Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to resent pressure on grandmothers to provide childcare?

919 replies

ReluctantGM · 05/04/2026 09:03

I feel like there’s a real pressure placed on grandmothers that just isn’t there for grandfathers.

I work and I want to keep working. Partly because I need the income, but also because it gives me structure and some space. But because I’m the grandmother, there’s a clear pressure on me to step in and provide regular childcare so my daughter and daughter-in-law can return to work. I’m often told I could be spending more time with the grandchildren and building a bond with them.

I do understand that childcare is expensive and that life is more expensive these days. I’m not dismissing that at all. But I’ve said more than once that I can’t do it. I don’t have the energy or capacity for it, and I don’t want to take on that level of responsibility.

My DD and DS keep bringing it up and have even suggested that I go part time or rearrange my hours to make it work. It feels like pressure rather than a genuine choice.

I was exhausted by parenting the first time round. My DS had mental health problems and needed a lot of care and support well into his early twenties. I gave everything to that stage of my life. Yes I love my grandchildren, but that doesn’t mean I want to be responsible for them day to day.

I also find it really hard to tolerate crying babies and young children now and I don’t want to keep getting ill from all the bugs they inevitably bring home.

Yesterday I was out shopping and saw a toddler having a full tantrum and felt relieved that I don’t have to deal with that anymore. I walked away to get away from the noise.

What I find particularly frustrating is that there is absolutely no expectation on my husband. No one is asking him to change his work or take this on. It’s just assumed I should be the one to step in.

I’ve spoken to other friends and they feel the same pressure. Their husbands get no pressure and there are no expectations of them to adjust their work hours or give up work to look after children.

Why do adult children/DIL/SIL feel they can pressure grandmothers into providing childcare, while grandfathers are left alone or not even asked, especially if they’re working?

OP posts:
Owly11 · 06/04/2026 09:41

SheilaFentiman · 06/04/2026 09:17

It is relevant because your post was about the poor feminism of daughters who asked for this.

It’s convenient for you making your post about the poor feminism of daughters that you ignored the fact a son was making one of the requests here.

I shan’t respond to you further because I have better things to do with my day than play chess with a pigeon.

I don't see why the poor feminism of men is relevant to the poor feminism of women? And you still haven't explained why it was convenient of me to focus on the poor feminism of women? If some women are being self entitled and selfish and hypocritical are we not allowed to call it out because we aren't also calling out the poor feminism and poor behaviour of men too? That sounds like 'whataboutery' to me. BTW if you stopped making so many ad hominem attacks on me it would probably make your arguments stronger.

FinancesSorted · 06/04/2026 09:44

I agree the level of entitlement and expectation is off the scale with some young parents it seems. Childcare is hard work especially if you are working as well.

Society is changing and the state pension age is now 67. People need to save for their retirement. This conflicts with some young parents, like those of the @ReluctantGM, who think grandma needs to cut hours / retire in order to support adult children with childcare. Those who are in their currently 50s/60s are definitely squeezed middle.

Some posters have rose tinted of times gone by when they where looked after by grandparents but in those days women often gave up work when they had children in the 60s/70s. When I had my children late 90s/early 00s my parents / in-laws were amazed that I continued in my career

MsJinks · 06/04/2026 09:52

I’m in a women against political group - as we worry about women’s rights being rolled back.

After reading this thread the political folk perhaps aren’t the biggest threat, but the continuing narrative in our culture that women are there to pick up, care and absorb costs to their career, finances, health and well-being. Rights are not just formed by legislation and policies they need to be accepted through all strata of society.

I appreciate that wanting childcare is not particularly motivated by wanting to trash rights but it is ignoring the rights mainly of your own mothers to choose how they wish to live their own lives. I think it is driven by entitlement- but why entitlement to taking over your mum’s life effectively? Not so much your Dad’s - and I know people who will go to lengths to accommodate Dad’s preference for a quiet life sans too much of the grandkids but never think the Mum may also want a bit of quiet.

Sure if she wants the grandkids of course she can - that’s her choice. But if she can’t or won’t there shouldn’t be the level of tantrum apparent from some on Mumsnet / we should all be wanting all women to make the choices they want to make surely.

blubberyboo · 06/04/2026 10:09

Fleetingmoment · 06/04/2026 08:03

its astonishing that so many boomers were practically raised by their grandparents, yet they are so reluctant to help at all! I’m not even saying regular childcare while parents are at work- I mean even occasional babysitting or just a quick visit! My MIL has not seen my toddler in a year. She lives 2hrs drive away, has a car and is retired. Yet she expects us to visit her, because it’s “our turn”. We don’t own a car and would have to drag our toddler on a train.

What are you talking about? The youngest boomers were born in 1964 and back then mums were expected to leave work to raise kids. They werent raised by grandparents. Their grandparents probably didn’t live 2 hrs away either. Who wants to drive 2 hrs to babysit???

given that boomers are now aged between 62 and 80 (effectively the full range of what was called old age pensioners back when they grew up) why the hell do you think they should be doing childcare or helping to raise your kids now?

Did you and DH wait until your 40s/50s to have your current toddler? The reality is if your parents are boomers and you wait until they are in their 60s70s or 80s to have your kids you can’t expect them to have any energy to babysit at all! Or be arsed to drive 2 hrs on a regular basis

VivaciousCurrentBun · 06/04/2026 10:13

We do not have grandchildren yet but have retired early. We will be travelling for at least 12 weeks this year. Until we are not fit enough that’s what we intend to do every year. But we are at home during school holidays due to obviously the expense of school holidays and the crowds so we could step up and do lots of holiday care.

My sister did loads of care, she is a lot older than me and her children are only a little younger than me. One of her grandchildren is the exact same age as my DS. She is not well off and worked PT as a cleaner so she was at home a lot as no money for holidays or weekends away or anything much so because she was at home her kids just expected it and she did it.

The regular sort of even just one day a week commitment would be the worst for us because we just like to decide to go away in our Motorhome.

I know a woman and her DH who do a round trip of 300 miles every week to look after grandchildren over 2 days.

Overflowingwithcosmos · 06/04/2026 10:18

PollyBell · 06/04/2026 00:03

When are women allowed a life?

This!

Ramblethroughthebrambles · 06/04/2026 10:33

Fleetingmoment · 06/04/2026 08:03

its astonishing that so many boomers were practically raised by their grandparents, yet they are so reluctant to help at all! I’m not even saying regular childcare while parents are at work- I mean even occasional babysitting or just a quick visit! My MIL has not seen my toddler in a year. She lives 2hrs drive away, has a car and is retired. Yet she expects us to visit her, because it’s “our turn”. We don’t own a car and would have to drag our toddler on a train.

It's frustrating to keep seeing this old myth trotted out when the opposite is true. It's just a social media thing aimed at people who want to stoke intergenerational resentment. In fact: "In the past two generations, the number of children being cared for by their grandparents has increased substantially from 33% to 82%. Almost two-thirds of all grandparents regularly look after their grandchildren"
https://www.informationnow.org.uk/article/grandparent-issues/#:~:text=joy%20to%20grandparents.-,Providing%20childcare%20for%20your%20grandchildren,billion%20nationally%20in%20childcare%20costs.

If you stop and think, it's obvious that fewer GPs looked after GCs in the 70s. There was a larger working class; few working class mothers had, sadly, expected to have a career - even after the equal pay act many were in low paid jobs & worked PT around childcare; there were far fewer single parents; older people on average had poorer health than now; children were more often left unsupervised at a younger age & expected to look after younger siblings.

I'm a boomer and of course there was more GP involvement in some families, but I expect to do more babysitting for any future GCs than my parents or GPs did. It still won't be regular though.

I completely get your frustration about taking a toddler on a train when MIL can drive. But don't let this cloud the facts.

WendyFromTransvisionWamp · 06/04/2026 10:33

I totally disagree with the notion that you can only have a bond if you provide regular childcare. I grew up seeing my maternal GM two to three times a year, for one or two nights at a time. With my paternal GM I spent couple of weeks in her farm every summer, no other visits. Both GM’s lived far away so that’s why. But I still loved both very much and as a teen and young adult, I still traveled to see them, completely on my own accord because I loved being with them.

However, my DH’s nieces were looked after my (now late) MIL, for years. She also lived on the same street. As young adults, both took her pretty much granted, avoided having to sit next to her at family functions etc.

Sam9769 · 06/04/2026 10:45

The older we get the more precious time becomes because we don't know how long we have left and how many healthy years we have left.
It's also a time when we have done a lot of hard work over the years and hope to have time to ourselves to do what we want to do. It's a real arrogance for anyone to think that they are entitled to use others, related or not, male or female, to care for their children. Your children are your responsibility.

Theoryofmind2026 · 06/04/2026 11:27

Theoryofmind2026 · 06/04/2026 08:11

You're right of course you're right, and it's shameful and shocking and frankly bizarre.

No grandmother should ever be expected to provide childcare for her adult children's kids. Full stop. End of sentence. No ifs, no ands, no buts.

Btw let's save ourself the nonsense replies from those pretending not to get it - those grandmothers who want to are not under discussion, it's the millions around the world who don't we are talking about.

Those who disagree with the simple reality that they are not owed any childcare and that their mother has a right to say no often demonstrate a clear lack of theory of mind. They simply have never developed the maturity and understanding that other people have beliefs, desires, intentions and emotions all of their own that may well be different to their own.

They also fail to think clearly about the reality that their mothers have ALREADY DONE THEIR OWN CHILD REARING AND THAT'S WHY THEY EXIST. Your mothers has already done her entire share. Fin.

They seem to never be able to accept the simple reality that nobody at all (absolutely nobody on this earth) is ethically responsible for childcare beyond the parents of that child. The buck stops directly at the parents.

All the oh buts and what ifs don't change that simple reality.

They seem not to see their own mothers as fully rounded independent human beings with rights.

They either pretend not to realise or genuinely don't have the cognitive and emotional ability to process the simple reality that many women endure child rearing even when they dislike it simply because it is expected of them at the time, or because it falls to them through duty and through love.

Millions of women loathe parenting - not me, to be clear, for the most part I actually enjoyed it - but I do not lack theory of mind or empathy, I am able to understand and accept that other people are not me and feel differently to me.

They also cannot seem to grasp that after raising a family, even those who did enjoy it have often simply reached capacity. They don't want to. And that's enough.

But whether the grandmother found the experience of raising her own family rewarding or burdensome the simple truth is that not wanting to is entirely valid.

No, of course you are not entitled to argue with her. No, of course she doesn't owe you tearing her guts and heart out for you to examine them and decide if he has a right to her feelings. She said no. End.

Grandmothers are complete human beings with her own desires, needs and emotional life. Their decision not to take on another round of childcare is valid on its own, no further justification is required.

As someone determined to force childcare onto your unwilling mother, your feelings carry no greater weight than hers.

In truth, your feelings hold no importance at all when it comes to how another adult chooses to spend her own seconds, moments, and hours. No one has the right to override another person's desires, needs, and personal boundaries simply because they want something from her. When an adult child demands that their mother provide ongoing childcare and she says no, their own frustration or disappointment is irrelevant to the decision because her time belongs exclusively to her. Exclusively. Without question.

It's not your time and its not your choice to give, take or use. Her time is not a piece of cake for you to slice a share from.

Grandmother's energy, her peace of mind, and her autonomy are hers alone to manage. The fact that you want her help does not create any obligation on her part.

Further, those who respond by threatening to withhold a relationship or by treating her more harshly because she refuses to care for their children is behaving in an abusive manner.

Such reactions ignore the fundamental reality that she has already done more than her share. She raised you. Her entire obligation is now fulfilled and her time now belongs entirely to her and no one is owed any portion of it.

People who push back against this basic boundary often view oldre women as little more than an NPC whose only purpose is to meet their needs and display a striking absence of empathy and compassion. Only what they want matters, how can grandmother be reshaped to serve your desires?

And then there are those who understand perfectly well that their demands are unfair and unkind yet they choose to feign confusion and repeat the same tired arguments in the hope that persistent pressure will eventually wear her down and force her into submission. This is straightforward bullying which unfortunately often works.

These are straightforward facts about respect autonomy and basic human dignity and are inarguable.

You cannot disagree with any of what I have said, not one word of it is incorrect.

And yet, some of you will keep bullying, keep shouting, keep putting your wants first, keep pretending not to get it keep "oh butting" and "what iffing" and "Well then I'll justing"

Demanding or thinking you have any entitlement at all to childcare for YOUR CHILDREN from your mother is bizarre behaviour, it's ugly behaviour and it's bullying behaviour.

If she says no she says no. She's done her bit already.

Leave your mothers in peace. They've earned it.

Edited

I'm very sorry about the numerous typos in this post, I was quite incensed at the rampant misogyny on display and the vicious, relentless cruelty to older women that we cannot seem to escape on this site.

There is nowhere quite like mumsnet if you're looking for the entitled tantrums of adult women who want to strip their mothers of the well earned chance to spend their remaining years making their own decisions to suit themselves and live their lives as they wish.

TheignT · 06/04/2026 11:29

AcrossthePond55 · 05/04/2026 19:28

I don't get the posts about your DH making changes to his work. DH and I always earned about the same so I can see a debate on 'who decreases hours' if we were considering doing childcare or whatever. But if one member of the couple (male OR female) earns a great deal more than the other why on Earth would they consider the much higher earner should decrease their hours and probably reduce their lifestyle as a couple and/or affect retirement plans. It simply doesn't make sense.

I wonder if the situation were reversed and you were the higher earner and your DH was being asked to do childcare if those posters would then say that you should reduce your hours and 'step into the breech'.

Yes it seems dated to assume men are always the higher earner. With my four kids in two couples the woman is the higher earner and the man juggles with compressed hours/shifts to make childcare work.

I always think surely some parents, male or female, actually want time as a sahp or part-time when kids are at school regardless of career progression or pension. It always seems to be presented as such a negative thing when some of us would have loved the opportunity.

Theoryofmind2026 · 06/04/2026 11:37

Ramblethroughthebrambles · 06/04/2026 10:33

It's frustrating to keep seeing this old myth trotted out when the opposite is true. It's just a social media thing aimed at people who want to stoke intergenerational resentment. In fact: "In the past two generations, the number of children being cared for by their grandparents has increased substantially from 33% to 82%. Almost two-thirds of all grandparents regularly look after their grandchildren"
https://www.informationnow.org.uk/article/grandparent-issues/#:~:text=joy%20to%20grandparents.-,Providing%20childcare%20for%20your%20grandchildren,billion%20nationally%20in%20childcare%20costs.

If you stop and think, it's obvious that fewer GPs looked after GCs in the 70s. There was a larger working class; few working class mothers had, sadly, expected to have a career - even after the equal pay act many were in low paid jobs & worked PT around childcare; there were far fewer single parents; older people on average had poorer health than now; children were more often left unsupervised at a younger age & expected to look after younger siblings.

I'm a boomer and of course there was more GP involvement in some families, but I expect to do more babysitting for any future GCs than my parents or GPs did. It still won't be regular though.

I completely get your frustration about taking a toddler on a train when MIL can drive. But don't let this cloud the facts.

Yes, certainly anecdotally I have no memories of anybody receiving much care from their grandparents. It just wasn't a thing. Working class mothers always worked, of course, but they left their kids home alone, took them with them to work (cleaners often did this) or worked shifts around them - my mum worked nightshift 3 nights a week for this very reason. They took jobs they could do at home or near to home and they also helped one another out where they could, the mums, not the grandparents for the most part. And there were nursery schools then too, and then of course once school started the kids walked to school on their own. I was walking my younger brother to school by the time I was 7.

Grandparents being regularly enlisted as unpaid carers and the entitlement around that by so many mumsnetters is quite new to me.

It is good to know that my memory of grandparents just being relatives and, on the whole, not an army of unpaid carers is borne out by the stats.

Strawberrycheesecake7 · 06/04/2026 11:38

ReluctantGM · 06/04/2026 08:12

What both sides can you see?

Your mum had help and now you are upset because she won't help you. Did your dad not benefit from the arrangement also? But he wont get criticised only the woman.

It is like the men do not exist.

So many times I have seen older women criticised because they won't help and the men do not even get mentioned. Rarely do you see expectations of grandfathers. How dare a woman get help and then not pay it back?

I think I was quite clear what I meant by both sides. On one side it would be completely unreasonable for me to expect my mum to rearrange her work schedule for the children I decided to have. One the other side I don’t see why she can’t help occasionally without making me feel awful about asking. She just doesn’t want to do any extra work. And will act like she did it all herself when her children are young, even though I know that’s not true. I didn’t mention my dad because he’s never put me down and shamed me for asking for help like my mum has. And he has on occasion helped me in other ways such as financially and with house maintenance etc, so it felt a bit mean to say he doesn’t support me just because he doesn’t have the children on his own. But okay he could be doing childcare too. I’m obviously a mum myself and I know that if my children ever became parents themselves I would never want them to feel as alone and unsupported as I have felt since giving birth, and would be round to help every opportunity I got (as would my husband).

Theoryofmind2026 · 06/04/2026 11:43

Strawberrycheesecake7 · 06/04/2026 11:38

I think I was quite clear what I meant by both sides. On one side it would be completely unreasonable for me to expect my mum to rearrange her work schedule for the children I decided to have. One the other side I don’t see why she can’t help occasionally without making me feel awful about asking. She just doesn’t want to do any extra work. And will act like she did it all herself when her children are young, even though I know that’s not true. I didn’t mention my dad because he’s never put me down and shamed me for asking for help like my mum has. And he has on occasion helped me in other ways such as financially and with house maintenance etc, so it felt a bit mean to say he doesn’t support me just because he doesn’t have the children on his own. But okay he could be doing childcare too. I’m obviously a mum myself and I know that if my children ever became parents themselves I would never want them to feel as alone and unsupported as I have felt since giving birth, and would be round to help every opportunity I got (as would my husband).

Your post drips with poisonous entitlement.

She just doesn't want to do any of YOUR work. It's not extra work. It's YOUR work and she is saying no and has a right to do so.

No matter what she did or didn't do you're not entitled to make her do what you want her to do. Your opinions, frustrations and feelings do not matter more than hers. She has a perfect right to say no for any reason, or none.

You're not entitled to her time.

You're not entitled to her labour.

You're not entitled to anything.

She's not your servant. She is a fully functioning person independent of you with her own rights and wants and You're Not Entitled to Anything.

Process it and move on.

TheignT · 06/04/2026 11:44

FinancesSorted · 06/04/2026 09:44

I agree the level of entitlement and expectation is off the scale with some young parents it seems. Childcare is hard work especially if you are working as well.

Society is changing and the state pension age is now 67. People need to save for their retirement. This conflicts with some young parents, like those of the @ReluctantGM, who think grandma needs to cut hours / retire in order to support adult children with childcare. Those who are in their currently 50s/60s are definitely squeezed middle.

Some posters have rose tinted of times gone by when they where looked after by grandparents but in those days women often gave up work when they had children in the 60s/70s. When I had my children late 90s/early 00s my parents / in-laws were amazed that I continued in my career

Circumstances vary. I'm in my 70 s. I worked from 15 to 70 although gradually reducing my hours over the last few years. My mother worked throughout my childhood. My maternal grandmother worked as her husband buggered off and left her with three kids to bring up, her mother did the same due to having an alcoholic husband and four kids to feed and clothe. No one raised an eyebrow when I went back to work in the 70s when my eldest was a few months old. I wasn't surprised when my Dil returned to work after maternity leave.

JHound · 06/04/2026 11:45

I wholeheartedly agree with you OP. There is a disturbing sense of entitlement among some parents who seem to think their personal choice to become parents should mean others sacrificing to assist them with that choice.

TheignT · 06/04/2026 11:48

Theoryofmind2026 · 06/04/2026 11:37

Yes, certainly anecdotally I have no memories of anybody receiving much care from their grandparents. It just wasn't a thing. Working class mothers always worked, of course, but they left their kids home alone, took them with them to work (cleaners often did this) or worked shifts around them - my mum worked nightshift 3 nights a week for this very reason. They took jobs they could do at home or near to home and they also helped one another out where they could, the mums, not the grandparents for the most part. And there were nursery schools then too, and then of course once school started the kids walked to school on their own. I was walking my younger brother to school by the time I was 7.

Grandparents being regularly enlisted as unpaid carers and the entitlement around that by so many mumsnetters is quite new to me.

It is good to know that my memory of grandparents just being relatives and, on the whole, not an army of unpaid carers is borne out by the stats.

I wonder if it's a regional thing? Colleagues used to comment on how much childcare I did but when I went to the part of the UK my parents came from my cousins were all doing the same sort of thing.
Maybe an idea for some analysis.

TheignT · 06/04/2026 11:55

ReluctantGM · 06/04/2026 08:07

However, I would say that the point about not having such a close relationship with your GC will be relevant.

A close relationship is only possible if childcare is done?

I don't think it's true but I think the relationship can be different. Just a personal anecdote but when uni student GC is down about something they phone me not the other GM who they do love but saw less of growing up as she lives 200 miles away.

Sometimes when I'm lying awake worrying it can seem like a dubious honour.

Strawberrycheesecake7 · 06/04/2026 11:56

Theoryofmind2026 · 06/04/2026 11:43

Your post drips with poisonous entitlement.

She just doesn't want to do any of YOUR work. It's not extra work. It's YOUR work and she is saying no and has a right to do so.

No matter what she did or didn't do you're not entitled to make her do what you want her to do. Your opinions, frustrations and feelings do not matter more than hers. She has a perfect right to say no for any reason, or none.

You're not entitled to her time.

You're not entitled to her labour.

You're not entitled to anything.

She's not your servant. She is a fully functioning person independent of you with her own rights and wants and You're Not Entitled to Anything.

Process it and move on.

Edited

Wanting occasional support from my own mother is “poisonous entitlement”? That’s a bit ridiculous and dramatic don’t you think? Unnecessarily nasty comment. I’m only saying she could help out very occasionally if she wants to build a relationship with her grandchildren. Which she does want, she complains constantly that they’re not close to her. I’m expected to take them round to see her any time she asks, which I do. If we’re talking about entitlement, why do grandparents who choose not to help feel entitled to a relationship with their grandchildren at all?

Liveshives · 06/04/2026 12:03

Dancingintherain09 · 05/04/2026 21:01

It's not easy brain fog and fatigue is a nightmare.

I have explained when our kids were little ie her and siblings (I had 3 of them), I was alone for weeks/months at a time, DH was away and we lived on base away from family support. I did 24/7 alone when my husband was away either deployed or on training etc and never had "a rest", So she has it easy having her DP home 3 days week. Even when home he worked 8am -6pm and I did childminding on top until 6.30pm.
She just can't see how easy her life is. 🙄😬

Edited

Your daughter sounds like a right entitled madam, who needs to think very seriously as to whether or not she has any more children if she can't see how lucky she is.

I would be definitely stepping back a bit from such a daughter rather than tolerating such entitlement.

Theoryofmind2026 · 06/04/2026 12:03

TheignT · 06/04/2026 11:55

I don't think it's true but I think the relationship can be different. Just a personal anecdote but when uni student GC is down about something they phone me not the other GM who they do love but saw less of growing up as she lives 200 miles away.

Sometimes when I'm lying awake worrying it can seem like a dubious honour.

Closer doesn't always mean better, grandmothers forced to raise grandchildren by entitled daughters may well feel resentful of their grandchildren and be eagerly awaiting the day they never have to be an unpaid servant or see any of them again.

And grandmothers who don't act as unpaid nannies can still foster relationships with their grandchildren if they want to, of course - provided their adult children aren't trying to punish them into submission by revoking visiting rights.

There are so many individual variables in human relationships that it's not possible to guess whether grandmothers will have, or even want, close relationships with their grandchildren regardless of who is doing the caregiving.

Theoryofmind2026 · 06/04/2026 12:10

Strawberrycheesecake7 · 06/04/2026 11:56

Wanting occasional support from my own mother is “poisonous entitlement”? That’s a bit ridiculous and dramatic don’t you think? Unnecessarily nasty comment. I’m only saying she could help out very occasionally if she wants to build a relationship with her grandchildren. Which she does want, she complains constantly that they’re not close to her. I’m expected to take them round to see her any time she asks, which I do. If we’re talking about entitlement, why do grandparents who choose not to help feel entitled to a relationship with their grandchildren at all?

Slagging your mother off because she won't kowtow to you and do your work for you is, indeed, poisonous entitlement. Stop being so dramatic. She said no, and that's that.

And there we have it - Stepford Gran Bingo!

Here's what you just said (and everyone knows it) "I like the idea of grandmothers being punished for not being servants to their adult children and their grandchildren. How dare they have wants that don't comply with my demands? They are not fully functioning humans, they are NPCs and need to service our wants. I like the idea of destroying any possible bond my children might have with my mother because I want to punish her for refusing to kowtow to me and my demands and refusing to take on my work for me. I may not (yet) be punishing her in that way but it's certainly crossed my mind. I am going to conflate my kids getting to visit their gran with coercing my mother into unpaid labour because then I don't sound like such a terrible person to myself and I can justify my unfair entitlement"

Take them or don't take them. Do as you choose. It still does not entitle you to her unpaid labour.

You are coming across as a truly nasty and entitled person. Vicious, in fact. Your mother obviously has your number.

Strawberrycheesecake7 · 06/04/2026 12:16

Theoryofmind2026 · 06/04/2026 12:10

Slagging your mother off because she won't kowtow to you and do your work for you is, indeed, poisonous entitlement. Stop being so dramatic. She said no, and that's that.

And there we have it - Stepford Gran Bingo!

Here's what you just said (and everyone knows it) "I like the idea of grandmothers being punished for not being servants to their adult children and their grandchildren. How dare they have wants that don't comply with my demands? They are not fully functioning humans, they are NPCs and need to service our wants. I like the idea of destroying any possible bond my children might have with my mother because I want to punish her for refusing to kowtow to me and my demands and refusing to take on my work for me. I may not (yet) be punishing her in that way but it's certainly crossed my mind. I am going to conflate my kids getting to visit their gran with coercing my mother into unpaid labour because then I don't sound like such a terrible person to myself and I can justify my unfair entitlement"

Take them or don't take them. Do as you choose. It still does not entitle you to her unpaid labour.

You are coming across as a truly nasty and entitled person. Vicious, in fact. Your mother obviously has your number.

Edited

I haven’t punished her for anything though? Like I said I take my children to see her all the time. I want them to have a relationship with her. I actually haven’t asked her for any help in years, as when I asked the first few times she made it clear she wouldn’t, so I have accepted it, doesn’t mean I have to be happy about it. And it’s hardly “slagging her off” to talk about my life on an anonymous forum where nobody knows who she is. You’re the one who is being dramatic.

MsJinks · 06/04/2026 12:21

I much prefer the set up of non regular childcare gran - I don’t want to be part of the round of rearing/disciplining/keeping consistent boundaries- I like the time with them to be fun, relaxed boundaries maybe around bed or chocolate or days out - I think it’s nice for them to have those times as well. I obviously don’t let them run complete riot when I have them but basically yes I like to spoil them. I believe I have a good relationship with them despite not being childcare gran - really who needs 2 mums telling them what to do ha.

This is my approach and I’m glad I have the choice - many do it differently for as many different reasons, and that’s right, as long as it is gran’s choice is what matters.

We will all have different relationships with grans, cousins, parents etc as that is life.

It is disgraceful suggesting grans can’t expect elderly help simply because they didn’t do as you wished. Did they never ask you as a kid to tidy your bedroom, as your responsibility? Though these tantrums over childcare are actually probably similar to those you might have had as a teen when asked to do something.

Theoryofmind2026 · 06/04/2026 12:22

Strawberrycheesecake7 · 06/04/2026 12:16

I haven’t punished her for anything though? Like I said I take my children to see her all the time. I want them to have a relationship with her. I actually haven’t asked her for any help in years, as when I asked the first few times she made it clear she wouldn’t, so I have accepted it, doesn’t mean I have to be happy about it. And it’s hardly “slagging her off” to talk about my life on an anonymous forum where nobody knows who she is. You’re the one who is being dramatic.

I didn't say you had punished her, I said you want to punish her. The thought of it pleases you.

That you can even try to conflate your kids getting to visit their gran with an ageing woman saying no to doing YOUR work (she is not your servant and has a right to say no to doing your work, you need to process this) is bewilderingly spiteful.

And course it's slagging her off, just in a more cowardly fashion than saying it to her face.

Stop being so dramatic. She said no, so that's that.

Swipe left for the next trending thread