Best Amazon Prime Day deals: Mumsnet favourites

Best Amazon Prime Day deals:
Mumsnet favourites

Shop now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Starters idiotic 40k Immigration scheme

148 replies

Wellwhatnowbellaboo · 08/03/2026 09:13

Wtf... maybe I'm not understanding this correctly. If you didn't get asylum you get given 40k IF YOU LEAVE? And if you don't? Do you still get to stay jn hotels etc.? I'm sick to the eyeballs of this weak government's lack of taking a strong stance. Every other European country is doing better than us. I'm not saying asylum should never happen - but we are bending over backwards while our own people are suffering. My DF mother paid taxes and worked all her life ... she has to sell her beloved small family home to pay for her care- but we'll give money and what else to illegals ? This country's decisions is making my blood boil. Point based immigration where we add to jobs that we struggle to find local talent I've got zero issue with - its fair. It's time we wake up - and uv you think IABU explain why plse ....

OP posts:
EvangelineTheNightStar · 08/03/2026 10:10

dapsnotplimsolls · 08/03/2026 10:00

If you're going to slag off Starmer, at least spell his name correctly.

shocked squirrel GIF

Look!!

Wellwhatnowbellaboo · 08/03/2026 10:15

porcupine1965 · 08/03/2026 10:00

Considering EU+ and UK: the UK takes only approximately 11%of asylum seekers and adjusted to the population it ranks about 15th. Why not complain about the unequal distribution of wealth in the UK, instead of kicking the even less fortunate?

This is the other side of the same coin. There isn't enough money to go around is there for both the unfortunate and the countries own needs. If there is prosperity no-one cares that much - we are not in that situation now. Perhaps the media is inflating the issue but if we cannot look after our own .. but give 10k per person of failed asylum ? And if it costs vastly more to keep them here ? The balance is wrong. Very wrong and we almost know it. My issue is why the government cannot deal with it appropriately and in context

OP posts:
BookedNoRefund · 08/03/2026 10:17

we'll give money and what else to illegals

If it winds up people who refer to human beings as ‘illegals’ then it’s money well spent!

Wellwhatnowbellaboo · 08/03/2026 10:18

dapsnotplimsolls · 08/03/2026 10:00

If you're going to slag off Starmer, at least spell his name correctly.

True that 🤣. Bloody spell check and too eager fingers. Shall I delete the tread and start a new one so we are all aligned, or do you think we can agree we all know what and who I'm talking about ?

OP posts:
dapsnotplimsolls · 08/03/2026 10:19

Wellwhatnowbellaboo · 08/03/2026 10:18

True that 🤣. Bloody spell check and too eager fingers. Shall I delete the tread and start a new one so we are all aligned, or do you think we can agree we all know what and who I'm talking about ?

Honestly, I wasn't sure to start with - I thought it was starters in certain jobs then I saw the 'immigration' bit.

Feel free to post a link, though 😁

NotThatSerious · 08/03/2026 10:19

Sofado · 08/03/2026 09:16

Well, for a start, the proposal is not 40k. It’s 10k.

Per person. Up to 40k per family

kinkytoes · 08/03/2026 10:20

Sofado · 08/03/2026 09:28

Obviously, they won’t be able to return - that will be one of the conditions. And 10k is vastly cheaper than housing and feeding someone. So it’s much cheaper.

How will anyone know if they are repeat applicants?

They are destroying all their ID before they arrive!

Underthinker · 08/03/2026 10:21

It might be cheaper to pay 10K that go through the full court and deportation process. But the question is will that money act as enough of an incentive so that more apply and then the overall cost of running the system increases?

Wellwhatnowbellaboo · 08/03/2026 10:23

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Probably true- can't edit it now anymore. But do you have a viewpoint to contribute ?

OP posts:
BlossomLeaves · 08/03/2026 10:23

“While our own people are suffering”
Yes, a lot of people are really struggling, as are our public services. But to think that’s caused by asylum seekers and other immigrants and not by years of the mega rich and their corrupt mates in power syphoning off everything they can from this country is misguided at best. As is the gross way people feel comfortable dehumanising fellow human beings as ‘illegals’.

HighJapes · 08/03/2026 10:38

So they get 10k, leave, then jump back on a boat and repeat the cycle?

given that you have blokes in their 30s coming over and claiming they’re 16 and the government readily accepts it. How the fuck are they going to stop people coming back and claiming their 10k over and over again?!

dapsnotplimsolls · 08/03/2026 10:47

HighJapes · 08/03/2026 10:38

So they get 10k, leave, then jump back on a boat and repeat the cycle?

given that you have blokes in their 30s coming over and claiming they’re 16 and the government readily accepts it. How the fuck are they going to stop people coming back and claiming their 10k over and over again?!

Fingerprints?

ChrisMartinsKisskam · 08/03/2026 10:51

TheFilliesWillRiseAgain · 08/03/2026 09:31

What's to stop them coming straight back and demanding accommodation and food again? They can even throw their passport in the Channel and say they are a different person to get the £40k again

I would hope that they would have had their fingerprints taken and photos to ensure that they can’t get back in

porcupine1965 · 08/03/2026 10:54

Wellwhatnowbellaboo · 08/03/2026 10:15

This is the other side of the same coin. There isn't enough money to go around is there for both the unfortunate and the countries own needs. If there is prosperity no-one cares that much - we are not in that situation now. Perhaps the media is inflating the issue but if we cannot look after our own .. but give 10k per person of failed asylum ? And if it costs vastly more to keep them here ? The balance is wrong. Very wrong and we almost know it. My issue is why the government cannot deal with it appropriately and in context

Not the other side of the same coin: only 0.4% of overall government spending is spent on asylum seekers. They are not to blame for the inequality in the UK. They are an easy scapegoat.

WildMintPanda · 08/03/2026 10:56

porcupine1965 · 08/03/2026 10:00

Considering EU+ and UK: the UK takes only approximately 11%of asylum seekers and adjusted to the population it ranks about 15th. Why not complain about the unequal distribution of wealth in the UK, instead of kicking the even less fortunate?

Because it's not relevant.

Asylum seeking and the problems it creates is an issue across Europe.

Other countries have taken harsher measures already, many of whom are more prosperous than the UK and have greater wealth equality. Denmark for instance.

NotDavidTennant · 08/03/2026 10:57

The people in the small boats are the least of it.

If you're here legally on a student or work visa and it runs out, then just claim asylum and get your free £10k.

climbintheback · 08/03/2026 11:03

Home Sec has stated to keep a family of 3 in asylum accommodation for a year costs £158,000 does this include immigration lawyers and ECHR lawyers back and forth back and forth for years when they have been refused asylum - either way £30,000 for these 3 seems like a deal!

SpiritAdder · 08/03/2026 11:04

I am generally pro immigrant, so while I disagree with most of your post, I fully agree that Starmer’s up to £40k bonus which is where a family with children (£10k per person capped at £40k) have failed to qualify for asylum is starkers. It will attract yet more asylum seekers to try the UK first, even if they know they will fail they can walk away with a life changing sum of money.

The £10k per person payoff only for families with children doesn’t seem right. I would think the UK needs more young people, not fewer given the birth rate is below replacement and children are far more likely to integrate and adopt the country that gives them asylum.

MsGreying · 08/03/2026 11:04

pokemoan · 08/03/2026 09:29

My DF mother paid taxes and worked all her life ... she has to sell her beloved small family home to pay for her care

It’s unlikely that she paid enough tax for that care though.

Don't start that argument else you'll be on a slippy slope of the work-shy being shoveled into the Soylent Green machine before you know it.

SpiritAdder · 08/03/2026 11:09

TheFilliesWillRiseAgain · 08/03/2026 09:29

It's £10k per person but the person is allowed to pick up to three family members who will also receive £10k each

The BBC is reporting this as very targeted on families only.
The scheme is expected to target about 150 families living in taxpayer-funded accommodation,

It’s not going to be offered to single adults or couples, unless they are reporting it differently in the UK?

I’m an expat in the US

5128gap · 08/03/2026 11:15

Dollyparton3 · 08/03/2026 09:30

With all due respect, who do you think should pay for your mother’s care due to her living to an old age? Me? Several other mumsnetters? Of course it should come from the remaining estate.

Using this as a topic of division from people fleeing their war torn country or unsafe persecution isn’t really the way to celebrate your mother a) being lucky enough to have an asset with the value to pay for their care and B) being blessed with a mother in her old age. The two are totally unrelated. But way to go making it all about you /your inheritance

Indeed. The OP expects the tax payer to fund her mother's care so she can recieve an unearned handout in inheritance. I don't know why I'm supposed to be OK with that but up in arms at this proposal. I'd prefer my money to go towards helping a child resettle than to protecting someone's inheritance.

porcupine1965 · 08/03/2026 11:23

WildMintPanda · 08/03/2026 10:56

Because it's not relevant.

Asylum seeking and the problems it creates is an issue across Europe.

Other countries have taken harsher measures already, many of whom are more prosperous than the UK and have greater wealth equality. Denmark for instance.

Asylum seeking and the problems its creates is an issue across Europe: they are consequences of colonial exploitation. The former colonial powers should acknowledge their financial, moral, ethical obligations. They colonized and called themselves ‘expats’, the asylum seekers coming in return - often fleeing horrendous circumstances - are called ‘illegals’.

Wellwhatnowbellaboo · 08/03/2026 11:24

porcupine1965 · 08/03/2026 10:54

Not the other side of the same coin: only 0.4% of overall government spending is spent on asylum seekers. They are not to blame for the inequality in the UK. They are an easy scapegoat.

With respect . I simply don't believe that figure. Please show us the actual report so we can see for ourselves. If it truly was only 0 4% I wouldn't give two hoots!

OP posts:
porcupine1965 · 08/03/2026 11:35

Wellwhatnowbellaboo · 08/03/2026 11:24

With respect . I simply don't believe that figure. Please show us the actual report so we can see for ourselves. If it truly was only 0 4% I wouldn't give two hoots!

Numbers from the Community Integrated Advice Centre (CIAC)

SpiritAdder · 08/03/2026 11:39

porcupine1965 · 08/03/2026 11:23

Asylum seeking and the problems its creates is an issue across Europe: they are consequences of colonial exploitation. The former colonial powers should acknowledge their financial, moral, ethical obligations. They colonized and called themselves ‘expats’, the asylum seekers coming in return - often fleeing horrendous circumstances - are called ‘illegals’.

I’m furious the giant Orange is busy creating another asylum crisis for Europe and the Middle East. He knows damn well that the refugees aren’t going to be crossing the Atlantic. He’s probably actually happy and thinking this is a big middle finger to Europe as he’s been doing nothing but insulting every European leader since he took office.