women have not been the property of men for some considerable time in England - chattel slavery has not been a thing since at least the late Anglo Saxon period.
if you are referring to the legal status of married women as being subsumed into the legal person of their husband (known as femme convert)
a) that is very different from slavery in that in slavery slaves can be bought and sold to any person
b) the status stopped immediately upon dissolution of the marriage either through death or annulment or divorce
c) the actual practice of this was significantly variable across time and place within England and there are many many instances of married women acting as femme sole (in their own right).
Conpare this to the situation under traditional Islamic rules where it was not permitted to enslave Muslims but slavery was absolutely fine and indeed only abolished in most Muslim countries due to western pressure.
under the Koran men are permitted to have sexual relations with any female slave they own “a doctrine known as “what their right hand possesses”. They are not permitted to prostitute out their female slaves to other men but can sell them to whoever they want.
https://www.brandeis.edu/projects/fse/muslim/slavery.html
one of the reasons there was a coalition against Islamic state is that they attempted to go back to the fundamentals of Islam which mean that the taking of sex slaves is A ok as long as the slave is not already a Muslim,
Islamic state took many women and children of the Yazidi faith and many thousands of them were used as sex slaves. For example look at this bbc article (from a while ago).
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-30573385
the Koran is very very clear that this is ok.