Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think no one can SERIOUSLY want Starmer to go now, it’s media created instability designed to damage the UK.

341 replies

partmermaidpartplant · 18/04/2026 10:42

trump, wars, Israel invading Lebanon, US mid terms…….

it would mental for Starmer to go and it’s a trap.

yabu - of course Starmer has to go, despite what is happening in the world right now.

yanbu - time to move on and deal with trump and the blatant manipulation of the media by Russia, right wing billionaire interests.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
xanthomelana · 18/04/2026 19:56

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 18/04/2026 15:23

He has 403 Labour MPs. He’s not failed to get any policies through parliament. He’s not failed to hold cabinet together.

Him not being popular with people who didn’t vote for him/Labour in the first place is a cheap excuse to get him to go.

It’s not him being unpopular that’s the problem. It’s all the years he sat on the opposition benches demanding various Tories resign for different things but when he’s in charge it’s everyone else’s fault and he’s constantly got excuses. His past tweets always resurface and show his hypocrisy.

Clavinova · 18/04/2026 19:57

nearlylovemyusername · 18/04/2026 17:55

Who out of the current lot can be better though?
Rayner? Wes? BP? they are even scarier then Starmer

I think Yvette Cooper could easily replace Starmer. As Foreign Secretary she is up to speed with foreign affairs, recent experience as Home Secretary, plus she has past economic experience - former Chief Secretary to the Treasury under Gordon Brown, previously worked as chief economics correspondent for The Independent before entering politics.

soundsys · 18/04/2026 20:00

Agreed. I’m no fan of Starmer but really not the time! I mean, what we get Wes Streeting?! I’m not convinced that’s going to make anything any better!

Namingbaba · 18/04/2026 20:07

Sorry didn’t mean to quote @Blimms . My reply was for the thread in general. Long day 😅

BIossomtoes · 18/04/2026 20:27

NoWordForFluffy · 18/04/2026 17:39

Actually, I just fact checked this. You're wrong.

I said living memory. I’m old and even I don’t have political memories of 1966.

NoWordForFluffy · 19/04/2026 00:38

BIossomtoes · 18/04/2026 20:27

I said living memory. I’m old and even I don’t have political memories of 1966.

You do know that living memory doesn't mean your personal living memory? There are many people much older than you are (more than a quarter of a century older, some of them). It's in their living memory. 1966 is in my parents' living memory too.

mathanxiety · 19/04/2026 00:59

Blimms · 18/04/2026 14:46

Are you saying that you think the British media want to damage the U.K.?
Do you not think turning a blind eye to people who are friends with rapists has something to do with it?

The British gutter press think of politics as a spectator sport that coincidentally sells their rags for them as long as they can keep the populace buying. They don't care about the impact of political instability or the policies of different parties on ordinary people. They are well cushioned from reality.

EilonwyWithRedGoldHair · 19/04/2026 01:22

Namingbaba · 18/04/2026 19:48

I’m pissed off at Starmer for being such a terrible politician. He’s so bad at politics and just so unappealing. Sure you could blame some of that on the media but he grew up in this country and should know what the media is like. It’s just dumb not to be aware of how stories are put out there. He’s only got himself to blame for most of them, I wish he was a bit more savvy as I do agree that there’s no one obvious who is better and I find some of the other parties very unappealing.

I don't think there's anything he could do, he could perform bloody miracles and the right wing media would present it as a disaster.

Let's be honest the cards are stacked against him no matter what he does.

MyJustCat · 19/04/2026 01:32

This is a joke right? I would happily walk over hot coals not to have that lying idiot in charge.

caringcarer · 19/04/2026 03:35

I'd love to see Starmer go. He's the worst ditherer. He's U turned 8 times. He makes consistently bad decisions like putting Lammy in charge of foreign affairs, like wanting to give awY the Chargos Islands then paying to rent them back, like putting RR as chancellor and then not sacking her when she was a proven liar. She is so addicted to lying she even lied about winning a chess competition. Starmer lies too. He was warned by several of his own party not go hire Mandy but he did it anyway. He even appointed him before waiting for vetting to take place. He is a huge liability and he needs to go.

Bringemout · 19/04/2026 05:50

Yeah, I’m worried he’ll be replaced by someone even shitter to be frank.

ProudAmberTurtle · 19/04/2026 08:34

There's a lot of naivete on this thread.

It's not a case of can Starmer survive, it's a case of when will his MPs oust him.

The momentum at the moment is they want to get the local elections out of the way and then pounce.

Saying there's noone good enough to replace him and he therefore should stay suggests the party you're backing isn't that great.

Myoldbear · 19/04/2026 08:50

ProudAmberTurtle · 19/04/2026 08:34

There's a lot of naivete on this thread.

It's not a case of can Starmer survive, it's a case of when will his MPs oust him.

The momentum at the moment is they want to get the local elections out of the way and then pounce.

Saying there's noone good enough to replace him and he therefore should stay suggests the party you're backing isn't that great.

I think many people are saying that no none from any party would be better than Starmer even if it were possible for them to be prime minister at the moment.

partmermaidpartplant · 19/04/2026 09:07

interesting ! I think the previous poster who said Starmer was boring and sensible had it right.

considering the car crash of recent Tory governments, Liz truss’s economic disaster and now she’s hanging out with Trump.

Labour has
green lit lots of new building projects
more wind farms
VAT on school fees
increased renters and workers protections
stayed out of the war !
closer ties with EU
increased defence spending after Tory party neglected the army forces.
reduced the ‘small boats’ - caused by farage and brexit by the way.

why don’t we hear about those things?

OP posts:
BIossomtoes · 19/04/2026 09:08

Myoldbear · 19/04/2026 08:50

I think many people are saying that no none from any party would be better than Starmer even if it were possible for them to be prime minister at the moment.

That’s exactly what we’re saying. I shudder to think where we’d be if any of the opposition party leaders had been PM over the last couple of months. As they say, perfect is the enemy of good.

TiredonToast · 19/04/2026 09:13

Keir Starmer feels like a puppet PM only in post as he was deemed the most acceptable face for centrist Brits to vote for but in so many instances he comes across as completely oblivious to what’s actually going on. I’ve never known of a government to have had so long in opposition to prepare and to make the job of governing look like such hard work. I’d love a general election asap and to vote this lot out. (FWIW if Keir did go and we didn’t have a general election, I think Darren Jones would be a reasonable replacement but it will likely be someone from the hard left- god help us all. Last comment, I’m not a fan of KS as PM but I do think he’s done a good job of reconnecting Britain on the international stage just domestically he’s been abysmal, as had RR.)

raisinglittlepeople12 · 19/04/2026 09:16

He is facilitating the genocide in Gaza by providing information and weapons. He’s also pandering to Trump, whose an actual dictator. All while doing nothing to help British citizens. I am surprised you’d think that’s fine

Hoardasurass · 19/04/2026 09:19

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 18/04/2026 14:53

The Tory dramas for the last few years have led many to believe changing PM regularly is normal. It’s not. He’s been elected for a term, he’s most likely going to complete that. If it’s getting close to the next general election and it’s really clear from polling that he is a problem that would cause them to lose the election, but changing leader would cause them to win, he might step down. However the Labour Party are shit at back stabbing compared to the Tories, even when the polling was clear that Corbyn himself, not his policies was a problem for the electorate, he chose to stay on and no one pushed him out until he lost 2 general elections.

if the public didn’t want Starmer to be the PM they shouldn’t have voted Labour last election. You’ll get a chance to pick someone else next time.

In the uk we dont elect a prime minister we elect a party.

@partmermaidpartplant I really dont think you understand quite how bad the mandalson fiasco is.
Mandalson failed the highest security vetting in this country which means hes a danger to the country and cant be trusted to see top secret intelligence as he is open to blackmail and bribery. Yet Starmer chose to ignore it and gave him clearance anyway. This sort of corruption has never been allowed to happen under any other UK government.

The simple fact is Starmer has put this country at risk just for his buddy and is now trying to throw everyone under the bus to try and protect himself.
Even if you believe Starmer that he didn't know (not possible) he has completely lost control of the civil service and that has allowed the security of this country to be compromised so he could put his friend in a position of power and give mandalson access to top secret information.
All.of that is before we look at the rest of Starmers lame duck premiership. The man and party are not fit for power, they are turning us into an authoritarian country with speach being policed in dangerous ways and are driving our country into bankruptcy just as every other labour government has in history. Some of us on this site are old enough to remember when we had to be bailed out by the IMF dur to labour mismanagement and are watching on in horror as history is repeating itself again.

The whole labour party belong in the bin

squaringtigers · 19/04/2026 09:19

If there was a credible person to replace him then yes, I think he should resign. Unfortunately there isn’t so it might be a case of ‘better the devil you know’.

Greenwitchart · 19/04/2026 09:22

No! I voted Labour and I want him to go.

Because he and Reeves have proved useless and he is pursuing bizarre policies like ID cards that nobody wants while failing to address the cost of living and demonising disabled people. They also killed the job markert with their increase in national insurance for employers.

He has done nothing to curb utility companies profiteering or hasn't been bold enough to say that Brexit was a disaster and that we need to find a way to rejoin.

He is no Labour leader and has no vision whatsoever for the country.

He will be toast anyway after the May elections...

TiredonToast · 19/04/2026 09:54

I don’t know who ultimately pulls the strings in government (someone in the blob?) but I think the Americans/Trump wanted Peter Mandelson as the US diplomat and the Brits kowtowed to accommodate this. Everyone in the UK knew of Mandelson’s unsuitability for such a role but a blind eye was turned in the hope that his appointment could be “handled”. It’s all coming home to roost now. KS won’t go until after the local elections when hopefully the electorate will express their digust with all the corruption in govt and jobs for the boys, however unsuitable..

BIossomtoes · 19/04/2026 09:57

This sort of corruption has never been allowed to happen under any other UK government.

Johnson failed security clearance as Foreign Secretary.

Some of us on this site are old enough to remember when we had to be bailed out by the IMF dur to labour mismanagement and are watching on in horror as history is repeating itself again.

Only half of the loan was actually drawn by the British government and it was repaid by 4 May 1979,[13] the day after the general election. Denis Healey, the Chancellor of the Exchequer at the time, went on to state that the main reason the loan had to be requested was that public sector borrowing requirement figures provided by the Treasury were grossly overstated.[14]

EasternStandard · 19/04/2026 09:59

ProudAmberTurtle · 19/04/2026 09:17

An MP revealed in the House last September that Mandelson had failed the vetting process.

There really is no way back for Starmer from this

https://x.com/i/status/2045511553529659514

Yeh that’s bad for him.

OnlyMabelInTheBuilding · 19/04/2026 10:01

partmermaidpartplant · 19/04/2026 09:07

interesting ! I think the previous poster who said Starmer was boring and sensible had it right.

considering the car crash of recent Tory governments, Liz truss’s economic disaster and now she’s hanging out with Trump.

Labour has
green lit lots of new building projects
more wind farms
VAT on school fees
increased renters and workers protections
stayed out of the war !
closer ties with EU
increased defence spending after Tory party neglected the army forces.
reduced the ‘small boats’ - caused by farage and brexit by the way.

why don’t we hear about those things?

You realise not everyone thinks these are good things, right?