Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Burnham has won. More turmoil?

724 replies

KatiePricesKnickers · Yesterday 05:51

Now Burnham has won, it will trigger a leadership contest, and if he wins, a new chancellor of the exchequer.

Surely this cannot be good for the country, or its finances?

YABU - Burnham is a true leader who will improve the UK for everyone and be a competent and respected leader.

YANBU - FFS, here we go again.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
june35 · Yesterday 08:42

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 08:37

Farage said this by-election was existential. @ClarkeandNewman’s analysis is correct.

He may have said that but doesn’t mean it’s true in the minds of the voters. Most of what Farage says is dismissed by the left, and yet when he says something that goes their way, all of a sudden what he says is gospel.

Yes, Reform winning would have been humiliating for Labour and shown Reform would probably win the next GE, as it’s such a safe Labour seat.

But in reality, we have another 3ish years of Labour whether we like it or not. Whatever the outcome of this election, we would still have a Labour government, but not necessarily the same PM.

People who wouldn’t have voted for Labour in a GE would have voted for Labour in this just to get rid of Starmer. People who want Starmer to stay would have voted against Labour to stop another change in leadership.

Twiglets1 · Yesterday 08:42

MulberryBrandy · Yesterday 08:39

There are vast numbers of us who could never vote Reform or Restore. We may have wanted to do something tactical but some things are really off limits!

Edited

Agree with this and personally I feel the same about the Green party too.

It's not a requirement to vote and I would rather abstain than vote for a party I consider too extreme.

Bloozie · Yesterday 08:42

We need it like a hole in the head.

But it also needs to happen.

And it isn't Labour's fault. Not Keir Starmer's or Rachel Reeves.

It's the electorate, expecting change overnight and being dumb enough to believe there are easy, fast answers to longstanding, complicated issues. The media, for relentlessly covering Farage's campaign of hate and not giving equal weight to the achievements of the government.

We get the government we deserve. We deserve the turmoil because apparently we're a bunch of reactionary impatient arseholes.

The country needs stability in order to give businesses - internal and external - confidence to invest. But that won't happen under Starmer because no one - NO ONE - is talking Britain and Britain's leadership down more than Britain right now.

We're absolute twats.

ClarkeandNewman · Yesterday 08:42

dottiehens · Yesterday 08:08

Is ideology. Nothing else.

What do you mean by ideology?

Sl0wS3as0n · Yesterday 08:43

Flyingintotheunknown · Yesterday 06:16

lol! With the current state of this country and his “I don’t give a fuck” attitude, then good luck to you 😂

Think we had a far, far bigger “don’t give a fuck” attitude from the Tories and Reform for quite some time.

MNLurker1345 · Yesterday 08:43

“How did he do it?: The BBC’s elections guru John Curtice said there were “two crucial elements” to Burnham’s victory: winning over tactical voters who normally back other parties — he reckoned it’s the worst ever Lib Dem performance in a by-election — and pulling in traditional Labour supporters who wanted to see the back of Keir Starmer. Getting help from the full Labour activist machine can’t have hurt either. The question is whether he can pull the same trick in hundreds of seats at once if he’s the prime minister everyone hates.” Politico London Playbook.

Katemax82 · Yesterday 08:43

I'm secretly glad

JacketPotatoFoodOfTheGods · Yesterday 08:45

Delighted he’s won 🙌🎉

ClarkeandNewman · Yesterday 08:45

PistachioTiramisu · Yesterday 08:16

Another upcoming lurch to the Left then? Not good news.

On the other hand, congratulations to the Conservatives for taking Aberdeen South from the SNP - onwards and upwards!

Gas and oil.

Twiglets1 · Yesterday 08:45

Katemax82 · Yesterday 08:43

I'm secretly glad

Why secretly? (if you don't mind explaining)

HighHeelsRedLips · Yesterday 08:46

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · Yesterday 07:38

He won't, you know. He'll be a footnote in history at best. Lord Starmer of Oxted was, as Keir Starmer, a successful barrister, appointed Queen's Counsel, and generally thought to have done well as Director of Public Prosecutions, after which he was knighted. However, although he led his party to a huge General Election victory in 2024 and thereby became Prime Minister, his government made a number of questionable decisions (see main entry for UK Labour government 2024-2029) which led to a great drop in his popularity and his party's within a short time. He lost a leadership election to Lord Burnham of Makersfield in 2026 and was elevated to the House of Lords shortly afterwards.

Oh but he will. Keir Starmer can call himself Lord whatever he likes but the fact remains he is no Winston Churchill!

jobnotsure · Yesterday 08:46

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · Yesterday 08:34

What is there to get away with? 50% of the UK population is female. Why hasn't the Labour Party managed to produce a brilliant female politician who could lead their party and win an election for them? The Tories have had four women as leaders!

And what's wrong with pointing out that the Labour Party has also not yet managed to elect a leader who wouldn't tick the White British box on an ethnic monitoring form? Again, all the others have.

It's all of a piece for me with their supposed commitment to women's rights, which is so superficial that they've steadfastly ignored the problems with identity politics and gender ideology in particular. Tickbox exercise at best.

They have produced quite a few female politicians who could be prime minister.

Angela Rayner, Shabana Mahmood, Yvette Cooper, Bridget Phillipson, Lisa Nandy just to name a few.

Many people are more interested in policies rather than playing politics and culture wars - which is what people are doing when they focus on the sex of the Labour Party leader rather than the policies.

Puppylucky · Yesterday 08:47

Flyingintotheunknown · Yesterday 06:13

“Starmer has shown a strong leadership on the world stage.”

And that’s the issue. It’s all that prick cares about, how he is seen on the world stage. He doesn’t give a shit about the UK, he only cares about how the other world leaders see him. Because he has a grandiose sense of self worth and thinks he’s far better than he really is. Complete, selfish total utter narcissist more like.
Oh and btw he’s done nothing but make a fool of himself on the world stage. He’s a laughing stock and the other world leaders know it.

Where does this insane level of vitriol come from? It's totally unmerited and I would love to know what's fuelling it.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 08:47

Twiglets1 · Yesterday 08:40

I don't ignore his bad ratings and don't love him myself but to me it's a truth that the media came for him from day 1 and the same thing will happen to Burnham or whoever replaces Starmer (assuming he loses a leadership challenge).

And people use social media to spread hate towards public figures. No one is immune because no politician can please everyone.

We’ll see. I think Starmer is a major issue. As a leader he swings voters away from his party. If they can find someone who does the opposite then go with it.

Carouseloflife · Yesterday 08:47

Reform threw everything at the bi election and didn’t win, I doubt they’ll find over 300 winning candidates ready for the next general election.

june35 · Yesterday 08:49

Carouseloflife · Yesterday 08:47

Reform threw everything at the bi election and didn’t win, I doubt they’ll find over 300 winning candidates ready for the next general election.

This was an extremely safe Labour seat, and a possibility to get out a quite unpopular prime minister. It wasn’t about Reform.

ClarkeandNewman · Yesterday 08:49

EasternStandard · Yesterday 08:17

They won in the other by-election and Kemi is leading in her ratings above the men. Labour are actually losing their leader so they can focus on that for a while.

Very poor analysis. You do actually need to look beneath the surface to understand the seismic shifts in UK politics over the last decade.

Incidentally it's conventional to refer to politicians by their last names, titles or honorific followed by last name. The way you say "Kemi" is jarring.

GeorgeMichaelsCat · Yesterday 08:50

Even if he becomes PM, nothing will change.

Sunshineandoranges · Yesterday 08:51

Dragonscaledaisy · Yesterday 06:03

That expectation was set by Labour themselves. Unless you voted Labour in the last election, you have no need to be embarrassed. The current shambles is entirely of Starmer's own making and sums up his entire short premiership with the party lurching from one psychodrama to the next, creating ongoing instability.

I was very hopeful for this government butthey seem so politically inept. This morning they have announced a new housing policy to save first time buyers an estimated £700. The sellers have to provide a housing pack. The labour government about 20 years ago introduced the Homes Information Pack (hips) also known as hated info pack because it cost the sellers hundreds but wasnt accepted by mortgage providersand went out of date after about 3 months so the seller had to pay again ( givt insisted on renewal )This new housing pack might have some differences but most information is time sensitive. So another likely boo boo.
But if we have a change I dont fancy Andy Burnham. The thing i dont like about Andy Burnham is his saying he will represent the people of the north. We are a country not east and west berlin and need more division like a hole in the head.

thepariscrimefiles · Yesterday 08:51

moose62 · Yesterday 06:18

To me it is not really about the person but the fact that the party in Government can vote in whoever they want as PM without the people who voted for them having a say. This goes for all parties.
Perhaps Burnham will be good, perhaps he will be a shambles, but either way he wasn't voted in by the people.
I know he was mayor but that doesn't mean he can run the country....I would feel the same if they said Sadiq Khan was going to be PM.

It's the Conservatives who have made a habit of getting rid of Prime Ministers and installing new ones without calling a General Election. They did it with Margaret Thatcher, Theresa May, Boris Johnson and Liz Truss.

Labour have done it once so far with Tony Blair and will probably do this with Keir Starmer but Mumsnetters usually save their ire for Labour politicians.

Livpool · Yesterday 08:51

Watercooler · Yesterday 06:14

While farage toadies to trump. I'd take starmer any day.

Exactly! I am just glad Reform didn’t win

Bloozie · Yesterday 08:51

Carouseloflife · Yesterday 08:47

Reform threw everything at the bi election and didn’t win, I doubt they’ll find over 300 winning candidates ready for the next general election.

I have absolutely no idea where they're finding their candidates from NOW. Every single one of them is like a bad caricature of a gammon or a Nazi. Like, so over the top they're not believable. Why are they fielding people that are so obviously thick, and extreme? They'd romp it if their candidates could string a sentence together and evidence a social media history free of swastikas and misogyny but nope. They CANNOT get it together.

Twiglets1 · Yesterday 08:52

EasternStandard · Yesterday 08:47

We’ll see. I think Starmer is a major issue. As a leader he swings voters away from his party. If they can find someone who does the opposite then go with it.

ok let's revisit this discussion leading up to the GE, assuming someone else - probably Burnham - has been in charge of the Labour party for a good couple of years.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 08:52

ClarkeandNewman · Yesterday 08:49

Very poor analysis. You do actually need to look beneath the surface to understand the seismic shifts in UK politics over the last decade.

Incidentally it's conventional to refer to politicians by their last names, titles or honorific followed by last name. The way you say "Kemi" is jarring.

Who cares? If you don’t like it scroll on by. I’ll use the name I want.

I’m pleased they won Aberdeen South, and she out polls all the men. Starmer is very low. He’s about to be ousted due to how disliked he is, Focus on that rather than use of Kemi.

mumumental · Yesterday 08:56

JulietteHasAGun · Yesterday 07:44

I do like Andy Burnham. It's a sad day for Manchester to lose him as mayor. However he's more left wing than Starmer at a time the population is swinging to the right so I think will finish Labour off.

I think overall he will be judged on whether he can turn the economy around. People will forgive him for being left wing if they have more money in their pocket. Sadly I think the economy is too far fucked for any fast fixes. But he seems to understand the need to invest for growth rather than austerity measures, or he has in Manchester anyway from what I can see.

I don’t think the general population is swinging right. They just want to matter far more than they currently do.