Best Amazon Prime Day deals: Mumsnet favourites

Best Amazon Prime Day deals:
Mumsnet favourites

Shop now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Starters idiotic 40k Immigration scheme

148 replies

Wellwhatnowbellaboo · 08/03/2026 09:13

Wtf... maybe I'm not understanding this correctly. If you didn't get asylum you get given 40k IF YOU LEAVE? And if you don't? Do you still get to stay jn hotels etc.? I'm sick to the eyeballs of this weak government's lack of taking a strong stance. Every other European country is doing better than us. I'm not saying asylum should never happen - but we are bending over backwards while our own people are suffering. My DF mother paid taxes and worked all her life ... she has to sell her beloved small family home to pay for her care- but we'll give money and what else to illegals ? This country's decisions is making my blood boil. Point based immigration where we add to jobs that we struggle to find local talent I've got zero issue with - its fair. It's time we wake up - and uv you think IABU explain why plse ....

OP posts:
Somersetlady · 08/03/2026 09:35

Sofado · 08/03/2026 09:30

Most failed asylum seekers are not families, though. As we hear so often.

Surely now they will bring their families (or other friends relatives) documents passports/marriage certs all regularly not provided.

it makes it very attractive to bring/coerce/persuade/traffick others with a guaranteed £40k payoff after you've been housed and fed for year(s) whilst your application is processed?

IAxolotlQuestions · 08/03/2026 09:36

Sofado · 08/03/2026 09:28

Obviously, they won’t be able to return - that will be one of the conditions. And 10k is vastly cheaper than housing and feeding someone. So it’s much cheaper.

They’ll return anyway. And then we’ll pay again because we don’t have the balls to just say no, go away.

Summerhillsquare · 08/03/2026 09:36

Somersetlady · 08/03/2026 09:25

Per person for a maximum of four people, so a family of four = 40k?

I don’t understand how they will police all the people that don’t even need asylum but come and apply for it simply to get the £40k…….?

surely this make the UK a VERY attractive please to seek asylum regardless of if your application is successful or not?

or am I missing something admittedly I haven’t done any research into the subject……..

Get thee to you tube like every other keen commentator on public matters 🤣

Somersetlady · 08/03/2026 09:37

TheFilliesWillRiseAgain · 08/03/2026 09:31

What's to stop them coming straight back and demanding accommodation and food again? They can even throw their passport in the Channel and say they are a different person to get the £40k again

You’d hope they would be finger printed or retina scanned to prevent this surely?

Pineneedlesincarpet · 08/03/2026 09:38

I feel like advertising this windfall may not act as a great deterrent?

Somersetlady · 08/03/2026 09:40

Erin1975 · 08/03/2026 09:33

They will have the right to appeal the decision. That process can take months because we don't employ enough people to deal with the process in a timely manner.

And failed the appeal it says (telegraph) so end of the road……

SomedayIllBeSaturdayNight · 08/03/2026 09:40

Have any of the posters here looked at the details of the proposal?
You can't just pop someone one a plane and wave goodbye, it's is far more complicated than that.
I'm not saying this is a good plan, but it is far more nuanced than you would know from this thread.

CeciliaMars · 08/03/2026 09:43

Can they then come back a second time and get it again? I heard on a radio show that the average yearly salary for countries like Afghanistan and Eritrea is £2500 a year. So £40,000 is 16 years worth of annual salary...

Pineneedlesincarpet · 08/03/2026 09:43

SomedayIllBeSaturdayNight · 08/03/2026 09:40

Have any of the posters here looked at the details of the proposal?
You can't just pop someone one a plane and wave goodbye, it's is far more complicated than that.
I'm not saying this is a good plan, but it is far more nuanced than you would know from this thread.

Well it should be as easy as "popping someone on a plane and waving goodbye" if they are here without permission. If we had proper borders. Bearing in mind defence is becoming more relevant these days.

TheFilliesWillRiseAgain · 08/03/2026 09:43

Somersetlady · 08/03/2026 09:37

You’d hope they would be finger printed or retina scanned to prevent this surely?

That might mean they won't get the £40k but it wouldn't stop them being housed and fed, which potentially would cost us more than £40k

Somersetlady · 08/03/2026 09:44

IamtheDevilsAvocado · 08/03/2026 09:34

But if they properly identify these people with biometrics and a key part is them NOT returning £10k is very little.

Processing anyone +accommodation+food and medical support.... costs LOADS.

£10k is a bargain

But putting them on a plane and not paying them £10k is cheaper surely?

every-time they come back (biometric proof withstanding) once application and appeal is refused?

Happyjoe · 08/03/2026 09:45

THisbackwithavengeance · 08/03/2026 09:23

You leave with the £10k in your pocket and then return next week on a small boat or through ROI. 🤷‍♂️

We keep fingerprint data etc and anyone arriving again will not get asylum. All they would've done is pay the people smugglers the money.

TheFrendo · 08/03/2026 09:47

Give them nothing but a DNA test on deportation.

Then we will recognise then if they try to come back.

Somersetlady · 08/03/2026 09:49

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I’m a bit confused. Is this a thread where we try to compete to “look” more intelligent than each other?

Are all dyslexic people of lower intelligence?

What is the point of your very well written, detailed explanation of the subject matter and worthwhile contribution to the thread? Just to demonstrate your superior intelligence?

angelos02 · 08/03/2026 09:52

Surely if they are fleeing torture, persecution etc, no amount of money would tempt them back there? It's as if they aren't genuine refugees isn't it?

WildMintPanda · 08/03/2026 09:53

Sofado · 08/03/2026 09:28

Obviously, they won’t be able to return - that will be one of the conditions. And 10k is vastly cheaper than housing and feeding someone. So it’s much cheaper.

It won't stop people from returning.

There's already a problem with asylum seekers having their application rejected, deported then coming back, sometimes within days. Sometimes they do it several times.

deeahgwitch · 08/03/2026 09:54

Can you get the cash, leave, and then come back ?

Somersetlady · 08/03/2026 09:56

angelos02 · 08/03/2026 09:52

Surely if they are fleeing torture, persecution etc, no amount of money would tempt them back there? It's as if they aren't genuine refugees isn't it?

As i understand it the payment is only applicable to failed asylum seekers who have already lost an appeal.

so even if you KNOW you don’t genuinely need asylum it must be pretty attractive to many to come be housed, clothed and fed go through the system and be paid £40k (as a pp said may time your average national wage) to eventually leave?

or am I missing something?

EasternStandard · 08/03/2026 09:57

Pineneedlesincarpet · 08/03/2026 09:38

I feel like advertising this windfall may not act as a great deterrent?

It’s a boost for traffickers who need to sell.

porcupine1965 · 08/03/2026 10:00

Considering EU+ and UK: the UK takes only approximately 11%of asylum seekers and adjusted to the population it ranks about 15th. Why not complain about the unequal distribution of wealth in the UK, instead of kicking the even less fortunate?

Sesma · 08/03/2026 10:00

It's quite attractive isn't it.

dapsnotplimsolls · 08/03/2026 10:00

If you're going to slag off Starmer, at least spell his name correctly.

AlastheDaffodils · 08/03/2026 10:01

TheFilliesWillRiseAgain · 08/03/2026 09:33

These are failed asylum seekers - they're not fleeing war torn countries.

The vast majority of the boat people are young men coming from safe countries who know they can make a lot of money from the British state

A lot of failed asylum seekers are fleeing war torn countries. Plenty of Afghan and Syrian asylum seekers have their asylum claims rejected. Your country being in a civil war, or having an oppressive and bloodthirsty government, is not sufficient grounds to claim UK asylum.

This is one of the difficulties of deporting people. There are no direct flights to their countries of origin, it’s not possible to safely charter one because none of the airlines are willing to fly there, and in any case the local government (if there is one) doesn’t want the people back so makes zero effort to facilitate a flight.

PP who talk about “popping them on a plane” don’t know what they are talking about.

chickenpotnoodle · 08/03/2026 10:06

It does seem ludicrous - and if you are affected by poverty - angers so many.
Deportations are extremely expensive 💸
Forced removals involve many costs:

  • Detention centres
  • Security escorts (often 2–3 officers per person)
  • Charter or commercial flights
  • Legal appeals and court processes
For example, reports around the UK’s deportation system have shown that some removals can cost tens of thousands of pounds per person once legal and operational costs are included. By comparison, paying £10,000 for a voluntary departure may actually save money.
Wellwhatnowbellaboo · 08/03/2026 10:10

Dollyparton3 · 08/03/2026 09:30

With all due respect, who do you think should pay for your mother’s care due to her living to an old age? Me? Several other mumsnetters? Of course it should come from the remaining estate.

Using this as a topic of division from people fleeing their war torn country or unsafe persecution isn’t really the way to celebrate your mother a) being lucky enough to have an asset with the value to pay for their care and B) being blessed with a mother in her old age. The two are totally unrelated. But way to go making it all about you /your inheritance

Please climb under a rock. You are missing the point entirely . My Dear Friend's mother is unlikely to give ME any inheritance. No point trying to correct you as you clearly don't see the issue of the country not helping their own. Don't reply back plse

OP posts: