Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think these boys should have been incarcerated?

823 replies

newrubylane · 21/05/2026 14:06

BBC News - Teenage boys sentenced for raping lone girls
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clypg68e2neo

I've never started an AIBU before, but I'm genuinely really shocked. I'm just not sure how this sentence is justifiable. Their actions were premeditated and deliberate, they were carrying a knife and they filmed themselves. They're obviously a danger to women/girls, and probably to other boys too.

If anyone knows how and why this sentence might have come about, I'd be interested to hear it.

A footpath beside a river, leading under a road bridge

Teenage boys sentenced for raping lone girls in Fordingbridge

The boys filmed themselves laughing and encouraging each other as they raped girls in separate attacks.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clypg68e2neo

OP posts:
Thread gallery
39
Unforgettablefire · 21/05/2026 19:43

”Shouldn’t criminalise these boys”
They are criminals! They’re rapists!
I’m another that would like to see them locked up for life because girls aren’t safe while they walk the streets.
Those poor girls. I bet their parents want to tear them to shreds I know I would.

MaidOfSteel · 21/05/2026 19:44

To me, the age of these boys should be considered an aggravating factor, not mitigating. If they are already planning & executing gang rape, filming it for their own titillation at age 14, and are not properly punished, what will they be like at 20? And 30? And what about other boys who see this news, learning that rape will be practically unpunished? This sentence makes the danger of rape & sexual assault worse for all girls & women.

My heart goes out to the girls who were brutally raped. I truly hope that they can find a happy and peaceful future.

chipsticksmammy · 21/05/2026 19:45

MaidOfSteel · 21/05/2026 19:44

To me, the age of these boys should be considered an aggravating factor, not mitigating. If they are already planning & executing gang rape, filming it for their own titillation at age 14, and are not properly punished, what will they be like at 20? And 30? And what about other boys who see this news, learning that rape will be practically unpunished? This sentence makes the danger of rape & sexual assault worse for all girls & women.

My heart goes out to the girls who were brutally raped. I truly hope that they can find a happy and peaceful future.

This post nails it.

The should be under locked supervision for life. They should not be free to do this again.

Nogimachi · 21/05/2026 19:46

Bollihobs · 21/05/2026 17:27

It's nit picking when I have explained how I was using the phrase - 'just' is not a wrong word when it isn't used in the that way.

Sorry, I’ve been thinking about this and it continues to bother me. We can swap the objects of your sentences to make the point clear. So if we say “The girls were all from the local area. The boys were just boys from the travelling community,” I’m not sure anyone would find that ok.

I know I’m hammering the point but language is used to minimise girls and women all the time. We are not “just”
anything.

tellmewhenthespaceshiplandscoz · 21/05/2026 19:47

FinchiePink · 21/05/2026 18:10

I apologise that my total of five short posts on the matter have made the thread so difficult for you.

Not sure why you think you have made the thread so difficult for me? Although it’s interesting that your few short posts on the matter (certainly to this point) all focus on a) telling the wimmin how hysterical and pointless our discussions are and b) getting quite cross yourself at a comment from a pp regards suggestion of violence to males.

Takes all sorts I guess

researchers3 · 21/05/2026 19:48

Allisnotlost1 · 21/05/2026 18:28

What?? Why does being a victim of violence prevent you from getting married or falling n love or being happy? Yes the girls will be harmed by what has happened and it will have lifelong consequences, but we don’t need to condemn them to never having any good things in their lives, jeez.

It's hardly condemning them. These girls will be changed forever by these rapes and that trauma may well mean they can't or don't want to be intimate or trust in future. Who could blame them?

Do you understand how trauma works? It doesn't sound like you do.

Online form signed and let's hope this goes somewhere.

FunnyOrca · 21/05/2026 19:50

I wish I hadn’t read the article. I feel like there’s an awful story about teenage girls being raped daily in the bbc at the moment. It’s terrifying as the mother of a daughter.

The way the judge seemed to reassure them they wouldn’t go to prison made my gut turn. I’ll also submit the form. Thank you for sharing it. I hope something happens. Those poor girls.

WearyAuldWumman · 21/05/2026 19:52

When I was a child, I was assaulted by a 13 yr old boy. Thank God I wasn't raped, but it had a profound effect on me.

Yes, I've had some happiness in my life, but the assault had a profound effect and caused me misery for very many years. I can assure you that I'll be filling up that form.

Allisnotlost1 · 21/05/2026 19:55

researchers3 · 21/05/2026 19:48

It's hardly condemning them. These girls will be changed forever by these rapes and that trauma may well mean they can't or don't want to be intimate or trust in future. Who could blame them?

Do you understand how trauma works? It doesn't sound like you do.

Online form signed and let's hope this goes somewhere.

Unfortunately I do know exactly how trauma works, and I wonder how many survivors you really know if you think something that damages you forever cannot also exist alongside happiness and peace in the future.
It is possible to heal, with help. But no sentence on its own is going to do that. I wonder how many people ‘signing forms’ and calling for ‘decades long sentences’ are also petitioning in any way for funding for survivors, or work with them or advocate for them.

None of which lets these boys off the hook, but punishment isn’t the end of the story.

Futurehappiness · 21/05/2026 19:58

I have also submitted the form to object to the unduly lenient sentence. I hope that many more people do the same.

A rape conviction needs to lead in almost every case to a custodial sentence, anything less undermines the seriousness of the crime. Any rehabilitation (if it is even possible) should follow the appropriate punishment.

I find the judge's comments especially that '"I should avoid criminalising these children unnecessarily' really egregious and insulting to the victims. 1: the victims were also children. 2: these perpetrators ARE ALREADY CRIMINALS so how does 'unnecessarily criminalising' them apply? Surely that ship has sailed.

ChalkOutlines · 21/05/2026 20:00

ImImmortalNowBabyDoll · 21/05/2026 19:18

I don't see how having low intelligence makes you feel like it's OK to rape a terrified girl. If he really has got to 15 and still isn't capable of knowing that rape is wrong then he's a danger to society and needs locking up even more.

I think a lot of people skim read the FOR THEIR AGE part or misinterpret it. He was low for the age of 13/14, that doesn’t necessarily mean he had significant delays , or had the mental age/intelligence of a much younger child. It’s not the excuse people think it is, and probably the reason why he was actually fit to stand trial.

Papoy · 21/05/2026 20:01

Basically that's a pat on the back .... What they do isn't a child like behaviour or a mistake of a young mind.... It is an adult crime and it should be an adult consequences !

EvieBB · 21/05/2026 20:06

WooBrad · 21/05/2026 17:34

I’ve also complained about this appalling sentence. Let’s get as many people as possible to fill in the form - use the link in the box where it asks for the names of the defendants.
https://www.cps.gov.uk/wessex/news/three-teenage-boys-sentenced-after-two-girls-raped-separate-attacks

Thanks, the form also asks for the name of the court they were sentenced....and probably other details. Could you share those here aswell please? Thank you

Meadowfinch · 21/05/2026 20:08

WearyAuldWumman · 21/05/2026 19:25

If it's anything like the situation in Scotland, the courts will only give a meaningful sentence after a second offence. If intelligence is the issue, then it'll be a mental health facility sine die.

The boys committed two separate rapes. There have already been two separate offences against two different victims.

This was a repeat pattern of premeditated gang rape and needs to be treated as such. They are all of the age of criminal responsibility.

The judge who passed this sentence is not fit to preside in court.

Pigeonpoodle · 21/05/2026 20:13

EvieBB · 21/05/2026 20:06

Thanks, the form also asks for the name of the court they were sentenced....and probably other details. Could you share those here aswell please? Thank you

They were sentenced at Southampton Crowm Court

aquitodavia · 21/05/2026 20:16

MaidOfSteel · 21/05/2026 19:44

To me, the age of these boys should be considered an aggravating factor, not mitigating. If they are already planning & executing gang rape, filming it for their own titillation at age 14, and are not properly punished, what will they be like at 20? And 30? And what about other boys who see this news, learning that rape will be practically unpunished? This sentence makes the danger of rape & sexual assault worse for all girls & women.

My heart goes out to the girls who were brutally raped. I truly hope that they can find a happy and peaceful future.

Completely agree

thestudio · 21/05/2026 20:19

Sorry if this has been asked multiple times, but is there a petition link?

I will try do the sentence review thing, don't suppose there is already a good form of words that I can cut and paste?

WindyMillerDrinksCider · 21/05/2026 20:23

Meadowfinch · 21/05/2026 20:08

The boys committed two separate rapes. There have already been two separate offences against two different victims.

This was a repeat pattern of premeditated gang rape and needs to be treated as such. They are all of the age of criminal responsibility.

The judge who passed this sentence is not fit to preside in court.

Exactly this. The judge needs to be scrutinised here.

Periperi2025 · 21/05/2026 20:24

Unforgettablefire · 21/05/2026 19:43

”Shouldn’t criminalise these boys”
They are criminals! They’re rapists!
I’m another that would like to see them locked up for life because girls aren’t safe while they walk the streets.
Those poor girls. I bet their parents want to tear them to shreds I know I would.

Maybe judges who fail to jail convicted rapist should get prison sentences if they rape again, see if that focuses their minds and changes their assessment of risk.

WindyMillerDrinksCider · 21/05/2026 20:24

I also find some of his remarks to be almost flippant.

Rosanov · 21/05/2026 20:27

Backedoffhackedoff · 21/05/2026 14:50

I’m afraid I agree we shouldn’t criminalise children

I think their risk to women/ the public and their progress in rehabilitation needs to be carefully assessed, and I would advocate on the side of caution with that- but not that they should be criminalised. It’s just not effective

Throw them in the pit, they’ll never be good members of society so why risk anyone else.

Pigeonpoodle · 21/05/2026 20:29

thestudio · 21/05/2026 20:19

Sorry if this has been asked multiple times, but is there a petition link?

I will try do the sentence review thing, don't suppose there is already a good form of words that I can cut and paste?

Not sure about a petition, but here’s a link to the sentence review.

it will ask for names, but just say they haven’t been released due to their age, and the court is Southampton. I don’t think the words matter too much - the important thing is we make it clear how we feel by force of numbers.

www.gov.uk/ask-crown-court-sentence-review

Simplelife1 · 21/05/2026 20:31

Perhaps its time we made men responsible for raising good men. Hit them where it hurts, their wallets. Make it well advertised
From 2027/8 whatever, any male under the age of 18 committing heinous crimes, , your father (regardless of the fact they may be estranged) will be fined a set ££££ garnered directly from wages, benefits, savings.

Repeat offence custodial sentence and double the fine for fathers.
Just thinking outside the box
So sick of reading so much violence against our poor girls.

Will we ever learn the names of the boys involved, It would be nice to pre warn our Dds

darkmoor · 21/05/2026 20:31

Thanks for linking the case, I have submitted an unduly lenient sentence report