Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to ask tenants to move before or after new baby?

314 replies

CatWithAPetDog · 30/05/2026 15:09

We are landlords and have a property that our son would like to move into at some point in the next year. Our current tenants have a toddler and have just told me that they are expecting another baby in November.

If you were the tenant, would you prefer to have to move out whilst pregnant or with a young baby. I know it’s not great timing for them either way, but which would you say would be easier? We can wait a while as long as my son is moved in this time next year, but then they would have a toddler and six month old baby, so it may be easier to do it sooner with just a toddler?

They’ve been good tenants so I would like to cause them the least stress possible.

Sorry forgot to make boring make sense

YABU - Get them to move before the new baby arrives

YANBU - Get them to move after the new baby arrives

OP posts:
caringcarer · 30/05/2026 16:36

I've given a tenant 3 1/2 months notice to leave by July 25th. They have 2 under 4 and are expecting twins in October and have a dog. I figured it would be much harder to move with a 4 year old 2 1/2 year old and newborn twin and a dog. Plus even though they are supposed to leave by July 25th they have not found anywhere to move to yet, despite a good reference, which is worrying and probably means they won't be able to move out and I'll have to go to court to get a repossession order.

Datafan55 · 30/05/2026 16:37

YourPoliteTurtle · 30/05/2026 16:27

If you rent, you accept that you are only responsible for the rent and the property doesn't belong to you, so you can't have a claim on it for infinite amount of times.

You are not affected by work, repairs, fluctuation on the market. You just pay the rent, and you only have the property for the duration of your lease.

It's very fair.

It's being given the idea that paying a monthly rent gives you any right or ownership to the property that is wrong

This.

Plus you feel lucky to have been able to have rented a nice place with nice landlords for a short time and not have to worry about the boiler repairs and what-not. Renting is what it is.

Anyone thinking they have a permanent claim on the place is 1) ironic given how banks can foreclose when people own and 2) well, the entitlement is off the scale. Excellent way to put off decent landlords too.

narnia2025 · 30/05/2026 16:37

Runningswanker · 30/05/2026 16:34

Equally, the OP is providing a house to a young person who needs somewhere to live. There are many crappy landlords out there but the fact that the OP has even asked the question they have shows they're not one of them.

She is still risking a young family becoming homeless.

Runningswanker · 30/05/2026 16:37

Dollysleftnip · 30/05/2026 16:25

Because its nonsense
People without children would do the jobs
Those with who need more space would move out to cheaper areas
There was a reasonable system in place where people gave a bit of thought to planning out their lives so they aren’t subjected to the whims of LL’s.
People would do better to return to those times
But if they dont its a lifetime of instability. Their choice.

I mean, I don't have children and I can't afford a 400k house.
I am fortunate to have a mortgage, but I live in a relatively cheap northern house and even here the rent prices prevent many from being able to afford to save a deposit, and that cheapest starter homes would be 200k. Which, given the wages in this area are typically low, would still be out of reach for many.

mathanxiety · 30/05/2026 16:38

CatWithAPetDog · 30/05/2026 16:24

It wasn’t free. It’s been paid for by us! So at his parents expense which me and his dad are fine with.

This is meant kindly, but I strongly advise that you ask your son to pay rent. It doesn't have to be market rates, but he should pay a certain amount, and he should be responsible for utilities too.

Cushioning young adults from life's financial realities does them no favours.

RetiredFromExplaining · 30/05/2026 16:38

I do hope the OP isn’t moving her son in for six months just so she can let it out again afterwards at a much higher rent than before.

I mean, she wouldn’t do that, would she?

caringcarer · 30/05/2026 16:38

narnia2025 · 30/05/2026 16:35

Yes but if they did that their would be no risk of anyone becoming homeless while pregnant or a small child which is what is a potential outcome here

i hppe that family are able to find something quickly for their sakes.

That is the downside of stopping the 12 months fixed term contract.

narnia2025 · 30/05/2026 16:39

Datafan55 · 30/05/2026 16:37

This.

Plus you feel lucky to have been able to have rented a nice place with nice landlords for a short time and not have to worry about the boiler repairs and what-not. Renting is what it is.

Anyone thinking they have a permanent claim on the place is 1) ironic given how banks can foreclose when people own and 2) well, the entitlement is off the scale. Excellent way to put off decent landlords too.

Edited

They don’t have permanent claim however they shouldn’t be in fear of being evicted because someone kid wants a free houses

if a house is well looked after, is paid for on time then really there is no reason to make people homeless.

StephensLass1977 · 30/05/2026 16:39

Moving while pregnant will feel like a piece of cake compared to once the baby's born. All that baby stuff they'll have to move, as well as the actual baby.

This is why I never wanted to rent.

Runningswanker · 30/05/2026 16:39

narnia2025 · 30/05/2026 16:37

She is still risking a young family becoming homeless.

Except they're planning how to do it without making them homeless. You seem to have missed the point of the thread entirely.

Datafan55 · 30/05/2026 16:40

narnia2025 · 30/05/2026 16:20

nope I’m in my 30s and have experienced entitled rich landlord for years. They don’t seem to care about the people who are occupying their home and just see them as a pay check. They are people

sounds like he is not even paying rent just being given a free house at someone else expense

This LL is QUITE LITERALLY showing she cares about the people who are occupying her home.

KatiePricesKnickers · 30/05/2026 16:40

Usual terrible behavior from a small landlord.
No wonder they are vilified.
This doesn’t happen with corporates.

Rachelshair · 30/05/2026 16:41

I'd have my son living with me before I'd evict a family with a newborn and a toddler into a broken housing market. You could be sending them into homelessness. I just couldn't do that to someone.

Datafan55 · 30/05/2026 16:41

narnia2025 · 30/05/2026 16:39

They don’t have permanent claim however they shouldn’t be in fear of being evicted because someone kid wants a free houses

if a house is well looked after, is paid for on time then really there is no reason to make people homeless.

Oh mate, give it up.

narnia2025 · 30/05/2026 16:42

Runningswanker · 30/05/2026 16:39

Except they're planning how to do it without making them homeless. You seem to have missed the point of the thread entirely.

there is a still a chance they will be.
the market is really bad at the moment and their is not a lot of choice. If the tenents are looking while the mother is on mat pay this could mean that she will not meet the criteria at that time which will lower their chances.

Datafan55 · 30/05/2026 16:43

KatiePricesKnickers · 30/05/2026 16:40

Usual terrible behavior from a small landlord.
No wonder they are vilified.
This doesn’t happen with corporates.

You really haven't rented from an actual terrible landlord, have you?

narnia2025 · 30/05/2026 16:44

Rachelshair · 30/05/2026 16:41

I'd have my son living with me before I'd evict a family with a newborn and a toddler into a broken housing market. You could be sending them into homelessness. I just couldn't do that to someone.

I’m glad it’s not just me.

i’m honestly worried that morals and kindness has gone out the window.

YourPoliteTurtle · 30/05/2026 16:48

I am glad people are not over-reacting and being over-dramatic on this thread, it's a such a relief to read common sense 😂

Bet all these people don't have the same attitude about their own business and income source! There they won't consider to become a charity for a second, but it's easier to be generous with someone else's money.

Runningswanker · 30/05/2026 16:50

narnia2025 · 30/05/2026 16:42

there is a still a chance they will be.
the market is really bad at the moment and their is not a lot of choice. If the tenents are looking while the mother is on mat pay this could mean that she will not meet the criteria at that time which will lower their chances.

If the LL allows them flexibility to move that's very unlikely. The difficult thing in a hot rental market is being able to take on a tenancy as soon as it's available, landlords don't want voids. That would give them the edge over a lot of potential tenants. Plus if income is borderline most agencies these days will accept with a guarantor, and there are companies who will provide this, a bit like buying insurance.
I'm not suggesting its better than the current tenant being able to stay but it is the reality of renting and this LL is at least trying to make it easier for the tenant
I'm under no illusion how bad LLs can be; one sold the house I was living in to a company and 'forgot' to tell me or give me notice, I found out about it when someone I know mentioned about 'that new X opening up on Y street' and I realised the building they were talking about was my home...

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 30/05/2026 16:52

OP I’d tell them now that you’ll need the house back in a years time but if they want to leave earlier /find the right property beforehand, you are happy to go with that.

That makes the decision of before or after baby to be their choice not yours.

Sunshineandoranges · 30/05/2026 16:54

ByCyanFinch · 30/05/2026 15:13

This happened to us. Tell them as soon as possible and give them a long time to find somewhere else. Stress that you will provide an excellent reference as they have been such good tenants. And if possible make it clear that there will be no penalty attached to them leaving earlier than the end of notice. It will be difficult for them to find somewhere so giving them as much notice and flexibility as possible is key.

Edited

I agree with this. We did the same for our tenants.

narnia2025 · 30/05/2026 16:56

Runningswanker · 30/05/2026 16:50

If the LL allows them flexibility to move that's very unlikely. The difficult thing in a hot rental market is being able to take on a tenancy as soon as it's available, landlords don't want voids. That would give them the edge over a lot of potential tenants. Plus if income is borderline most agencies these days will accept with a guarantor, and there are companies who will provide this, a bit like buying insurance.
I'm not suggesting its better than the current tenant being able to stay but it is the reality of renting and this LL is at least trying to make it easier for the tenant
I'm under no illusion how bad LLs can be; one sold the house I was living in to a company and 'forgot' to tell me or give me notice, I found out about it when someone I know mentioned about 'that new X opening up on Y street' and I realised the building they were talking about was my home...

Not everyone can get a guarantor.

maybe I am more emotive about this but I don’t think people realise how difficult it is at the moment to find a house to rent. Even for people with decent earnings and good references there is still a chnace you are gonna to be competing with another 4 or 5 family’s for that one property: to chuck a family out just so a child can leave in house a for free just seems wrong.

Megifer · 30/05/2026 16:59

narnia2025 · 30/05/2026 16:42

there is a still a chance they will be.
the market is really bad at the moment and their is not a lot of choice. If the tenents are looking while the mother is on mat pay this could mean that she will not meet the criteria at that time which will lower their chances.

Its good that op will give them as much notice as possible then so they have a decent chance at getting somewhere before her mat leave starts

narnia2025 · 30/05/2026 17:00

Megifer · 30/05/2026 16:59

Its good that op will give them as much notice as possible then so they have a decent chance at getting somewhere before her mat leave starts

Yeah hopefully
and even better if she lets them stay longer if they are really struggling.

TheDrswife · 30/05/2026 17:05

Dollysleftnip · 30/05/2026 16:09

Which is why you buy a house before having children

What a stupid thing to write! Are you aware that some people literally cannot afford to buy a home?

Swipe left for the next trending thread