Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

So what do we think will happen to Andrew, could he actually go to prison?

458 replies

cateringday · 19/02/2026 14:54

I just don’t believe it could happen. Also I’d like him to go to prison for the sex offences, that seems more important than his sharing confidential information problem.

OP posts:
angela1952 · 20/02/2026 18:32

LizzieW1969 · 20/02/2026 09:04

I suspect the government would get rid of him the way they got rid of Edward VIII, by using what they know about him to make him step aside for the next heir to the throne. (That was another one who should have faced justice for his crimes.)

But it would never even get that far, as, unlike with Edward VIII, the public know about Andrew’s crimes.

Obviously none of this would ever happen in reality, but he really must be removed from the line of succession.

I thought he had already been removed from the line of succession? I believe that Harry has too.

PistachioTiramisu · 20/02/2026 18:38

I was thinking about all this in the shower - why doesn't Ghislaine Maxwell turn State's Evidence and tell the truth about what she knows? It would clear things up to some extent and she would probably have her sentence either reduced or cancelled.

AgeingGreycefully · 20/02/2026 18:39

House arrest is the most likely outcome of any conviction. The security issues surrounding his personal safety would be impossible in prison and, like any other inmate, he can’t be in solitary 24/7.

Lovedogwalking · 20/02/2026 18:41

I dont think there's anywhere in our prison estates that could handle having a royal inside. He'd need to be kept in a vulnerable prosoner wing because of his status and his offences, it would cost astronomical amounts just to keep him safe inside which the prison service are duty bound to do.
I thought about this today, some deal will have to be struck, its a very difficult situation.

AgeingGreycefully · 20/02/2026 18:41

MrsTerryPratchett · 19/02/2026 15:28

Who was the last one?

Charles I. He was beheaded…!!!

Allseeingallknowing · 20/02/2026 18:46

angela1952 · 20/02/2026 18:32

I thought he had already been removed from the line of succession? I believe that Harry has too.

Edited

No he hasn’t, it has to be done by the Government, they have only just started discussing it.

Zippedydodah · 20/02/2026 18:47

WaryHiker · 19/02/2026 22:42

My theory is that Charles wants him to leave the country to get people's attention off the rest of the royal family. So, he has allowed the arrest so that Andrew will flee to the UAE before he can be charged.

Apparently Ferguson is already out there after spending a few days in the Alps 🤷🏼‍♀️

LeafyMcLeafFace · 20/02/2026 19:06

BMW6 · 19/02/2026 21:39

I very much doubt she killed herself over her sexual encounter with AMW. Nor because of prolonged trauma. She was obviously a very troubled person and was no stranger to lying to get dosh. I don't know - neither do you.

As for your "end of" re consent to sex and trafficked I suggest you read upthread for accuracy in regards to Law.

Whilst some of your posts make some sense regarding the need to be measured while the process of law takes place, the way you talk about an abused and traumatised woman who took her own life because of her treatment by powerful and wealthy men, is absolutely shameful.

It shows huge amounts of prejudice, and ignorance about the impact of abuse and undermines any of the good points you ever made.

Far more shocking than anything else I’ve read on here

Megsy81 · 20/02/2026 19:10

PandoraSocks · 19/02/2026 18:54

Why did he (or rather his mum) pay out millions of pounds?

We also don't yet know what else AMW may have got up to. What about the photos of him with a prone young woman? What was that about? Now that the police have his devices, they will bring able to dig further, hopefully.

In the meantime, he is being investigated for leaking of information to Epstein as would be the case if any of us plebs had done that.

Witch hunt, my backside.

Why does anyone pay money to settle out of court….. to keep it out of court and in this family’s case to likely reduce the media spectacle (which clearly has worked). It does not necessarily mean anyone is guilty.

You’re right …. You don’t know what else he has been up. It could be horrendous it could also be nothing.

a photo is a snapshot of a millisecond. Kneeling on the floor next to a fully clothed woman means absolutely nothing but narrative distorts perception

Do I believe he is sleazy? Yes. Is he a creep? Yes. Has he committed a crime? Pure conjecture at this point. Therefore is it a witch hunt to suggest anything else? Yes should he be found guilty of anything, should he be subject to the full force of the law? Absolutely with bells on

sprigatito · 20/02/2026 19:32

Lovedogwalking · 20/02/2026 18:41

I dont think there's anywhere in our prison estates that could handle having a royal inside. He'd need to be kept in a vulnerable prosoner wing because of his status and his offences, it would cost astronomical amounts just to keep him safe inside which the prison service are duty bound to do.
I thought about this today, some deal will have to be struck, its a very difficult situation.

The HSU at Belmarsh could probably manage him. Charles Bronson had an entire wing to himself at one point.

crasenda · 20/02/2026 19:37

They could refurbish a place in the Tower of London for him I reckon.

CaptainMyCaptain · 20/02/2026 19:43

angela1952 · 20/02/2026 18:32

I thought he had already been removed from the line of succession? I believe that Harry has too.

Edited

No he hasn't. It's under discussion at the moment.

Laurmolonlabe · 20/02/2026 19:56

I'll be more convinced when there are people who have been convicted under this law- looks unworkable.

manywanderings · 20/02/2026 20:10

I think Andrew was being blackmailed by Epstein, hence sharing all those documents about his trade visits (allegedly). I think the problem started with Fergie after she and Andrew divorced. Apparently Epstein had been funding her since the year of her divorced. He seems to like getting vulnerable women under his wing. Maxwell's Father had just died when he took her under his wing. Fergie had just been chucked out of the Royal Family under scandal and divorce and apparently needed money. So he maybe seemed like a kind helpful friend. But then he kept bankrolling her. I suspect Andrew met Epstein through Fergie - she has already been caught offering access to Andrew for money once so she may well have done that previously with Epstein. Then there was some kind of honey trap maybe. Andrew is probably pretty thick and naive and came from a certain background where not only Royals were immune but probably hadn't even heard of sex trafficking. Also from an era (the 70s) were anyone slept with anyone and so what. So he may well have had no idea that a girl he was introduced to was a honey trap. Epstein apparently had videos on various people in compromising situations. I read a piece (can't rememer who from - Epstein's neighbour maybe) that said that's how he made all his money - blackmailing people.

So - I'm not condoning anything (and also bear in mind Andrew is innocent until proved guilty and trial by media isn't a court) but nothing so far has proved he has done anything illegal. Seedy yes, as mentioned before.

And then he and Fergie were caught up in Epstein's world financially. They had to keep giving favours because he was funding them. I think Andrew in particular wanted to help Fergie out when she got into millions of pounds worth of debt and got more in with Epstein the financier. They were both caught up with him. I also think Andrew, having a bit of a Royal ego (and maybe a chip on his shoulder for being a second son and without the huge income Charles had from the Duchy of Cornwall etc) was flattered or even groomed by Epstein into thinking he was some kind of businessman worth knowing. When he got the job as trade envoy or whatever, Epstein was still calling in the favours. If he did share things he shouldn't have he was either thick, foolish, blackmailed, believing he really was being an ace businessman dealing with a financier, or a bit of all four.

But Epstein had something on both of them so they couldn't stop. And Andrew had more to lose than most, being such a public figure and part of the monarchy.

Whether he eventually knew about the sex trafficking or not I have no idea - and nobody does unless it's proved. Maybe he was arrogant enough to think that a 27 year old Russian woman just wanted to sleep with him because he was a Prince and that Epstein just happened to know a lot of beautiful women (she was probably paid a lot of money for it like Ms Giuffre but who knows - but was significantly older). Even so it could still be sex trafficking.

So he's been arrested over the potential misconduct in a public office regarding documents. Which is apparently very hard to prove and that's if he was even classed as being in "public office" - he wasn't a politician. If it was just seen as bad judgement it's not a criminal offence. Maybe it depends what the documents are.

Epstein was an evil man - because he's dead he can't be villified in the media. So all the attention is on Andrew.

I may be lynched for this, but I actually think it has all gone to far and is indeed a witch hunt against someone who has the furthest to fall, can't help what he was born into and his upbringing, has had no real benefits from being Royal, married the wrong person and stayed loyal so he could see his children a lot perhaps. And just got himself into a very big mess (not helped by chip on shoulder and arrogance) and yes maybe he's also a sexist product of the 70s (there was a lot of sleeze in the 70s "Readers wives" and so on).

But I am personally quite horrified at the amount of hate and vitriol online about someone who has never been found guilty of anything. That might change if he ends up in court. When there were so many others involved in the Epstein scandal who are sitting there untouched.

Andrew has lost everything, his family, his home (given to him by his Mother), his dignity, he seems to be the most hated person in Britain, he is ridiculed and humiliated publicly in the papers daily. Isn't that punishment enough for someone who has never even been found guilty of someone.

He is alone having been shunted into a house owned by his brother the King. They apparently never did get on and Andrew was resented for being the favourite. And now his parents are gone he is dependent on the brother who doesn't particularly like him (was maybe even jealous) and who has thrown him under a bus to save the monarchy.

What does get my goat is all the people saying poor King. Poor King my xxxx - he was hardly a paragon of virtue - friend of Saville. And other members of the Royal Family who had girls smuggled into Buckingham Palace (Phillip I think it was, allegedly). It was the norm. The King is the only member of the Royal Family who can;t be arrested apparently. The law is under his name! If Andrew went to court the case would be Andrew Mountbatten Windsor versus the King. His own brother.

I don't think any of us (the multitude online) should be vigilante and drive a man to suicide with hatred and vitriol. He accepted giving up various things to put the monarchy first (some were forced on him as well). But now it has just become cruelty and unpleasant.

Let the law play out and see where it goes, but until then, he is innocent until proved guilty despite his lifestyle and awful association with Epstein.

Whether true or not, Fergie said she had written those emails after denouncing him because he had threatened to kill her children. That sounds plausible to me after everythibg else known about Epstein. So Andrew also could have been being blackmailed. He's a complete idiot yes. And he probably will end up in court over something.

But he has no privacy whatsoever - he's been thrown to the baying hounds by his own family. The whole monarchy needs to go - it ruins the lives of people born into it who won't become future monarch. And yes if he had stayed in the Navy (where he was a war hero and highly thought of) and married someone less flighty and extravagant, or born in a different era, his life may have been a lot better.

I think the whole thing now is verging on inhuman. The pages of comments on social media hoping he kills himself - because he looks so shocked and terrified on that photo as he left the police station. That is sick.

And yes I do think about the victims - Epstein's victims. Andrew is a complete scapegoat in all this compared to all the people getting away with things who aren't Royal.

Sorry for the rant - but - just get rid of the Monarchy! But then we'd have no scandals to gossip about would we?

I suspect it would be hard for them to be able to charge him for this offence but there is also a strong likelihood that he will be charged "because it's in the public interest". And that may lead to further investigations.

What the heck are the US doing about all this? Nothing it seems.

Never liked Charles.

SemiRetiredLoveGoddeess · 20/02/2026 20:13

BubbleFree · 19/02/2026 15:00

I very much doubt it unless Charles locks him in the Tower. He’ll probably slither out of this like the little worm that he is.

I think locking him in the Tower of London is an excellent idea. It would really increase Tourists Rates.

They could let him out once a day. And build and put him in Public Stocks where people could throw buckets of shit at him and shout abuse..

What do you think.?

ThistleTits · 20/02/2026 20:29

MerelyPlaying · 19/02/2026 15:08

They couldn’t keep him safe in prison. And whatever you think about him, the government/DoJ has a duty of care towards anyone in custody.

They keep other sex offenders safe in prison.

ThistleTits · 20/02/2026 20:30

TotallyAddictedToCoffee · 19/02/2026 15:12

Exactly, this is what I said to a colleague earlier; he'd have to have his own private wing in the prison, with his own set of staff etc - so not even remotely cost effective/in the public's interest

Yes he's a disgusting human being, but he won't do prison time, unless it's a house-arrest style arrangement

They done it for the Lockerbie "bomber."

SemiRetiredLoveGoddeess · 20/02/2026 20:33

Could this be the end of the Monarchy?
I do hope so.
What a strange unhealthy concept Royalty is.

Mental Hospitals are full.of people who think that they are Kings, Queens and God.

The Royal Coat of Arms Motto is

Honi soit qui mal y pense"

"Shame on him who thinks evil of it"

A bit of a conundrum for the Royal Family now?

manywanderings · 20/02/2026 20:34

Anyway it looks like Andrew has more investigations coming his way. Multiple police forces in the Uk involved now going through unredacted Epstein files, checking to see if any Uk airports were used for sex trafficking, and wanting to speak to his former protection officers. So he could be found complicit in sex trafficking (if the airports turn out to have been used for some of Epstein's trafficked women to Andrew).

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/feb/20/police-quiz-former-prince-andrew-protection-officers-over-epstein-links

Motherofalittledragon · 20/02/2026 20:38

It’s a nice though, but I seriously doubt it.

ReleaseTheDucksOfWar · 20/02/2026 21:04

@manywanderings Its clear you've put a huge amount of thought into your nuanced and level headed post.

Not sure it's correct that Andrew was loved in the Navy, but a lot of what you say seems far more rational than the scary baying for blood that's going on atm.

FlipFlopVibe · 20/02/2026 21:18

pouletvous · 19/02/2026 16:41

I think he will probably take his own life. That’s awful but i think a possibility

I agree, there’s absolutely no coming back from this. He’ll have to hide away for the rest of his life. He’s had the audacity to swan about till now as he probably thought he was untouchable but he’ll have lost his whole family after this arrest and can never show his face in public again.

manywanderings · 20/02/2026 21:46

FlipFlopVibe · 20/02/2026 21:18

I agree, there’s absolutely no coming back from this. He’ll have to hide away for the rest of his life. He’s had the audacity to swan about till now as he probably thought he was untouchable but he’ll have lost his whole family after this arrest and can never show his face in public again.

I'm not so sure. It might be a relief now the police are finally involved, especially if he is found not to be guilty of anything or charged of anything. Then he can start rebuilding a life more quietly. I sincerely hope he doesn't commit suicide as I wouldn't wish that on anyone but it concerns me that he is basically more isolated on the King's estate than he would be in prison. Although he does have dogs apparently, which might help.

He actually wanted to go to court and "clear his name" over the Virginia Giuffre thing when it broke, but was persuaded to put the Queen and the Monarchy first in her platinum jubilee year and accept an out of court settlement instead.

That case has actually been legally settled.

manywanderings · 20/02/2026 21:48

ReleaseTheDucksOfWar · 20/02/2026 21:04

@manywanderings Its clear you've put a huge amount of thought into your nuanced and level headed post.

Not sure it's correct that Andrew was loved in the Navy, but a lot of what you say seems far more rational than the scary baying for blood that's going on atm.

Thank you. It seems someone else thinks the same (article below) - it's social media that is the worst, so my rant was about the reactions on social media mainly.

"The hunting of Andrew has gone too far. Admit it – you can feel it. His arrest this week on suspicion of misconduct in public office unleashed yet another round of prideful animus for the former prince. Social media was a riot of malicious glee. Then came that photograph of him in the back of his car following his release from custody. He looks startled, haunted, frightened. The mob lapped it up. They wrung pleasure from his pain."

https://archive.ph/jMxnZ

Khayker · 20/02/2026 21:58

BMW6 · 19/02/2026 14:57

Which sex offences?

Trafficking