Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Is my Mother’s will fair?

106 replies

erfanclub · 27/04/2026 21:30

DM in 70s, reasonable health for her age.
Widowed. She didn’t inherit anything from DF or her DM or DF. She got a few thousand from an aunt and her DSIS. She gave me some of this (as I wasn’t named in will) which I used to pay off student debts.

I’m an only child.
I have 3 DC.
Eldest with ex who has no contact.
2 younger with current DP.
2 elder DC are adults & rent where they live.
DC3 has disabilities and may never be able to hold down a full time permanent job & may end up on means tested benefits as an adult.

I, myself am disabled and live on means tested & disability benefits.

I own a house I bought when working & have a £115k mortgage with another 23 years to go paying £640pcm.
It has c £200k equity. My plan was/is to take out equity or downsize as & when DC want deposits to buy their own homes. (Estimating £50k each).

DM has no will so if she dies intestate I inherit her home with equity of c £80k. I would put this into my mortgage not only because that makes financial sense but because otherwise I’d be over the capital limits for the means tested elements of what I receive.

DM has now said she has written a will, giving half to me and splitting the other half between not only my 3DC but also current DP.

IMO this is highly problematic for 2 main reasons.
DC1 cannot inherit from DP as he isn’t his DF.
So DC 2 & 3 could inherit more than DC1 which I don’t think is fair. DC 2 & 3 could also potentially inherit from others on DP’s family side which creates even more inequality.

Secondly if DC3 becomes an adult & is on means tested benefits at the time of inheriting they would lose their benefit income & be forced to use their inheritance for basic living costs. This feels like a huge waste.
DM then suggested that DP hold money ‘in trust’ (ie not a formal /legal trust) for DC3. That she suggested DP instead of me felt insulting as I am good with money & DP is worse than useless. (One of the reasons the house is solely mine & not joint).

If DM wants DC to inherit directly rather than through me it’s her choice even though to me it makes no financial sense as with a lower mortgage I’m more able to help DC with ongoing expenses & their own house deposits.

She said she doesn’t want them “beholden” to me.

But to take from me & DC1 & give to DP I find upsetting. Background is relationship with DP is fractious at best. History of financial & emotional abuse. I can’t imagine it lasting long term.
This is unknown to DM. She’s not the kind of mother I could talk to about anything emotional/sensitive.

It’s so important to me to provide for my DC because despite my DPs having high income/ high assets when I was a young adult they gave me no help. I inherited nothing from DF.

Is this fair?

OP posts:
arethereanyleftatall · Yesterday 10:40

The parent company paid in £90 million….

Of course a person who was Prime Minister would be a desirable candidate for a board. They don’t need to corrupt the UK out of millions to achieve it.

AlphaBravoGamma · Yesterday 13:14

arethereanyleftatall · Yesterday 07:55

Are you drunk?
people are suggesting nothing like this, rather that when she gets to the point she has £80k in savings, or can downsize and release £100k (I think, I can’t remember) that she spends this money on her own living costs; rather than give it away so that she can continue getting her living costs off the tax payer.
no one has any problem supporting people with disabilities who can’t work. They do have a problem when that person has a pile of money themselves which they are giving away to their children, especially given that most tax payers don’t have £50k to give each child for a house deposit.

No, I'm not and wasn't drunk.

The OP was getting a kicking for anticipating money coming her way.

She was getting kicked for having to live on disability benefits ('taxpayer money') whilst expecting this money to come her way.

She and her family may never receive this money, but she getting a kicking from some rather nasty people on here.

arethereanyleftatall · Yesterday 14:46

AlphaBravoGamma · Yesterday 13:14

No, I'm not and wasn't drunk.

The OP was getting a kicking for anticipating money coming her way.

She was getting kicked for having to live on disability benefits ('taxpayer money') whilst expecting this money to come her way.

She and her family may never receive this money, but she getting a kicking from some rather nasty people on here.

I don’t think, and hope there wasn’t, a single post suggesting she shouldn’t be getting benefits now. The objections were about her intentions to gift tens of thousands so that she never has to spend her own (mums) money on her own living costs. In fact, she called it a ‘waste of money.’ I can absolutely empathise with the posters here who pay tax themselves and couldn't dream of gifting their children £50k each.

Swiftie1878 · Yesterday 15:24

It’s impossible for someone’s will to be unfair. It is their WILL. They can do whatever the hell they like with their own money.
If you sounded off like that to me, I’d disinherit you completely!

WallaceinAnderland · Yesterday 16:11

Swiftie1878 · Yesterday 15:24

It’s impossible for someone’s will to be unfair. It is their WILL. They can do whatever the hell they like with their own money.
If you sounded off like that to me, I’d disinherit you completely!

Maybe they should be renamed a Want rather than a Will. It means the same thing but so many people don't seem to understand that.

It's harder to argue against your mother's Want.

Boomer55 · Yesterday 16:20

It’s her money, her choices. Nothing to do with what you think. Shes still alive. 🙄

New posts on this thread. Refresh page