Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Afghanistan humanitarian crisis

256 replies

Ihatetomatoes · 18/05/2026 22:21

BBC news 3 out of 4 struggle to find food

A growing number of billionaires and yet shocking food famine around the world.

Shocking decisions taken to sell children.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0q25dwj807o

A man wearing a pink turban cuddles his small daughter close in front of a cracked mud wall

Afghanistan humanitarian crisis: Ghor's starving families

In Afghanistan today, a staggering three in four people cannot meet their basic needs.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0q25dwj807o

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Ihatetomatoes · Yesterday 21:32

EmeraldShamrock000 · Yesterday 21:32

Exactly. It wasn’t normal. In Afghanistan it is normal.

Is it normal, the report framed it as an extreme response to severe poverty?

OP posts:
TheGander · Yesterday 21:33

@Foodgloriousfoodie you seem to be living in some kind of imagined fantasy of a glorious Islamic past. Look at the situation today. And btw my great grandmother was no one’s property.

OtterlyAstounding · Yesterday 21:33

Bringemout · Yesterday 21:31

Yes the difference is it was a scandal because wider society knew it was wrong. It is not that these things don’t happen, it’s societies response to it that tells you what that society is. These cases of men selling their little girls is not causing a scandal in afghan society is it?

Yes, exactly. These things happened far too much in the past in the western world, but they weren't normalised through the entirety of society in the same way.

HerbertHunterIWasBornToLoveYouNSoul · Yesterday 21:33

Bringemout · Yesterday 21:29

children have died due to sexual trauma after these “marriages”. Anyone remember the 8yr old in Yemen who died after her wedding due to tearing and internal bleeding. How many times has that happened and we don’t hear about it because you are in a society where people have so little regard for children, girls and women no-one cares, just buy another wife.

That's horrific and that's an understatement
All in the name of religion.
Religion still causing mayhem in this day and age.

Foodgloriousfoodie · Yesterday 21:33

WaryCrow · Yesterday 21:28

No more so than the empires of Asia. We’re a little tired of being colonised, exploited and abused under these endless complaints. Few have been as generous to other countries since imperialism than the people of Western Europe. The working people here work for what they get, and they were here doing exactly that before both mass migration and imperialism.

I’m astounded

I’m very very glad I wasn’t one of those working classes over 100 years ago

Octavia64 · Yesterday 21:33

Foodgloriousfoodie · Yesterday 21:06

In feel like posters are being really short sighted and ignorant about history - women were still property of men here in England around 100 years ago and
had no legal rights and Middle Eastern countries were certainly not behind us in science, mathematics and art - certainly in Mathematics - the ability of the world to be developed due to algebra - that originated in Baghdad

women have not been the property of men for some considerable time in England - chattel slavery has not been a thing since at least the late Anglo Saxon period.

if you are referring to the legal status of married women as being subsumed into the legal person of their husband (known as femme convert)

a) that is very different from slavery in that in slavery slaves can be bought and sold to any person

b) the status stopped immediately upon dissolution of the marriage either through death or annulment or divorce

c) the actual practice of this was significantly variable across time and place within England and there are many many instances of married women acting as femme sole (in their own right).

Conpare this to the situation under traditional Islamic rules where it was not permitted to enslave Muslims but slavery was absolutely fine and indeed only abolished in most Muslim countries due to western pressure.

under the Koran men are permitted to have sexual relations with any female slave they own “a doctrine known as “what their right hand possesses”. They are not permitted to prostitute out their female slaves to other men but can sell them to whoever they want.

https://www.brandeis.edu/projects/fse/muslim/slavery.html

one of the reasons there was a coalition against Islamic state is that they attempted to go back to the fundamentals of Islam which mean that the taking of sex slaves is A ok as long as the slave is not already a Muslim,

Islamic state took many women and children of the Yazidi faith and many thousands of them were used as sex slaves. For example look at this bbc article (from a while ago).

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-30573385

the Koran is very very clear that this is ok.

Yazidi women

Islamic State: Yazidi women tell of sex-slavery trauma

The Yazidi religious minority community in Iraq says 3,500 women and girls are still being held by the so-called Islamic State, many being used as sex slaves. Paul Wood met some of those who escaped.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-30573385

Bringemout · Yesterday 21:34

Ihatetomatoes · Yesterday 21:31

Forced Adoptions: Between the 1950s and 1970s, many unmarried mothers were pressured or coerced by churches and social workers into "giving up" their babies for adoption. Some mothers have described this as their children being "sold" by institutions.

Completely different to selling your daughter to people yourself knowing she will be raped.

EmeraldShamrock000 · Yesterday 21:34

Ihatetomatoes · Yesterday 21:32

Is it normal, the report framed it as an extreme response to severe poverty?

No, it wasn’t normal, it was a minority of people. The whataboutary won’t ever normalise the use of child brides.

Ihatetomatoes · Yesterday 21:35

Octavia64 · Yesterday 21:33

women have not been the property of men for some considerable time in England - chattel slavery has not been a thing since at least the late Anglo Saxon period.

if you are referring to the legal status of married women as being subsumed into the legal person of their husband (known as femme convert)

a) that is very different from slavery in that in slavery slaves can be bought and sold to any person

b) the status stopped immediately upon dissolution of the marriage either through death or annulment or divorce

c) the actual practice of this was significantly variable across time and place within England and there are many many instances of married women acting as femme sole (in their own right).

Conpare this to the situation under traditional Islamic rules where it was not permitted to enslave Muslims but slavery was absolutely fine and indeed only abolished in most Muslim countries due to western pressure.

under the Koran men are permitted to have sexual relations with any female slave they own “a doctrine known as “what their right hand possesses”. They are not permitted to prostitute out their female slaves to other men but can sell them to whoever they want.

https://www.brandeis.edu/projects/fse/muslim/slavery.html

one of the reasons there was a coalition against Islamic state is that they attempted to go back to the fundamentals of Islam which mean that the taking of sex slaves is A ok as long as the slave is not already a Muslim,

Islamic state took many women and children of the Yazidi faith and many thousands of them were used as sex slaves. For example look at this bbc article (from a while ago).

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-30573385

the Koran is very very clear that this is ok.

Is this confined to extreme islamists or other faiths?

OP posts:
Foodgloriousfoodie · Yesterday 21:35

TheGander · Yesterday 21:33

@Foodgloriousfoodie you seem to be living in some kind of imagined fantasy of a glorious Islamic past. Look at the situation today. And btw my great grandmother was no one’s property.

She would have been her husbands if in this country and be able to be legally raped by him until 1990 I believe

no imagined fantasy - I’m trying to counteract posters view of the Middle East being some backward backwater 500 years behind us

Ihatetomatoes · Yesterday 21:36

EmeraldShamrock000 · Yesterday 21:34

No, it wasn’t normal, it was a minority of people. The whataboutary won’t ever normalise the use of child brides.

I asked the question because a poster suggested selling children was normal in Afghanistan, the report suggested it was to current extreme poverty.

OP posts:
Foodgloriousfoodie · Yesterday 21:36

Bringemout · Yesterday 21:34

Completely different to selling your daughter to people yourself knowing she will be raped.

So your saying those institutions that robbed these children were fairer..

OtterlyAstounding · Yesterday 21:36

HRTQueen · Yesterday 21:31

You are not understanding of their mindset and culture

it would be inconceivable for the majority that they would ever consider a woman travelling to another country alone
its not just based on misogynist views. They only know life where it is dangerous and violent especially for women they send young men away because it’s safer for them to travel and they are more likely to manage the very harsh travelling to another country plus they are likely to make more money to send home it’s not so they can go on a jolly for a few years

if you had to send a child away would you feel a son of 18 is safer travelling in groups of men or a daughter of 18

what do you think you could do in their situation hold meetings in the local cafe to arrange a group of young women to travel and organise a group of young men to gather weapons and fight or hold a march and try and negotiate

sending money home enables their families to buy food and medicine and the very basics and the pressure on them to do so is immense of the most powerful governments on the world are unable to change things how are those that are refugees able to

Explain the 90% domestic violence stat then, if they're all such good men in an impossible situation.

And yes, I understand that their mindset and culture is drenched in misogyny.

Frankly, I would rather send my daughter away in the hopes that she might escape, even with a journey that was a horrific ordeal, than knowing that if she stayed she would certainly suffer a horrific ordeal for the rest of her life, being owned, and raped on a regular basis by her husband, in a country that saw her as less worthy of rights than a camel.

Octavia64 · Yesterday 21:39

Ihatetomatoes · Yesterday 21:29

The "Maiden Tribute" Scandal (1885): Investigative journalist W.T. Stead exposed a thriving market in London where parents living in extreme poverty would sell their underage daughters to brothels for a few pounds. This led to the age of consent being raised from 13 to 16.

It happened.

Edited

peiple were not property.

there were at that point multiple missions in many places where women and children who were (don’t really know how to phrase this) selling sex could go to try to get out of the industry.

the prostitires were not the PROPERTY of anyone else and if they left there was not a legal process to return them to their owner.

compare the romans or slavery in America or Islamic slavery where runaway slaves were hunted down and returned to their owner.

Foodgloriousfoodie · Yesterday 21:40

OtterlyAstounding · Yesterday 21:36

Explain the 90% domestic violence stat then, if they're all such good men in an impossible situation.

And yes, I understand that their mindset and culture is drenched in misogyny.

Frankly, I would rather send my daughter away in the hopes that she might escape, even with a journey that was a horrific ordeal, than knowing that if she stayed she would certainly suffer a horrific ordeal for the rest of her life, being owned, and raped on a regular basis by her husband, in a country that saw her as less worthy of rights than a camel.

The daughter would die if he didn’t nothing

I don’t think people
in the west can begin to imagine - how could we possibly

and btw the patriarchy in the west continues because women collude with it - perhaps women shouldn’t accept it and just “rise up”like the men In Afghanistan should (as a poster suggested) or the women of Afghanistan if it’s that easy

it’s not as easy as you think

EasternStandard · Yesterday 21:40

Foodgloriousfoodie · Yesterday 21:35

She would have been her husbands if in this country and be able to be legally raped by him until 1990 I believe

no imagined fantasy - I’m trying to counteract posters view of the Middle East being some backward backwater 500 years behind us

How do you see the situation in Afghanistan now?

Ihatetomatoes · Yesterday 21:41

Anyway, there are ways that people can donate if they wish to, kindly provided by some posters. Thank you.

I've realised its not a subject of interest to many, so will leave it there.

OP posts:
SpaceRaccoon · Yesterday 21:42

Foodgloriousfoodie · Yesterday 21:06

In feel like posters are being really short sighted and ignorant about history - women were still property of men here in England around 100 years ago and
had no legal rights and Middle Eastern countries were certainly not behind us in science, mathematics and art - certainly in Mathematics - the ability of the world to be developed due to algebra - that originated in Baghdad

No, it was developed long before Islam.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_algebra

EmeraldShamrock000 · Yesterday 21:43

HRTQueen · Yesterday 21:31

You are not understanding of their mindset and culture

it would be inconceivable for the majority that they would ever consider a woman travelling to another country alone
its not just based on misogynist views. They only know life where it is dangerous and violent especially for women they send young men away because it’s safer for them to travel and they are more likely to manage the very harsh travelling to another country plus they are likely to make more money to send home it’s not so they can go on a jolly for a few years

if you had to send a child away would you feel a son of 18 is safer travelling in groups of men or a daughter of 18

what do you think you could do in their situation hold meetings in the local cafe to arrange a group of young women to travel and organise a group of young men to gather weapons and fight or hold a march and try and negotiate

sending money home enables their families to buy food and medicine and the very basics and the pressure on them to do so is immense of the most powerful governments on the world are unable to change things how are those that are refugees able to

It been well documented that the females who have made it to the crossing are raped and or murdered. I vaguely remember in Greece, the females were tossed overboard left to die.

Foodgloriousfoodie · Yesterday 21:43

EasternStandard · Yesterday 21:40

How do you see the situation in Afghanistan now?

As a totalitarian terrorist regime with a humanitarian crisis of proportions we can’t begin to imagine

OtterlyAstounding · Yesterday 21:44

Foodgloriousfoodie · Yesterday 21:40

The daughter would die if he didn’t nothing

I don’t think people
in the west can begin to imagine - how could we possibly

and btw the patriarchy in the west continues because women collude with it - perhaps women shouldn’t accept it and just “rise up”like the men In Afghanistan should (as a poster suggested) or the women of Afghanistan if it’s that easy

it’s not as easy as you think

Death is not always the worst option. A terrible statement to have to make, but a true one.

I never said it was easy. I said I have the utmost contempt for men in a country rife with domestic violence, misogyny, and abject dehumanisation. I disdain the men who buy little girls, who sell little girls, and who keep impregnating their wives, knowing the situation their children will face. I have no sympathy for men who flee, and abandon their female family members.

The solution? God knows. But that doesn't mean I will excuse any of those men for the things they do - or don't do.

SpaceRaccoon · Yesterday 21:44

Tbh I'm disgusted to see women who should know better, defending these men. It's such cultural relativism. Not selling your tiny daughter to be raped should be an absolute.

Bringemout · Yesterday 21:45

I’m sick of excusing child rape because some people want to feel they are being even handed, kind and understanding about it. I’m an ethnic minority, this ridiculous attitude harms girls and women, the “oh we weren’t any better” whilst neglecting the fact that you would go mental if your husband suggested selling your own daughter because things are a bit tight. But nooooo we must indulge in navel gazing and be understanding when it happens to little brown girls, the first rape won’t hurt them at allll, it’ll be fine! Yes ofcourse my Sophia should be able to choose a man when she’s 25 but little Fatima can be sold off as a five year old, it’s their culture and ofcourse a hundred years ago someone did something super bad in the UK so we should not judge too harshly.

How do you think Afghan women perceive this? They know exactly what is going to happen to their daughters. Who amongst you would tolerate it if some five year old in your family needed an operation and your DH went “oh yeah sure we’ll pay for it but we are going to be wanting to collect her in a few years for our son”. You’d be sickened is a white man did that.

The racism of low expectations.

Octavia64 · Yesterday 21:46

Ihatetomatoes · Yesterday 21:32

Is it normal, the report framed it as an extreme response to severe poverty?

Yes it is normal.

the Taliban have recently “clarified” the law in Afghanistan and slavery is now explicitly legal.

see

https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/the-talibans-new-criminal-procedure-code-for-courts-fundamental-rights-violations-are-now-legal-in-afghanistan/

for example of comment on this.

in particular it goes further than the Koran which states that people who are Muslims are not permitted to be enslaved.

the Afghanistan code specifically considers only Hanafi Muslims to be Muslims and other types to be “heretics” and therefore only hanafi Muslims cannot be enslaved.

(this is somewhat similar to saying only Church of England members are Christians and catholics/orthodox are not).

OtterlyAstounding · Yesterday 21:46

EmeraldShamrock000 · Yesterday 21:43

It been well documented that the females who have made it to the crossing are raped and or murdered. I vaguely remember in Greece, the females were tossed overboard left to die.

Jesus Christ. That's beyond monstrous.

Really, it makes me think that the only way this situation will be solved is when all the women and girls in Afghanistan die of starvation, in childbirth, and of preventable illnesses, and the men are left with no one to abuse.