Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Trooping the colour booing

311 replies

theresalighttofindyou · Yesterday 10:54

AIBU to think this was well deserved?

Kate can glower at people as much as she wants but the monarchy is a rotten institution and people are getting more and more annoyed by it

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Pistachiocake · Yesterday 13:29

Dollymylove · Yesterday 11:23

Who are the booers and why are they booing? Trooping the Colour is on one of our big traditions, attracting big crowds. Anyone who is not happy with it is free to fuck off

While I wouldn't go myself, our neighbours-who love all monarchy events-are second generation immigrants, and say they feel very welcome. No doubt they will be angry about the nastiness. They are Muslim, so those who say only white Christians are pro-Royal are wrong. The thing I do agree with is that at least we don't have a president.

CoffeeCantata · Yesterday 13:30

theresalighttofindyou · Yesterday 13:26

So you genuinely see no issue with them having virtual immunity from all crimes, billions that they’re piling up, and parading through the streets in gold carriages while children starve?

I think that's what's called a 'straw man argument', which would waste my time to engage with!

ilovesooty · Yesterday 13:30

ThisIsMyUsername0 · Yesterday 12:02

I didn't see Kate glowering however if someone were to be shouting aggressively about my childrens family while they were passing, I'd do more than glower. Awful people to have acted like that. Poor kids.

If their parents want to put them in the public eye in full awareness that there's a growing republican movement in the country they'll have to accept that people are going to express an opinion in front of them.

And expressing that opinion doesn't make them spiteful cunts.

theresalighttofindyou · Yesterday 13:31

CoffeeCantata · Yesterday 13:30

I think that's what's called a 'straw man argument', which would waste my time to engage with!

So the answer is you’re fine with it, for some reason

OP posts:
FancyBiscuitsLevel · Yesterday 13:33

It’ll be interesting if they do bring the children again next year or to other events where the children will be near the public (who haven’t been vetted and controlled in advance).

Bur perhaps those who strongly support the children being used for good PR for the royals on the grounds the Wales children need to learn how to be working royals will think it’s important they also learn a significant part of the country hate them.

Cheese55 · Yesterday 13:34

BrownTroutBluesAgain · Yesterday 13:23

Well that’s not true

Shall we get rid of them and shoot ourselves in the foot again like the 20% on private schools

Its all very short sighted

‘ Recent attempts to measure the size of the impact of the royal family on UK tourism have estimated the capital value of UK monarchy as a business to be £67.5 billion (up from £44 billion in 2012) and the annual contribution to the UK economy to be £1.766 billion.

https://www.regionalstudies.org
Impact of the UK Royal Family on tourism - RSA Main

Edited

People would continue to visit the tourist sites whether the RF existed or not. Its like going to France and seeing the Eiffle tower

QuaintBeaker · Yesterday 13:34

theresalighttofindyou · Yesterday 11:07

Is that the only way to protest?

I'm in!

ginasevern · Yesterday 13:35

If Kate doesn't like people booing her kids, she and her husband are free to resign. They're absolutely filthy rich, like pigs in shit. But you'd have to drag them kicking and screaming away from the excessive privileges and billions rolling in from the Duchies. Whilst I can understand (to some small extent) that people would choose a monarch over a president, I cannot comprehend the fawning, devotion and adulation that this particular set of humans seems to command. They're the ultimate self preservationists and rotten to the core and have been for centuries.

QuaintBeaker · Yesterday 13:36

ERthree · Yesterday 11:39

Would you accept people shouting abuse at your children? Why should she then ?

No but I wouldn't parade mine about like that in the first place

ForWiseRoseCat · Yesterday 13:37

CoffeeCantata · Yesterday 13:29

Aha! That old chestnut.

It's one of the reasons I roll my eyes at republicans - they despise most of the population. When they come up against people with different views, it must be the old Kool Aid again...yawn.

I love how royalists think they're better than republicans but neither are right or wrong.

Everyone has different views. I don't agree with the royal family but others think their the greatest thing to walk the earth. The hero worship of a family by default of birth is weird in the 21st century. The fawning over Kate is really weird, royalists post things about her being absolutely stunning and a great future queen when they have no idea what she thinks or what she'll be like but hey she looks good in expensive frocks so she'll be a great future queen!

At least a president can be voted out, we're stuck with a king or queen whether we agree with them or not.

ilovesooty · Yesterday 13:38

LuckyHazelFox · Yesterday 12:40

Well if you think booing and behaving like a toddler is being grown up, you do you. They have a right to protest but shouting not my king is going to change nothing. Gives the great unwashed a day out I suppose.

Why are you calling them "the great unwashed"?

OneBusyFinch · Yesterday 13:38

For anyone interested, highly recommend these books by respected authors Norman Baker and Andrew Lownie respectively.

Norman Baker broke ranks from being a Minister of State and Privy Counsellor to analyse the role that royals play in society.

Andrew Lownie is a historian and author who rigorously researched and had to submit rather a lot of Freedom of Information requests at considerable personal cost.

Trooping the colour booing
Trooping the colour booing
Trooping the colour booing
theresalighttofindyou · Yesterday 13:39

ilovesooty · Yesterday 13:38

Why are you calling them "the great unwashed"?

Genuinely such a vile thing to say.

OP posts:
LuckyHazelFox · Yesterday 13:40

ilovesooty · Yesterday 13:38

Why are you calling them "the great unwashed"?

What else should I call bullies booing children?

DisforDarkChocolate · Yesterday 13:41

ERthree · Yesterday 11:39

Would you accept people shouting abuse at your children? Why should she then ?

If they don't want their children to encounter legitimate protest, then they can leave them at home.

ilovesooty · Yesterday 13:42

ExtraOnions · Yesterday 12:52

Thousands of people enjoying the event, and a few yellow t-shirted cretins shouting. The anti-monarchists had their chance in 1642 … give it up.

cretins? For expressing an opinion?

hairbearbunches · Yesterday 13:42

PistachioTiramisu · Yesterday 13:15

OP has really got the bit between her teeth today! I don't think any Royal supporters will persuade her otherwise. I can't imagine being so wound up and jealous because other people have more money than me! I'm not sure what on earth Grenfell has to do with it! Is she suggesting that any date on which something unpleasant/tragic occurred in this country should be avoided in case it clashes with a Royal event???

FFS. Do you think any of the royal palaces have been clad with cheap combustible material? Material that was banned in other countries and should not have been used here either, but was used because it was cheap, cheap, cheap and it was being put up on the little people's housing so what did it matter.

MrsShawnHatosy · Yesterday 13:44

SadiraOfTyr · Yesterday 12:39

How are anti-monarchists "living in the past"?

Quite. If anything it’s monarchists who are living in the past, clinging to an outdated institution with increasingly little relevance to modern life.

SundayBangor · Yesterday 13:45

Isitevensummer · Yesterday 12:44

What would you expect them to say in protest then? Because "End Special financial secrecy rules, be transparent about all sources of wealth and stop protecting immoral and criminal behaviour" doesn't have the same ring.

I think those are all fair and good things to expect of the institution.
“Not my king” makes it sound like the sole issue is with the head of state being unelected. Which I'm no longer sure is the worst arrangement a nation can have.

It also reminds me too much of US protests and makes me suspicious the protestors are just very online types who don't understand the differences between the two places.

MrsShawnHatosy · Yesterday 13:46

ilovesooty · Yesterday 13:38

Why are you calling them "the great unwashed"?

Anyone who uses that phrase is a raging snob!

BrownTroutBluesAgain · Yesterday 13:49

Cheese55 · Yesterday 13:34

People would continue to visit the tourist sites whether the RF existed or not. Its like going to France and seeing the Eiffle tower

You are missing the point entirely
People visit because we have a royal family as well as our heritage

Having lived abroad in several countries people find it fascinating.

but if you have figures from a non biased source that prove that massive financial plus wouldn’t drop it would be an interesting read

ikeepforgetting · Yesterday 13:50

As someone not from these parts, I look on this stuff with great bemusement. It is absolutely bonkers to defend, bow and scrape to ostentatious, protected inherited wealth like this. It really is a cult and posters on this thread are proving that in bucketloads.

ikeepforgetting · Yesterday 13:50

The people in other countries 'find in fascinating' for reasons other than you think.

BringBackCatsEyes · Yesterday 13:51

ikeepforgetting · Yesterday 13:50

As someone not from these parts, I look on this stuff with great bemusement. It is absolutely bonkers to defend, bow and scrape to ostentatious, protected inherited wealth like this. It really is a cult and posters on this thread are proving that in bucketloads.

Can you tell where you are from?

PilotingAWail · Yesterday 13:52

I don't agree with booing small kids (although booing itself is a non threatening gesture imo)
I couldn't think of anything worse than travelling to London to boo at people who have no meaning in my life, and who I will never give any fucks about 🤷🏻‍♀️
But my 'King', yeah, in name only.
I would never vote for these people, given the opportunity.
Obviously 🤫 don't tell anyone on the Royal Family site, I'll be lynched 😂