Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Met police are erasing the third victim of the Golders Green stabbing

1000 replies

tulippetals · 02/05/2026 09:54

https://x.com/metpoliceuk/status/2050114417405132857?s=46

I am actually horrified. A third, Muslim, man was stabbed in the attack but he isn’t being mentioned anywhere. How is this allowed?!

Metropolitan Police (@metpoliceuk) on X

A man will appear in court today charged following a Counter Terrorism Policing investigation into two men stabbed in #GoldersGreen: https://t.co/BgK04EQmyX

https://x.com/metpoliceuk/status/2050114417405132857?s=46

OP posts:
Thread gallery
23
Wouldcou · 02/05/2026 09:57

Never heard there was third person either. Strange

Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · 02/05/2026 09:58

Because the first one was a personal dispute. Not a racially motivated attack on him because he was Muslim.

tulippetals · 02/05/2026 09:58

Wouldcou · 02/05/2026 09:57

Never heard there was third person either. Strange

With media reports it’s one thing. But for the actual police to lie and misrepresent what’s happening is disgraceful.

OP posts:
RoniaCheetah · 02/05/2026 09:59

I had heard about the third person (probably because I read The Guardian which is linked after that tweet). I think the counter terrorism bit only relates to his attacks in Golders Green though. The previous stabbing happened earlier in the day after a 'personal dispute '.

PatriciaRocks · 02/05/2026 09:59

Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · 02/05/2026 09:58

Because the first one was a personal dispute. Not a racially motivated attack on him because he was Muslim.

Thank you 👍

Wouldcou · 02/05/2026 09:59

Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · 02/05/2026 09:58

Because the first one was a personal dispute. Not a racially motivated attack on him because he was Muslim.

But then that would show he was stabbing people for other reasons that weren’t racial.

DuchessofReality · 02/05/2026 09:59

Well it is in the 3rd paragraph of that police statement. And all BBC reports I have seen/heard since the charges have had that detail in.

GoodkneeBadKnee · 02/05/2026 09:59

Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · 02/05/2026 09:58

Because the first one was a personal dispute. Not a racially motivated attack on him because he was Muslim.

Do you have a link to your source?

tulippetals · 02/05/2026 10:00

Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · 02/05/2026 09:58

Because the first one was a personal dispute. Not a racially motivated attack on him because he was Muslim.

He was mentally unwell. It’s actually vile that people are trying to erase the third victim because it doesn’t fit the narrative.

OP posts:
RoniaCheetah · 02/05/2026 10:00

Wouldcou · 02/05/2026 09:59

But then that would show he was stabbing people for other reasons that weren’t racial.

No it wouldn't. The first one was a personal dispute. He then travelled to make a racially motivated attack on Jewish people.

tulippetals · 02/05/2026 10:00

Wouldcou · 02/05/2026 09:59

But then that would show he was stabbing people for other reasons that weren’t racial.

Well that doesn’t fit the narrative does it?

OP posts:
Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · 02/05/2026 10:01

Wouldcou · 02/05/2026 09:59

But then that would show he was stabbing people for other reasons that weren’t racial.

Oh come off it. The other guy was in the same house as him. They knew each other. He travelled to a known Jewish area and stabbed 2 orthodox Jews.

tulippetals · 02/05/2026 10:01

RoniaCheetah · 02/05/2026 10:00

No it wouldn't. The first one was a personal dispute. He then travelled to make a racially motivated attack on Jewish people.

Yes. It would.

OP posts:
PatriciaRocks · 02/05/2026 10:01

tulippetals · 02/05/2026 10:00

Well that doesn’t fit the narrative does it?

What narrative? Posters have clarified what happened.

RoniaCheetah · 02/05/2026 10:02

tulippetals · 02/05/2026 10:01

Yes. It would.

Clearly the counter terrorism investigation outcomes disagree.

Alsop · 02/05/2026 10:02

one is a domestic/personal incident at his home and one was a terrorist attack, obviously both by the same person and awful but it’s obvious why the second is mentioned in the tweet as that’s the one related to the counter terrorism police investigation mentioned.

LakieLady · 02/05/2026 10:02

Iirc, the first stabbing was mentioned in the early news coverage, but then it seemed to drop off the radar. At the time, I assumed that they'd discovered that the first one was unconnected, but it appears not.

If this was a deliberate decision on the part of journos/editors, I'd be interested to know the thinking behind it.

Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · 02/05/2026 10:02

tulippetals · 02/05/2026 10:00

He was mentally unwell. It’s actually vile that people are trying to erase the third victim because it doesn’t fit the narrative.

What is the narrative? That Jewish people have been subject to racially aggravated attacks in this country at a far higher scale per head of population than any other group? Do you think these are all ' false flag' operations?

PatriciaRocks · 02/05/2026 10:03

Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · 02/05/2026 10:01

Oh come off it. The other guy was in the same house as him. They knew each other. He travelled to a known Jewish area and stabbed 2 orthodox Jews.

Yes, who were not known to him, but identifiable as Jews by their clothing/head coverings.

PatriciaRocks · 02/05/2026 10:04

LakieLady · 02/05/2026 10:02

Iirc, the first stabbing was mentioned in the early news coverage, but then it seemed to drop off the radar. At the time, I assumed that they'd discovered that the first one was unconnected, but it appears not.

If this was a deliberate decision on the part of journos/editors, I'd be interested to know the thinking behind it.

Do you think it was a conspiracy? I think it's there in print upthread for people to read.

Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · 02/05/2026 10:05

Alsop · 02/05/2026 10:02

one is a domestic/personal incident at his home and one was a terrorist attack, obviously both by the same person and awful but it’s obvious why the second is mentioned in the tweet as that’s the one related to the counter terrorism police investigation mentioned.

We also don't know why this was. Did he try and stop him? Was he involved in some way? No one knows. The only narrative being pushed here is that this is all a massive Jewish conspiracy theory. I wonder where we've heard that one before?

Raquelos · 02/05/2026 10:06

Wouldcou · 02/05/2026 09:59

But then that would show he was stabbing people for other reasons that weren’t racial.

While that may be correct, it doesnt negate the fact that the second two stabbings were racially motivated does it? He was clearly unbalanced and violent when he stabbed the first victim, a muslim man who was known to him and with whom he had a disagreement. He was then unbalanced, violent and racially motivated when he went on to stab two Jewish men who were not known to him and who had not interacted with him at all. With no other information currently available the supposition is that the later victims were targeted because they were visibly Jewish.

tulippetals · 02/05/2026 10:06

So let’s get this straight.

Man stabs three people.

Only two victims matter.

Got it.

OP posts:
WolfDaysOfMoon · 02/05/2026 10:07

LakieLady · 02/05/2026 10:02

Iirc, the first stabbing was mentioned in the early news coverage, but then it seemed to drop off the radar. At the time, I assumed that they'd discovered that the first one was unconnected, but it appears not.

If this was a deliberate decision on the part of journos/editors, I'd be interested to know the thinking behind it.

The Guardian published his name yesterday, Ishmail Hussein.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.