The thing about leaving the ECHR and replacing it with a British Bill of Rights is that..
Immigration control is not (and never has been) solely the purview of the ECHR.
The IK already has separate immigration acts - which could be amended before being put before parliament..
More significantly (and it baffles me that people don’t realise this) asylum is granted under the Refugee Convention (a separate convention pre-dating the ECHR).
The UK would need to leave the Refugee Convention (does Reform even mentor propose this?) repeal various immigration acts and the UK’s Human Rights Act.
I love Reform voter optimism that all of that (with replacement Acts of parliament drawn up and passed through parliament) in a one term government.
And that leaves aside the other conventions - Convention Against Torture, Convention on the rights of the child, convention against trafficking…
So if one imagines all of those conventions were no longer applicable to the UK because we exited all 5 of them, replaced the Human Rights Act, replaced the Immigration Acts, (they’d need parliament to vote for each of these by the way)… costs for this (not to mention all that civil service overtime drafting legislation!!!!), then the Equality Act….
The thing is we don’t have a USA style scenario where a president can write a vote on the back of a fag packet when he wakes up in a bad mood and call it an executive order.
No matter WHAT Farage or Tice or anyone else says these are facts. I worked in immigration law in the civil service so it’s not a case of political leanings..
The government ( “reform” government ) would need an overall majority plus overall persuasive clout on the Treasury and the Home Office to spend money on such drastic and costly endeavours.
If they could accomplish any of this I’ll eat my feet!!
If the Rwanda plans could be overturned so easily by the judiciary (entirely foreseeable) they’d have a hell of a time getting a British Bill of Rights through parliament and actually active that could pass an immigration tribunal because all an immigration judge has to do is consider any one of those conventions left standing to allow an appeal for someone to remain in the UK… It’s not the quick trip to Asda middle aisle of select your rights for the British that Reform want to portray it.
And finally.. even if they could withdraw from every convention and draft their Bill, costing it and enforcing it.. they have to spend enormous sums trying to remove people from the UK (come all ye taxpayers!) .. but they won’t ever be able to remove someone who can’t get a travel document- airlines won’t allow them on board and host/home countries won’t grant them entry.