"yes, but that's just one cat, that you know and have time to focus on in your own home. How can a man go through all that complex thought process every time he comes across a woman anywhere near him?"
This is fabulous. Dear goodness, I've never known a thread like this for people taking things literally to the point of cartoonish absurdity. I checked back in to see if the madness was ongoing, and yes, it is - same old, same old... But this one was so exquisite, I had to post something (sucker for punishment - I'm learning from this, and not checking back in again, you'll be pleased to know).
So (deep breath).
Kindly, my suggestion isn't that men gather all their considerable intellectual faculties to think of nervous cats every time they see a woman on the street.
Here's another encounter that may help to explain.
Shortly after my earlier last post, walking down the street, I saw a man slowly pushing a pram in front of me. I was walking faster than him and about to overtake him, and the pavement wasn't very wide. As such, anticipating the potential for me to make him jump as I suddenly appeared from behind his shoulder, I instead gently cleared my throat when I was still a few feet away as a subtle advance warning, and also angled my body slightly as I passed in a kind of instinctive "I respect your personal space" non-verbal cue that politely acknowledged the limited distance between us.
This is all that we mean, people!
I'm kind of glad actually to have seen the above and be able to write this as my final post, as it conveniently addresses a few of the misrepresentations (lies?) that seem to keep coming up.
Like OP, I wasn't "following" this man - I was approaching from behind him at a slightly faster pace.
Like most (all?) of the posters on my "side" of this debate - and, indeed, like most thinking people - I recognise that men have the capacity to feel unsafe (and yes, the right to "take action to keep themselves safe", or whatever the curious phrase that keeps coming up is).
Unlike some here, I don't see instinctively respectful, empathetic body language as an unfathomable mystery or overwhelming challenge in my busy day. That so many do really does suggest the OP - however badly chosen her example and unreasonable her moral judgement about our beleaguered hero, poor old bag-bloke - did have one hell of a point after all.
To me, as another poster said, really, it's all pretty simples (bless Aleksandr!)