Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be annoyed by the volume of deleted comments which are merely mildly provocative or robustly stating an opposing opinion, rather than being unacceptably rude or offensive?

186 replies

auserna · 15/03/2026 15:05

NOT a TAAT.

Does anyone else find it highly irritating when threads end up having more holes than Swiss cheese due to so many posts having been deleted?

Much of the time the person at whom the contentious comment was aimed has replied (obviously before the deletion) in a manner that suggests they weren't in the least offended or bothered by it - but now you can no longer see what they were responding to.

It sometimes feels a bit like being back at school, with everyone running to the teacher and gleefully exclaiming, "Reported!" as if they're going to earn a gold star for doing so.

It's not actually injurious to one's health to be mildly ruffled by someone having a different opinion or viewpoint on a particular topic, as happens all the time in real life.

I may be an outlier here, and am happy to accept that if it's the case, but I'm curious to know how others feel.

OP posts:
ilovesooty · 15/03/2026 21:33

SwanRivers · 15/03/2026 21:25

I think in context it means being deliberately unhelpful, rather than inadvertently giving unhelpful advice.

So for example if a poster posts purely to pick someone up on their spelling and grammar, and offers nothing else.

At least that's the way I understand it.

Nitpicking which isn't adding anything to the topic
Posts designed to belittle and shame
Aggressive posts which have the effect of discouraging posters from seeking support

That's my interpretation anyway.

Bagsintheboot · 15/03/2026 21:34

DBSFstupid · 15/03/2026 21:21

Yes.
To report a poster for writing an 'unhelpful' post is laughable.

Not at all.

There have been quite a few instances where an OP has posted, obviously in distress, and then gets piled on with numerous obviously unhelpful posts that, while not being outright attacks, are clearly just intended to have a dig.

If you don't agree with the way a forum is moderated, you're more than welcome to start your own...

DBSFstupid · 15/03/2026 21:39

SwanRivers · 15/03/2026 21:25

I think in context it means being deliberately unhelpful, rather than inadvertently giving unhelpful advice.

So for example if a poster posts purely to pick someone up on their spelling and grammar, and offers nothing else.

At least that's the way I understand it.

Ok, that does make sense. Thank you.

TheBroonOneAndTheWhiteOne · 15/03/2026 21:41

ohyesido · 15/03/2026 15:39

Do comments get hidden or removed simply because someone chose to report it, or does someone from MNHQ actually look at a reported post and decide whether it stays?

They can only look at a post if it's been reported.

DBSFstupid · 15/03/2026 21:41

Bagsintheboot · 15/03/2026 21:34

Not at all.

There have been quite a few instances where an OP has posted, obviously in distress, and then gets piled on with numerous obviously unhelpful posts that, while not being outright attacks, are clearly just intended to have a dig.

If you don't agree with the way a forum is moderated, you're more than welcome to start your own...

Your third paragraph is not very helpful😅

HarryVanderspeigle · 15/03/2026 21:47

Hard to tell really, as once they are deleted, I don't know what they said. I did once have a comment hidden that was never unhidden. It was about phonics, so no idea what was so contentious!

auserna · 15/03/2026 21:56

HarryVanderspeigle · 15/03/2026 21:47

Hard to tell really, as once they are deleted, I don't know what they said. I did once have a comment hidden that was never unhidden. It was about phonics, so no idea what was so contentious!

Perhaps someone didn't read it properly (seems to be de rigueur on here) and thought you were accusing someone of being phobic of something!

OP posts:
Nutmuncher · 15/03/2026 21:56

Absolutely agree. Whoever has the inclination to report a post on a forum in 2026 because they simply dislike a tone or point being made (unless it’s incredibly attacking/derogatory) is in my opinion a jobsworth. Also depends heavily on who is moderating.

CruCru · 15/03/2026 22:24

DBSFstupid · 15/03/2026 21:12

Oh well that explains it!! Unhelpful?? Unbelievable.

I posted on a thread where I disagreed with the OP (not rudely, I hope). She decided that as a couple of other posters had also disagreed with her, we must all be one person posting under different accounts. Then she kept posting that we were clearly a troll and that it was a plot to discredit her thread. That was weird. And unhelpful.

SemiRetiredLoveGoddeess · 16/03/2026 22:14

Just another form of Click bait following an algorithm?

StolenTeapots · 17/03/2026 07:33

Is the change because mn might be getting sold?

Mykneesareshot · 20/03/2026 15:29

User8457363 · 15/03/2026 15:36

People can post all manner of racist or ableist crap and it’s left to stand though.

MN only delete posts if they have been reported. So that's why you often see horrendous statements left to stand...it simply means that all the people who read it agreed with it or didn't find it offensive to report.

The only reason more innocuous comments get deleted is because you inadvertently picked an argument with someone who reports every comment that they don't agree with or feel attacked by. Or they have loads of sock puppet accounts and report you using each one so the chances are higher that you get deleted.

Never underestimate the insanity of people who are chronically online.

Hence I have never reported a comment nor been offended by one. I think some people have nothing better to do than go looking for comments to report as some sort of game. We don't all subscribe to a moderators opinion.

CruCru · 20/03/2026 16:05

In fairness I remember reading threads that were more hole than content years ago.

satsumaqueen · 20/03/2026 17:12

Yes I find it very irritating. I had comments deleted once, I had no idea why as I didn’t say anything remotely offensive. Someone reporting me and Mumsnet kept removing every thing I said. It was very weird. I feel like a lot of the time if someone doesn’t like the way their thread is going they will start reporting comments they don’t agree with. Same as threads kept being deleted. It’s annoying

Losted · 20/03/2026 17:27

I was expecting the poll to be roughly 50:50, but it's currently over 80% in agreement

Which means absolutely nothing.

I have the voting thing turned off so I never see the buttons or the % breakdown, but I have lost count of the number of times I see "oops, I pressed the wrong button", and so many threads make it obvious that a poster hasn't even bothered to read the OP, so their "vote" is worth .the square root of fuck all.

SixtySomething · 21/03/2026 00:53

dastardlydani · 15/03/2026 16:07

You used to be able to correct grammar but you can’t now.

Good.
I find people correcting grammar unbearably condescending and rude.

SwanRivers · 21/03/2026 01:13

SixtySomething · 21/03/2026 00:53

Good.
I find people correcting grammar unbearably condescending and rude.

So do I.

Imagine being unlucky enough to be poor at spelling and grammar, in a day and age where so many of us hardly go a day without texting or posting on the internet.

And then imagine being corrected by insufferable twats every time you do.

If it’s so important to them they should’ve taken up teaching.

QuezovercoatI · 21/03/2026 02:04

Dontlletmedownbruce · 15/03/2026 16:08

I agree OP. I read something offensive generalising about a group of people, it wasn't racist or albeist but it was sexist and bigoted and i thought it was really inappropriate. So I said to the OP something along the lines of 'maybe that's because you are a bigot and lack critical thinking'. It was reported because it was deemed a personal attack. Which I guess it was but the general bigoted comment was left stand. So basically MN says its not ok to be specific but you can generalise all you like. It's ok to say 'Londoners are all racist idiots' or 'women who wear high heels are sluts', or 'bricklayers are paedophiles' but not to call an individual out on it. It's ridiculous. I was also gobsmacked that the person brazen enough to post such a nasty comment ran off crying to have my relatively mild comment deleted.

Just experienced this today. The post I was replying to was an absolute screed of misogynistic insults to the women on the thread and women in general. Word for word the sort of thing you see on "Alpha male podcasts" so I suggested the poster had been absorbing too much red pill content (can't remember my exact wording)
Deleted for a personal attack. Yet the horrible post I was answering was left up.

Katemax82 · 21/03/2026 10:08

auserna · 15/03/2026 15:44

The thread was deleted as well, so I never got any help trying to debunk it in my efforts to get the person (family member) who kept sending me such crap to desist.

I have an anti vaxxer stepson who sent me a load of crap with the guise of being concerned for my baby before his first jabs. I ignored the message completely and told my husband to tell him to stop because I won't engage with him on it

Bagsintheboot · 21/03/2026 10:21

QuezovercoatI · 21/03/2026 02:04

Just experienced this today. The post I was replying to was an absolute screed of misogynistic insults to the women on the thread and women in general. Word for word the sort of thing you see on "Alpha male podcasts" so I suggested the poster had been absorbing too much red pill content (can't remember my exact wording)
Deleted for a personal attack. Yet the horrible post I was answering was left up.

You need to report it. MNHQ won't look through a thread for context unfortunately.

Dontlletmedownbruce · 21/03/2026 11:59

Bagsintheboot · 21/03/2026 10:21

You need to report it. MNHQ won't look through a thread for context unfortunately.

This is the bit I don't get. They can't possibly trawl through everything but if someone reports a post as a personal attack they have to read it to decide if its appropriate to delete or not. So they read someone saying 'you are racist / sexist@username ' usually quoting the offensive post. Yet they can't be bothered to read a few extra lines. I am all for free speech but I think most people agree there is a line that can be crossed. I think it suits MN to have extreme and controversial / provocative views so they increase traffic for advertising revenue. There is absolutely no moral compass here, they are happy to cause distress or allow misinformation spread. They also choose to not pay more staff to police it better, they are no better than the other grabby tech companies. Yet they market themselves as a helpful and supportive platform, that's what really annoys me.

CruCru · 21/03/2026 15:30

When I have an actual problem, I do not mention it on MN. I think it’s more for trivial grumbles than serious problems.

I suspect that the MN crew don’t read threads for context because so many threads are a bit of a rabbit hole. There are long running threads with in jokes that seem fairly unintelligible at the outset. Some threads are a bit niche.

ilovesooty · 21/03/2026 15:38

CruCru · 21/03/2026 15:30

When I have an actual problem, I do not mention it on MN. I think it’s more for trivial grumbles than serious problems.

I suspect that the MN crew don’t read threads for context because so many threads are a bit of a rabbit hole. There are long running threads with in jokes that seem fairly unintelligible at the outset. Some threads are a bit niche.

I wouldn't dream of posting about a serious problem on here. I wouldn't expect to access any meaningful support and I don't think this is a secure place to talk about anything important. I'd expect MNHQ to be able to look at reports in context but I suppose it depends who's on duty and how busy they are.

Walksspecial · 29/03/2026 10:52

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

BIWI · 29/03/2026 10:57

a) many of the deletions are not farcical - there's been a big rise in racist posts, for example
b) many of them are because they are personal attacks or deliberately goady
c) increasingly MNHQ are deleting those which are deemed unnecessarily aggressive or unpleasant, as there's a recognition that the tone of the site is much the worse because of this
d) many of them are being started by trolls/bots/PBPs

I doubt there are many, if any, truly "innocuous" posts that have been deleted (although it's undoubtedly true that some get deleted by mistake). Unless you're someone who thinks that 'free speech' means you can post whatever racist or homophobic or misogynistic or ageist shit you like?