Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder on the future of generous welfare in the UK

1000 replies

happybug1234 · 11/05/2026 12:51

It seems increasingly obvious that many middle-income families are becoming frustrated at how squeezed they are financially, while at the same time seeing people on universal credit receive a growing range of subsidies and support — £1 attraction tickets on days out, a 6% rise in benefits this financial year, childcare costs reclaimable through Universal Credit, housing benefit, and so on. I see thread after thread on this on this site and also increasing momentum in the media on this issue (income cliff edges etc)

In my own extended family, 1 unemployed parent with the other on min wage, in social housing appear to have more holidays and more disposable income than we do, despite us both working full time with a household income of around £95k. Once childcare, mortgage, insurances, commuting and tax are taken into account, we 100% have a lower level of disposable income than they do as they do not have any of these work related costs and their rent is paid. They have recently gone on a 2 week holiday whilst the most we can ever afford is 1 week.

Quite a few teachers in my friendship circle are declining promotion opportunities or TLR because the extra pay often doesn’t feel worth the additional stress once tax, pension contributions and childcare costs are factored in. Instead, some are putting more effort into private tutoring, which is tax free cash in hand.

What is stopping the government from addressing this as people seek to be responding accordingly in their behaviour!

OP posts:
Plugg · 11/05/2026 21:00

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Boohoo76 · 11/05/2026 21:01

littleorangefox · 11/05/2026 20:59

"Entitled" is the wording used by the government/DWP.

We all know what entitled means in this context…

XenoBitch · 11/05/2026 21:01

Plugg · 11/05/2026 20:59

Not true. Mumsnet is brutal about people that rely on the state for funding because they think working full time is for other people just not for them.

FFS give your head a wobble. PP is a single mum... keeping her career by still working part time. Will increase her hours when her kid is old enough.

Wynter25 · 11/05/2026 21:02

XenoBitch · 11/05/2026 21:00

No, I did not. Her job right now is raising a small child with no support. That is why she is on UC.

And will point out got 4yr old. 2yr old and near 1yr old. I am doing my best for them

Florich · 11/05/2026 21:02

Kirbert2 · 11/05/2026 20:33

I have nothing left to save and I'm unable to work. I'm absolutely terrified of what the future holds.

Yes I am sorry. It’s nothing to envy. People who are dependent on benefits are vulnerable to the whims of any particular government. I don’t see that is something to be jealous of. Hope things don’t get worse. I just feel pessimistic.

AlcoholicAntibiotic · 11/05/2026 21:02

Wynter25 · 11/05/2026 21:02

And will point out got 4yr old. 2yr old and near 1yr old. I am doing my best for them

Why is their father not paying to support them?

XenoBitch · 11/05/2026 21:03

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

and if she works full time, then the tax payer will be paying for childcare and you will also fucking bitch about that too.

You will be paying either way.

Wynter25 · 11/05/2026 21:03

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

You are just so hilarious.

XenoBitch · 11/05/2026 21:04

Wynter25 · 11/05/2026 21:02

And will point out got 4yr old. 2yr old and near 1yr old. I am doing my best for them

That is a small gap between them all. I am sure you got your hands full already Flowers

Wynter25 · 11/05/2026 21:04

AlcoholicAntibiotic · 11/05/2026 21:02

Why is their father not paying to support them?

Because hes an emotionally abusive prick whos to lazy to work and isnt allowed contact

Plugg · 11/05/2026 21:04

XenoBitch · 11/05/2026 21:01

FFS give your head a wobble. PP is a single mum... keeping her career by still working part time. Will increase her hours when her kid is old enough.

You keep saying that, as though her taking tax payers money to work part time when taxpayers have to work full time to pay for it is at all morally or ethically acceptable. There’s a word for people like that.

PropertyD · 11/05/2026 21:04

ShyMaryEllen · 11/05/2026 15:14

There's a huge difference between a pensioner who has worked for decades (and paid NI and tax) getting £200 or so a week in return, and a 20 year old living with parents claiming UC after paying nothing.

It can never be fair that a family with two FT earners can't afford a home and a decent standard of living, particularly when the one next door might have nobody in work but more money coming in, or that someone working full time gets the same as a colleague working part-time and getting topped up by UC. I would prefer to see universal payments for things like childcare and school meals, made directly to the nursery/school, and a benefit cap set at below minimum wage. That way, children wouldn't suffer, but there would still be an incentive for claimants to find work.

I'm not a fan of means-tested anything, as it just drags workers down if they have to pay for things that would be free if they didn't work. £1 entry fees to claimants might add up to a drop in the ocean, but it sends a message that working to support your family is pointless, and would be infuriating to a working parent who couldn't afford to take their children to the event. It's also wrong that wages are so low that many workers have to claim UC.

You ignore what people are saying at your peril. Work should always pay more otherwise why do it. What I also thinks helps people on benefits is the black economy where they have their benefits and cash in hand jobs that the benefits people don’t know about. That and people living with a boyfriend but pretending they don’t.

PIP claims are spiralling out of control and everyone knows it. Issue is that there isn’t a squad of people to investigate so they claim it’s not an issue

Kitte321 · 11/05/2026 21:04

XenoBitch · 11/05/2026 20:58

She is a single mum. She may not have family help with the child minding.
And she had said repeatedly, that then her kid is 3, she will do more hours.

But again. I HAD to go back to work and so I utilised a nursery (that I paid for) that my little boy attended from the age of 11 months. Would I have chosen to have more time off? Maybe. But I have financial commitments and two children to provide for.
I do understand the desire to stay at home and work fewer hours. The juggle is incredibly hard. However, I don’t think that is a choice we are all entitled to make unless we can fund it ourselves.
There are exceptions to this, such as caring for children with disabilities.

Kirbert2 · 11/05/2026 21:04

AlcoholicAntibiotic · 11/05/2026 21:02

Why is their father not paying to support them?

Because they are allowed to just walk away and leave the single mum to all of the judgement and vitriol apparently.

Boohoo76 · 11/05/2026 21:05

Whatalunatic · 11/05/2026 20:59

lots of mums who share care with a husband or partner are able to work 40 hours plus a week due to a shared approach to picking up and dropping off at childcare/school. Try doing it on you own. And then trying doing it with one in nursery, another in a preschool in the opposite direction and another in school half a mile away from the preschool. All with different opening/closing times. And no car. So when you've dropped off - taking maybe an hour or more - you're then reliant on public transport to get you to work on time and then back before they all close. It's not easy and sometimes impossible to navigate.

It's not helpful to compare situations when you know nothing at all of the other person. And yes, I realise that not all marriages are equal, that many women struggle and effectively live single lives regardless of the person sleeping next to them. That's the point. It's tough out there for everyone but doing it on your own? Just try it for a few months and let us know how you get on.

And before you give me a ton of abuse along the lines of 'only people taking from teh system would say that', I am a single parent of 3, one of whom is disabled. I worked mainly full time whilst they were younger and once my eldest got to an age where he was able to be responsible, I also did 2 part time jobs around the full time and being a mum. I continue to work full time and seasonally because being on my own for over 15 years now without a penny from the ex, well, life is tough. And if I could do it again, I would try and balance things better because my children's welfare was also important. Not just the cold hard cash I would muster up every month. My priorities were not right.

In work with a number of single mums working 40 hours plus. They do it on their own. The previous poster should be able to manage 30. That’s only 6 hours per day.

Plugg · 11/05/2026 21:05

XenoBitch · 11/05/2026 21:03

and if she works full time, then the tax payer will be paying for childcare and you will also fucking bitch about that too.

You will be paying either way.

If I’m paying either way can I choose to pay for her childcare please?

XenoBitch · 11/05/2026 21:05

Plugg · 11/05/2026 21:04

You keep saying that, as though her taking tax payers money to work part time when taxpayers have to work full time to pay for it is at all morally or ethically acceptable. There’s a word for people like that.

Ok, she could have just left her job altogether and got more benefits.

ilovesooty · 11/05/2026 21:06

Sometimessmiling · 11/05/2026 18:56

You get so much more than we ever got from the government. Much more.

I'm a pensioner. No children. No handouts as you put it. No benefits until I was eligible for the state pension. And I'm still working.

Boohoo76 · 11/05/2026 21:06

XenoBitch · 11/05/2026 21:05

Ok, she could have just left her job altogether and got more benefits.

And that makes it better does it? Why do you think it is appropriate for people to claim benefits who don’t need them?!

youalright · 11/05/2026 21:06

Plugg · 11/05/2026 20:49

Work hard at school get to uni. Work hard at uni get a job that pays more than NMW. It’s the standard plan for most people.

Its a privelage not everyone has.

Cherry8809 · 11/05/2026 21:07

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

KvotheTheBloodless · 11/05/2026 21:07

I think welfare (aka wealth redistribution) will become more necessary as wealth inequality grows. AI and technological advances will dramatically reduce the number of menial tasks that most of the population has historically been employed to do. The handful of people at the very top of the pyramid will be incredibly rich, whilst the increasing number of people out of work or in extremely low paying roles will need a helping hand - otherwise they'll be completely shut out from all the benefits such advances could bring to society as a whole.

This is tricky though, as the people at the top and in the middle don't see why they should subsidise people at the bottom, forgetting that the way society and our economy are structured lead to increasing social inequality if this isn't addressed through government intervention.

Too much social inequality leads to social unrest, which further harms human society.

The other issue is that we don't want to tax those at the top too much, as those people and companies will just move their wealth overseas. We have to remain attractive as a place to live, through the right levels of taxation, investment incentives and regulation.

There's a really delicate balance to be struck by the state, and I'm really, really glad it's not me that has to decide where to set it!

Whatalunatic · 11/05/2026 21:08

Plugg · 11/05/2026 21:04

You keep saying that, as though her taking tax payers money to work part time when taxpayers have to work full time to pay for it is at all morally or ethically acceptable. There’s a word for people like that.

you know part time workers pay tax too, right?

XenoBitch · 11/05/2026 21:08

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Ah and here is the internalised misogyny.

littleorangefox · 11/05/2026 21:08

My husband works full time earning just under £40k and I'm a SAHM. We also receive a significant amount of benefits. We have a mortgage and 4 young kids. We don't "live in poverty" and can afford all our bills (which we pay the full amounts for) and have money left over every month without any shame. We also don't drink, smoke or abuse drugs nor do we have a massive TV 😂 Can't say I'm aware of any entry for £1 to attractions near where I live though except the zoo one time.

I have some health issues which weren't a massive problem until after our third child was born. The fourth was a result of a migrated coil and due to traumatic circumstances at the time was past the point of a possible termination but it's unlikely that we would have taken this route anyway. Yes, we proceeded with having a fourth child while claiming benefits. At the time there was little financial gain to this. We now receive more due to the 2 child cap being lifted but we obviously cannot pick and choose which elements of UC we receive. Nobody is aware of my health issues except my husband and 1 or 2 trusted friends. Most people would assume I am fairly healthy and due to living in a "nice" house and area that we wouldn't be claiming benefits either. Yes, I can have children and care for them but it takes every bit of energy I have both physically and mentally at the moment. To others, it may appear that I can carry out regular tasks and have a "normal" life. But, I have been assessed as unable to work by medical professionals and I really could not manage paid employment right now. I trust their judgement more than randoms on the Internet. Not everything is as black and white as most people on mumsnet seem to like to believe about benefit claimants.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread