Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Mumsnet race to the bottom

552 replies

limeandwater · 24/03/2026 09:15

I have noticed on MN there has been a real race to the bottom mentality. To be clear I am not talking about budget advice threads that can be incredibly helpful.

I am talking about the posters that think working people should be so accepting of a miserable life.

Again I am not talking about 5 star holidays in The Maldives, 26 plate Range Rovers, or shopping at Harrods Food Hall.

Somebody posts about the price of coffee then the response is to make your own and bring it with you. Somebody posts about the price of a cafe lunch on a family day out and the response is bring your own sandwiches. Somebody posted about the cost of running a car and the answer is cycle. Like that's realistic in a rainy December.

When did people get so accepting that life had to be miserable?

OP posts:
dinbin · 24/03/2026 16:59

@Mangelwurzelfortea its ridiculous, younger generations have less disposable income than previous generations did at the same age, largely because of housing costs.

But it’s far easier to blame individuals rather than reflect on the actual reality so then the issues can be ignored.

Mangelwurzelfortea · 24/03/2026 17:00

dinbin · 24/03/2026 16:59

@Mangelwurzelfortea its ridiculous, younger generations have less disposable income than previous generations did at the same age, largely because of housing costs.

But it’s far easier to blame individuals rather than reflect on the actual reality so then the issues can be ignored.

Housing costs and massive university debts. I can't even imagine starting my working life with all that hanging round my neck - and not even any guarantee of a job. Not even a good job - any job.

Dragonflytamer · 24/03/2026 17:02

Mangelwurzelfortea · 24/03/2026 16:59

This is exactly the sort of judgy post I am talking about.

What the fuck do you even mean by more 'self-fulfilling' than a coffee? It's a drink, not a volunteering session at the local hospice.

It's not judging its basic financial sense.

UraniumFlowerpot · 24/03/2026 17:03

These are interesting examples OP because I think they’re things that have shifted over time. My parents were pretty well off, never had any money worries, but honestly I can hardly remember a time from our childhood when they bought a takeaway coffee, and we almost always took a picnic with us if we had a day out. So there can be an element of mindset shift in some smaller things like this where we’ve just convinced ourselves that little daily conveniences are necessary. But I totally agree with you on the more general point. It shouldn’t be so hard to earn enough to pay rent bills and food without needing to worry. While “make do with what you can afford” is a reasonable line of advice in the short term and for an individual, it sucks as a response to the general situation of continually decaying salaries and living standards. Unfortunately it does seem that we’re in a position where the country is no longer productive enough or internationally competitive enough to support the standard of life that most people want. Plus the massive shift of wealth that’s been allowed in recent decades. Not an easy one to solve.

Cuttingthroughredtape · 24/03/2026 17:06

Mangelwurzelfortea · 24/03/2026 16:59

This is exactly the sort of judgy post I am talking about.

What the fuck do you even mean by more 'self-fulfilling' than a coffee? It's a drink, not a volunteering session at the local hospice.

As I said, crack on with take out coffees if you wish, BUT don't then claim poverty.

Someone else mentioned university. It is not compulsory and you could be earning for 5 years rather than running up debts. So many put themselves on a self destructive path with no long term game plan.

OooPourUsACupLove · 24/03/2026 17:06

Jellycatspyjamas · 24/03/2026 16:59

So the person who described a cafe lunch as greasy and fatty was being supportive, or the person who described instant coffee as swill was just expressing their view. Every time there’s a thread involving choices other people make there’s a plethora of posters passing judgment to the point where you’d think giving your child a chocolate bar was more harmful than crack.

But no, it’s all projection - no judgment at all.

It's up to you how you take it.

But yes, I think having assumptions challenged and having someone say "no, you don't need to have X, I don't and I'm fine" or "honestly Y isn't really that nice, you'll probably feel better for not having it" or "actually you can do Z, all you need is .... " and basically offering new perspectives and new options is far more supportive in the long term than a gentle hand pat and "oh poor you, you can't possibly be expected to do without your coffee and your cafe lunch, life is really unfair".

BauhausOfEliott · 24/03/2026 17:13

Dragonflytamer · 24/03/2026 15:20

But most people aren't saying people have to have the same level of thrift, they are saying if you're going to make expensive choices don't complain that they are expensive.

Sometimes, though, it's really bloody depressing when a small avenue of pleasure is closed off to you. We all have small joys in our lives, and it's bloody miserable and annoying when they're taken away from us.

People are allowed to have a little vent about that, surely, without a bunch of sanctimonious bellends popping up to tell them that actually, their small joy was just a stupid extravagance that they should be ashamed of enjoying in the first place, and could easily be replaced with something they don't actually enjoy at all.

If people were saying 'God, Rolexes are so expensive these days, AIBU to think they should be affordable to me?' then yes, they'd be ridiculous. But sneering at someone for feeling a bit miserable that they can't afford the small pleasure of a coffee and a cake in a cafe with with their kids and implying that they're profligate oafs for even considering the idea is, frankly, just dickish.

Jellycatspyjamas · 24/03/2026 17:15

The assumption that the poster was having something greasy or fatty, rather than a soup or a salad is ok then? They said they missed going for lunch in a local cafe, not what they ate while there. It’s only assumptions that don’t fit with yours that are worthy of challenge?

And Y may not be nice to you, but you can’t objectively say it’s not nice for someone else, or that they’re wrong for wanting Z that you wouldn’t choose.

Melarus · 24/03/2026 17:15

OooPourUsACupLove · 24/03/2026 17:06

It's up to you how you take it.

But yes, I think having assumptions challenged and having someone say "no, you don't need to have X, I don't and I'm fine" or "honestly Y isn't really that nice, you'll probably feel better for not having it" or "actually you can do Z, all you need is .... " and basically offering new perspectives and new options is far more supportive in the long term than a gentle hand pat and "oh poor you, you can't possibly be expected to do without your coffee and your cafe lunch, life is really unfair".

I've read through pages and pages of these two threads now (this + Panorama), and not one person has said, "Oh, a flask of coffee! That's a good idea, I'll try that tomorrow!"

Or "Right, from now on I'm making my own sandwiches, because you, random internet stranger, are doing that and you're happy, so I'm sure I will be too!"

All we're doing is putting each other's backs up to no purpose - as usual

itsthetea · 24/03/2026 17:17

I guess the thread title does set people up the wrong way - it is basically saying if you prefer a life that isn’t built around coffees and expensive days out you are somehow at the bottom and you shouldn’t be proud of how you live

Goditsmemargaret · 24/03/2026 17:18

I think the answer is since the majority of your country voted for Brexit.

Katypp · 24/03/2026 17:18

At the start of the Middle East war, there were stories on the news every night of people stuck in Dubai when hostilities started.
One young couple had left their baby behind with her mum to go on holiday in Dubai and had been caught up in it and their return had been delayed.
It must have been miserable - and expensive - for them and I had a lot of sympathy for them.
But then he said that they had 'had to use money they were saving for a house deposit' to pay for accommodation and went on to say that they had been saving for years etc.
When my ex and I were saving for a deposit in the 1980s, every single spare penny we had went into that savings account. No holiday at all, never mind an expensive holiday in Dubai 'while saving for years for a deposit'.
I think it's that type of entitlement and selective hardship that turns off a lot of my sympathy about how hard it is to live today. Just imagine if they had not had that holiday - their deposit would have been £5,000(?) more. But evidently they must have thought they deserved that holiday because they worked hard.
Go figure.

BauhausOfEliott · 24/03/2026 17:20

Dragonflytamer · 24/03/2026 15:06

Hardly the same. I have employee who gets a costa twice a day. So she spends £4 per drink, £8 per day, £40 per week, £1,920 per year on coffee (assuming she doesn't when is on holiday). She could have effectively have a £3.5k payrise by drinking water.

What's that got to do with you? If her daily Costa coffees bring her pleasure, it's perfectly OK for her to buy them. With her money. That she earned.

We all could all save money if we made our lives completely fucking joyless and miserable, but most human beings would rather have some pleasant indulgences in their lives, because, you know, we're not self-flagellating puritans.

dinbin · 24/03/2026 17:20

Sometimes, though, it's really bloody depressing when a small avenue of pleasure is closed off to you. We all have small joys in our lives, and it's bloody miserable and annoying when they're taken away from

And it’s not a new thing. The lipstick effect was a thing during the Great Depression. ’Beauty is your duty’ etc

OooPourUsACupLove · 24/03/2026 17:21

Jellycatspyjamas · 24/03/2026 17:15

The assumption that the poster was having something greasy or fatty, rather than a soup or a salad is ok then? They said they missed going for lunch in a local cafe, not what they ate while there. It’s only assumptions that don’t fit with yours that are worthy of challenge?

And Y may not be nice to you, but you can’t objectively say it’s not nice for someone else, or that they’re wrong for wanting Z that you wouldn’t choose.

Sigh.

Again, it's about different perspectives.

You seem very fixated on something having to be agreed by everyone as right or wrong, good or bad.

I'm suggesting that knowing someone else doesn't value X,Y or Z that you see as essential can open up possibilities and new approaches.

It's inspiration not prescription.

Katypp · 24/03/2026 17:22

BauhausOfEliott · 24/03/2026 17:20

What's that got to do with you? If her daily Costa coffees bring her pleasure, it's perfectly OK for her to buy them. With her money. That she earned.

We all could all save money if we made our lives completely fucking joyless and miserable, but most human beings would rather have some pleasant indulgences in their lives, because, you know, we're not self-flagellating puritans.

And as long as you are not complaining about things have never been so hard and boomers have no idea, that's fine.
But it jars when people expect to spend much more money on fripperies then complain they haven't got the spare cash earlier generations have.

dinbin · 24/03/2026 17:22

we're not self-flagellating puritans.

perhaps this should be part of the next governments campaign slogan!

dinbin · 24/03/2026 17:24

But it jars when people expect to spend much more money on fripperies then complain they haven't got the spare cash earlier generations have.

I think it’s more jarring when some cannot comprehend that younger generations don’t have the same disposable income as previous generations did at their age due to fripperies instead of housing costs and wage stagnation. It’s really not that hard to understand but 🤷🏻‍♀️

Dragonflytamer · 24/03/2026 17:26

BauhausOfEliott · 24/03/2026 17:20

What's that got to do with you? If her daily Costa coffees bring her pleasure, it's perfectly OK for her to buy them. With her money. That she earned.

We all could all save money if we made our lives completely fucking joyless and miserable, but most human beings would rather have some pleasant indulgences in their lives, because, you know, we're not self-flagellating puritans.

Yes absolutely it is for her to buy whatever she likes! The objection comes when she spends the afternoon complaining at what the world is coming to when coffee costs £4. It is fine to choose to spend your money on whatever you like just don't then moan about it.

She doesn't seem to get any pleasure or joy from it. If she came back happy it would have no impact.

BauhausOfEliott · 24/03/2026 17:28

OooPourUsACupLove · 24/03/2026 17:06

It's up to you how you take it.

But yes, I think having assumptions challenged and having someone say "no, you don't need to have X, I don't and I'm fine" or "honestly Y isn't really that nice, you'll probably feel better for not having it" or "actually you can do Z, all you need is .... " and basically offering new perspectives and new options is far more supportive in the long term than a gentle hand pat and "oh poor you, you can't possibly be expected to do without your coffee and your cafe lunch, life is really unfair".

But yes, I think having assumptions challenged and having someone say "no, you don't need to have X, I don't and I'm fine" or "honestly Y isn't really that nice, you'll probably feel better for not having it" or "actually you can do Z, all you need is .... " and basically offering new perspectives and new options is far more supportive in the long term

It isn't remotely supportive, though. It's patronising, overbearing and smug.

It's also very egocentric of you to assume that a) people haven't already considered your very obvious suggestions and ruled them out because they aren't right for them, and b) just because YOU happen to feel better for not having something, everyone else will/should too.

It's not supportive - you might mean it to be, but it just comes across as smug superiority.

You also need to learn the difference between someone who is just expressing an opinion to get something off their chest, and someone who is actually asking for your advice. Don't expect people to be delighted with your advice when they never asked for it in the first place.

dinbin · 24/03/2026 17:29

When my ex and I were saving for a deposit in the 1980s, every single spare penny we had went into that savings account. No holiday at all, never mind an expensive holiday in Dubai 'while saving for years for a deposit'.

I did have holidays before I got on the property ladder. Largely because I was older so it would have been a long time to forego holidays.

My parents bought their 2nd “forever home” at 30 in the 80s in London. Helped by an interest only mortgage.

OooPourUsACupLove · 24/03/2026 17:29

Melarus · 24/03/2026 17:15

I've read through pages and pages of these two threads now (this + Panorama), and not one person has said, "Oh, a flask of coffee! That's a good idea, I'll try that tomorrow!"

Or "Right, from now on I'm making my own sandwiches, because you, random internet stranger, are doing that and you're happy, so I'm sure I will be too!"

All we're doing is putting each other's backs up to no purpose - as usual

Yeah, I wouldn't expect a road to Damascus type conversion on the thread 😂 it's more about ideas that stick (sometimes exactly because they get the back up!) and people come back to over time.

I've seen it. I've experienced it myself. I've been really angry at having my spending priorities questioned / challenged. But over time I thought about it and I had to admit to myself that person had a point.

Some things I changed. Some things I kept doing, but now as a conscious choice and with awareness that I was making decisions not to use my money in other ways that might be long term beneficial.

dinbin · 24/03/2026 17:30

It is fine to choose to spend your money on whatever you like just don't then moan about it.

So none of us can complain about rising energy costs or food prices? Everytime I go shopping I have a moan, as does everyone I know!

itsthetea · 24/03/2026 17:31

dinbin · 24/03/2026 17:24

But it jars when people expect to spend much more money on fripperies then complain they haven't got the spare cash earlier generations have.

I think it’s more jarring when some cannot comprehend that younger generations don’t have the same disposable income as previous generations did at their age due to fripperies instead of housing costs and wage stagnation. It’s really not that hard to understand but 🤷🏻‍♀️

I think you find it’s just one generation that got used to having lots of spare cash for none essentials - quite a small cohort. A lot of older people never saw the point of the coffee culture because it wasn’t an option when they were forming their habits - habits that tend to stay with you for life

so you don’t miss what you never wanted. In my case I put more into the pension pot if I had any left. Which for a good many years I didn’t.

But I know the younger generation also finds it hard to accept that older people who now have homes of their own were at one time surviving in a bed sit in the cheapest part of town ( it’s red light district) and counting the pennies for a potato for their tea. Whilst working full time in a decent job.

OooPourUsACupLove · 24/03/2026 17:32

BauhausOfEliott · 24/03/2026 17:28

But yes, I think having assumptions challenged and having someone say "no, you don't need to have X, I don't and I'm fine" or "honestly Y isn't really that nice, you'll probably feel better for not having it" or "actually you can do Z, all you need is .... " and basically offering new perspectives and new options is far more supportive in the long term

It isn't remotely supportive, though. It's patronising, overbearing and smug.

It's also very egocentric of you to assume that a) people haven't already considered your very obvious suggestions and ruled them out because they aren't right for them, and b) just because YOU happen to feel better for not having something, everyone else will/should too.

It's not supportive - you might mean it to be, but it just comes across as smug superiority.

You also need to learn the difference between someone who is just expressing an opinion to get something off their chest, and someone who is actually asking for your advice. Don't expect people to be delighted with your advice when they never asked for it in the first place.

Ah, now you see the only suggestions I have made on this thread were in direct answer to someone saying cycling requires Thing X, because I know from my own experience it doesn't.

I was actually in this post speaking from the perspective of someone who received the suggestions.