Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be confused by 'high earners' complaining about taxes?

981 replies

tutuland · 10/02/2026 18:25

So high earners pay lots of tax. The top 20% pay for 70% or whatever the numbers are.

But (beyond printing more money) isn't the money there high income people make just coming from the paying public? No matter who you work for, your company's profit is just an accumulation of normal people paying for things.

So ultimately, isn't it all our money anyway? Just beacuse the game is rigged and you get paid 400K for management whatever, it doesn't mean you're more deserving of that money than anyone.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
TestingDaily · 10/02/2026 21:07

tutuland · 10/02/2026 21:06

Ultimately, the shop owner's profit came from the pockets of customers.. It capitalism isnt it?

They sold stuff customers wanted and customers voluntarily exchanged money for

MissConductUS · 10/02/2026 21:09

TestingDaily · 10/02/2026 21:04

In the United States nurses get paid far more. Almost as if in private industry, with competition you get paid for and valued for your skills.

Correct. In the UK, the NHS has a near monopoly on the employment of medical professionals. In the U.S., medical practices and hospitals compete to hire them. Nurses here can easily make 80k USD per year, and more with specialized experience.

NorthXNorthWest · 10/02/2026 21:09

GrumpyFrogg · 10/02/2026 19:34

We're all suffering because of government failure. It's across the board. Complaining about paying too much tax when youre in the top few % is also morally dubious.

Do you really think higher-rate taxpayers should just accept the waste and mismanagement of the taxes they pay, without complaint? If anything, they have more reason than most to complain - they are the greatest contributors after all.

You think they are morally dubious? Really? Is that because they haven’t simply moved to a lower-tax country, but have instead stayed here, continuing to prop up a broken system and an inept government that so many people depend on?

TestingDaily · 10/02/2026 21:10

MissConductUS · 10/02/2026 21:09

Correct. In the UK, the NHS has a near monopoly on the employment of medical professionals. In the U.S., medical practices and hospitals compete to hire them. Nurses here can easily make 80k USD per year, and more with specialized experience.

I've told NHS nurses this and they respond very angrily about "privatisation"

NorthXNorthWest · 10/02/2026 21:11

TestingDaily · 10/02/2026 21:06

What about doctors? £38k as a first job. That's not bad. And the earning increases they get in the future.

If we had a more private competitive system and not a state monopoly they'd be paid vastly more.

Because that works so well in the US...

notnorman · 10/02/2026 21:12

Im happy to complain because im sick of paying out hundreds of thousands of pounds in tax every year (2x companies and a PAYE role too) for it to be pissed up the wall by morons in government quite frankly

MissConductUS · 10/02/2026 21:12

tutuland · 10/02/2026 21:06

Ultimately, the shop owner's profit came from the pockets of customers.. It capitalism isnt it?

If there was no profit to reward shop owners, there would be no shops.

Yes, that’s capitalism.

5128gap · 10/02/2026 21:12

Jamesblonde2 · 10/02/2026 18:32

How much tax do you pay OP for education, health and roads? Where would we be without high earners do you think?

I think the point she's making is that consumers have to pay more for things because businesses are paying a lot to high earners and shareholders, and that those people wouldn't have their money if it wasn't for the rest of us paying for over the odds for things. So, in short, where would high earners be without us?

TestingDaily · 10/02/2026 21:12

NorthXNorthWest · 10/02/2026 21:11

Because that works so well in the US...

I'd say that each state in the US the different. The US system has major laws as well. But there's a world apart from the just the NHS and the USA.

tutuland · 10/02/2026 21:14

TestingDaily · 10/02/2026 20:24

My husband earns just under £200k and with his upcoming promotion is negotiating a bump to £250k. He works very hard and has sacrificed a lot for us. He deserves every single penny.

What does your husband do that he 'deserves' 250k?

More than a surgeon, a taxi driver, guy working night shift at McDonalds.

OP posts:
tutuland · 10/02/2026 21:14

5128gap · 10/02/2026 21:12

I think the point she's making is that consumers have to pay more for things because businesses are paying a lot to high earners and shareholders, and that those people wouldn't have their money if it wasn't for the rest of us paying for over the odds for things. So, in short, where would high earners be without us?

Yes thanks!

OP posts:
tutuland · 10/02/2026 21:15

MissConductUS · 10/02/2026 21:12

If there was no profit to reward shop owners, there would be no shops.

Yes, that’s capitalism.

Who said no profit? Just higher taxes.

OP posts:
catipuss · 10/02/2026 21:15

tutuland · 10/02/2026 21:04

How do you deserve it more? More than a freshly graduate doctor?

The doctor chose to be a doctor, they could have started there own business or gone on benefits. They knew what the career progression was and of course the options to leave the UK once they were qualified and earn much more abroad. All up to them.

What you are talking about is true communism, everyone contributes what they can and everyone gets what they need. No one gets more than that, theoretically of course it never works out like that somehow. What happens to those who don't/won't contribute? don't ask!

Higgledypiggledy864 · 10/02/2026 21:16

tutuland · 10/02/2026 18:25

So high earners pay lots of tax. The top 20% pay for 70% or whatever the numbers are.

But (beyond printing more money) isn't the money there high income people make just coming from the paying public? No matter who you work for, your company's profit is just an accumulation of normal people paying for things.

So ultimately, isn't it all our money anyway? Just beacuse the game is rigged and you get paid 400K for management whatever, it doesn't mean you're more deserving of that money than anyone.

Bonkers

Catapultaway · 10/02/2026 21:16

5128gap · 10/02/2026 21:12

I think the point she's making is that consumers have to pay more for things because businesses are paying a lot to high earners and shareholders, and that those people wouldn't have their money if it wasn't for the rest of us paying for over the odds for things. So, in short, where would high earners be without us?

Or where would you be without the high earners subsidising you...

tutuland · 10/02/2026 21:16

TestingDaily · 10/02/2026 21:10

I've told NHS nurses this and they respond very angrily about "privatisation"

Maybe some nurses would like to not make 250K but live in a fair society where healthcare is a human right not a privilege.

OP posts:
tutuland · 10/02/2026 21:17

Catapultaway · 10/02/2026 21:16

Or where would you be without the high earners subsidising you...

Yes but where did these high earners get their money? Beyond actually mining for bitcoin- your money came from the pockets of society.

OP posts:
tutuland · 10/02/2026 21:18

Why does everyone report things like that? I'm not being goady. You cant even handle a conversation about this Lol

OP posts:
tutuland · 10/02/2026 21:19

Catapultaway · 10/02/2026 21:16

Or where would you be without the high earners subsidising you...

So high earners (beyond those actually mining bitcoin) are getting paid from the pockets of many, many members of society.

OP posts:
catipuss · 10/02/2026 21:20

MissConductUS · 10/02/2026 21:09

Correct. In the UK, the NHS has a near monopoly on the employment of medical professionals. In the U.S., medical practices and hospitals compete to hire them. Nurses here can easily make 80k USD per year, and more with specialized experience.

And the patients pay for it, we don't want to pay but expect someone to fund big wages and world class treatment. Both systems are flawed.

Ionlymakejokestodistractmyself · 10/02/2026 21:22

cassgate · 10/02/2026 18:34

Well when you pay 75k in tax a year and can’t get a gp appointment and are forced to go private and your mum waits 22 hours for an ambulance while laying on the floor with a fractured pelvis, then yes I think that is something you complain about.

But surely you could complain about that if you paid 7K in tax as well?

Especially given that on a salary that pays 75k in tax, you definitely have the option to go private...

MissConductUS · 10/02/2026 21:23

tutuland · 10/02/2026 21:15

Who said no profit? Just higher taxes.

Taxes reduce profits, lowering the incentives to work and invest in the shop or open new shops.

High marginal tax rates thus lead to lower economic growth, which in turn leads to lower tax receipts to fund government.

TestingDaily · 10/02/2026 21:26

tutuland · 10/02/2026 21:14

What does your husband do that he 'deserves' 250k?

More than a surgeon, a taxi driver, guy working night shift at McDonalds.

He deserves it because his employer wants to pay him that much. He's on the brink of partnership at his organisation. I won't say what exact service line he's in. But he works tirelessly to deliver for the clients and often works 80-90 hour weeks. He's constantly on call and even has to work weekends to deliver. Clients are super happy with him and want him to continue working with him.

Surgeons are "allowed to make £100k+" but others can't. Taxi drivers and those at McDonald's are less skilled.

ArtificialInaccuracy · 10/02/2026 21:27

ScaryM0nster · 10/02/2026 19:02

OP - would you expect to be paid more in your role if you took on increased responsibility/ got promoted?

Do you generally expect that increase in your pay to actually make it into an increase in your take home pay?

Most people do.

The quirk with high earners is that what they get to keep as a proportion of those increases is much lower than for low earners.

Depending on what you earn, a £10k increase in your annual pay can mean anything from a £9k increase in your take home to a £3.5k increase. For the same pay rise.

To some that doesn’t seem reasonable.

It can actually mean a loss of £20k in net pay.

MissConductUS · 10/02/2026 21:28

TestingDaily · 10/02/2026 21:26

He deserves it because his employer wants to pay him that much. He's on the brink of partnership at his organisation. I won't say what exact service line he's in. But he works tirelessly to deliver for the clients and often works 80-90 hour weeks. He's constantly on call and even has to work weekends to deliver. Clients are super happy with him and want him to continue working with him.

Surgeons are "allowed to make £100k+" but others can't. Taxi drivers and those at McDonald's are less skilled.

This. Wages are set largely by supply and demand. Employers pay high wages to certain employees because it is profitable to do so.

Swipe left for the next trending thread