People should take this stuff seriously.
Infrastructure like the internet is just such a huge opportunity for any hostile faction to act. I don't support China's level of censorship at all, but there is a serious reason they are so locked down.
The BBC I struggle to have sympathy for, while at the same time thinking it is really terrible that they have lost the trust of so many. And it's their own doing, not because of manipulation by Russians. People only have to see them fuck up seriously once, where you know they themselves are manipulating a story, or sitting on it. And poof! the trust is gone. If I can see they are being either totally incompetent or dishonest on one story where I have some level of expertise, all of the other stories where I am less informed are sspect too. Their intentions in telling me even true stories are suspect.
I don't know how they haven't understood that. I think they still haven't really dealt with the aftermath of their allowing spliced together footage of Trump - despite the resignations of people at the top there isn't a sense they have dealt with the real cause of the decline, that an of the people actually involved directly, who had conversations about it in meetings at the time, have been exposed or their thinking challenged.
It's a massive loss, especially in the face of foreign interference. But it seems like a lot of sectors, media, universities, libraries, rejected the idea that their own political neutrality was an important part of the stability of the state, maybe about 15 years ago or so now? There are some pointy questions we could ask about where that push came from, actually....