Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Allow a play date where mum unapologetically supports children’s education tax

1000 replies

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 11:16

Just this really, our local independent prep school closed due to the education tax earlier this year and has caused absolute chaos for lots of families, including my own. My dd (6) has been invited for a play date with a girl she seems very friendly with and who seems very sweet, but I’ve since found out from another parent that the mum is an ‘unapologetic education taxer’. My instinct is to cancel the play date, AIBU?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Gallusoldbesom · 30/05/2026 15:02

And me

Mischance · 30/05/2026 15:02

It is not a "children's education tax" as many here have explained.
I am sorry this had such a profound impact on your child but it is important to be accurate about what it is.
I have GC at both state and private schools. The parents of the latter agree that it was unfair that the schools were VAT exempt saw this coming and took steps to save up for this eventuality.

It is sad that some schools have had to close but please bear in mind that the majority of children have been at cash-strapped state schools in need of funding. It was no longer reasonable to offer this sort of tax favour to pruvate schools.

Mischance · 30/05/2026 15:05

The school didn’t have enough children because the government put the fees up by a fifth half way through the year.

No ... the governors chose to put the fees up by 20%.

thestudio · 30/05/2026 15:05

why have you replicated your previous thread?

Quokkas · 30/05/2026 15:06

Jesus Christ, OP. Get a grip of yourself.

Quokkas · 30/05/2026 15:07

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 12:23

Well exactly, also I would imagine that alcohol abuse/smoking would be likely in the home.

Why?!

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 15:08

AllyMacbealmyarse · 30/05/2026 14:53

So use that one then! No reason you should be exempt from a tax on a luxury good/service because you don’t want to use the one that is provided free of the point of delivery. And in any event is it the parent paying tax, not the child, so your point about a child being entitled to a tax free education doesn’t stand- they can have one, but their parent has decided to opt out so has to bear the consequences.

To my mind trying to avoid tax is more ‘immoral’ than being a person who thinks others shouldn’t be allowed to do so.

If you think the state education isn’t good enough (though noting plenty of us do perfectly fine on it) then spend your time campaigning to improve it, rather than whinging about paying tax on eligible purchases.

Tax payer funded education is not what I mean when I say tax free education, some of us already fund that. I mean non tax payer funded tax free education, I want every child to have access to tax free education and vocational training, including yours, as many education options as possible just as the rest of the world does.

I simply don’t understand the mentality of trying to limit children’s education because it wasn’t an option you choose for yourself, it’s just mean and yes immoral. I think it’s more unsettling because the target is children and do you genuinely feel better about yourself and your life seeing children having to move schools or people lose their jobs ?

My daughter is now at state, I don’t class that as tax avoidance (?!?)

OP posts:
GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 15:10

thestudio · 30/05/2026 15:05

why have you replicated your previous thread?

I can’t see that?

OP posts:
Passingthrough123 · 30/05/2026 15:12

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 15:08

Tax payer funded education is not what I mean when I say tax free education, some of us already fund that. I mean non tax payer funded tax free education, I want every child to have access to tax free education and vocational training, including yours, as many education options as possible just as the rest of the world does.

I simply don’t understand the mentality of trying to limit children’s education because it wasn’t an option you choose for yourself, it’s just mean and yes immoral. I think it’s more unsettling because the target is children and do you genuinely feel better about yourself and your life seeing children having to move schools or people lose their jobs ?

My daughter is now at state, I don’t class that as tax avoidance (?!?)

Ah, so she's at state school now. Did you know that at the time of the last General Election, 60% of state school teachers voted for Labour?

What if your DD's teacher is "one of those people"? Will you ban them from teaching your child?

ilovesooty · 30/05/2026 15:13

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 13:13

Guts? Quite obviously it would suggest a bitter person, net tax recipient, easily misled to blame children for their failings and likely lower than average intelligence. The numbers don’t lie on this.

Most of these of these are not personality traits. You wriggled out of the question in the same cowardly way as you are going to avoid the play date. If you had any courage you'd tell this mother what sort of person you think she is, but you'd rather involve your daughter in lying, wouldn't you?

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 15:13

Mischance · 30/05/2026 15:05

The school didn’t have enough children because the government put the fees up by a fifth half way through the year.

No ... the governors chose to put the fees up by 20%.

There is a lot of ignorance around this, even though it is very straight forward. The 20% is paid by the children or fee payer on any educational or vocational training services provided. So yes the government put the cost to children/parents up by a fifth half way through the academic year.

OP posts:
YourWildAmberSloth · 30/05/2026 15:15

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 11:51

LOL no way, she is obviously quite unstable. I’ll go with hay fever or something

Why though? At least have a backbone and the courage of your convictions, and be honest and open about them - as she has. The mum is likely to try again, and you will run out of excuses. I would rather someone just said no and told me why, so that I didn't waste time trying to foster a friendship that can never go anywhere.

Conflictedemotion · 30/05/2026 15:15

This.

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 15:15

ilovesooty · 30/05/2026 15:13

Most of these of these are not personality traits. You wriggled out of the question in the same cowardly way as you are going to avoid the play date. If you had any courage you'd tell this mother what sort of person you think she is, but you'd rather involve your daughter in lying, wouldn't you?

Yeah because telling a stupid person they’re stupid always works out for the best

OP posts:
GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 15:16

YourWildAmberSloth · 30/05/2026 15:15

Why though? At least have a backbone and the courage of your convictions, and be honest and open about them - as she has. The mum is likely to try again, and you will run out of excuses. I would rather someone just said no and told me why, so that I didn't waste time trying to foster a friendship that can never go anywhere.

She’ll get the hint eventually.

OP posts:
CatkinToadflax · 30/05/2026 15:16

DS2’s best friend is a lovely young adult. His dad is a Reform councillor. The best friend is still a lovely young man and DS is sure he’s a friend for life. We are not Reform voters in this house but his dad’s role is entirely irrelevant to their friendship. So OP I completely disagree with you.

However. It is simply not true that state schools can meet the needs of every child. Anyone who believes that they do, clearly has a privilege not experienced by my DS1. Labour claimed that the VAT would fund improvements to state schools. This has not happened and is not in the process of happening, because whatever little has been raised has been directed elsewhere. The Tories made state education impossible for my son and many many other young people and Labour have done nothing to improve it.

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · 30/05/2026 15:17

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 11:46

Wow 10 minutes in and the comments have convinced me that my first instinct was right ! I will reject the play date, I see protecting children from toxic people who hold immoral views as part of my job as a parent.

You're being ridiculous, and this is why "play dates" are a stupid concept.
All too often it's parents who haven't mentally left their own school days and are still in the playground behaviour wise.
Letting their little Henry and Lola's only playing with their own friends kids, despite whether they actually want to play together or not. Or like in your case, only if you like the parent and if they are "up to standard."
You'd have a point if they discriminating against others and were racist or homophobic for example, in case that rubbed off, but this? Nope. She's entitled to her opinion, even if it doesn't align with yours.

AlternateLook · 30/05/2026 15:17

Jesus Fuck, get over yourself.

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 15:18

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · 30/05/2026 15:17

You're being ridiculous, and this is why "play dates" are a stupid concept.
All too often it's parents who haven't mentally left their own school days and are still in the playground behaviour wise.
Letting their little Henry and Lola's only playing with their own friends kids, despite whether they actually want to play together or not. Or like in your case, only if you like the parent and if they are "up to standard."
You'd have a point if they discriminating against others and were racist or homophobic for example, in case that rubbed off, but this? Nope. She's entitled to her opinion, even if it doesn't align with yours.

Fair enough, agree with that.

OP posts:
CrispySquid · 30/05/2026 15:18

OP is on a chomp. This thread is a complete wind-up.

PurpleThistle7 · 30/05/2026 15:19

This post is super funny.

VickyEadie · 30/05/2026 15:19

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 14:54

Do you have a point? Or is this just some needless personal attack.

🍪

YourWildAmberSloth · 30/05/2026 15:21

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 15:16

She’ll get the hint eventually.

I'm sure she will. I don't agree with her stance to be fair, but I have far more respect for her - at least she's honest.

Passingthrough123 · 30/05/2026 15:25

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 15:16

She’ll get the hint eventually.

When she does and tells the other school gate parents, what do you think the impact will be on your DD? How will you explain it to her when she doesn't get invited to ANY playdates or parties because her mum thinks she's cleverer and has better morals than everyone else?

GigglyOrange · 30/05/2026 15:29

Velumental · 30/05/2026 14:27

You mean taxing of private schools as businesses rather than charities? Costa which the businesses which are the schools choose to pass on to the parents using the business? Parents who have an option to use a state funded service if they don't wish to pay those costs? That tax? That business tax on businesses?

Costa is a business, yes and it will pay corporation tax on profits. Independent schools ran as businesses will also pay corporation tax on profits. Some schools are ran as charities which goes back to the thinking that educating children benefits all of society, they don’t pay tax on profits as they don’t make any and run at cost.
The childrens education tax is a tax paid by the child or fee payer on education services or vocational training. Can I ask you thought the education tax actually was?

OP posts:
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.