Voting for Reform.the north/south

[Jollyjupiter]

As a proud Northerner i can say 80 per cent of my peer group will vote for Reform in May. Do you think it will be a North v South split?

And also passive browsing - meaning they are open to all the dross that reform supporters post.
The figure still stands, however you twist it - the 25-34 age group is the largest.

But this makes no sense if you are already voting reform then someone's superior attitude doesn't actually make any difference. Or you are voting reform because someone else thinks its a stupid thing to do and you are doing it to thumb your nose at them which is, a, stupid thing to do.

Same, I’ve got my eye on a few countries if Reform get in.

But that doesn't prove that more educated people are more informed. There is a huge link between education and socio economic status. It makes total sense that those in different socio economic groups will have different concerns and will vote accordingly.

I've mentioned this before but immigration is more of a concern for people with lower SES. This makes complete sense as they are more likely to feel the sharp end of the down sides of immigration. They will wait longer for social housing, struggle to compete for work in deprived areas and generally compete for less resources with more people around. The middle classes are more insulated from all of this.

The cuts to the benefits bill
2 child benefit cap
no benefits for foreign nationals
Restoring law and order
Detention and deportation of illegal immigrants
Deportations of foreign criminals
protection for churches

As a woman, which of these policies is persuading you to vote Reform, those who are proposing to do so?

Ok, thanks for answering.

And you'll put up with tax on childlessness, scrapping of equality act and remote working rights alongside those?

Many countries have similar voting patterns as the same issues are impacting them.

Also - regarding Restore, I like the death penalty for the likes of Huntley and the Axel kid

I sometimes fear that
people think that fascism arrives in fancy dress
worn by grotesques and monsters
as played out in endless re-runs of the Nazis.
Fascism arrives as your friend.
It will restore your honour,
make you feel proud,
protect your house,
give you a job,
clean up the neighbourhood,
remind you of how great you once were,
clear out the venal and the corrupt,
remove anything you feel is unlike you…

It doesn’t walk in saying,
“Our programme means militias, mass imprisonments, transportations, war and persecution.”

M.Rosen.

Huntley is already dead.
How about Lucy Letby?

Thank you, that's the one

Bit late for Huntley.

"Like" is a strange epithet to attach to the death penalty.

Reform’s official position on childless couples is NOT to increase their taxes. This was proposed by one reform member and is not official policy.

The equality act does need reforming and remote working is a non issue really.

Or showing my age now, Beverley Allitt?

Agree. Far better than any of the other party leaders

Yes he is now but what about the years he’s lived at the tax payers expense? Should have got rid of him years ago.

Lucy Letby, it’s not 100% proven that she’s guilty so no.

Also, Rudakabana was officially a child at the time of the crimes. Should we kill those who murdered Jamie Bulger as well, if we are killing people who commit murder before they are adults? I am really wondering who Restore want to give death penalty to. Letby was convicted of killing tiny helpless babies. She would definitely be on the death penalty list I assume?

Lovely is definitely subjective, she's anything but to me 😁

She's been convicted in a court of law.

One of James’ killers went on to commit more crimes involving children so yes, he should go.

As for Rudakabana … lower the age of “adult” to 16. You know what you’re doing at that age.

So calling yourself a 'proud' northerner is ok?

Exactly, it's really interesting (for want of a better word) why so many people can't believe she's capable of doing such a thing, picking over her case and desperate to find her innocent.
Why her but not others?

Reforming the equality act is not the same as scrapping it.
I quite like vulnerable groups being protected from discrimination...

Remote working enables a high number of disabled people and mothers to work who would otherwise be reliant on benefits. It is definitely not a "non-issue".

Yes but questions are still being asked so it’s not undeniable guilt so no. It has to be 100% undeniable guilt.