lugol · Yesterday 07:56

If you're cool with taxing education then shame on you.

People paying for private education for their children were also paying for the state schools but not occupying those places so state school kids benefitted.

Now those private schools are closing the kids enter the state system and everything is worse and overcrowded.

What exactly is great about that?

Nothing. It was always a terrible policy and it hasn’t worked for Starmer.

DandelionFarmer · Yesterday 08:14

ForGreenHiker · Yesterday 07:22

That isn’t sexism. Or racism.

Why not? Its the vety definition of it. Judging someone by the colour of their skin and their sex.

ClarkeandNewman · Yesterday 08:14

Twiglets1 · Yesterday 07:31

Agree Streeting did a decent job as health secretary and would bring a more centrist approach to Labour.

He could do for Labour what Kemi is doing for Conservatives - appeal to a broader base. Think it will be Burnham for PM though as Labour still seem to think they should go more left wing despite evidence to the contrary.

Remind us how many votes the Tories got in Makerfield? Or how well they did in the May elections?

Reform has replaced the Tories because there is always a rump of around a third of voters (who bother to turn out) who will vote for the right, often against their own interests. Badenoch has turned an ailing Tory party into a defunct one.

KaleQueen · Yesterday 08:15

TinaBeliever · Yesterday 06:07

Hang on, I thought a reform were going to wipe the floor with labour?

I demand a recount!

😂

It’s a fix!

AInightingale · Yesterday 08:16

Isn't this what we went through with May/Johnson? A PM who lacked charisma and the common touch being elbowed aside for someone with populist appeal, a hugely popular mayor. Personally ambitious and hailed as some kind of messiah who will 'deliver' for the party and the country. Well, six years on, Johnson's party is in ruins and it may end similarly for Labour.

PistachioTiramisu · Yesterday 08:16

Another upcoming lurch to the Left then? Not good news.

On the other hand, congratulations to the Conservatives for taking Aberdeen South from the SNP - onwards and upwards!

kerstina · Yesterday 08:16

I love Andy Burnham but I agree a leadership contest is not what we need . We need boring , stable and effective leadership. I wish the government could be more loyal to each other and cohesive for the good of the country than what we have seen lately. You know actually work together and I wish there was more cross party working together on big issues too. I do blame the media for a lot of Keirs unpopularity.

ThingsAreNotWhatTheyWere · Yesterday 08:17

I'm relieved too. Although it will inevitably result in a leadership contest at some point, this is "the lesser of two evils", I think.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 08:17

ClarkeandNewman · Yesterday 08:14

Remind us how many votes the Tories got in Makerfield? Or how well they did in the May elections?

Reform has replaced the Tories because there is always a rump of around a third of voters (who bother to turn out) who will vote for the right, often against their own interests. Badenoch has turned an ailing Tory party into a defunct one.

They won in the other by-election and Kemi is leading in her ratings above the men. Labour are actually losing their leader so they can focus on that for a while.

FinchiePink · Yesterday 08:17

MeetMeOnTheCorner · Yesterday 08:08

He wants Starmer for fall on his sword @FinchiePink. It’s just appalling however you look at it! Burnham has won a by election and now is the king of Westminster elect. He talks about change, but so did Starmer. They all just talk, talk, talk. He mentions hope! He cannot deliver that! He’s just dishonest about what he can do. The national issues are way above what he’s encountered before. These idiots are just swimming in word soup.

I know I've been quite circumspect above but what I do think is that it's very unlikely that Starmer will fall on his sword! He has no good reason to, at present. At least that we know of.

For what it's worth, I agree that no politician - of any colour or stripe - is going to be able to fix the issues we have currently. Unfortunately we're in a period of contraction globally. As a race we've overextended ourselves and over consumed our resources and as a species we've been living the relative high life for a few decades. Now it's coming to an end and people are going to be unhappy and struggle as things revert to normal. Short of a major technological advancement happening imminently (like mastering nuclear fusion at scale which means very cheap clean energy for all) then we are all going to have to get used to our quality of life getting worse. There is no politician in the world who can fix that.

Nottodaty · Yesterday 08:17

Things do need to change, I just don’t think changing one talker for another talker.

Nothing seems to be landing with any party and people creating a frenzy, mis information being used for their own narrative.

Unsettling, and worrying. We don’t have the money to keep paying out, we want to look after the most vulnerable but they right now are at risk. We need to ensure we supporting our young people with opportunities or we will loose them. We need to deal fast with the people arriving at our shores - support where needed and if not ticket back home swiftly.

CaveMum · Yesterday 08:18

If the rumours that Andy will install Ed M as Chancellor are true, we’re all screwed!

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 08:18

Dragonflyy · Yesterday 08:12

Perhaps. I'm not sure what you're saying changes the facts though that people who voted for Reform a few weeks ago have just leant Burnham their vote so he can remove KS. This by-election was a vote to remove Keir Starmer. Of course turnout would be high.

Edited

It’s not “facts”. Turnout was 20% higher. That alone would explain the result. You’ll be telling me there are fairies at the bottom of your garden next.

MulberryBrandy · Yesterday 08:18

AInightingale · Yesterday 08:16

Isn't this what we went through with May/Johnson? A PM who lacked charisma and the common touch being elbowed aside for someone with populist appeal, a hugely popular mayor. Personally ambitious and hailed as some kind of messiah who will 'deliver' for the party and the country. Well, six years on, Johnson's party is in ruins and it may end similarly for Labour.

An interesting comparison, I always thought May was treated shabbily as well.

ClarkeandNewman · Yesterday 08:21

APageInYourDiary · Yesterday 07:36

Do you think it’s only the “rich” who have difficult and stressful jobs? How ridiculous. I work long hours in a difficult and stressful job but I’m not rich - dh earns significantly more than me but doesn’t work the hours I do. The utter bullshit that the more you earn the harder you work is such a fallacy. Tedious and ignorant 🙄

People who see the "rich" as some kind barrow boy made good, pull yourself up by your own bootstraps class are both well out of date and frankly, lickspittles. The rich now is the rentier class, living it up on passive income from property speculation and the like. As if they don't look down on the salaried, including the ones who think they're better than the minimum wage earners.

the80sweregreat · Yesterday 08:21

I fear Ed Milliband more than the idea of Andy Burnham to be honest. I saw an interview with him and he sounds almost deranged. He is another one with a huge ego and look what he did to his own brother.
Id rather a General election than have him in charge and I can’t imagine that Rachel Reeves will keep her job if we get a new PM.

Speakeasier · Yesterday 08:22

CoffeeAndACroissant · Yesterday 05:59

It's because of things like Instagram, everyone wants instant wins. There were 14 years of Tory austerity and yet for some reason people thought Labour could magically fix everything in six months and then were shocked when that didn't happen.

I'm genuinely embarrassed to be British.

I know it’s cringe.

It started almost immediately Labour won the election. They were constantly blamed for things they couldn’t possibly be responsible for after 14 years of Tory Government.

And yet people blamed them for poor public services, immigration, failing economy etc etc from day one. It’s like people are unable to exercise any critical thinking whatsoever.

MulberryBrandy · Yesterday 08:22

There was a real trend towards tactical voting to keep out Reform. Look at Lib Dems, Greens - maybe even Conservative vote?

MikeRafone · Yesterday 08:23

Lugol · Yesterday 07:00

Quite why anyone even believes that the Government are running things anyway baffles me.

They are owned and run by the banks who run and own us.
They don't stop the energy companies from fucking us over, don't protect us from any of the onslaught of men pouring into our country to rinse it and have fucked over the youth by making them unemployable.

They have fucked small business by making it so ridiculously expensive to employ people so businesses are being forced to shed staff to keep going.

They spin everyone into a frenzy dividing us all while screwing us over removing our freedoms yet are toothless when girls are raped and men are stabbed.

This country is bankrupt and so is the rest of Europe.
If people think Andy Burnham is the answer when all this is, is another fucking male popularity contest and more smoke and mirrors to distract everyone while they push through digital ID.

In France when electricity and gas became cheaper they immediately passed the savings onto the population, reducing energy costs in the evenings by 60% and when the fuel prices came down last week they insisted the savings were immediately passed onto the population so they could pay less.

In the UK we are paying so much more and getting so much less.

People here are far too concerned with Palestine etc and not concerned enough with making the Government sort this country out.
Anyone who does is labelled as far right to shut them down.

We should ALL be taking to the streets to protest the state of this place but unless people can virtue signal about a country on the other side of the world they aren't interested.

We are all being played.

Andy Burnham won't change shit. This country is bankrupt.

So if it’s the banks running everything, why are you then blaming Labour 🤷‍♀️

EasternStandard · Yesterday 08:23

Speakeasier · Yesterday 08:22

I know it’s cringe.

It started almost immediately Labour won the election. They were constantly blamed for things they couldn’t possibly be responsible for after 14 years of Tory Government.

And yet people blamed them for poor public services, immigration, failing economy etc etc from day one. It’s like people are unable to exercise any critical thinking whatsoever.

Starmer is too disliked. Maybe you’ll have more of a chance with Burnham.

Endgames · Yesterday 08:23

Reform still got 42 percent though - no evidence the shine is coming off, AB’s speech was dead on, it’s much more like voters in that region (I work mostly there) are giving labour one last chance to implement some policies most people think are good ideas.

cardibach · Yesterday 08:24

Dragonscaledaisy · Yesterday 06:03

That expectation was set by Labour themselves. Unless you voted Labour in the last election, you have no need to be embarrassed. The current shambles is entirely of Starmer's own making and sums up his entire short premiership with the party lurching from one psychodrama to the next, creating ongoing instability.

Quote the opposite. Starmer was very clear there would be a difficult 2 year period before any improvement.

Whatafustercluck · Yesterday 08:25

I quite like Andy Burnham but I agree the last thing the UK needs right now is more instability. It was good to see Reform get a trouncing though.

Swipe left for the next trending thread