Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Media pushing Starmer to war

137 replies

Indigosky37 · 03/03/2026 05:32

Daily mails headline is “Keir Starmer accused of hand wringing and pearl clutching” and Kemi Badenoch saying he’s “scared”. Then a comment section full of “he’s a coward” “ he’s a chicken” “incompetent idiot” “an embarrassment”.

So are the media pushing Kier Starmer to take us to war then? Is that what they want, because if he did the headlines would be about how we don’t want a war. The man can’t win. But pushing for war and making out Kier to be weak for not doing it is worrying.

OP posts:
Angelic999 · 03/03/2026 08:35

BeAvidHiker · 03/03/2026 07:29

Media doesn’t need to push Starmer to do anything. The guy has done about 78,000 u turns in less than two years already. He’s about as strong as a wet paper bag. He’ll give way even if you just look at him with a strong glare. What a pathetic excuse for a leader we have.

Edited

And if he followed Trump from day one everyone would be saying he's Trumps lapdog. The guy can't win.

He's right not to jump in to this conflict head first.

Dragonflytamer · 03/03/2026 08:37

I'm with Starmer on this (unusually), the last thing the UK should be doing is getting involved with Netanyahu's illegal war mongering.

kirinm · 03/03/2026 08:37

Velentia · 03/03/2026 08:32

As PM Starmer should have explained to us what he was doing and why. To not support Trump is a major decision in itself. Israel being the leader of this attack is another factor that links in with our home politics. Another reason for explanation.
Will we be sending information that we have harvested from intelligence sources including GCHQ.
By not addressing the nation and putting his governments opinion to us in a concise way he is looking like a weather vane, a ditherer. This is a time to be resolute.

He has explained why. Which bit didn’t you hear?

Passingthrough123 · 03/03/2026 08:38

Dragonflytamer · 03/03/2026 08:37

I'm with Starmer on this (unusually), the last thing the UK should be doing is getting involved with Netanyahu's illegal war mongering.

Exactly. This thread would be full of 'He's just like Blair' comments and calling him a war mongerer instead.

Edited to add: that was meant to be a reply to a PP but you clearly share the same sentiment anyway!

Passingthrough123 · 03/03/2026 08:40

Velentia · 03/03/2026 08:32

As PM Starmer should have explained to us what he was doing and why. To not support Trump is a major decision in itself. Israel being the leader of this attack is another factor that links in with our home politics. Another reason for explanation.
Will we be sending information that we have harvested from intelligence sources including GCHQ.
By not addressing the nation and putting his governments opinion to us in a concise way he is looking like a weather vane, a ditherer. This is a time to be resolute.

He gave a statement to Parliament yesterday!

Dragonflytamer · 03/03/2026 08:42

Passingthrough123 · 03/03/2026 08:38

Exactly. This thread would be full of 'He's just like Blair' comments and calling him a war mongerer instead.

Edited to add: that was meant to be a reply to a PP but you clearly share the same sentiment anyway!

Edited

I'd much rather we spent money on our schools than on missiles to blow up Iranian schools.

GreyfriarsJobbies · 03/03/2026 08:43

Velentia · 03/03/2026 08:32

As PM Starmer should have explained to us what he was doing and why. To not support Trump is a major decision in itself. Israel being the leader of this attack is another factor that links in with our home politics. Another reason for explanation.
Will we be sending information that we have harvested from intelligence sources including GCHQ.
By not addressing the nation and putting his governments opinion to us in a concise way he is looking like a weather vane, a ditherer. This is a time to be resolute.

But...he did exactly this on the 1st. And I have no doubt he'll do it again as the situation evolves. Just because you weren't spoon-fed it on your TikTok feed doesn't mean it didn't happen.

StopWindingBobStopWinding · 03/03/2026 08:43

Velentia · 03/03/2026 08:32

As PM Starmer should have explained to us what he was doing and why. To not support Trump is a major decision in itself. Israel being the leader of this attack is another factor that links in with our home politics. Another reason for explanation.
Will we be sending information that we have harvested from intelligence sources including GCHQ.
By not addressing the nation and putting his governments opinion to us in a concise way he is looking like a weather vane, a ditherer. This is a time to be resolute.

He put out a statement directly to the public which appeared on my social media on Sunday, and went before Parliament for over two hours yesterday. Did you want him to come round and explain it to you in your kitchen over coffee?

PandoraSocks · 03/03/2026 08:46

Dragonflytamer · 03/03/2026 08:42

I'd much rather we spent money on our schools than on missiles to blow up Iranian schools.

Dragonflytamer, it is not often that I agree with you but in this case I do and with your previous post.

Velentia · 03/03/2026 08:48

After being nagged by Trump and Hegseth he changed and gave permission to use Akrotiri and Fairford. That is not resolute. Not heard anything about Israel from him.

MissyB1 · 03/03/2026 08:55

Velentia · 03/03/2026 08:48

After being nagged by Trump and Hegseth he changed and gave permission to use Akrotiri and Fairford. That is not resolute. Not heard anything about Israel from him.

Yes I disagree with him giving permission for the US to use the airbases. You won’t hear a peep out of him about Israel that’s for certain! But at least he admitted that regime change likely wont work, and we should learn from the past.
However I would like to know more about exactly what support we are giving US and Israel in terms of intelligence etc…

StopWindingBobStopWinding · 03/03/2026 08:56

Velentia · 03/03/2026 08:48

After being nagged by Trump and Hegseth he changed and gave permission to use Akrotiri and Fairford. That is not resolute. Not heard anything about Israel from him.

It is pragmatic. Treading a fine line when the incumbent in the White House is volatile and not bothered about the rule of law, but maintaining visible support for a Western ally. I can’t see what else could be done to balance international relations at a time like this.

zurigo · 03/03/2026 09:00

The right wing media and political parties are all pro-America and this war, so the DM is just toeing the party line. If you listened to the comments in the HoC yesterday, they were split along the same lines - right wing in favour, left wing not. I hope dithering Starmer holds his line. The UK has no dog in this fight and should stay the hell out of it.

BurntBroccoli · 03/03/2026 09:02

Every right wing newspaper is clamouring for war this morning as are Tories and Reform supporters (the same who always mention Blair in his role for Iraq).
Starmer is acutely aware that he needs to stay out of this US war and I agree completely.

DeftGoldHedgehog · 03/03/2026 09:02

If he went to war, they'd say he is Trump's puppet.

Seaitoverthere · 03/03/2026 09:06

StopWindingBobStopWinding · 03/03/2026 08:56

It is pragmatic. Treading a fine line when the incumbent in the White House is volatile and not bothered about the rule of law, but maintaining visible support for a Western ally. I can’t see what else could be done to balance international relations at a time like this.

I agree but is seems that pragmatism is an alien concept for a chunk of the population. In a way they aren’t to blame as we have all been clearly encouraged into division since Brexit which carried on into Covid and I think is starting to become a bit entrenched as part of the national psyche now.

Myoldbear · 03/03/2026 09:08

It's strange;

just like this thread the majority of people I've spoken to, or read about on other forums, think Starmer is right on this occasion.

However, Chris Mason said that a poll of public opinion had found that a substantial majority of people wanted us to join the war.

It's on the BBC website.

Something isn't right.

Erin1975 · 03/03/2026 09:09

Well the media do love a war.

zurigo · 03/03/2026 09:11

DeftGoldHedgehog · 03/03/2026 09:02

If he went to war, they'd say he is Trump's puppet.

And this is, I suspect, a major reason why he's trying to tread a fine line between not supporting the war and not falling out with unpredictable Trump. Starmer is many things, but he's not an idiot, and he remembers the Iraq war and how Blair following Bush into Iraq not only brought Blair's premiership to an end, but it tarnished his reputation forever. It's more than 20 years since Blair became Bush's 'poodle' and he's still not allowed to forget it.

Bagsintheboot · 03/03/2026 09:13

LoudSnoringDog · 03/03/2026 06:34

Short memories of the aftermath following Blair taking us into Iraq on a whim (again a the behest of the USA). I don’t agree with Starmer on much but hope he holds his resolve here.
If he does take us into Israel and the USAs war with Iran, you can bet your house he will be hung out to dry once the first UK serviceman/woman is killed in action.

Pretty much.

It will flip over from "coward shirking his responsibilities" to "warmonger with blood on his hands" faster than you can blink.

Greenwitchart · 03/03/2026 09:13

I think Starmer is a dreadful leader but in this instance he is perfectly right not to get us involved in a conflict that was only started to distract from the Epstein files and to pander to Israel.

Some of us are old enough to remember what happened in Iraq and Afghanistan...

BurntBroccoli · 03/03/2026 09:23

zurigo · 03/03/2026 09:11

And this is, I suspect, a major reason why he's trying to tread a fine line between not supporting the war and not falling out with unpredictable Trump. Starmer is many things, but he's not an idiot, and he remembers the Iraq war and how Blair following Bush into Iraq not only brought Blair's premiership to an end, but it tarnished his reputation forever. It's more than 20 years since Blair became Bush's 'poodle' and he's still not allowed to forget it.

He is.

Starmer: "I want to be very clear: we all remember the mistakes of Iraq. And we have learned those lessons. We were not involved in the initial strikes on Iran… and we will not join offensive action now."

BIossomtoes · 03/03/2026 09:27

BendoftheBeginning · 03/03/2026 07:01

These are likely the same people who wanted the Iraq war so very much, then immediately flipped and have called Tony Blair a war criminal ever since.

Without a shadow of a doubt. Basically Starmer can’t win in this instance whatever he does.

PinkChaires · 03/03/2026 09:31

Can i ask( genuinely, not trying to defend him) what Starmer has done so have people hate him so much? I dont think that hes more incompetant than Boris or Rishi for example, but people seem to think hes worse than them

VickyEadieofThigh · 03/03/2026 09:33

BendoftheBeginning · 03/03/2026 07:01

These are likely the same people who wanted the Iraq war so very much, then immediately flipped and have called Tony Blair a war criminal ever since.

CORRECT.