To think Nigel Farage should be locked up?

[nobodyssons]

He was inciting violence with his “address to the nation” speech, calling for rage.

Meanwhile, he doesn’t care when women are actually murdered by the police

https://x.com/nigel_farage/status/1371213488882847749?s=46

Surely enough is enough and they need to take action?

But on the night, they engaged in two tier policing… this proves the opposite of what you think it does!

You’re out. Why? Because you can’t face the truth that one section of society is protected more than another?

Yes, when he practiced Law.

Do you have the evidence for that?

It would seem some folk can't handle the truth.

This is fake news.

They should have assessed who had been fatally stabbed whilst the other person was fine.

No, "cold" rage means take it to the ballot box, and he rightly identifies that large numbers of people ARE furious, this is what politically able and aware people do, they refer to the actual reality that people are experiencing, another good example is Boris accepting that there was widespread anger over the attempts to overthrow Brexit because some powerful people only like democracy when they win, he made the right call while prominent Labour names just kept shouting to get another vote and another until they got their way. In this case KS is completely avoiding the conversation that needs to be had about the dismantling of woke diversity culture that has infected all the main institutions by pretending that Farage is calling for violence and saying that we must respect the family"s wishes etc. etc.

They were Starmer's clients in 2003. Of course, he denies it.

Exactly. Many folk are sickened by the path this country is going down.

That’s the way isn’t it? Fingers in the ears, cry racist, run away

Me too..

Er no. He is expressing his opinion.

So no. Because it's bullshit

The police need to work with it, you can see the bad outcomes. Jack Straw can recognise it. The training will probably change and Labour supporters will switch again.

If it doesn’t get amended under Labour it probably will at next GE.

Name drop TR and NF and argument over!

No problem, Keir..

Of course they wouldn"t, everyone who can think for themselves knows what Farage is saying.

But why are posters not agreeing with that? What do they want?

I've done some research, and it turns out it wasn't true after all.

I don't disagree, but it isn't correct to say that Digwa's claim was one of just 'racial abuse'. The police thought they were coming to an assault. They thought Digwa was the victim, because he and his brother lied about it. They thought Henry Nowak was the culprit and treated him as they undoubtedly treat many suspects when they arrive on scene. Henry won't have been the first person to have said they had been injured in order to avoid being handcuffed. Nothing makes the police's behaviour correct, but I think it's more complex than 'diversity policies'. We've already established you don't agree, and that's fine.

Locking up people whose political views we don’t agree with. Wow, that is a slippery slope isn’t it.

It’s both. The incredibly bad reaction at the scene by those officers and the training.

The former under investigation and the latter will likely lead to changes to equality of outcome training.

Is there a source for that, other than some cranks on twitter?

Next you'll be telling us that the father was a genocidal warlord too

They didn't need to handcuff Henry. He was hardly moving. He wasn't resisting arrest. Handcuffs are not an automatic requirement for an arrest, so say the College of Policing.

Funnily enough, even after Henry had died, they didn't handcuff Digwa. They took him to the police station and offered him a meal.