Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder what else can be done to break the cycle of generations living off benefits?

1000 replies

Allonthesametrain · 15/05/2026 22:25

Sounds harsh because It is. As a former teacher, then eduation social worker, now the past few years more heavily involved with school attendance.

My desire has always been to help children from unprivileged backgrounds to know their worth and achieve the best they can and this has been my career from age 23 to 57.

The number of times I've cried, torn my hair out, is immeasurable. I and colleagues have gone above and beyond to support the families, genuinely care about them, but unfortunately the outcome has been, as I've said in title, it's a continiation of the cycle of being brought up within a small community and low expectations.

So many gorgeous kids (supported throughout their young lives until they leave school) who tell you their dreams of what they want to to achieve in life, we do everything we can to enable it and some have indeed broken out of the circle but unfortunately the reality has been...

Parents who live lifestyles of no bedtime routine, tell their kids not to come back before ...pm, sleep in and don't get them out of bed ready and fed for school and as for weekends, pub and take back a new bloke

Parents who have issues themselves and project them onto DC. The kids soon realise they can stay off school for feigning illness and would actually be a comfort to Mum

The parents who just cba and say shall we just still in bed?

Of course there are so many other mitigating factors but these are the 3 main experiences we've dealt with. Unfortunately it really does come down to poor parenting and no matter what interventions we do to encourage attendance, only a minority are genuine.

So the cycle...DC think education isn't important, parents are hopeless role models and can often be aggressive to teachers, a deflection of blame.

Then oh DD gets pregnant at age 15, DS has been reprimanded by the police for scooting around in a balaclava. Then pure hostility when we try to continue to talk to them and what could be done to help.

Basically it's just such a shame, these sweet young kids who say they want to be ... become so influenced by their homelife, a need to fit in with their family and peers from the same estate, that they ignore the support we give them, don't turn up to appointments etc.

For the genuine cases, DC with SEN, the effort to try and ensure they are in best place is utmost and it's heartbreaking there aren't enough of them. Yes, we do know genuine cases and not just so many parents striving for a diagnosis because they feed DC a terrible diet and let them stay up late so are tired and irritable at school.

Expecting some backlash, whatever anyone says I can reason with.

OP posts:
LittleMi55Nobody · 16/05/2026 10:02

Isittimeformynapyet · 15/05/2026 22:31

Can't believe you used to be a teacher. There's so many errors in your post.

going by your "constructive" reply im assuming you're the sort who she's on about

SpryTaupeTurtle · 16/05/2026 10:04

Elsvieta · 16/05/2026 09:36

I'm struggling to think of solutions that aren't pretty damn Draconian, tbh. Matching the long-term unemployed to jobs and requiring them to accept, even if it means moving to another region. All benefits to be stopped (for the able-bodied) after a certain number of years. Bring back Borstal and corporal punishment in schools. No benefits at all for unmarried (as in never-married) mothers and mandatory adoption of babies born to those who can't support them. Not saying we should do all of that, but I think at this point this is the only approach that would make any difference. Some behaviours don't change until absolutely forced.

I think a reversal of the acceptance, and state support, of illegitimacy would, in the long run, benefit children, women and society in general. Women get trapped in poverty by raising kids alone while men dodge most of their responsibilities, and can only manage by drawing benefits for years; the state, in effect, has taken on the role of the husband. When the state didn't do that, premarital birth was rare. Maybe it's time to go back to a state that doesn't do that.

What do you think, OP, after so long working in the field? Can you see a way to change the attitudes and behaviours that wouldn't involve straight-up coercion?

Tripe. My mum worked for almost 50 years with the minimum of support from my dad and none from my brothers.

topcat2014 · 16/05/2026 10:10

It's interesting, isn't it, that when mechanisation and robots came for the blue collar car industry jobs that was "progress" and all good.

Now AI is coming for the white collar office jobs there is panic.

I worry where the jobs are for cohorts of pleasant but unqualified young people to get. We know it's hard for graduates. What about folk with a couple of GCSEs?

Even driving jobs (bus/lorry) require classroom work - pretty sure back in the day this wasn't needed.

I'm not saying send everyone back down the mines - but large employers were often a route to a proper life, rather than cobbling together zero hours contracts in cafes

SpryTaupeTurtle · 16/05/2026 10:20

Stopping benefits would push more people into poverty. No one should have to be married to claim benefits. And of course. Let's just thrash kids. That will teach them. My mum and my brothers dad weren't married. They split because he wanted her to have an abortion. Should she just have married him anyway incase she ever needed to claim benefits?

SpryTaupeTurtle · 16/05/2026 10:22

Allonthesametrain · 15/05/2026 22:25

Sounds harsh because It is. As a former teacher, then eduation social worker, now the past few years more heavily involved with school attendance.

My desire has always been to help children from unprivileged backgrounds to know their worth and achieve the best they can and this has been my career from age 23 to 57.

The number of times I've cried, torn my hair out, is immeasurable. I and colleagues have gone above and beyond to support the families, genuinely care about them, but unfortunately the outcome has been, as I've said in title, it's a continiation of the cycle of being brought up within a small community and low expectations.

So many gorgeous kids (supported throughout their young lives until they leave school) who tell you their dreams of what they want to to achieve in life, we do everything we can to enable it and some have indeed broken out of the circle but unfortunately the reality has been...

Parents who live lifestyles of no bedtime routine, tell their kids not to come back before ...pm, sleep in and don't get them out of bed ready and fed for school and as for weekends, pub and take back a new bloke

Parents who have issues themselves and project them onto DC. The kids soon realise they can stay off school for feigning illness and would actually be a comfort to Mum

The parents who just cba and say shall we just still in bed?

Of course there are so many other mitigating factors but these are the 3 main experiences we've dealt with. Unfortunately it really does come down to poor parenting and no matter what interventions we do to encourage attendance, only a minority are genuine.

So the cycle...DC think education isn't important, parents are hopeless role models and can often be aggressive to teachers, a deflection of blame.

Then oh DD gets pregnant at age 15, DS has been reprimanded by the police for scooting around in a balaclava. Then pure hostility when we try to continue to talk to them and what could be done to help.

Basically it's just such a shame, these sweet young kids who say they want to be ... become so influenced by their homelife, a need to fit in with their family and peers from the same estate, that they ignore the support we give them, don't turn up to appointments etc.

For the genuine cases, DC with SEN, the effort to try and ensure they are in best place is utmost and it's heartbreaking there aren't enough of them. Yes, we do know genuine cases and not just so many parents striving for a diagnosis because they feed DC a terrible diet and let them stay up late so are tired and irritable at school.

Expecting some backlash, whatever anyone says I can reason with.

I'm a qualified youth worker. Some of the most challenging places I have worked in have been well off places where parents have thrown money at their kids and let them do what they liked of an evening.

youalright · 16/05/2026 10:26

Tink3rbell30 · 16/05/2026 10:00

The problem is there are a lot of freebies and incentives for claiming but the minute you work more hours these are taken away or reduced. I purposely keep my hours at a certain amount as the more the work the more your wage gets taken off you in other ways.

I work and claim benefits im significantly better of then i would be if I didn't work

SpryTaupeTurtle · 16/05/2026 10:29

Tink3rbell30 · 16/05/2026 10:00

The problem is there are a lot of freebies and incentives for claiming but the minute you work more hours these are taken away or reduced. I purposely keep my hours at a certain amount as the more the work the more your wage gets taken off you in other ways.

I get no freebies - as a single person I get council tax reduction. Anything else I get is because I'm disabled not on universal credit

Backedoffhackedoff · 16/05/2026 10:37

That’s not generational though is it?

Socialclimber12 · 16/05/2026 10:37

LoremIpsumCici · 16/05/2026 00:56

Not everyone is lucky enough to be born a Boomer.

Boomer doesn’t refer just to baby boom, but also the longest running BOOM in the economy that have uplifted everyone in your generation like a tidal surge increasing wages and house values faster than inflation all on the back of free University level education.

Later generations have endured multiple small boom, big bust cycles. Which is why wages are low and taxes are high. They also have had to go into debt for what was free for your generation.

The stats show it.
The lowest 10% of earners saw their wages increase in real terms from 1975 to 1999 by 100%. That’s right, their buying power doubled. This is an opportunity to build intergenerational wealth for nothing.

However, from 1999 to 2023, the lowest 10% of earners saw their wages increase in real terms by a mere 10%. This is barely scraping by, there’s no opportunity to build intergenerational wealth just by working hard.

I hope you have enough mathematical ability to understand the difference and impact it would have.

House values, I am sure you know the story there where bank of (boomer) mum and dad either as gift or inheritance have been the #1 way that FTBs are able to get a starter home for over twenty years and counting.

I think you are missing the point of my post, I lived in (still do) one of the most deprived areas of the country and the way my friends and I got better lives was education and a fundamental desire to have more than our parents which was nothing. I didn’t just join a rising tide it took a lot of hard work and I know some people who never broke out of it back then despite being a boomer. But now I see what the OP describes, a lack of aspiration

Backedoffhackedoff · 16/05/2026 10:39

AnnaQuayRules · 16/05/2026 08:53

The poster a few posts up has explained that she's better off not working than working.

That’s not generational though is it?

Onbdy · 16/05/2026 10:41

MistressoftheDarkSide · 16/05/2026 02:16

No, no it is not a "massive issue". It is a divisive myth designed to pit the "hard working" against the feckless while ignoring the growing structural inequalities, negation of social mobility and sky rocketing transfer of wealth upwards to the already rich. It is a strategy that panders to eugenecists and designed to create a self fulfilling prophecy amongst the alleged "underclasses" and prime the population for "hard choices" subtly underpinned by growing right wing ideologies.

I live on the edges of a historically rough council estate. I see more right to buy properties with tradesmens vans, and traveller made good homes than anything else. Yes, there are the odd gaggles of teens playing at gangs, but you see them in their school uniforms when Monday rolls round.

The roughest hotspots are the affluent town centre where upper middle class kids are doing and dealing coke and ket.

Most local homeless are middle aged with chronic mental health issues that they self medicate.

Additionally, the younger generations are leveraging online platforms to generate income more than people realise, so while they may seem to be "failing" at mainstream, they're side hustling - there may be a moral debate to be had about some of the sources of income, but if the only goal in life is to make money, who cares eh?

Problem areas were created when councils started pushing "problematic" families all together in certain areas / estates, however, right to buy changed things considerably.

The problems we are facing now are precious little to do with a "genetic" underclass, and far more to do with the so rapid changes in work, the cost of living, the speed of technological progress, and difficulty in maintaining communities that used to have funded provisions for youth services, further education, libraries etc which have all been decimated in favour of private enterprise that focuses only on profit, not people.

Yes, in our rabid capitalist dystopia, there will always be those who struggle, and "make the place look untidy" however, the myth of hoardes of families who have "never worked" is just that - a myth. It suits people to have a target when their lives feel precarious and they feel powerless in the face of successions of self serving and ineffectual governments that are far more interested in licking the corporate boot for kick backs than anything else.

History is absolutely repeating itself on the roughly 80 year cycle of rise and fall. And it's not the fault of "families who have never worked".

What an absolute load of bollocks! 😂 As I said, you clearly don’t live anywhere near me.

It is a fact and many of us see it on a daily basis. It is something I witnessed in my previous role as a teacher and now in my current job. To claim otherwise is completely delusional. The government is concerned enough about it to be bringing in measures to tackle the economically inactive, especially in those under 30 who are thirsty generation unemployed. I’m assuming they are basing this on actual data.

Tink3rbell30 · 16/05/2026 10:44

youalright · 16/05/2026 10:26

I work and claim benefits im significantly better of then i would be if I didn't work

Edited

Maybe job dependant then? I'm on MW and get more help the less I work.

Onbdy · 16/05/2026 10:44

SouthernNights59 · 16/05/2026 02:49

Many MNers seem to believe that if it doesn't happen in their leafy enclave then it doesn't happen at all. They have no reason to meet these families at all so can't comprehend that they exist.

@SouthernNights59
Exactly! They clearly don’t live anywhere near me.

Therescathairinmybath · 16/05/2026 10:45

youalright · 16/05/2026 09:42

Yes because more people are disabled due to a failing nhs and increase in pension age its not because pip has got easier to get
Edit i don't agree with lifting the 2 child benefit cap.

Edited

PIP payment levels have increased since the pandemic (which nobody wants to think about any more). There’s a significant number of people living with Long Covid who became disabled after having the disease. It caused previously healthy people to have strokes, heart attacks, chronic lung problems and conditions like ME/CFS. Other people have suffered continuing mental health problems because of the lockdown restrictions with very little NHS support to help them. In the UK we have handled the aftermath of the pandemic very poorly.

Tink3rbell30 · 16/05/2026 10:46

SpryTaupeTurtle · 16/05/2026 10:29

I get no freebies - as a single person I get council tax reduction. Anything else I get is because I'm disabled not on universal credit

You should get (and deservedly so) a lot more help than just the CT reduction while disabled and on UC.

Ilovecoffeeme · 16/05/2026 10:47

RaininSummer · 15/05/2026 22:38

I agree OP. See it all the time on my job too.

I agree too. I used to work with some vulnerable people and it was like a revolving door. They didn’t know anything different.

FirstWorldProblemSolver · 16/05/2026 10:52

Backedoffhackedoff · 15/05/2026 22:37

It doesn’t really sound like your post is about benefits tbh.

its not really the case that generations easily live on benefits. This is a very pre austerity attitude- very 90s actually.

you can no longer just not work because you don’t fancy it. Disability benefits are difficult to qualify for. The dole itself, unemployment benefits, are next to nothing.

Read @BurnoutBee 's post and stand corrected then.

neverbeenskiing · 16/05/2026 10:53

I work with children in a safeguarding role.

Whoever these researchers are who "couldn't find" any examples of families where no one has worked for 3 generations, I wish they'd come to me. I could have introduced them to at least 10 families in that situation!

BUT benefits are not what keeps the cycle of poverty going for those families. It's intergenerational trauma that keeps it going- issues like Domestic Abuse, Mental Illness, Substance Misuse, Neglect, Crime and antisocial behaviour. These things get passed down from generation to generation and become normalised. Children who are born into chaos and grow up never having known anything but chaos will often go on to have chaotic lives as adults and the cycle continues.

Taking benefits away won't magically make those complex social issues disappear, it will more likely result in a greater number of children being removed from their families and placed into a 'care' system that is already barely functioning as it is. There needs to be much greater investment in services like DA, Youth Offending, Mental Health Services, Children's Social Care, Early Years and Substance Misuse services so they can actually achieve meaningful and sustained change. But that would require the Government to step up and commit to properly funding public services, and listening to the people who actually work on the front line of those services rather than spunking stupid amounts of money on pointless initiatives and reforms that sound good but don't work in practice whilst talking about pulling the rug from under vulnerable families by making it more difficult for them to access benefits.

Backedoffhackedoff · 16/05/2026 10:55

Onbdy · 16/05/2026 10:41

What an absolute load of bollocks! 😂 As I said, you clearly don’t live anywhere near me.

It is a fact and many of us see it on a daily basis. It is something I witnessed in my previous role as a teacher and now in my current job. To claim otherwise is completely delusional. The government is concerned enough about it to be bringing in measures to tackle the economically inactive, especially in those under 30 who are thirsty generation unemployed. I’m assuming they are basing this on actual data.

Seeing things through your narrow sphere of experience isn’t that meaningful at a societal level

Backedoffhackedoff · 16/05/2026 10:56

FirstWorldProblemSolver · 16/05/2026 10:52

Read @BurnoutBee 's post and stand corrected then.

Is that the one that’s not generational? Apologies as I posted this last night and there are 12 pages since then

SpryTaupeTurtle · 16/05/2026 10:57

I'm actually on benefits. I was turned down for lcwra three times. I was also initially refused disability benefits after a triple leg fracture and had to go to tribunal to get it. One person's post on an Internet forum doesn't mean that's everyone's lived experience.

SpryTaupeTurtle · 16/05/2026 11:02

I personally know of one family like this. Kids dead or in jail. Dad dead from drug overdose.

Girls of the family pregnant young. However most of the people I see around me, including single parents are working part time at least. There are lots of people who grow up in poverty or in dysfunction who don't fit the three generations on benefits narrative

And if people think disability benefits are easy to get - that wasn't my experience in the slightest. It was a horrible process that made me feel worse than when I started

BurnoutBee · 16/05/2026 11:04

@sparrowhawkhere

I am the person who worked full time for many years as a teaching assistant. I then had a period of burnout so I applied for UC.

I was shocked to discover that I am roughly £500 a month better off staying at home (I get housing element etc). YOU asked ME how I am a role model to my children?

In many ways actually. During my time as a TA whilst raising the three of them, I completed an OU degree. My eldest is on track for some fantastic GCSE results judging from his recent mocks.

I am not going to remain on universal credit forever as quite frankly there’s no challenge for me. But, currently, at this moment of time I can only apply for jobs in the higher paying brackets as I am NOT going to work to be poorer.

Why am I going to return to work as a teaching assistant and go back to counting my pennies? It’s a huge relief now to go into a supermarket and buy good quality food for dinners. Meat etc. Benefits my children much more it seems not working. You’re on cloud cuckoo land if you think I’m going to give that up.
My next job will NEED to pay me more for it to be worth it. Like I said, I’m not dragging my arse out to be in a defecit of £500. I’d have to be pretty stupid to do that tbh.

suburburban · 16/05/2026 11:08

littlelamb11 · 16/05/2026 09:14

The cycle you talk about is usually genetics rather than generations copying their parents.
Learning difficulties, undiagnosed Sen or nd. This runs in families and although you may get some who are brighter and make it to uni this is rare.
You say low expectations but if someone doesn’t have very intelligent parents who are in social housing and struggle to keep a job or are unemployable which can be difficult if they have low intelligence, they usually have children with the same difficulties or intellectual struggles and that’s why the cycle continues.
Expectations are naturally higher for those born to successful parents who excelled intellectually because they have those genes.
It is harder to get a job now with a low level of education and life is a competition so those born with disadvantages are likely to be the ones unemployed. I think that’s partly a society problem because we still pick and choose the same brightest candidates and then moan the ones we didn’t pick are unemployed or on benefits because other employers do the same.

True but in the past they would have to work to survive

MatronPomfrey · 16/05/2026 11:10

Allonthesametrain · 15/05/2026 23:42

Yes, this is my demographic area which I travel to 3 hour round trip daily. Of course the MNs who are upset about going into an office one day a week won't understand the involvement from purely caring and devoted to job to willingly commute to try to make a difference while also having DC. Xx

Also in the North East and much experience of working with families that have experienced generational unemployment and criminality.

Teachers trying to teach when some children reg to even sit at their desk. Children out to all hours, setting fire to bins. Many on illegal electric scooters and bikes that their parents bought for them. Fathers and sons going to their unpaid work requirement together. I’m sure other parts of the country are the same.

I worry for the future because it really seems to be everywhere. Children growing up in chaotic homes has a detrimental affect on their future.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread