Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Met police are erasing the third victim of the Golders Green stabbing

1000 replies

tulippetals · 02/05/2026 09:54

https://x.com/metpoliceuk/status/2050114417405132857?s=46

I am actually horrified. A third, Muslim, man was stabbed in the attack but he isn’t being mentioned anywhere. How is this allowed?!

Metropolitan Police (@metpoliceuk) on X

A man will appear in court today charged following a Counter Terrorism Policing investigation into two men stabbed in #GoldersGreen: https://t.co/BgK04EQmyX

https://x.com/metpoliceuk/status/2050114417405132857?s=46

OP posts:
Thread gallery
23
ProudAmberTurtle · 02/05/2026 10:40

Lavenderflower · 02/05/2026 10:35

Are you okay - do you think it was okay the other man died?

The level of stupidity / ignorance on this thread is mind blowing.

The 'third man' was his friend. He was in his house.

And he didn't die. In fact he wasn't even hospitalised. He suffered minor injuries.

He only told authorities about the attack when he saw what his friend had done on the news.

tulippetals · 02/05/2026 10:40

Hoardasurass · 02/05/2026 10:38

You do understand that a domestic dispute that resulted in the stabbing of anyone especially a friend of 20+ years is always considered less news worthy that 2 random knife attacks on strangers because of their religion.
Question for you @tulippetals if it was a Jewish man who attacked his Jewish friend and then went on to randomly attack 2 Muslim men for no reason other than the fact that they were visibly Muslim would be upset at the way its reported ie the 2 random strangers getting more press than the friend, and if not why not

Well the thing is when attacks against Muslim people occur they don’t get the press that other attacks do.

OP posts:
Whysnothingsimple · 02/05/2026 10:40

tulippetals · 02/05/2026 10:32

Let’s also think about the fact that they’re suggesting a special police force for circa 300k people yet violence against women and girls is being ignored

If you’re talking about the protection of Jewish people, well maybe some people understand that there should be a lot more than 300,000 if another antisemitic leader hadn’t annihilated 6 million Jews. Maybe decent people think that we need to do everything we can possibly do to stop that kind of hatred against Jews rising again! Maybe there are decent people in the world who learned from the Holocaust. Even Starmer is coming round and acknowledging that antisemitism has been allowed to go unchecked in this country. I understand this change of stance might not be to some people’s liking!

PatriciaRocks · 02/05/2026 10:41

The other victim has not been "downplayed". It's all about when that information became available, and the context of the other attacks.
As you can see, it's been widely reported.

Beavis8 · 02/05/2026 10:41

tulippetals · 02/05/2026 10:32

Let’s also think about the fact that they’re suggesting a special police force for circa 300k people yet violence against women and girls is being ignored

This thread has been set up for rage bait purposes.

OP, at least try to educate yourself before spewing out your ill informed opinion. It's people like you who contribute to unrest. You need to develop your comprehension, seek facts and learn how to think critically.

PatriciaRocks · 02/05/2026 10:41

tulippetals · 02/05/2026 10:40

Well the thing is when attacks against Muslim people occur they don’t get the press that other attacks do.

What is your evidence for that?

DeskGnome · 02/05/2026 10:42

tulippetals · 02/05/2026 10:24

This man also has previous history of violent attacks. I am sick of this media narrative

Lol, I think most people are getting sick of yours.

ProudAmberTurtle · 02/05/2026 10:42

SlumChum · 02/05/2026 10:39

I have no skin in this game, but this thread is the first time I'm learning there was a 3rd victim, and I've been checking news sites twice a day for the last few days.

It was very stupid of the authorities to downplay the third victim as it lends itself to specifically these kinds of conspiracy theories.

It's perfectly understandable that a radicalised, hate filled man could attack someone known to them, and then feel emboldened to carry out a terrorist attack. One does not occlude the other, it supports it.

Just as the Southport monster practiced terrorising his family before he went on to commit a gender-based terrorism attack.

The authorities did not cover up there being a third victim. JFC.

They didn't know there was one until he came forward later and told the police the terrorist had tried to kill him in a different part of London. Thankfully, he only suffered minor injuries

Puzzledandpissedoff · 02/05/2026 10:42

tulippetals · 02/05/2026 10:10

The police have neglected to mention him.

Starmer fails to mention him in his statement.

The media have failed to mention him.

As has been pointed out, the police mentioned this in their statement, media reports where it was included have already been linked and many have explained thr different contexts of the attacks

Best, surely, to accept you were mistaken rather than tryi6to make this into something it isn't

Whysnothingsimple · 02/05/2026 10:42

tulippetals · 02/05/2026 10:40

Well the thing is when attacks against Muslim people occur they don’t get the press that other attacks do.

That is utter foundation less nonsense. Give examples!

WorkHardPlay · 02/05/2026 10:45

No one is trying to erase the other victim! It has been covered in all media, but it isn’t being covered in the same way as the other two attacks, because … IT ISNT THE SAME AS THE OTHER TWO ATTACKS.

None of the three attacks were random. One was a personal dispute, and the other two were targeted because they were Jewish. This wasn’t a man attacking random people who just so happened to be Jewish.

It’s actually wild OP, that you can’t see your statement is in fact trying to erase and deny the antisemitic nature of these attacks. It’s on par with ‘I have black friends so I can’t be racist’ …. like ‘oh, he stabbed someone who was Muslim, so it cant be antisemitism (even though he didn’t stab that first man BECAUSE he was Muslim)’

You need to take a long look in the mirror OP and realise that you’re the bigot here.

ProudAmberTurtle · 02/05/2026 10:45

Beavis8 · 02/05/2026 10:41

This thread has been set up for rage bait purposes.

OP, at least try to educate yourself before spewing out your ill informed opinion. It's people like you who contribute to unrest. You need to develop your comprehension, seek facts and learn how to think critically.

Am surprised Mumsnet hasn't deleted this thread or at least removed many of the posts.

It's FULL of misinformation. The OP seems to be antisemitic.

Whysnothingsimple · 02/05/2026 10:45

Beavis8 · 02/05/2026 10:41

This thread has been set up for rage bait purposes.

OP, at least try to educate yourself before spewing out your ill informed opinion. It's people like you who contribute to unrest. You need to develop your comprehension, seek facts and learn how to think critically.

I mean, at least the OPs stance has been shown to be utter foundationless bollocks.

LakieLady · 02/05/2026 10:45

Lavenderflower · 02/05/2026 10:32

I think some of the comments are absolutely disgusting. At the end of the day three men have died - one person is not more important than the other. A person’s death should never be minimised.

I wonder if the comments would be different if Essa Suleiman's first victim had been a woman?

Error404FucksNotFound · 02/05/2026 10:45

Chinkirk · 02/05/2026 10:32

I’m not following. Is OP saying that the fact the guy travelled to Golders Green and started stabbing people who could be visually identified as Jewish just a coincidence?

Apparently so.

A random psycho stabbed someone in his household then he travelled nearly ten miles, which Google tells me takes about half an hour, he didnt stab anyone else on the way, he waited until he got to Golders green then he stabbed 2 Jewish men.

But that was totally random and his journey to the area of london most known for its large jewish population, followed by him stabbing 2 Jewish people was coincidental. He just randomly picked a place to travel to that had nothing to do with anything and waited till he got there to stab randomly.

Ok then.

He stabbed someone he knew, which was a horrendous thing to do. he then travelled specifically to stab Jewish people which was also horrendous.

I don't understand what is to be gained by denying the obvious.

It makes zero sense for him to have travelled there unless he specifically wanted to stab people there .

Lavenderflower · 02/05/2026 10:45

AmberSpy · 02/05/2026 10:37

Nobody died @Lavenderflower. And the poster did not say it was ok that a third man was attacked. They are drawing a clear distinction between a personal dispute and a terror attack.

I think it’s inappropriate - it’s minimising the serriousness of the incident particularly as it has been alleged that this person has a long history and was known to services and be a risk to the public. If these allegation are true - it means that authorities may not have done enough safeguarding - probably related to the funding cuts.

bigfacthunter · 02/05/2026 10:46

tulippetals · 02/05/2026 10:17

So you don’t find it suspicious that the third victim is being entirely erased because it paints a very different picture?

If Kier Starmer/Met Police issued statements about a terror attack in London where 3 people were attacked they would be criticised for inflating the numbers as only two people were targeted because of their race/faith, the third was a personal dispute. Do you genuinely not see that? I say all this as someone who is usually very quick to scrutinise/doubt the police, gov and mainstream media.

PatriciaRocks · 02/05/2026 10:47

Lavenderflower · 02/05/2026 10:45

I think it’s inappropriate - it’s minimising the serriousness of the incident particularly as it has been alleged that this person has a long history and was known to services and be a risk to the public. If these allegation are true - it means that authorities may not have done enough safeguarding - probably related to the funding cuts.

What exactly has been "minimised"?

AmberSpy · 02/05/2026 10:47

Lavenderflower · 02/05/2026 10:45

I think it’s inappropriate - it’s minimising the serriousness of the incident particularly as it has been alleged that this person has a long history and was known to services and be a risk to the public. If these allegation are true - it means that authorities may not have done enough safeguarding - probably related to the funding cuts.

What is inappropriate specifically?

Helpboat · 02/05/2026 10:47

RoniaCheetah · 02/05/2026 10:00

No it wouldn't. The first one was a personal dispute. He then travelled to make a racially motivated attack on Jewish people.

The mental gymnastics used for this bravo

Onmytod24 · 02/05/2026 10:48

Look, this man had just been released from a high security psychiatric ward for his mental health problem and he was living in a place for vulnerable adults in the circumstances he was in. I don’t know why our lical elections have been taken over by this incident to me it’s blowing out of proportion.

Whysnothingsimple · 02/05/2026 10:49

Lavenderflower · 02/05/2026 10:32

I think some of the comments are absolutely disgusting. At the end of the day three men have died - one person is not more important than the other. A person’s death should never be minimised.

Can you name the three men who have died? Are you on the right thread?????

SpaceRaccoon · 02/05/2026 10:49

OP if I'm honest I don't think you're that upset about it, I think you're making a massive point to try and minimise the fact that there was another violent anti-Semitic attack.

The man is clearly mentally unwell but his illness and targets seem oddly specific all the same.

SALaw · 02/05/2026 10:49

I’ve not watched loads of news the past few days and I’ve heard him mentioned several times?

Helpboat · 02/05/2026 10:50

bigfacthunter · 02/05/2026 10:46

If Kier Starmer/Met Police issued statements about a terror attack in London where 3 people were attacked they would be criticised for inflating the numbers as only two people were targeted because of their race/faith, the third was a personal dispute. Do you genuinely not see that? I say all this as someone who is usually very quick to scrutinise/doubt the police, gov and mainstream media.

or it’s a mentally unwell person who’s gone on a stabbing spree and two of the victims happen to be Jewish? The knee jerk reactions and disproportionate response yet again is doing no favours to anyone.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread