Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

…to suggest that it’s time the Royal family stands on its own feet and stops taking money from the public purse?

338 replies

HappyGalentines · 20/02/2026 16:31

The Royal family owns and has access to lots of money, land and property. So is it right that they should to take any more money away from us?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
UnhappyHobbit · 20/02/2026 18:10

ginasevern · 20/02/2026 17:48

I sincerely hope the AMW arrest will be the beginning of the end. The up-coming generation mostly couldn't give a toss about any of them and to be honest, even reading Gransnet, neither could a lot of the over 60's (which I am). @UnhappyHobbit Why on earth do you think K & W are positive role models? For whom? They barely work and neither exactly sets the world alight with charisma whilst William is busy trousering as much money as he can. It's totally immoral.

With regards to Wills and Kate, they come across as a stable family who take public service seriously, without constantly chasing headlines or drama. In a time when celebrity culture and online division dominate so much of public life, their steady, low-key presence stands out. Even people who aren’t fans of the monarchy can see that they’re using their platform to highlight things like environmental innovation and mental health, issues most people agree are worth supporting. I prefer them to any celebrity influencer who only want fame for their own ego and money.

Ihateboris · 20/02/2026 18:10

Oaktree1952 · 20/02/2026 18:07

Who else is going to pay them? They are running the country. They are working. Would you rather a prime minister who also was a teacher or accountant on the side? Your way of thinking suggests that people should work for free when they have a certain amount in their bank account.

I'm simply saying that they pay for their own lifestyles..you know like most people. And they are not running the country..they represent the country.

minipie · 20/02/2026 18:10

BananaPeels · 20/02/2026 18:09

The royal family costs £1.29 per person per year. Is that really that bad?

Think what that adds up to and what else that could fund.

Especially if they also had to pay proper taxes on their income.

AngryLikeHades · 20/02/2026 18:11

How would the monarchy fall apart/dissolve/be paid off?

BananaPeels · 20/02/2026 18:11

waterbobble · 20/02/2026 18:07

More satire? 😆

No. Why? What do you think all the state functions are for? They roll out the royal family to schmooze world leaders to give the Uk deals and more favourable terms . You might not like it but it is useful for the Uk government to do this

Tutorpuzzle · 20/02/2026 18:11

Oaktree1952 · 20/02/2026 17:57

I would much rather pay for King Charles and the royal family than Kier Starmer and any other prime minister and definitely more than a president.

But, to their credit, most younger people (and a fair few over fifties like me!) completely disagree with you (see ‘Social Attitudes Survey’).

Revolutions can happen very quickly. Let’s hope preparations are being made because Andrew, as further grimy details come to light, may, just may, be a catalyst.

damsello · 20/02/2026 18:11

Respect is earned. Have they earned our respect? If so, how and why?

Ihateboris · 20/02/2026 18:12

minipie · 20/02/2026 18:09

They are running the country. They are working.

They are certainly not running the country!

They are “working” in a sense only. I doubt anyone would notice if they stopped doing the “jobs” they do. With the possible exception of Anne.

Running the country...that's the best laugh I've had in a long time 🤣🤣🤣

BananaPeels · 20/02/2026 18:12

minipie · 20/02/2026 18:10

Think what that adds up to and what else that could fund.

Especially if they also had to pay proper taxes on their income.

A lot of NHS managers?

waterbobble · 20/02/2026 18:12

With regards to Wills and Kate, they come across as a stable family who take public service seriously, without constantly chasing headlines or drama. In a time when celebrity culture and online division dominate so much of public life, their steady, low-key presence stands out

Low key is the word

Even people who aren’t fans of the monarchy can see that they’re using their platform to highlight things like environmental innovation and mental health, issues most people agree are worth supporting

😆

I prefer them to any celebrity influencer who only want fame for their own ego and money

They aren’t doing the charity work because they are being nice.

NoDrums · 20/02/2026 18:13

What this whole sordid story shows is how feudal our system still with, even with a constitutional monarchy. The RF don’t pay income tax, inheritance tax, have their lives nevertheless funded by the taxpayer and then you get someone like Andrew and Ferguson who thoroughly abuse those privileges. Going to shake hands in Fashion Week is hardly public service. The light has been shone and the magic has gone (to lift it from the original).

I think we should get to decide whether we want a monarchy at all and if it is voted on that we do want it, then how it can be controlled. The bowing and scraping has to stop.

UnhappyHobbit · 20/02/2026 18:13

waterbobble · 20/02/2026 18:12

With regards to Wills and Kate, they come across as a stable family who take public service seriously, without constantly chasing headlines or drama. In a time when celebrity culture and online division dominate so much of public life, their steady, low-key presence stands out

Low key is the word

Even people who aren’t fans of the monarchy can see that they’re using their platform to highlight things like environmental innovation and mental health, issues most people agree are worth supporting

😆

I prefer them to any celebrity influencer who only want fame for their own ego and money

They aren’t doing the charity work because they are being nice.

How can you say that with such certainty?

waterbobble · 20/02/2026 18:14

If they all disappeared tmw how would my life change? And yes I would still be aware that mental health is important, climate change is a thing & that the early years are important for dc. Imagine that!

Ihateboris · 20/02/2026 18:14

minipie · 20/02/2026 18:10

Think what that adds up to and what else that could fund.

Especially if they also had to pay proper taxes on their income.

I'd prefer that to go to the NHS, police and education

YourGreenCat · 20/02/2026 18:14

but what is "private" money. They'll claim enough of state properties that even cutting them off officially wouldn't make an inch of difference.

Properties, land etc.. only become "public" when they need work done or to avoid paying tax on them.

They made damn sure normal rules don't apply, have you checked how the estate of the Duke of Westminster was handled when he died? No inheritance tax there 😂

waterbobble · 20/02/2026 18:14

What this whole sordid story shows is how feudal our system still with, even with a constitutional monarchy. The RF don’t pay income tax, inheritance tax, have their lives nevertheless funded by the taxpayer and then you get someone like Andrew and Ferguson who thoroughly abuse those privileges

Exactly, it’s the wrong message before you even get to A & F.

Redcrayons · 20/02/2026 18:16

BananaPeels · 20/02/2026 18:09

The royal family costs £1.29 per person per year. Is that really that bad?

An individual level it’s a small amount, but collectively it’s huge and there are so many better ways that money could be spent.

They are all very wealthy people, they can fund themselves.

waterbobble · 20/02/2026 18:16

@UnhappyHobbit say what? How can anything you have posted be said with certainty?

NeedAnyHelpWithThatPaperBag · 20/02/2026 18:16

The country could certainly do with the revenue from liquidating a lot of their assets.

ChequerToRed · 20/02/2026 18:17

They could do with restructuring their income. The Duchy of Cornwall brings in £23mil a year, that alone could easily support all of them in fine style.

waterbobble · 20/02/2026 18:17

The royal family costs £1.29 per person per year. Is that really that bad?

@BananaPeels does the above include security? The money lost because of no IHT?

BananaPeels · 20/02/2026 18:18

Redcrayons · 20/02/2026 18:16

An individual level it’s a small amount, but collectively it’s huge and there are so many better ways that money could be spent.

They are all very wealthy people, they can fund themselves.

Until the government can spend the money it has properly, I don’t want them to have another penny quite frankly . If we abolished the royal family and took that money, it wouldn’t be spent on anything ‘better’, it would just end up in the general tax pot and I bet we don’t see any more teachers/ policemen etc.

UnhappyHobbit · 20/02/2026 18:18

waterbobble · 20/02/2026 18:16

@UnhappyHobbit say what? How can anything you have posted be said with certainty?

Make your point directly to what I have said that isn’t accurate so I can address it properly.

damsello · 20/02/2026 18:20

The Duke of Westminster's estate bore no Inheritance tax presumably because it was all placed in a Discretionary Trust. Same with the RF estates I reckon. That option is open to anyone. The tax crystallises when the trustees appoint to a beneficiary and that could be years hence.

I'm not defending the RF here, let me be clear. What is an abomination is the fact that their wills are sealed whereas the peasants are not allowed to do that. Therefore all mistresses, out of wedlock children, blackmail debts, ha ha you name it can be hidden forever, together with the net value of said estates.

The Duke of Westminster's will is available if you pay to have a copy sent to you. Can't do that for any of the RF.

Pedallleur · 20/02/2026 18:20

LVhandbagsatdawn · 20/02/2026 17:39

You are right - they DO own lots of land and property.

All the profits from that go to... The government.

The RF gets back about 12%.

This is called the sovereign grant act, but it was known as the civil list for many years.

So the RF could go and live off their massive land holdings, yes, but overall the taxpayer is going to lose out.

They own the Duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster which are theirs. Yes there is the Crown Estate but where it all ends/begins seems v.opaque. No IHT for the heir to the throne. Who owns/pays for what?