Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think telling a child to "cover up" because of male teachers is ewwww?

904 replies

FreeeeeeeeFreeFalling · 21/05/2026 19:59

DD and her mates were wearing fairly standard vest tops at school for an own clothes day. All dressed exactly the same. DD singled out and told to cover up (I suspect because she is slightly larger chested than the others), which she found humiliating. She was told "there are male teachers around" as the reason!
They are 16.
I kind of think if male teachers can't keep their eyes to themselves, they shouldn't be teachers, right?!

AIBU to think this is a bit off?

OP posts:
darksideofthetoon · 21/05/2026 20:32

Didn’t Sting write a song about this? Not aged very well those lyrics!

GingerdeadMan · 21/05/2026 20:32

The6thQueen · 21/05/2026 20:27

GP in a bikini would be weird, crop top at a funeral wouldn’t bother me. Some ‘little black dresses’ some wear are just as form hugging. People seem to have an issue with skin, rather than body parts per se. I genuinely do struggle to understand why. It’s literally just skin 😂

Again you're misunderstanding.

Its not about whether it bothered YOU. Its about showing respect to the people around you. Most people would be upset if someone turned up inappropriately dressed for a funeral.

Just because you can't understand this concept doesn't mean it doesn't exist and isn't understood by most people.

However, you seem to understand more than your willing to admit, because you admit that a GP in a bikini would be weird. So all we are arguing about is where to draw the line - you admit there is a line, somewhere, more than just 'genitals covered'.

chirrupybird · 21/05/2026 20:33

At 16 your DD knows she is looking busty, if she wants to show it off fair enough, if she didn't realise how much she is showing someone giving a heads up is also fair enough

MrsElijahMikaelson1 · 21/05/2026 20:34

But yes school shouldn’t have phrased it about being about the male gaze. It should just have been that it’s an inappropriate look in a professional sense

Petrolitis · 21/05/2026 20:35

The6thQueen · 21/05/2026 20:07

No one should cover up for someone else. So long as no genitalia are on show, it’s just a body. Any form of shaming is wrong, and let’s face it, it’s normally women who are on the receiving end.
What’s wrong with having arms, or legs, or stomachs on display? Pretty much everyone on the planet has one. It’s time we stopped making people feel ashamed for having a body.
If anyone suggests it’s because women/girls then become sexualised, go give your head a wobble. That’s the problem of the person doing the sexualising, not the person being comfortable in their own skin.

Yeah this is why all teenage boys walk about in bra tops and hot pants.

Oh wait they don't.

Now I firmly believe women should wear what they please but to ignore how frequently womens clothes are designed to appeal to the male gaze and how woman are socially pressured into looking a certain way to increase their perceived value is naive indeed.

AzureLurker · 21/05/2026 20:36

Teacher here, the comment mentioning the male teachers is perhaps flippant and misjudged, however I did have to politely point out to a pupil in my happens to be all girls class the other day that her bra was popping out, and a fellow pupil (fairly sure they were mostly in vest tops) gave out a shriek perhaps as they are aware this is more likely to happen with a vest top due to thin straps, as am I, and would not find it practical or professional to wear myself in that environment regardless of gender (or all the teenage boys around). My pupil was quick to yank it up and will hopefully be more aware next time.

User79853257976 · 21/05/2026 20:36

The6thQueen · 21/05/2026 20:30

If a mother turned up to a parents evening tonight in a crop top and pair of shorts it wouldn’t bother me. It’s warm, and she would be comfortable in it. Same as if a man came in wearing shorts and a tank vest. Same as if she came in wearing active wear, which covered her completely but showed the outline fully of all her body parts. Because I’m there to talk to her as a person, not to judge her clothing.
Wearing a bikini would be odd, not because of the amount being shown, but because it’s not contextual. They wouldn’t be swimming at a parents evening, or sunbathing.

I was referring to the teacher wearing that in a formal environment. Not the parents.

The6thQueen · 21/05/2026 20:36

GingerdeadMan · 21/05/2026 20:32

Again you're misunderstanding.

Its not about whether it bothered YOU. Its about showing respect to the people around you. Most people would be upset if someone turned up inappropriately dressed for a funeral.

Just because you can't understand this concept doesn't mean it doesn't exist and isn't understood by most people.

However, you seem to understand more than your willing to admit, because you admit that a GP in a bikini would be weird. So all we are arguing about is where to draw the line - you admit there is a line, somewhere, more than just 'genitals covered'.

I think you’re misunderstanding. I’m not talking about whether I care or not generally - you asked me how I would react, so I responded.

My point is that why is skin such an issue for others? What is it that people are struggling with? I think it’s important to reflect on where our thoughts and opinions come from, not just simply accept that they exist. This is what I am asking (repeatedly), why does showing shoulders, or tops of arms or tops of thighs make people uncomfortable. I’ve already stated genitalia should be covered and that bikinis would be wrong to wear in these environments. But what is wrong with a tank top and a pair of shorts?

The6thQueen · 21/05/2026 20:37

User79853257976 · 21/05/2026 20:36

I was referring to the teacher wearing that in a formal environment. Not the parents.

I think I’ve answered this (multiple times now)

PollyBell · 21/05/2026 20:38

So young girls are wanting to show off their bodies but when people notice their bodies that is wrong

And in an education setting same as work place there is a line of what is acceptable for males and females

The6thQueen · 21/05/2026 20:38

Petrolitis · 21/05/2026 20:35

Yeah this is why all teenage boys walk about in bra tops and hot pants.

Oh wait they don't.

Now I firmly believe women should wear what they please but to ignore how frequently womens clothes are designed to appeal to the male gaze and how woman are socially pressured into looking a certain way to increase their perceived value is naive indeed.

Sorry, but that’s bollocks. Women’s clothes are designed to make women feel pretty, comfortable and happy with themselves. Not to attract men.
And plenty of boys wear shorts, tank tops or no tops in warm weather.

Happytaytos · 21/05/2026 20:39

The6thQueen · 21/05/2026 20:36

I think you’re misunderstanding. I’m not talking about whether I care or not generally - you asked me how I would react, so I responded.

My point is that why is skin such an issue for others? What is it that people are struggling with? I think it’s important to reflect on where our thoughts and opinions come from, not just simply accept that they exist. This is what I am asking (repeatedly), why does showing shoulders, or tops of arms or tops of thighs make people uncomfortable. I’ve already stated genitalia should be covered and that bikinis would be wrong to wear in these environments. But what is wrong with a tank top and a pair of shorts?

A tank top often shows cleavage, is that coming under genitalia or not? Cleavage isn't "just" skin like a shoulder or thigh.

JudgeJ · 21/05/2026 20:39

Purplelightening · 21/05/2026 20:05

Standard, women have to cover up because men can't control themselves 🙄. Disgusting comment. I would make a complaint.

As the post above says if a girl is wearing short skirt or low top and a male teacher looks in her direction simply to speak to her then he is open to vindictive accusations and she will be believed by the sisterhood.

Happytaytos · 21/05/2026 20:40

Fwiw I'd have the same issue with boys showing bum crack in low slung trousers, boys with hotpant type shorts so you could see penis outline, boys with midriff out. None of those are appropriate in school either.

The6thQueen · 21/05/2026 20:40

Happytaytos · 21/05/2026 20:39

A tank top often shows cleavage, is that coming under genitalia or not? Cleavage isn't "just" skin like a shoulder or thigh.

Cleavage is not private parts. It’s a sexualised characteristic, but it’s a normal part of a woman’s body.

CatsandSun · 21/05/2026 20:40

I’d complain op, I don’t know why people are comparing your daughter wearing a vest top to having her arse out, it’s not the same thing at all.

EdithBond · 21/05/2026 20:41

I’m not a fan of school uniform or strict dress codes.

But I can understand an argument for no vests - for girls or boys - unless covered with a cardigan or jacket. It’s a professional environment. Though surely a strappy sundress is no different. Which is why dress codes are based on fashions, rather than logic.

However, the comment about male teachers is weird. First, because women should never have to consider (nor young women be encouraged to consider) the male gaze when dressing.

And second, because (obvs lesbian, bi) female teachers can perv at girls too. As our PE teacher used to when we had to use the communal showers 🤢

User79853257976 · 21/05/2026 20:41

The6thQueen · 21/05/2026 20:37

I think I’ve answered this (multiple times now)

Okay, you just don’t understand the difference between formal and informal settings. Formal = smart or smart casual. Shorts and a vest top are not smart, it’s not about skin.

Feis123 · 21/05/2026 20:41

Wifebeaters aka vests are never appropriate as outer wear, it is underwear. A 16-year old girl with a large chest in a vest is not exactly an image of a child.

Bunnycat101 · 21/05/2026 20:41

vest tops have always been against dress codes at my work place and they are against the dress code for non uniform days and for 6th form at my daughter’s school. It’s just accepted really in lots of places.

While my youngest at primary doesn’t have a dress code as such I’ve had to stop her from wearing some ridiculous things to school on mufti day.

The6thQueen · 21/05/2026 20:42

User79853257976 · 21/05/2026 20:41

Okay, you just don’t understand the difference between formal and informal settings. Formal = smart or smart casual. Shorts and a vest top are not smart, it’s not about skin.

It was a non-uniform day - i.e. non-formal. General school-wear no, for the reasons you describe.

Sirzy · 21/05/2026 20:43

i don’t think there is anything wrong with children learning some clothes are more appropriate for the beach than school. Just the same as when they are in the workplace most likely they will have basic standards of dress expections!

icannotlivelaughloveintheseconditions · 21/05/2026 20:43

No one on school or a professional workplace should have their bottom, chest or stomach on show

The6thQueen · 21/05/2026 20:43

Some of the mindsets on this thread. And we wonder why victim blaming and violence against women is still rife. I’m genuinely amazed for a majority female site.

ToffeeCrabApple · 21/05/2026 20:44

Vest tops aren't appropriate for a school environment, whether on a boy, girl or teacher of either sex.

And you know that op.

Even my DC primary school has rules about dressing appropriately on non uniform occasions.

Swipe left for the next trending thread