And once labelling catches up with consumer opinion, none of this will be a problem any more.
And I'm intrigued by your angle amd why you hold this position. No Muslim wants this all to kick off and cause further resentment.
They didn't ask for this, it's landed on them as a result of poor recognition of the need for integration. There has been an extremely lazy and "laissez faire" approach to the challenges moving around populations of people with radically different cultures. Which is fine, because most of it sorts itself out.
This is a fairly small example of a tweak in legislation that is needed to correct an imbalance that probably shouldn't have happened, but hey, that's life.
What i dont understand is the "objection to the objection". Telling people they have no right to have an opinion. That's essentially what you are saying to atheists like me, that I have no right to care that I was unknowingly fed someone's religiously slaughtered meat that is against my beliefs. Because deep down, I feel very sad about animal slaughter methods. I'm just as entitled to have beliefs about the slaughter process of the meat in the food chain as anyone else, and to request that that is respected.
If my canteen had clearly displayed a sign saying "all meat is halal" and I had the choice, then fine. I never realised I needed to ask. 😔 Why is that any different to a religious person being fed something against their beliefs, (eg being given pork mislabelled as beef)?