Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Burnham has won. More turmoil?

742 replies

KatiePricesKnickers · Yesterday 05:51

Now Burnham has won, it will trigger a leadership contest, and if he wins, a new chancellor of the exchequer.

Surely this cannot be good for the country, or its finances?

YABU - Burnham is a true leader who will improve the UK for everyone and be a competent and respected leader.

YANBU - FFS, here we go again.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Happyjoe · Yesterday 11:05

AllJoyAndNoFun · Yesterday 10:52

Right- but there were 2 big inflection points in the national debt - sharp increase immediately after GFC until 2010, when Labour were still in power and had been for the previous decade (increase slowed after 2010) and covid - I mean they could have just let it rip or not paid anyone furlough but I dont think Labour would have done that either.

While covid was a factor but it wasn't it all, not by a long shot. And do you think Labour would've done a fast lane for their rich tory friends (and only their rich tory friends, no other parties allowed!) to supply useless PPE at inflated prices, wasting quite a few millions of our money?

Labour have created debt but the difference for me is that they mainly borrowed and spent it on making things work. Tories have borrowed higher and yet broken it all, except for lining the pockets of their friends etc.

This makes interesting reading for those who wish to know.
https://www.bestforbritain.org/scandalous_spending_tracker

Ah, for some reason MN is breaking the link, can't get it to work.

anotherside · Yesterday 11:06

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · Yesterday 10:59

Yes it's Reform, who have never been in powers fault, not Labour who have been in with a massive landslide for 2 years. Definitely Reform.

Well Farage was a massive instigator of Brexit. So yes he takes more responsibility than most for the current state of the UK, the billions hit to the economy stretching far into future. Very conservatives estimates put the cost to UK’s economic output at minus £100 billion a year. Imagine if this guy actually led a government.

ClarkeandNewman · Yesterday 11:08

AllJoyAndNoFun · Yesterday 10:58

But this could be a case of "win the battle but lose the war". If Burnham now becomes leader and takes Labour further left, as seems likely, then this could give Reform a greater advantage at the next election. One more reform MP at the moment= no real impact. Lose majority at next election = disaster.

All this comes down to Labour being too broad a church. I suspect St Andy will have exactly the same problems as KS in terms of getting anything done because one side of the party will rebel against him.

If Burnham takes Labour to the left, they'll occupy approximately the same position on the political spectrum as the Majority administration.

Speakeasier · Yesterday 11:08

anotherside · Yesterday 11:06

Well Farage was a massive instigator of Brexit. So yes he takes more responsibility than most for the current state of the UK, the billions hit to the economy stretching far into future. Very conservatives estimates put the cost to UK’s economic output at minus £100 billion a year. Imagine if this guy actually led a government.

Absolutely this!

Although people STILL say he should be PM because he appears like someone you could spend time with down the pub 😵

MostlyGhostly · Yesterday 11:09

Just watched the BBC coverage. I feel like a trusted adult has entered the room and is going to sort the squabbling kids and make them share nicely. I do really hope I’m not disappointed but at least I’ve someone to vote for now.

Stardustnush · Yesterday 11:11

KatiePricesKnickers · Yesterday 05:51

Now Burnham has won, it will trigger a leadership contest, and if he wins, a new chancellor of the exchequer.

Surely this cannot be good for the country, or its finances?

YABU - Burnham is a true leader who will improve the UK for everyone and be a competent and respected leader.

YANBU - FFS, here we go again.

Burnham doesn't even care about that constituency. The man is a career politician with a massive ego and a ruinous plan. Teh markets will shift and we'll get even poorer. Thai will go to prove why Labour only get into power every 20 yeas and our kids' kids will pay the toll... Frankly we all deserve better.

Speakeasier · Yesterday 11:13

Happyjoe · Yesterday 10:34

And yet the tories left us with a bigger debt than Labour ever did, together with a messed up, broken country with nothing working and high unemployment and benefits bill. Ah, but yeah, all Labours fault eh?

I know. How can we still be believing that the Tories are the party that champions the economy when they presided over such a decline in this country this century plus the economically disastrous Brexit. Just because it may benefit you short term with e.g. lower taxes, it doesn’t long term with crumbling infrastructure and a crumbling economy.

ByGraptharsHammer · Yesterday 11:14

All this “Telegraph” lite - Burnham to the left stuff. What I’m watching is a man who is very carefully calibrating his message to voters on the elements that Reform have been having a field day with - not race or immigration but the nature of people’s lives and how they are living, how much money they have, what their utilities cost, their children’s aspirations.

He is not stupid. He deals with the racism of Reform by talking about the standard of living and communities.

Also seems to be aware of the standard right wing line about city borrowing and UK bonds. Thats a minority “call in the IMF” view.

KatiePricesKnickers · Yesterday 11:14

MostlyGhostly · Yesterday 11:09

Just watched the BBC coverage. I feel like a trusted adult has entered the room and is going to sort the squabbling kids and make them share nicely. I do really hope I’m not disappointed but at least I’ve someone to vote for now.

According to Starmer, the adults were already in the room.

OP posts:
Stardustnush · Yesterday 11:20

jobnotsure · Yesterday 08:46

They have produced quite a few female politicians who could be prime minister.

Angela Rayner, Shabana Mahmood, Yvette Cooper, Bridget Phillipson, Lisa Nandy just to name a few.

Many people are more interested in policies rather than playing politics and culture wars - which is what people are doing when they focus on the sex of the Labour Party leader rather than the policies.

Edited

Can you really imagine Angela Rayner as PM? Representing this country on an international platform? God help us...

ByGraptharsHammer · Yesterday 11:21

Stardustnush · Yesterday 11:20

Can you really imagine Angela Rayner as PM? Representing this country on an international platform? God help us...

Liz Truss. Do we not mention this nonentity and shudder? This actually happened!

ChubbyPuffling · Yesterday 11:28

Love all the one horse race pontificating.

Andy Burnham already lost a leadership battle against Ed Milliband, and lost another to Jeremy Corbyn.

So what has changed?

We know Wes Streeting will join the race... (not sure grass roots membership are ready for his personal situation). Who else?

incidentally · Yesterday 11:31

Meadowfinch · Yesterday 05:57

Better than Reform winning.

This.

If people hadn't constantly had their knives out for Keir Starmer, this wouldn't have happened. Look in the mirror guys.

As it is, Burnham is the best man for the top job and I hope he manages to turn things round for Labour and the country.

Twiglets1 · Yesterday 11:31

EasternStandard · Yesterday 08:56

Of course he might not do that well. His policies might be weak too and promised change doesn’t happen for him either.

But the same again, Labour really will have to look at themselves rather than blame others if they do lose the GE.

Agree with that.

Dragonscaledaisy · Yesterday 11:32

KatiePricesKnickers · Yesterday 11:14

According to Starmer, the adults were already in the room.

Yes - peddling that line worked well for him didn't it. Much parroted on MN though, unsurprisingly.😂

ClarkeandNewman · Yesterday 11:35

KatiePricesKnickers · Yesterday 11:14

According to Starmer, the adults were already in the room.

He didn't say that in his first speech outside number 10, or afterwards. I'm not a Starmer fan but let's aim for accuracy here.

IsEveryUserNameBloodyTaken · Yesterday 11:36

DreadedInn · Yesterday 06:23

Or I am happy to subsidise others who I believe need it.

The problem is when you subside things it puts the cost up for everything.

ClarkeandNewman · Yesterday 11:36

Stardustnush · Yesterday 11:20

Can you really imagine Angela Rayner as PM? Representing this country on an international platform? God help us...

What's your view on how a teenage single mother from a very working class background (she worked in care) achieved one of the highest ranking positions in UK politics?

Stardustnush · Yesterday 11:37

ClarkeandNewman · Yesterday 09:28

You may use the name you want, of course. But it makes you appear unintelligent and contributes to a process resulting in populism and exactly the kind of division and low standards we see in politics today.

Language matters, as does reflexivity.

Eh? Makes the poster look unintelligent? Populism!?! What on earth are you on about?

Maybe it's worth considering that people like calling Kemi "Kemi" as it's the woman's name? It rolls off the tongue and frankly speaking many women in particular relate to her on a political and human level. I allow my kids to watch some PMQ and political debates, interviews etc and they like "Kemi" above other politicians...

EasternStandard · Yesterday 11:43

Stardustnush · Yesterday 11:37

Eh? Makes the poster look unintelligent? Populism!?! What on earth are you on about?

Maybe it's worth considering that people like calling Kemi "Kemi" as it's the woman's name? It rolls off the tongue and frankly speaking many women in particular relate to her on a political and human level. I allow my kids to watch some PMQ and political debates, interviews etc and they like "Kemi" above other politicians...

Yep. Better than the rewriting of her last name too on some threads. I like her, and it looks like others do too going by her polling. She polls above the others and a smidge away from being the only leader with a positive net rating.

And I still think Labour have a better chance with Burnham not Starmer. If Labour MPs are feeling hopeful today which I’m sure many are then get him in. They’d be mad not to.

Abhannmor · Yesterday 11:45

I won't vote coz I don't live in Britain. But was over last week for a visit. My sis and bil are happy enough with Starmer, they like that he is boring. And they say things are slowly improving. They run a small promotions business so pay attention to stuff like inflation.

Having said that I think the main problem with any change at PM will be the Tory press as per usual. Eden replaced Churchill to widespread indifference. MacMillan usurped Eden , yawn. Douglas Home dislodged MacMillan, whatever. Major pushed Thatcher aside , phew. May , Johnson, Truss , Sunak , wake me up when it's over.
But if it's a Labour guy the case is altered suddenly - he has no mandate ! Immediate election or it's the end of civilization as we know it.
You can just see Chris Mason , Kuennsberg et al ramping up the faux outrage , to say nothing of GBH news....

ByGraptharsHammer · Yesterday 11:52

I would just be happier if both the Labour Party and indeed the Conservatives stopped chasing Reform and their regressive agenda.

Look at who Reform and who they thought would be a good candidate for Makerfield. A foul mouthed man who is happily sexist. That was their choice.

If Labour or the Conservatives cannot beat a party with that sort of low rent and nasty attitude then we are in trouble. All of us.

incidentally · Yesterday 11:53

Stardustnush · Yesterday 11:37

Eh? Makes the poster look unintelligent? Populism!?! What on earth are you on about?

Maybe it's worth considering that people like calling Kemi "Kemi" as it's the woman's name? It rolls off the tongue and frankly speaking many women in particular relate to her on a political and human level. I allow my kids to watch some PMQ and political debates, interviews etc and they like "Kemi" above other politicians...

LOL at women relating to political android Kemi Badenoch on a human level.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 11:56

incidentally · Yesterday 11:53

LOL at women relating to political android Kemi Badenoch on a human level.

Obviously, she gets loads of support if not on mn. Who do you relate to? Starmer?

Flyingintotheunknown · Yesterday 11:58

EasternStandard · Yesterday 11:43

Yep. Better than the rewriting of her last name too on some threads. I like her, and it looks like others do too going by her polling. She polls above the others and a smidge away from being the only leader with a positive net rating.

And I still think Labour have a better chance with Burnham not Starmer. If Labour MPs are feeling hopeful today which I’m sure many are then get him in. They’d be mad not to.

I like Kemi too. She seems so down to earth. The problem is she’s a leader of a party that now has a seriously bad reputation and it’s going to be difficult, if not impossible for her to fix. She would probably be better off starting her own party at this rate. But the more I listen to her take on KS in the PMQs the more I like her.